Close
 


COUP PLOT VS MARCOS JR!??? 😉👊👊
Hide Subtitles
Click any subtitle word to view Tagalog.com dictionary results.
Computer Shortcuts: Left / Right arrows to jump 2 seconds back or forward. +Enter or Space to toggle Play/Pause button. Full Screen Mode

Richard Heydarian VLOGS
  Mute  
Run time: 31:49
Has AI Subtitles



Video Transcript / Subtitles:( AI generated. About AI subtitles » )
00:00.0
Bro speaking of blind item, marami tayong blind item in the previous episode. This is a blind item ngayon yung inimply na behind a coup attempt against President Marcos Jr.
00:12.0
Of course in the Philippines when the term coup comes in, you always have a mixed response right?
00:19.0
So on one hand it's like, eh ok na naman, gagamitin na naman yan to shut down opposition. We had enough of the coup plot, weaponization during Duterte administration.
00:31.0
Our favorite natin, Oktoberfest. Oktober revolution. 2017 sabi nung isa, si Parlada ba yan? Sabi niya yung Russian Oktober revolution, Bolshevik takeover.
00:47.0
Sabi niya, baka Oktoberfest diba? Now speaking of that, syempre dami blind item. Sino naman ang behind? Ano dyan?
00:57.0
Of course alam natin, logically if there is discontent within the military, where is this coming from? If ever there's anyone against BBM, I don't think it's the opposition anymore.
01:11.0
It's those who are very unhappy because they didn't get the piece of pie they were expecting.
01:16.0
So this coup plot looks like a blind item talaga?
01:21.0
Baka nga blind item. You know what I find really weird is, eto lang yung sense ko, I think this is a nothing burger.
01:30.0
I really think it's a nothing burger. May naging ingay dyan para manggulo. It's a nothing burger because if the military was angry, it was not at this administration, it was at the previous administration.
01:41.0
Of course, on a very personal level, I'm sure mas close kay Politico X, kay Politico Y, may mga colonel na mas close kay Politico X or Politico Y.
01:53.0
So that's yung personal level. And there might be may personal na giraan dito, hindi ko alam.
01:58.0
Pero if you zoom out, mag-macro ka lang, kanina ko pa magagalit kung ikaw military. The military is extremely pro-American and it's extremely anti-communist.
02:07.0
Yung previous administration was not only willing to sell us out to China, it was also elected with the support of the Communist Party of the Philippines.
02:16.0
And then went on to appoint communist-nominated cabinet secretaries to its government.
02:23.0
And really played ball with the communists until, of course, it went on a hard right turn and started killing the communists because it was reacting to the military.
02:33.0
So kung kanino ba magagalit ang military? Dito ba? Sa current organization?
02:37.0
Line item tayo, bro. Huwag natin pagkailangan. Huwag natin pagkailangan.
02:42.0
May letter R doon, hindi Ronald Llamas. Sabi ko ba, baka hindi kukuladesma daw.
02:49.0
Kukuladesma.
02:52.0
At the same time, bro. So the other part of my answer is, of course, no burger, hamburger.
02:59.0
But on the other hand, we have a history of coups, right? So many coup d'etats in Filipino history.
03:05.0
And let's not forget, earlier this year, President Marcos Jr. had to step in and do some reshuffle in the military.
03:12.0
Diba? Because some people appointed by some other blind item people. Blind item natin ulit.
03:19.0
May in-appoint sila sa military na mukhang may ginagawang kalukuan daw.
03:23.0
So they had to do some reshuffle and all of that.
03:25.0
Although, of course, the official excuse was, oh, some of the appointments in the past kind of jumbled the hierarchical promotions.
03:32.0
So we had to just rationalize it.
03:34.0
But from what I hear, including from people who are serving at a very senior level in defense and military,
03:40.0
was actually some mumbo jumbo was going on. So Marcos had to fix it.
03:43.0
So at the same time, I cannot be totally dismissive about this because we do have a history of coup plots and all of that.
03:50.0
Ang coup talaga natin, Marcos era, diba? Of course, the biggest coup is really the otogolpe of 1972.
03:57.0
Because in 1972, the declaration of martial law was a coup, actually, if you think about it.
04:03.0
Pero it was an internal coup. In other words, Marcos used the military to destroy the administration he was leading
04:11.0
to create a new dictatorship, a new administration, which would be run by himself in the military.
04:16.0
So that's actually a self-coup, or in political science terms, otogolpe.
04:20.0
That is still the biggest coup in our history, 1972.
04:23.0
That's very convenient to say science.
04:26.0
And it was no less by a lawyer, a constitutional law specialist in a way, right?
04:33.0
Which makes it very interesting.
04:34.0
So let's talk about it. Because if you look at the arms race of the Philippines, it's the most American-trained military in the entire Indo-Pacific.
04:42.0
I cannot think of any other country as influenced by America.
04:46.0
Because you can talk about Japan and Korea having US bases and all.
04:49.0
But those countries already had their own military cultures, in the case of Japan, before they were colonized by the US.
04:53.0
So they have a long history of having their own shogun and all of that.
04:57.0
In the Philippines, really, the AFP arms race, it's really an American constructed institution.
05:03.0
I'm not saying they're pro-American still.
05:05.0
Because I have a more nuanced take on that.
05:07.0
I think they're more China-skeptic than just blindly pro-American.
05:10.0
But going back to this, it's true.
05:12.0
Very similar to us, actually. More China-skeptic than pro-American.
05:16.0
Yeah, exactly. That's how I see it.
05:18.0
It's more I hate those guys than I love Americans.
05:21.0
Because the Americans sometimes seem to have a swagger.
05:25.0
You know what, honestly, I was talking to some military people.
05:27.0
They prefer to be with Australians because they're cool.
05:31.0
And they're very nice.
05:32.0
I'm super cool.
05:33.0
I'm not going to say who told me that.
05:34.0
But pretty high-level people.
05:36.0
They said, it's nice to talk to Australians.
05:38.0
They don't have a swagger.
05:39.0
They're so fun to be around with.
05:41.0
They bring you fancy stuff, but without showing off.
05:45.0
Just like that.
05:46.0
But what you're saying is the baseline culture came from the Americans.
05:50.0
Exactly.
05:51.0
And speaking of that, this is where Samuel Huntington, among others, comes in.
05:54.0
Samuel Huntington, one of his best books was The Soldier and the State.
05:59.0
I don't like his Clash of Civilizations.
06:00.0
We'll discuss that later in our next episode as we discuss the Middle East, etc.
06:05.0
But one of his first books was The Soldier and the State.
06:07.0
And he talked about civil-military relations and what makes democracy strong.
06:10.0
And what makes democracy stable is objective control by the civilian leadership over the military through constitutional order.
06:19.0
The moment the military just obeys the father or mother, it's no longer a military force.
06:25.0
What is it now?
06:27.0
Father to mother or mother to father?
06:29.0
It's a personal militia now, right?
06:31.0
Father to mother, but not mother to father, okay?
06:34.0
That's what I thought.
06:35.0
Mother to father.
06:36.0
Okay, let's not talk about that.
06:37.0
Let's talk about mother to father.
06:39.0
Yes, that was a good entry.
06:42.0
So speaking of this, I would say compared to other Asian armed forces,
06:47.0
the Philippines had the most exposure to this kind of professional objective control, right?
06:53.0
Strategic culture that we inherited from.
06:55.0
It's one of the few good things I think we got from the Americans, which is the military-civil-military relations.
07:00.0
I mean, of course, it was sometimes gray because of Max Aysay, defense minister, working with who against who.
07:07.0
I get it.
07:08.0
But compared to our neighbors, speaking of Thailand, I think Thailand has had more constitutions and coups than there are months.
07:14.0
Or Indonesia.
07:16.0
Indonesia.
07:18.0
The Indonesian military has a duifong si or a double function.
07:23.0
So it's not just protection.
07:25.0
It perceives itself as a guarantor of certain right-wing politics that are at the center of Indonesia.
07:32.0
And in our previous episode, we talked about the 1965 mass killings.
07:36.0
And that was because the military thought of itself as a guardian of certain principles of the republic,
07:43.0
and therefore thought that it could just, as a result, could enable the killing of almost a million suspected communists.
07:50.0
So, I mean, compared to our neighbors, I think our military is pretty okay, actually.
07:55.0
Especially compared to the Indonesians.
07:57.0
My God, historically, Indonesians.
07:59.0
1965 killings.
08:01.0
If that doesn't make you look down on the military, I don't know what.
08:04.0
Again, I mean, of course, Easter of EJKs.
08:07.0
There are many problems.
08:09.0
I mean, we can talk about Palpara and so on and so forth.
08:11.0
But the reality is we have to appreciate the film is within the Southeast Asian context.
08:15.0
Oh, within the South.
08:16.0
Oh, my God.
08:17.0
Within the South.
08:18.0
Thailand compared to Indonesia, my goodness.
08:19.0
The mass killings were done in the South.
08:21.0
And Myanmar.
08:24.0
My God.
08:25.0
Myanmar, right?
08:26.0
Oh, my God.
08:27.0
Oh, Myanmar.
08:28.0
That's the real archetype of the horrible military.
08:33.0
Even in the Middle East, bro, you can't find anything like that.
08:36.0
Like the genocidal.
08:38.0
I remember one of my colleagues said,
08:41.0
Who's the ugly one?
08:42.0
That's the bad one.
08:43.0
In Myanmar, they're ugly.
08:45.0
I mean, they're literally ugly.
08:47.0
Like, have you seen that?
08:48.0
Like, they're literally ugly.
08:49.0
Right?
08:50.0
I mean, what's the name of it?
08:52.0
Even in Thailand, the uncles.
08:53.0
The uncles.
08:54.0
The punta uncles are so ugly also.
08:55.0
Right?
08:56.0
The priot.
08:57.0
No, but at least one of them is chubby.
08:59.0
The other one is cute.
09:00.0
The other one.
09:01.0
The priot kind of looks presentable enough.
09:03.0
But look at the Myanmar one, bro.
09:05.0
Right?
09:06.0
Their head's nickname was something like cat shit.
09:09.0
Like that.
09:10.0
Check it.
09:11.0
Because it's said to be smelly.
09:12.0
Like, bro, just look at their nicknames.
09:14.0
No, no.
09:15.0
What's the word we use?
09:17.0
Matikas.
09:18.0
There's an element that's kind of hard for our soldiers.
09:22.0
I forgot the Burmese term that's used.
09:24.0
But it kind of translates as bat shit.
09:25.0
Right?
09:26.0
Bat shit versus matikas.
09:28.0
Yeah, yeah.
09:29.0
Or cat shit.
09:30.0
Why is there a history of matikas?
09:33.0
I mean, you're right, Richard.
09:35.0
I mean, if you think about the PMA,
09:37.0
I mean, you're from Baguio.
09:39.0
I suspect you might have some attachment to the PMA.
09:42.0
It's actually a great...
09:43.0
That's my second choice.
09:44.0
It's actually a great institution.
09:47.0
I mean, in a way, it does produce very professional soldiers.
09:51.0
It's a great state college.
09:54.0
It's a great state tertiary institution.
09:56.0
We talk about the University of the Philippines a lot,
09:58.0
but the PMA is a great tertiary.
10:00.0
And like the University of the Philippines,
10:02.0
it creates social mobility.
10:05.0
Because kung mahirap ka, nakapasok ka sa PMA,
10:07.0
makakapag-aral ka,
10:08.0
and then you become a soldier,
10:10.0
and after you're a soldier,
10:11.0
you may not want to stay as a soldier,
10:13.0
then you can do other things.
10:15.0
And so it's a vehicle for social mobility,
10:18.0
like the best state institutions.
10:20.0
And then they do teach you at the PMA
10:24.0
the distinction between,
10:26.0
the proper distinction between a civilian and a military person.
10:29.0
So I think it's one of our great institutions,
10:33.0
pagpugay sa ating mga PMAers.
10:37.0
But that baseline culture, of course, can be corrupted.
10:40.0
Si Ferdinand Marcos was the worst corruptor
10:42.0
of that baseline culture.
10:44.0
And I've been very critical of Alfred McCoy recently,
10:47.0
but his best book is actually called
10:50.0
Closer Than Brothers,
10:52.0
where he talks about how Marcos perverted the military.
10:55.0
And napaka, you know,
10:57.0
65, you know, first term pa lang,
11:00.0
and Ninoy Aquino was warning about this already.
11:03.0
He was trying to create already what Aquino called
11:05.0
the garrison state.
11:07.0
And the reason for that was
11:09.0
slowly yung mga people na rinirespect yung distinction
11:12.0
between civilian and the military,
11:13.0
mostly PMA trained,
11:15.0
tinatanggal yung Marcos,
11:16.0
slowly in his first term,
11:17.0
or early retirement,
11:18.0
or hindi pi rinopromote,
11:19.0
kaya very subtle.
11:21.0
And then yung mga nagra-rise up the ranks
11:23.0
for non-PMAers,
11:24.0
mostly mga galing ROTC programs,
11:26.0
mostly Ilocano, I'm sorry Richard.
11:29.0
Of course, yung best example would just be Fabian Ver.
11:31.0
Fabian Ver is not a PMAer, diba?
11:33.0
Fabian Ver was essentially a laki of Ferdinand Marcos,
11:36.0
and that's why he got promoted.
11:37.0
So that's how you corrupt the military,
11:39.0
despite yung kind of baseline system
11:41.0
of loyalty to democratic principles.
11:46.0
And if you wanna see how that's done,
11:47.0
just read Closer Than Brothers.
11:49.0
It's a great example.
11:50.0
So the argument, essentially, of McCoy is
11:52.0
it's less about the collapse of professionalization
11:56.0
of PMA-trained people,
11:58.0
it's more of the marginalization
12:00.0
of the truly professional one
12:02.0
in favor of their version of BATOL.
12:05.0
I don't know, like their own political loyalists.
12:13.0
Yeah, yeah.
12:14.0
Or si Fabian Ver,
12:15.0
you know, BATOL de la Rosa,
12:17.0
Asturo Dries, Duterte,
12:18.0
as to Fabian Ver.
12:20.0
Exactly.
12:21.0
So Ver was original.
12:22.0
Ika-iba lang doon,
12:23.0
tulis yung isa, sundali yung isa.
12:26.0
But except, of course, the Ver's are also,
12:28.0
I mean, there's a report that in the 18th century,
12:31.0
there was a Don Fer or something like that.
12:33.0
So actually, may old Spanish era
12:35.0
elite ang background ng mga Fabian Ver na yan.
12:38.0
But ibang usapan na yan.
12:39.0
Kasi actually, I'm thinking of writing a book
12:41.0
about Marcos, di ba?
12:42.0
I'm thinking about opening a scene in Batac,
12:44.0
parang mga vignettes there, di ba?
12:47.0
So that's why I had to research
12:48.0
about also the Fabian Ver
12:49.0
and all of that background.
12:50.0
But going back to this,
12:52.0
but one element we didn't discuss
12:54.0
and I think it's relevant also today,
12:55.0
is the Cold War.
12:56.0
Because today is the new Cold War,
12:58.0
which I think is putting the Philippines,
12:59.0
I mean, I see the Philippines
13:01.0
like the Berlin of 1960s, 1950s, right?
13:03.0
This is where the two giants are colliding.
13:06.0
All of intel and counter-intel
13:08.0
and sharp power and propaganda.
13:10.0
Everything's happening in the Philippines.
13:11.0
This exciting part, this is the scary part.
13:14.0
And the Philippine military is, of course,
13:16.0
at the forefront of dealing with this.
13:18.0
Now, during the Marcos time,
13:19.0
the Cold War, right?
13:21.0
Really provided, perhaps,
13:22.0
I mean, to what degree was the Cold War
13:24.0
a good excuse or a legitimate reason
13:27.0
for Marcos to militarize the state
13:30.0
or to objectivize his control
13:32.0
over the military
13:33.0
in order to more decisive deal?
13:35.0
I mean, like radically from the center, right?
13:37.0
But can we discuss that part too?
13:39.0
Because our good friends,
13:41.0
some of our good friends have written
13:42.0
on that extensively.
13:43.0
Nakasusuporto ka ng US
13:45.0
kasi sasabi mo lang
13:46.0
this is an anti-communist effort.
13:47.0
That's why I'm strengthening the military.
13:49.0
So at that point,
13:50.0
you could get away with any...
13:51.0
Yung problema with the Cold War
13:52.0
was you could get away with anything
13:54.0
if you style it as anti-communist, right?
13:56.0
And then the US will be like,
13:57.0
ah, anti-communist?
13:58.0
Sige, sige, supportado ka namin.
14:00.0
In a way, parang, ano eh,
14:01.0
parang the US thinks of itself
14:02.0
as so intelligent.
14:03.0
Pero actually, during the Cold War,
14:05.0
ang dali nilang utuin.
14:06.0
May haris sila ng utu-uto.
14:08.0
Now, if I'm in Chile,
14:09.0
you're underestimating
14:10.0
ganang mauturi ng US
14:12.0
for all their networks of intelligence and all.
14:15.0
Nag-re-rely din sila
14:16.0
sa mga operator na lo.
14:17.0
Indigenous informants,
14:18.0
I think that's the pejorative term,
14:20.0
di ba?
14:21.0
Utu-uto sila, oh.
14:22.0
Parang mga mokong eh,
14:23.0
inuuto.
14:24.0
Sabi mo lang anti-communist ka,
14:26.0
you get a free pass.
14:27.0
Now,
14:28.0
do you, well,
14:29.0
I mean,
14:30.0
do those circumstances
14:31.0
obtained today
14:32.0
in this new Cold War
14:33.0
are ganaka utu-uto
14:34.0
ang mga Amerikano?
14:35.0
I mean,
14:36.0
they did support
14:37.0
the son of a dictator,
14:38.0
but because he's anti-China,
14:40.0
ostensibly anti-China,
14:41.0
but he's not a dictator yet,
14:43.0
you know, like his father.
14:44.0
And hopefully,
14:45.0
he'll never be a dictator.
14:46.0
Hopefully not, yeah.
14:47.0
No, no.
14:48.0
What I'm saying is that
14:49.0
it's poignant
14:50.0
in our time
14:51.0
in a sense that
14:52.0
the issue of
14:53.0
how to deal with China,
14:56.0
obviously,
14:57.0
it's a political issue,
14:58.0
but the military is also
14:59.0
front and center.
15:00.0
And if there's anyone
15:01.0
who's going to be
15:02.0
creating trouble
15:03.0
within the military
15:04.0
to undermine BBM,
15:05.0
obviously,
15:06.0
there's a China angle to that, right?
15:07.0
It's hard to imagine
15:08.0
this has nothing to do with China.
15:09.0
In the past kasi,
15:10.0
alam natin
15:11.0
yung panoon nila
15:12.0
Trigianes
15:13.0
is because of corruption,
15:14.0
di ba?
15:15.0
All of the kagawanan
15:16.0
nangyari in the South.
15:17.0
My sense is,
15:18.0
yes, these are problems,
15:19.0
institutional problems,
15:20.0
but I think this is more
15:21.0
geopolitical-driven than ever.
15:22.0
Right?
15:23.0
Than the
15:24.0
typical trapo situation,
15:25.0
driving...
15:26.0
So, bro,
15:27.0
kung ganyan sa timong,
15:28.0
may entrada ang China
15:29.0
sa military natin?
15:30.0
Not necessarily China,
15:31.0
but their proxies, right?
15:32.0
In favor of their...
15:33.0
Yung mga special envoy nila?
15:34.0
I don't know.
15:35.0
I don't know.
15:36.0
I don't know.
15:37.0
I mean...
15:38.0
So,
15:39.0
again,
15:40.0
I'm really speaking out
15:41.0
without any concrete evidence.
15:42.0
So,
15:43.0
again,
15:44.0
I'm really speaking out
15:45.0
without any concrete evidence.
15:46.0
So,
15:47.0
again,
15:48.0
I'm really speaking out
15:49.0
without any concrete evidence.
15:50.0
But my point is,
15:51.0
if you look at the big picture,
15:52.0
I won't be surprised
15:53.0
if not this
15:54.0
supposed coup plot,
15:55.0
future coup plots
15:56.0
could be one way or another
15:57.0
related to
15:58.0
broader competition
15:59.0
between US and China
16:00.0
because
16:01.0
Marcos keeps on going
16:02.0
harder and harder
16:03.0
not only to American orbit,
16:04.0
but even Japan right now
16:05.0
is pushing for
16:06.0
visiting forces agreement.
16:07.0
Of course,
16:08.0
they call it
16:09.0
reciprocal access agreement,
16:10.0
but we know
16:11.0
what's going on there.
16:12.0
So,
16:13.0
if you're pro-China,
16:14.0
panic mode.
16:15.0
Kanina lang,
16:17.0
the reason why
16:18.0
my takes on Middle East
16:19.0
is because
16:20.0
it is a big problem in the Philippines
16:21.0
and they were saying,
16:22.0
Philippines is falling
16:23.0
for Japanese militarism.
16:24.0
What?
16:25.0
These are talking
16:26.0
from Communist point of view.
16:27.0
Japanese militarism?
16:28.0
Japanese militarism?
16:29.0
Seriously?
16:30.0
Japan did horrible things
16:31.0
in the Second World War.
16:32.0
Absolutely,
16:33.0
no question.
16:34.0
But to talk about
16:35.0
today's Japan
16:36.0
as Japanese militarism?
16:37.0
This is it.
16:38.0
We're here again!
16:39.0
This is it,
16:40.0
the ideas
16:41.0
are not changing.
16:42.0
Geopolitics is not changing.
16:43.0
It's like
16:44.0
I went wild!
16:45.0
Why did they believe
16:46.0
that the US presence today
16:47.0
is the same as the US presence
16:48.0
in 1898?
16:49.0
These people
16:50.0
believed that
16:51.0
the Japanese presence today
16:52.0
is the same Japanese presence
16:53.0
as it is
16:54.0
in freaking 1940.
16:55.0
I mean,
16:56.0
it's just,
16:57.0
ugh.
16:58.0
But bro,
16:59.0
this is the ultimate irony.
17:00.0
It comes from
17:01.0
the Makapili 2.0 club,
17:02.0
right?
17:03.0
The people who are
17:04.0
attacking Japan today
17:05.0
are a version
17:06.0
of Makapili 2.0,
17:07.0
right?
17:08.0
And remember,
17:09.0
the Makapili
17:10.0
was Japan's
17:11.0
way of,
17:12.0
you know,
17:13.0
ruling the Philippines.
17:14.0
But that's it.
17:15.0
When I hear the words
17:16.0
Japanese militarism,
17:17.0
you know,
17:18.0
Western colonialism,
17:19.0
it's like,
17:20.0
yeah,
17:21.0
that's a historical fact.
17:22.0
But how is that relevant
17:23.0
today
17:24.0
compared to
17:25.0
the bullying
17:26.0
in your face
17:27.0
that is happening
17:28.0
on a daily basis
17:29.0
in the West Philippines?
17:30.0
That's what I'm saying.
17:31.0
And that's where
17:32.0
the arguments
17:33.0
of the others
17:34.0
really explode.
17:35.0
But I feel like
17:36.0
this guy
17:37.0
is already applying
17:38.0
for SMNI resident analyst.
17:39.0
There he is.
17:40.0
And he's not
17:41.0
dropping his name,
17:42.0
right?
17:43.0
That's the point
17:44.0
as foreign analyst
17:45.0
for SMNI.
17:46.0
Oh my God.
17:47.0
Oh my God.
17:48.0
So,
17:49.0
I don't know.
17:50.0
I mean,
17:51.0
Icobro,
17:52.0
I mean,
17:53.0
as I said,
17:54.0
so I think we established
17:55.0
that things
17:56.0
are far from perfect.
17:57.0
There was a lot of corruption
17:58.0
of the military.
17:59.0
But in fairness
18:00.0
to the armed forces
18:01.0
of the Philippines,
18:02.0
especially during
18:03.0
Pinoy's time,
18:04.0
no?
18:05.0
The Bayanihan program,
18:06.0
General Bautista,
18:07.0
a very good friend of ours,
18:08.0
you know,
18:09.0
when he was the AFP chief,
18:10.0
he pushed for really
18:11.0
professionalization
18:12.0
of the security sector,
18:13.0
especially the military.
18:14.0
That's why
18:15.0
the military
18:16.0
didn't join
18:17.0
Digong's drug war.
18:18.0
How many times
18:19.0
Didong asked the military
18:20.0
to join him,
18:21.0
they said no.
18:22.0
How many times
18:23.0
Didong said,
18:24.0
take over,
18:25.0
we want the military
18:26.0
to go,
18:27.0
they said no.
18:28.0
How many times
18:29.0
he wanted to declare
18:30.0
nationwide martial law,
18:31.0
they said no.
18:32.0
In fact,
18:33.0
for me,
18:34.0
the reason why
18:35.0
he did not become
18:36.0
a real dictator,
18:37.0
he was more of
18:38.0
a fake dictator,
18:39.0
was because the military
18:40.0
stood.
18:42.0
I'm sure
18:43.0
that the soldiers
18:44.0
who will survive
18:45.0
will be beaten
18:46.0
by Didong
18:47.0
because here he was
18:48.0
like a town mayor
18:49.0
going around
18:50.0
military camps,
18:51.0
surreptitiously
18:52.0
giving away
18:53.0
glocks to soldiers.
18:54.0
The soldiers,
18:55.0
what will I do there,
18:56.0
right?
18:57.0
They will be beaten
18:58.0
by the president.
18:59.0
So,
19:00.0
it's not just
19:01.0
because there are
19:02.0
a lot of
19:03.0
really tough soldiers.
19:04.0
And this is a
19:05.0
post-EDSA phenomenon.
19:06.0
I think we're
19:07.0
really living,
19:08.0
still living in
19:09.0
the post-EDSA society.
19:10.0
Even if a lot
19:11.0
of its premises
19:12.0
are crumbling.
19:13.0
Because after
19:14.0
EDSA,
19:15.0
and you should read
19:16.0
the works of
19:17.0
Cricel Diabes,
19:18.0
Boys in the Barracks.
19:19.0
Because after the
19:20.0
horrors of martial law,
19:21.0
civil society,
19:22.0
but also
19:23.0
the military itself
19:24.0
invested in
19:25.0
security sector reform.
19:26.0
And it tried
19:27.0
to revive
19:28.0
the old tradition
19:29.0
of our military
19:30.0
survival.
19:31.0
And we saw
19:32.0
during the
19:33.0
post-martial law period
19:34.0
that with the
19:35.0
exception of
19:36.0
crazy people
19:37.0
like Palparan,
19:38.0
mass murderers,
19:39.0
that there
19:40.0
really has been
19:41.0
an improvement
19:42.0
in our
19:43.0
security sector
19:44.0
since the
19:45.0
Marcos period.
19:46.0
And it's a
19:47.0
steady improvement.
19:48.0
And, you know,
19:49.0
what they did
19:50.0
during the time
19:51.0
of Digong
19:52.0
was just proof
19:53.0
that, you know,
19:54.0
in many ways,
19:55.0
this is a much
19:56.0
improved AFP.
19:57.0
And there's
19:58.0
also
19:59.0
I mean,
20:00.0
I've been reading
20:01.0
Patricia Evangelista's book.
20:02.0
Great book,
20:03.0
by the way.
20:04.0
And the
20:05.0
security sector
20:06.0
reform
20:07.0
is not the
20:08.0
brutalized
20:09.0
in the Philippines.
20:10.0
It's not the soldiers.
20:11.0
You know,
20:12.0
of course,
20:13.0
I didn't mention
20:14.0
PNP for a good reason,
20:15.0
right?
20:16.0
Because that's
20:17.0
a long discussion,
20:18.0
right?
20:19.0
But, you know,
20:20.0
just to appreciate it,
20:21.0
you know,
20:22.0
the Philippine military
20:23.0
really stood
20:24.0
its ground.
20:25.0
It's true that
20:26.0
some people got
20:27.0
promoted.
20:28.0
I think you already
20:29.0
mentioned one of
20:30.0
these persons under
20:31.0
Digong for their
20:32.0
political loyalty.
20:33.0
Some of them really,
20:34.0
you know,
20:35.0
went up very fast
20:36.0
because of their
20:37.0
political loyalty,
20:38.0
right?
20:39.0
So,
20:40.0
you know,
20:41.0
I think
20:42.0
it's
20:43.0
very important
20:44.0
to
20:45.0
understand
20:46.0
the
20:47.0
political
20:48.0
loyalty
20:49.0
of the
20:50.0
Philippines.
20:51.0
And
20:52.0
I think
20:53.0
it's
20:54.0
very important
20:55.0
to understand
20:56.0
the
20:57.0
political
20:58.0
loyalty
20:59.0
of the
21:00.0
Philippines.
21:01.0
And
21:02.0
I think
21:03.0
it's
21:04.0
very important
21:05.0
to understand
21:07.0
the
21:08.0
political
21:09.0
loyalty
21:10.0
of a
21:11.0
Philippine
21:12.0
president
21:13.0
because
21:14.0
he's
21:15.0
very
21:16.0
divisive.
21:17.0
So,
21:18.0
you know,
21:19.0
that's one
21:20.0
of the
21:21.0
probably
21:22.0
the
21:23.0
reasons
21:24.0
why
21:25.0
he's
21:26.0
so
21:27.0
divisive.
21:28.0
But
21:29.0
I think
21:30.0
it's
21:31.0
very
21:32.0
important
21:33.0
to
21:34.0
understand
21:35.0
that
21:36.0
he's
21:38.0
very
21:39.0
divisive
21:40.0
but
21:41.0
he's
21:42.0
very
21:43.0
strong
21:44.0
in
21:45.0
his
21:46.0
power.
21:47.0
And
21:48.0
the reason
21:49.0
why he's
21:50.0
so
21:51.0
strong
21:52.0
is because
21:53.0
he has
21:54.0
the
21:55.0
best
21:56.0
information
21:57.0
he could
21:58.0
have.
21:59.0
He
22:00.0
has the
22:01.0
best
22:02.0
information
22:03.0
he could
22:04.0
have.
22:05.0
And
22:06.0
the
22:07.0
reason
22:08.0
why
22:09.0
he's
22:10.0
so
22:11.0
strong
22:12.0
is because
22:13.0
he has
22:14.0
the
22:15.0
best
22:16.0
information
22:17.0
he could
22:18.0
have.
22:19.0
And
22:20.0
the
22:21.0
reason
22:22.0
why
22:23.0
he's
22:24.0
so
22:25.0
strong
22:26.0
is because
22:27.0
he has
22:28.0
the
22:29.0
best
22:30.0
information
22:31.0
he could
22:32.0
have.
22:33.0
And
22:34.0
the
22:35.0
reason
22:36.0
why
22:37.0
he's
22:38.0
so
22:39.0
strong
22:40.0
is because
22:41.0
he has
22:42.0
the best
22:43.0
information
22:44.0
he could
22:45.0
have.
22:46.0
And
22:47.0
the
22:48.0
reason
22:49.0
why
22:50.0
he's
22:51.0
so
22:52.0
strong
22:53.0
is because
22:54.0
he has
22:55.0
the best
22:56.0
information
22:57.0
he could
22:58.0
have.
22:59.0
And
23:00.0
the
23:01.0
reason
23:02.0
why
23:03.0
he's
23:04.0
so
23:05.0
strong
23:06.0
is because
23:07.0
he has
23:08.0
the best
23:09.0
information
23:10.0
he could
23:11.0
have.
23:12.0
And
23:13.0
the
23:14.0
reason
23:15.0
why
23:16.0
he's
23:17.0
so
23:18.0
strong
23:19.0
is because
23:20.0
he has
23:21.0
the best
23:22.0
information
23:23.0
he could
23:24.0
have.
23:25.0
And
23:26.0
the
23:27.0
reason
23:28.0
why
23:29.0
he's
23:30.0
so
23:32.0
strong
23:33.0
is because
23:34.0
he has
23:35.0
the best
23:36.0
information
23:37.0
he could
23:38.0
have.
23:39.0
And
23:40.0
the
23:41.0
reason
23:42.0
why
23:43.0
he's
23:44.0
so
23:45.0
strong
23:46.0
is because
23:47.0
he has
23:48.0
the best
23:49.0
information
23:50.0
he could
23:51.0
have.
23:52.0
And
23:53.0
the
23:54.0
reason
23:55.0
why
23:56.0
he's
23:57.0
so
23:58.0
strong
23:59.0
is because
24:00.0
he has
24:01.0
the best
24:02.0
information
24:03.0
he could
24:04.0
have.
24:05.0
And
24:06.0
the
24:07.0
reason
24:08.0
why
24:09.0
he's
24:10.0
so
24:11.0
strong
24:12.0
is because
24:13.0
he has
24:14.0
the best
24:15.0
information
24:16.0
he could
24:17.0
have.
24:18.0
And
24:19.0
the
24:20.0
reason
24:21.0
why
24:22.0
he's
24:23.0
so
24:24.0
strong
24:25.0
is because
24:26.0
he has
24:27.0
the best
24:28.0
information
24:29.0
he could
24:30.0
have.
24:31.0
And
24:32.0
the
24:33.0
reason
24:34.0
why
24:35.0
he's
24:36.0
so
24:37.0
strong
24:38.0
is because
24:39.0
he has
24:40.0
the best
24:41.0
information
24:42.0
he could
24:43.0
have.
24:44.0
And
24:45.0
the
24:46.0
reason
24:47.0
why
24:48.0
he's
24:49.0
so
24:50.0
strong
24:51.0
is because
24:52.0
he has
24:53.0
the best
24:54.0
information
24:55.0
he could
24:56.0
have.
24:57.0
And
24:58.0
the
24:59.0
reason
25:00.0
why
25:01.0
he's
25:02.0
so
25:03.0
strong
25:04.0
is because
25:05.0
he has
25:06.0
the best
25:07.0
information
25:08.0
he could
25:09.0
have.
25:10.0
And
25:11.0
the
25:12.0
reason
25:13.0
why
25:14.0
he's
25:15.0
so
25:16.0
strong
25:17.0
is because
25:18.0
he has
25:19.0
the best
25:20.0
information
25:21.0
he could
25:22.0
have.
25:23.0
And
25:24.0
the
25:25.0
reason
25:26.0
why
25:27.0
he's
25:28.0
so
25:29.0
strong
25:30.0
is because
25:31.0
he has
25:32.0
the best
25:33.0
information
25:34.0
he could
25:35.0
have.
25:36.0
And
25:37.0
the
25:38.0
reason
25:39.0
why
25:40.0
he's
25:41.0
so
25:42.0
strong
25:43.0
is because
25:44.0
he has
25:45.0
the best
25:46.0
information
25:47.0
he could
25:48.0
have.
25:49.0
And
25:50.0
the
25:51.0
reason
25:52.0
why
25:53.0
he's
25:54.0
so
25:55.0
strong
25:56.0
is
25:57.0
because
25:58.0
he has
25:59.0
the best
26:00.0
information
26:01.0
he could
26:02.0
have.
26:03.0
And
26:04.0
the
26:05.0
reason
26:06.0
why
26:07.0
he's
26:08.0
so
26:09.0
strong
26:10.0
is
26:11.0
because
26:12.0
he has
26:13.0
the best
26:14.0
information
26:15.0
he could
26:16.0
have.
26:17.0
And
26:18.0
the
26:19.0
reason
26:20.0
why
26:21.0
he's
26:22.0
so
26:23.0
strong
26:24.0
is because
26:25.0
he has
26:26.0
the best
26:27.0
information
26:28.0
he could
26:29.0
have.
26:30.0
And
26:31.0
the
26:32.0
reason
26:33.0
why
26:34.0
he's
26:35.0
so
26:36.0
strong
26:37.0
is because
26:38.0
he has
26:39.0
the best
26:40.0
information
26:41.0
he could
26:42.0
have.
26:43.0
And
26:44.0
the
26:45.0
reason
26:46.0
why
26:47.0
he's
26:48.0
so
26:49.0
strong
26:50.0
is because
26:51.0
he has
26:52.0
the best
26:53.0
information
26:54.0
he could
26:55.0
have.
26:56.0
And
26:57.0
the
26:58.0
reason
26:59.0
why
27:00.0
he's
27:01.0
so
27:02.0
strong
27:03.0
is because
27:04.0
he has
27:05.0
the best
27:06.0
information
27:07.0
he could
27:08.0
have.
27:09.0
And
27:10.0
the
27:11.0
reason
27:12.0
why
27:13.0
he's
27:14.0
so
27:15.0
strong
27:16.0
is because
27:17.0
he has
27:18.0
the best
27:19.0
information
27:20.0
he could
27:21.0
have.
27:22.0
And
27:23.0
the
27:24.0
reason
27:25.0
why
27:26.0
he's
27:27.0
so
27:28.0
strong
27:29.0
is because
27:30.0
he has
27:31.0
the best
27:32.0
information
27:33.0
he could
27:34.0
have.
27:35.0
And
27:36.0
the
27:37.0
reason
27:38.0
why
27:39.0
he's
27:40.0
so
27:41.0
strong
27:42.0
is because
27:43.0
he has
27:44.0
the best
27:45.0
information
27:46.0
he could
27:47.0
have.
27:48.0
And
27:49.0
the
27:50.0
reason
27:51.0
why
27:52.0
he's
27:53.0
so
27:54.0
strong
27:55.0
is because
27:56.0
he has
27:57.0
the best
27:58.0
information
27:59.0
he could
28:00.0
have.
28:01.0
And
28:02.0
the
28:03.0
reason
28:04.0
why
28:05.0
he's
28:06.0
so
28:07.0
strong
28:08.0
is because
28:09.0
he has
28:10.0
the best
28:11.0
information
28:12.0
he could
28:13.0
have.
28:14.0
And
28:15.0
the
28:16.0
reason
28:17.0
why
28:18.0
he's
28:19.0
so
28:20.0
strong
28:22.0
is
28:23.0
because
28:24.0
he has
28:25.0
the best
28:26.0
information
28:27.0
he could
28:28.0
have.
28:29.0
And
28:30.0
the
28:31.0
reason
28:32.0
why
28:33.0
he's
28:34.0
so
28:35.0
strong
28:36.0
is
28:37.0
because
28:38.0
he has
28:39.0
the best
28:40.0
information
28:41.0
he could
28:42.0
have.
28:43.0
And
28:44.0
the
28:45.0
reason
28:46.0
why
28:47.0
he's
28:48.0
so
28:49.0
strong
28:50.0
is
28:51.0
because
28:52.0
he has
28:53.0
the best
28:54.0
information
28:55.0
he could
28:56.0
have.
28:57.0
And
28:58.0
the
28:59.0
reason
29:00.0
why
29:01.0
he's
29:02.0
so
29:03.0
strong
29:04.0
is
29:05.0
because
29:06.0
he has
29:07.0
the best
29:08.0
information
29:09.0
he could
29:10.0
have.
29:11.0
And
29:12.0
the
29:13.0
reason
29:14.0
why
29:15.0
he's
29:16.0
so
29:17.0
strong
29:18.0
is because
29:19.0
he has
29:20.0
the best
29:21.0
information
29:22.0
he could
29:23.0
have.
29:24.0
And
29:25.0
the
29:26.0
reason
29:27.0
why
29:28.0
he's
29:29.0
so
29:30.0
strong
29:31.0
is
29:32.0
because
29:33.0
he has
29:34.0
the best
29:35.0
information
29:36.0
he could
29:37.0
have.
29:38.0
And
29:39.0
the
29:40.0
reason
29:41.0
why
29:42.0
he's
29:43.0
so
29:44.0
strong
29:45.0
is because
29:46.0
he has
29:47.0
the best
29:48.0
information
29:49.0
he could
29:50.0
have.
29:51.0
And
29:52.0
the
29:53.0
reason
29:54.0
why
29:55.0
he's
29:56.0
so
29:57.0
strong
29:58.0
is because
29:59.0
he has
30:00.0
the best
30:01.0
information
30:02.0
he could
30:03.0
have.
30:04.0
And
30:05.0
the
30:06.0
reason
30:07.0
why
30:08.0
he's
30:09.0
so
30:10.0
strong
30:11.0
is because
30:12.0
he has
30:13.0
the best
30:14.0
information
30:15.0
he could
30:16.0
have.
30:17.0
And
30:18.0
the
30:19.0
reason
30:20.0
why
30:21.0
he's
30:22.0
so
30:23.0
strong
30:24.0
is because
30:25.0
he has
30:26.0
the best
30:27.0
information
30:28.0
he could
30:29.0
have.
30:30.0
And
30:31.0
the
30:32.0
reason
30:33.0
why
30:34.0
he's
30:35.0
so
30:36.0
strong
30:37.0
is because
30:38.0
he has
30:39.0
the best
30:40.0
information
30:41.0
he could
30:42.0
have.
30:43.0
And
30:44.0
the
30:45.0
reason
30:46.0
why
30:47.0
he's
30:48.0
so
30:49.0
strong
30:50.0
is because
30:51.0
he has
30:52.0
the best
30:53.0
information
30:54.0
he could
30:55.0
have.
30:56.0
And
30:57.0
the
30:58.0
reason
30:59.0
why
31:00.0
he's
31:01.0
so
31:02.0
strong
31:03.0
is because
31:04.0
he has
31:05.0
the best
31:06.0
information
31:07.0
he could
31:08.0
have.
31:09.0
And
31:10.0
the
31:11.0
reason
31:12.0
why
31:13.0
he's
31:14.0
so
31:15.0
strong
31:16.0
is because
31:17.0
he has
31:18.0
the best
31:19.0
information
31:20.0
he could
31:21.0
have.
31:22.0
And
31:23.0
the
31:24.0
reason
31:25.0
why
31:26.0
he's
31:27.0
so
31:28.0
strong
31:29.0
is because
31:30.0
he has
31:31.0
the best
31:32.0
information
31:33.0
he could
31:34.0
have.
31:35.0
And
31:36.0
the
31:37.0
reason
31:38.0
why
31:39.0
he's
31:40.0
so
31:41.0
strong
31:42.0
is because
31:43.0
he has
31:44.0
the best
31:45.0
information
31:46.0
he could
31:47.0
have.
31:48.0
And
31:49.0
the
31:50.0
reason
31:51.0
why
31:52.0
he's
31:53.0
so
31:54.0
strong
31:55.0
is because
31:56.0
he has
31:57.0
the best
31:58.0
information
31:59.0
he could
32:00.0
have.
32:01.0
And
32:02.0
the
32:03.0
reason
32:04.0
why
32:05.0
he's
32:06.0
so
32:07.0
strong
32:08.0
is because
32:09.0
he has
32:10.0
the best
32:11.0
information
32:12.0
he could