Can you omit the enclitic palá
@roelands
Pala definitely has meaning to it, and omitting and adding it does change the tone of the sentence. Ex: Tama ako = I was right. Tama pala ako! = I was right after all!
Futhermore, I think palá is more an interjection than an enclitic.
My two cents…
It’s definitely an enclitic. It behaves like an enclitic, and follows the same rules and patterns as the other enclitics. (Also, me not being a professional linguist or grammarian, I tend to defer to the pros on things like this. When all the trusted sources say something is an enclitic, I tend to believe them, unless I have a rigorous counter argument in mind).
Enclitics are also dependent on other parts of a sentence for their meaning and to become a complete thought. Interjections, however, by definition can be said as stand alone sentences. Ex: Oh!, My goodness!, Hey!, Wow!. Pala can be part of an interjection, but is not an interjection itself. (Just like “my goodness!” is an interjection and “my!” is not).