Close
 


SECRET HISTORY OF PHILIPPINES’ AGRICULTURE CRISIS
Hide Subtitles
Click any subtitle word to view Tagalog.com dictionary results.
Computer Shortcuts: Left / Right arrows to jump 2 seconds back or forward. +Enter or Space to toggle Play/Pause button. Full Screen Mode

Richard Heydarian VLOGS
  Mute  
Run time: 30:48
Has AI Subtitles



Video Transcript / Subtitles:( AI generated. About AI subtitles » )
00:00.0
Good day, bro!
00:02.5
Been a while!
00:03.4
Welcome back, idol!
00:05.0
Kamusta?
00:06.0
Lodi, kamusta yan?
00:07.3
Getting used to the tropics again!
00:10.7
Kamusta, init?
00:12.0
Kamusta?
00:12.6
Okay naman!
00:13.3
At least, gladly, medyo malapit ng Christmas.
00:16.2
Medyo okay pa yung weather compared to what I was expecting.
00:19.2
But of course, from the Greenland...
00:20.7
Malapit na Christmas.
00:21.7
It's been Christmas for at least a month.
00:24.1
I know!
00:24.5
I'm talking about the international version of Christmas,
00:28.1
hindi yung bare months natin.
00:29.9
So mamaya na si Jose Marichan.
00:32.4
Yeah, bro!
00:33.4
So, you know, I'm adjusting and all of that.
00:35.7
The funny thing is,
00:36.9
it looks like yung sleeping patterns ko completely stable
00:40.2
even when I'm traveling, pag nasa Europe,
00:42.5
or even all the way to Greenland.
00:44.3
Pero for some reason, whether it's in US or Philippines
00:47.3
or even Japan, yung mga ganyang bansa,
00:49.2
sirayin sirka yung cycle
00:51.1
because I don't know, maybe there's something about gravity in Europe.
00:54.0
Now, despite jet lags and all,
00:55.3
I can always sleep at 10pm, 11pm, wake up early morning.
00:58.9
Ganon din sa Greenland.
00:59.9
So, I don't know.
01:00.5
I don't know what's going on.
01:01.4
But hopefully, next time I drop by there,
01:03.3
I have a better circadian cycle, bro.
01:05.6
Iga, how are you?
01:06.7
How are things going with you?
01:07.6
I'm okay.
01:08.2
I just finished the first draft of the book.
01:11.1
And then I'm hoping to send it to friends who can comment.
01:14.2
Namely, one Richard A. Darian.
01:16.7
A certain Richard A. Darian.
01:19.5
Yeah.
01:20.5
Looking forward, bro.
01:21.8
Do you have a publisher in mind?
01:23.4
I mean, has a publisher...
01:25.4
You're revealing your publisher or what?
01:27.4
Yeah, yeah.
01:27.9
I don't want to reveal the publisher.
01:29.9
Pero, US-based most likely.
01:33.1
Because hanggang wala pang kontrata,
01:35.3
hindi pa official.
01:36.3
But I am working with a publisher and an editor
01:39.8
from a publisher of some who are very enthusiastic about it.
01:43.6
I mean, they're editing it already.
01:45.1
So, they put in that much work.
01:47.4
So, is this more print or university press?
01:50.7
University pa rin because these are the demands of my job.
01:56.0
I have to publish with a university press.
01:58.7
Of course.
01:59.2
Of course.
01:59.2
Now, mamaya pag-asaban natin many, many complicated issues
02:03.4
including, of course, the conflict of not only the past month
02:07.2
but potentially the conflict of the decade, no?
02:09.6
Which is having a lot of impact all around the world.
02:11.7
Of course, we're talking about...
02:12.2
Probably conflict of our generation, you know?
02:14.0
Of our generation even.
02:15.1
Although, you know, I'm pessimistic enough to fear
02:17.9
that there could be even worse situation in 10, 15 years.
02:20.6
Being in the Philippines, analyzing China, Taiwan,
02:23.7
you never know, right?
02:24.7
But as things stand, you know,
02:26.6
like the number of children just killed over the past,
02:29.2
the number of children killed, what, over past years
02:33.2
according to the data I'm seeing.
02:35.0
So, from a humanitarian standpoint, this is crazy.
02:37.4
This is crazy.
02:38.0
We thought the Ukraine conflict and casualties was horrible.
02:41.1
This is next level.
02:42.3
But before we go there,
02:43.5
let's talk about yung minamahal natin na bayan.
02:46.9
So, a number of things happened
02:48.7
and I felt it's perfect to talk to a historian.
02:52.6
But before we talk about history,
02:54.7
because I want to talk about coup.
02:56.9
History of coup d'etat in the Philippines.
02:59.2
Because it looks like, you know,
03:02.0
there are insinuations that, you know,
03:05.5
you know who, right?
03:06.4
Maybe behind coup plots against Marcos Jr.
03:10.0
And guess what?
03:10.7
It's not the Dilawang.
03:11.8
It's not the Pinklawang.
03:13.5
It's whoever's left in the power group.
03:15.9
As if sobrang lapit nila sa military
03:19.2
nitong pinag-uusapan mo.
03:21.0
Yeah, yeah.
03:21.8
As if yung policy nila na pro-China
03:26.4
mabango sa military
03:28.0
and then they have the gun.
03:29.2
So, to organize na military.
03:31.2
Yeah, I think this is based on this
03:32.7
as the idea na,
03:33.4
oh, once upon a time,
03:34.4
I appointed you,
03:35.4
so I owe you for life.
03:37.0
I own you for life.
03:38.2
It doesn't work that way.
03:40.1
Kahit na gusto ko kayong i-benta sa China
03:42.9
at nakipag-aliansa ako sa komunista,
03:45.3
okay lang.
03:46.0
Okay lang.
03:46.9
Exactly, exactly.
03:48.3
Pero bago tayo pumunta sa mga coup at coup plotters,
03:50.8
marami din tayong mga kaibigan na coup plotters natin,
03:53.3
di ba?
03:54.4
Let's talk about itong Department of Aqu-
03:56.7
I'm sorry, Agriculture.
03:59.2
Department of Aquaculture
04:00.7
ng tawag ng tao.
04:02.5
Oh, my God.
04:03.9
Our favorite, bro.
04:04.9
Our favorite department.
04:06.3
Department of Agriculture.
04:08.0
How do you feel about the appointment
04:09.6
of one of the biggest donors to Marcos
04:11.7
who also happens to be a businessman
04:13.3
and who happens to come from background
04:15.7
not in agriculture but aquaculture, right?
04:19.2
How do you feel about it, bro?
04:20.9
May nabasa akong isang article na
04:22.8
at least daw alam niya yung distribution networks
04:25.4
kasi part siya ng distribution.
04:27.1
Fairness.
04:27.5
So, that's,
04:28.3
that's,
04:29.2
there's something to be said about that
04:31.2
and I think lagi naman
04:32.5
pag nag-a-appoint ng businessman
04:34.0
into certain positions in government,
04:36.1
lagi kang iiling ng konti
04:38.2
kasi may conflict of interest.
04:40.3
Madalas may conflict of interest
04:41.8
unless, of course,
04:42.6
bitawan niya yung mga holdings niya.
04:44.5
Pero,
04:45.0
at the same time,
04:47.1
we do know that the advantage
04:48.6
of certain businessmen,
04:49.9
kung magaling sila na businessman
04:51.2
and hindi corrupt na businessman
04:52.5
na naglalaro lang,
04:53.9
is meron silang hands-on experience
04:56.1
with the industry
04:56.9
and if they can step beyond
04:58.3
their narrow interests
04:59.6
and take on the position
05:00.5
of a cabinet minister,
05:01.5
it could be really effective.
05:02.5
That's,
05:02.8
that's a silver lining.
05:04.5
But on the other hand,
05:06.0
this does kind of break
05:07.7
a kind of certain pattern
05:09.0
within the Marcos administration
05:10.6
of really appointing technocrats
05:12.4
to key positions,
05:13.7
di ba?
05:14.2
I mean,
05:14.5
a couple of weeks back,
05:15.4
we were even thinking na
05:16.6
baka mag-appearan si Maroja sa cabinet
05:19.1
or si Babe Simpson sa cabinet.
05:21.6
So,
05:22.2
between the two of us,
05:23.5
we were thinking that
05:24.2
there was a real technocratic push
05:25.8
within the government,
05:26.6
di ba?
05:27.2
An appointment,
05:28.0
like this sounds like,
05:29.2
you know,
05:29.6
a kind of Duterte appointment.
05:31.7
Like, you know,
05:32.0
it's similar to like,
05:33.5
well,
05:34.1
hindi naman kasing lala.
05:35.0
Pero yung pinakamalala
05:35.9
na conflict of interest
05:37.0
ni Duterte,
05:37.9
di ba?
05:38.0
Yung DSWD.
05:39.3
Ay, di, di.
05:39.8
Yung ano,
05:40.3
so public works
05:41.7
na in-appoint si Mark Villar,
05:43.7
di ba?
05:44.3
Very clear conflict of interest there.
05:46.3
So, this is more like
05:47.0
a tatay move for me
05:48.3
than a very BBM move.
05:50.0
What are your thoughts?
05:51.5
Ako, bro,
05:53.0
the best,
05:53.6
number one,
05:54.0
hindi naman kasing sama,
05:54.6
pero mas close yun.
05:55.9
Yeah, yeah.
05:56.0
I mean, in fairness,
05:56.5
I mean, both of us are nuanced.
05:57.8
Of course, we want
05:58.5
whoever is there to succeed
05:59.7
because medyo malalayang
06:00.8
situation sa
06:01.5
Department of Agriculture.
06:03.0
But, I mean,
06:03.5
before going there,
06:05.4
I mean,
06:06.0
I wonder if there were takers.
06:09.1
Mas sige.
06:10.5
Yun.
06:11.2
O nga, no?
06:12.0
So, possible.
06:13.1
Actually, Marcos Jr.
06:14.3
had other people in mind,
06:15.7
including other donors
06:16.7
who are much closer
06:18.1
to the expertise
06:19.5
that is needed
06:20.0
for this department.
06:20.7
But, baka wala talagang gusto eh.
06:22.8
So, I don't know the story
06:24.4
of other people
06:25.1
who may have been offered this.
06:26.3
So,
06:26.5
I'm not going to pretend
06:27.3
that this was really
06:28.3
the choice of Marcos Jr.
06:30.4
And, therefore,
06:30.9
this is the reflection
06:32.0
of Marcos Jr.'s
06:33.5
strategy about moving forward.
06:35.0
But, it's very clear.
06:35.7
Marcos wants to create
06:36.7
a plausible deniability.
06:39.1
Not really.
06:39.8
A one degree of separation
06:41.1
from the food crisis
06:42.3
on popularity disaster
06:44.3
he's facing, right?
06:45.3
Because,
06:45.7
if you put someone else
06:46.6
in charge of the agriculture,
06:48.0
at least there's a fall guy,
06:49.4
right?
06:49.8
So, probably,
06:50.7
that's why others
06:51.5
didn't want to take the job
06:52.5
because it's essentially
06:53.8
applying to be the fall guy,
06:55.4
right?
06:55.7
Right?
06:55.7
If the food inflation
06:57.0
moves forward.
06:57.7
So, that's what I'm looking at, bro.
06:59.6
Baka nga,
07:00.3
baka walang takers masyado
07:01.9
because even with Maroas,
07:03.6
I think it's more DTI
07:04.8
we were thinking about
07:06.0
rather than Department of Agriculture.
07:07.4
I was thinking about
07:08.4
Kiko Pangilinan
07:09.2
but election is coming soon.
07:10.6
So, if Kiko Pangilinan
07:11.5
is thinking of running,
07:12.5
which I think he is,
07:13.9
I heard Riza
07:14.8
the other month
07:15.6
hoping that, you know,
07:17.0
Kiko will join her soon
07:18.2
so that hindi siya
07:18.8
nag-isa sa Senate,
07:19.7
then it doesn't make sense
07:21.0
for Kiko to join
07:21.8
this administration
07:22.6
for another additional reasons
07:24.5
that, you know,
07:24.9
we're closing
07:25.6
already on next election.
07:26.5
So, baka nga
07:27.6
wala talagang takers
07:28.7
and for Marcos Jr.,
07:29.8
he just felt this
07:30.8
urgency
07:31.8
to put that
07:32.9
one degree of separation
07:34.0
between himself
07:34.8
and the food crisis problem.
07:36.8
Will it work?
07:37.4
I'm not sure
07:38.0
because he's still the president.
07:39.2
He's still gonna get the blame
07:40.4
if food inflation persists
07:41.7
but at least he will have
07:42.6
an excuse
07:43.1
which he hasn't had
07:44.3
for more than a year.
07:45.4
Ika, what do you think about it?
07:46.8
Tsaka, yeah,
07:47.5
of course,
07:48.3
some fall guy
07:49.1
and then,
07:51.0
kasi unless you think about,
07:52.4
again, babalik tayo
07:53.0
dun sa taripa, diba?
07:54.0
We have some of the highest
07:55.1
food tariffs in Asia
07:56.3
and that's why
07:57.4
our inflation
07:58.1
in Southeast Asia
07:59.0
and that's why
07:59.5
our inflation is the worst
08:00.9
because of our food tariffs
08:02.6
which disproportionately
08:04.1
detriment the poor.
08:07.2
So, kahit sino pa
08:08.1
ilagay mo dyan sa agriculture,
08:09.7
mataas talaga
08:10.4
yung inflation natin
08:11.3
kung yan
08:12.7
kung yan
08:13.7
ang nananatiling problema.
08:15.8
I would like to think
08:16.7
of the
08:17.3
inordinately high tariffs
08:19.0
as the root
08:19.8
not the root,
08:21.1
I don't believe in root causes
08:22.3
but as the major cause
08:24.1
of the problem
08:25.1
some people say that
08:26.1
the major cause of the problem
08:27.2
is importation
08:28.2
yung mga parang economic
08:29.3
nationalists talaga
08:30.2
who believe in
08:30.9
absolute food security
08:32.1
and I think
08:33.0
absolute food security
08:34.3
is a kind of pipe dream
08:35.3
I've said this
08:36.4
multiple times
08:37.1
we're part of a global economy
08:38.7
and dahil bahagi tayo
08:39.8
ng isang global economy
08:41.0
kailangan talaga natin
08:41.9
mag-angkat
08:42.6
at sa pag-aangkat
08:43.8
kailangan natin
08:44.4
masiguro na yung inaangkat
08:45.7
natin ay mura
08:46.6
para
08:47.3
ang pinapakain natin
08:49.0
ay hindi na mamahalan
08:50.3
dun sa
08:50.7
dun sa binibili nila
08:52.0
so, unless you can do
08:53.3
something about that
08:54.1
yung tariffs
08:55.1
hindi na din yung magagawa
08:56.5
ng agriculture department
08:57.8
of course
08:58.2
may mga other things
08:60.0
that are
09:00.4
that are moving
09:01.3
in the direction of
09:02.9
tamer inflation
09:04.3
as a whole
09:05.1
so, you know
09:06.0
yung rate hikes
09:08.0
ng US
09:08.5
hindi na kasing aggressive
09:09.6
so, baka hindi na rin
09:10.6
natin kailangan mag-rate hike
09:11.8
dito
09:12.2
although
09:13.3
nag-rate hike pa rin
09:14.3
ng Banko Sentral
09:15.1
I don't know why
09:16.0
because the Banko Sentral
09:17.3
is the Banko Sentral
09:18.4
catch up
09:19.3
nagka-catch up sila
09:20.5
because
09:20.7
nag-off cycle
09:23.2
rate hike
09:23.7
si
09:24.0
government
09:24.9
or
09:25.1
So, there are other things
09:27.5
that could tame
09:28.2
the inflation
09:29.1
in the short run
09:29.9
pero yung long-run
09:31.2
food inflation
09:31.8
and remember
09:32.4
ito talaga yung conclusion ko
09:33.5
when we talk about inflation
09:35.3
hitting the poor
09:36.5
we're actually talking
09:37.8
about food inflation
09:38.8
and so
09:39.5
unless we
09:40.1
address yung big issue
09:41.6
around food inflation
09:42.8
I think
09:43.3
may hirapan talaga
09:44.5
yung agriculture
09:45.3
agriculture department
09:46.7
and all this other stuff
09:48.0
like, you know
09:49.0
central bank interventions
09:50.4
temporary tinkering
09:52.7
with
09:53.3
distribution problems
09:54.9
that stuff can help
09:57.4
in the margins
09:58.0
pero yung malaking issue
09:59.1
yung napakalaking taripa
10:00.6
unless ma-tugin mo yun
10:02.2
sa tingin ko
10:02.7
mal pa rin yung pagkain
10:04.2
Bro, I'm gonna push you
10:05.3
a little bit here
10:05.9
I mean, none of us are
10:07.2
agricultural economists here
10:08.6
but
10:08.8
I think yung sinasabi mong tariff
10:11.2
ito yung essentially
10:11.9
yung buwis
10:12.5
sa mga imported
10:13.3
na
10:13.7
na bigas
10:15.7
a lot of that
10:16.3
from Vietnam
10:16.9
90% from Vietnam alone
10:18.5
and then the rest
10:19.1
from Thailand, etc.
10:20.9
I would say
10:21.4
that's the quote-unquote
10:22.2
proximate cause
10:23.5
but ano yung
10:24.4
nalaga yun?
10:24.9
That's the word
10:25.2
proximate cause
10:26.1
That's the proximate cause
10:27.5
pero ano yung mga
10:28.5
structural factors
10:29.5
how can we explain
10:30.8
a country like the Philippines
10:32.1
which has such a
10:33.8
fertile soil
10:35.1
such a good climate
10:36.6
etc.
10:38.1
is so dependent
10:39.1
on food imports
10:40.1
hindi lang sa bigas
10:41.0
I mean, what really explains
10:42.1
the failure of
10:42.8
agricultural sector?
10:44.6
I mean, naiintindihan ko
10:45.3
na in the past
10:45.9
pinag-usapan natin
10:46.7
maybe yung diet natin
10:48.1
medyo bawas-bawas
10:49.0
sa sana all
10:50.3
rice
10:51.5
all day rice
10:52.4
double rice
10:53.1
I understand
10:53.8
I mean, you know
10:54.8
I have many
10:55.3
athletic friends around me
10:56.8
who are saying
10:57.0
yeah, we really have to
10:57.9
cut the rice
10:58.4
but it's easy to say for you
10:59.7
because you can have steak
11:00.8
mahal ang protina eh
11:02.3
exactly
11:02.9
but aside from
11:04.8
yung mga advice na
11:06.2
cut on the rice
11:07.1
healthy lifestyle
11:07.9
mga ganyan
11:08.5
no, I mean
11:09.4
what are the structural factors
11:10.6
what explains
11:11.7
okay, I'll put it this way bro
11:13.2
what explains the fact that
11:14.7
and this must be
11:15.3
close to your heart
11:15.9
that the Philippines
11:16.8
has the longest running
11:18.0
and the most
11:18.8
failed
11:19.7
land reform program
11:21.2
anywhere in Asia
11:22.5
if not in the world
11:23.5
I mean, this is close to you
11:24.3
because of your
11:24.7
Hacienda Luisita
11:25.7
research back in the day
11:27.4
your current book
11:28.6
looks at of course
11:29.3
the Philippines
11:29.8
political economy
11:30.9
in crucial years
11:32.2
so, paano natin
11:33.5
maintindihan yun
11:34.3
bakit ang Pilipinas
11:35.3
ay napaka
11:36.0
underdeveloped
11:36.9
pagdating sa kanyang
11:37.6
agricultural sector
11:38.7
alam mo
11:39.6
and here
11:41.0
tama, this is where
11:42.1
maybe the traditional
11:43.4
left
11:44.0
has a point
11:45.1
nakahit naalala ko
11:46.3
sa Hacienda Luisita
11:47.4
eh, pag
11:48.8
pag hawak ng kuwa
11:50.0
ang ko yung lupa
11:50.5
may times kasi na
11:51.6
hindi mahawakan
11:52.4
ng mga kuwa
11:52.9
ang ko yung lupa
11:53.7
so, magbubungkal
11:54.5
sila
11:54.7
in other words
11:55.3
they'll just occupy the land
11:56.4
and they'll produce
11:57.2
what they need to produce
11:58.4
for themselves
11:59.0
and for trade
12:00.4
so, pag hawak ng kuwa
12:02.0
kung magtutubo yan
12:02.9
meaning they grow sugar
12:04.0
and sugar is not
12:04.8
sugar is important
12:05.6
but it's export
12:06.5
and it really doesn't
12:07.6
doesn't feed people
12:08.6
pag nag-auto kuwa ko
12:10.2
magdadiversify
12:11.5
yung mga magsasaka
12:12.5
so, they start
12:13.1
nagtatanim ng gulay
12:14.5
nagtatanim ng mais
12:15.5
all sorts of things
12:16.8
that can feed people
12:18.0
so, there's
12:18.4
there's an argument
12:19.0
to be made
12:19.5
na more land reform
12:20.8
moves
12:22.4
individual farmers
12:24.0
away from
12:24.5
itong mga
12:25.2
cash crops
12:26.1
na ready for
12:27.3
inflation
12:27.9
and will build them
12:28.9
towards crops
12:29.8
that feed themselves
12:30.7
and feed other people
12:31.7
so, there is
12:33.4
there's absolutely
12:34.6
a point
12:35.6
to that kind of
12:36.8
more traditional
12:37.5
leftist argument
12:38.4
nakikita mo yan eh
12:39.5
punta ka lang doon
12:40.8
so, bakit walang
12:42.8
land reform?
12:43.9
I don't know
12:44.7
I don't know
12:45.6
I think
12:46.6
this is one of those
12:48.2
issues where
12:48.7
I don't like the
12:49.6
elite capture argument
12:50.7
medyo sawa na ako doon
12:52.0
but this is the one
12:53.1
issue where the
12:53.8
elite capture
12:54.4
argument
12:54.8
well, it makes sense
12:55.8
kasi diba
12:56.6
this is the one issue
12:58.9
where it makes too much
12:59.8
land owners
13:00.6
they're never gonna
13:01.4
yeah, I mean
13:02.3
that's the point
13:03.4
I mean, I understand
13:04.2
you're being iconoclastic
13:05.7
and I think a lot of times
13:06.7
you have a point
13:07.4
but sometimes may point
13:08.7
naman talaga eh
13:09.5
yung elite
13:09.9
pari, ang linaw nito
13:11.5
kasi ito medyo malinaw
13:12.7
diba yung
13:13.5
yung kongreso ni Cory
13:14.8
sino nagkumpas
13:16.4
ng land reform efforts
13:17.5
sa panahon na yan
13:18.1
si ano
13:18.8
si Piping Kuangko
13:19.6
yung kapatid niya
13:20.4
na may-ari
13:20.9
ng Hacienda Luisita
13:22.0
bakit hindi
13:23.0
pambigay yung Hacienda Luisita?
13:24.4
dito dahil si Piping
13:25.2
nag-push ng
13:26.2
legislation
13:27.2
na sinabi
13:28.4
hindi mo kailangan
13:28.9
yung pambigay
13:29.4
yung Hacienda Luisita
13:30.3
kailangan mo lang
13:30.9
bigyan ng stock options
13:31.8
yung mga magsasaka
13:32.7
doon sa
13:33.4
kumpanya
13:34.6
at effectively
13:36.0
ano na yun
13:36.5
land reform na yun
13:37.6
or distribution
13:38.4
dahil may stock options sila
13:40.1
eh yung mga respondent
13:41.1
na nakausap ko
13:41.9
sabi nila
13:42.8
every time
13:43.6
nakakatanggap sila
13:44.5
ng benepisyo
13:45.3
from yung kanilang
13:46.1
shares doon sa kumpanya
13:47.3
eh mas marami pa silang
13:49.3
binabaya doon sa tricycle
13:50.8
para kunin yung pera
13:52.0
kaysa doon sa pera
13:52.8
na naupo nila
13:53.5
so I mean
13:54.6
you know
13:55.6
this one is
13:56.7
I guess a straight up
13:57.9
case of
13:58.6
you know
13:58.9
elite capture
13:60.0
yung land reform
14:01.2
polydark talaga natin
14:02.8
having said that
14:04.9
parang there's also
14:06.0
meron din isang argument
14:08.1
dito na
14:08.5
how do you force
14:09.9
the elite to transition
14:10.9
away from
14:11.9
Haciendas
14:12.8
right
14:13.2
how do you do that
14:14.2
how do you
14:15.7
force industrialization
14:17.2
well you need
14:17.7
state support
14:18.5
and I don't think
14:19.9
state support
14:20.5
has supported
14:21.2
industrialization
14:22.2
so much
14:22.8
so much
14:23.5
so the
14:25.4
argument does work
14:26.5
but yung brother
14:27.1
argument ko
14:27.9
yung brother argument
14:29.0
natin about how
14:29.9
developmental state
14:30.9
can transition away
14:32.0
from that
14:32.5
I mean
14:33.4
you need to force
14:34.8
you need to force
14:36.0
the land reform
14:36.6
through laws
14:37.2
right
14:37.5
if you force
14:39.2
yung land reform
14:39.8
that requires
14:40.4
political will
14:41.0
but on the other hand
14:42.0
you need to create
14:42.9
parang economic
14:43.6
circumstances
14:44.3
wherein
14:44.8
mas madali silang
14:46.0
i-kick out of their land
14:47.0
because there are
14:47.6
other industries
14:48.4
available in the Philippines
14:49.5
that the government
14:50.1
will support
14:50.8
like you know
14:52.1
things that
14:53.3
are more associated
14:54.4
with
14:54.7
industrialization
14:56.1
and a developmental state
14:57.2
tradables
14:57.9
so it's more like
14:59.4
essentially double incentive
15:00.7
right
15:01.1
positive and negative
15:02.0
negative incentive
15:02.9
to you know
15:03.6
eto na
15:04.3
land reform na
15:05.3
oh yan nga riyan namin kayo
15:06.6
pero pangalawa
15:08.1
don't worry
15:08.6
it's not the end of the world
15:09.7
you can still have your
15:10.8
10 yayas
15:12.0
and 12 drivers
15:13.0
and all
15:13.4
because you will find
15:14.3
another industry
15:15.3
that will
15:15.7
yes yes
15:16.3
because
15:16.5
magtrata transition tayo
15:18.2
to whatever
15:18.6
to electronics
15:19.5
diba
15:19.8
this is where
15:20.7
this is where
15:21.4
yung diversification
15:22.7
of exports
15:23.4
is quite necessary
15:24.5
I don't think
15:25.1
you can have
15:26.2
complete land reform
15:27.4
if you don't
15:27.9
diversify exports
15:28.9
because you
15:29.5
this is the elite
15:30.7
hindi mo basta-basta
15:32.5
kayang brasuhin yan
15:33.5
sa Pilipinas
15:34.3
kailangan din talaga
15:35.6
ng incentive
15:36.1
to transition
15:37.4
which is a very good point
15:38.9
because I already
15:39.5
I essentially have
15:40.2
two countries in mind
15:41.0
Vietnam and Thailand
15:42.3
where we get
15:42.9
much of our rice
15:43.8
90% essentially
15:45.0
from Vietnam
15:45.5
and the rest from Thailand
15:46.5
these two are
15:47.3
agricultural superpowers
15:48.6
the Vietnam one
15:49.8
I mean I like
15:50.4
pho
15:50.9
I like so many things
15:51.9
about Vietnam
15:52.4
but it's not like that
15:52.5
but it's not like that
15:52.6
but it's not like that
15:52.7
it's a communist
15:53.2
socialistic country
15:54.3
for Italians
15:55.3
so I'm not sure
15:56.7
it's the best model
15:58.4
for coming up
15:59.3
with land reform
15:59.9
of course you and I
16:00.7
have read the book
16:01.4
by Lovell
16:02.0
about Maoism
16:03.3
and global history
16:04.1
where a lot of land reform
16:05.8
that happened is
16:06.5
essentially pinatay
16:07.7
lahat ng mga shenderos
16:09.0
ng mga Maoista
16:10.3
under the command
16:11.6
of Chinese
16:12.2
etong mga Vietnam
16:12.7
so that's where
16:13.3
there was a dark turn
16:14.3
so if you look at
16:15.8
the history of land reform
16:17.1
in Vietnam
16:17.6
it's not very
16:18.8
enviable
16:20.1
to be honest
16:20.8
and I'm definitely
16:21.8
not against that
16:22.6
kind of
16:22.6
kind of a
16:23.1
Maoist way
16:23.8
of dealing with land reform
16:24.9
and then you look at Thailand
16:26.4
it's very interesting
16:27.2
for a long time
16:28.2
Thailand was seen
16:29.2
as the Philippines twin
16:30.3
Southeast Asian twin
16:31.5
at some point
16:32.4
both of us
16:33.0
were troubled democracies
16:34.2
and troubled economies
16:36.4
but at some point
16:37.5
Thailand's democracy
16:38.9
went down
16:39.6
but their economic
16:40.6
trajectory
16:41.6
actually picked up
16:42.6
their infrastructure
16:43.3
became nice
16:44.0
and if you look at
16:44.9
Itaksin
16:45.6
who's the man
16:46.3
behind a lot of
16:47.6
development
16:48.3
in Thailand's
16:49.3
agricultural sector
16:50.4
a lot of development
16:51.3
in the rural sector
16:52.1
you know
16:52.6
Itaksin could have been
16:53.5
your other
16:54.0
typical Filipino
16:55.1
conglomerate
16:55.8
oligarch
16:56.9
and then if you look at it
16:58.4
because Thailand
16:59.3
is increasingly
17:00.7
an export-oriented economy
17:02.2
because they attracted
17:03.1
a lot of high-quality
17:04.3
Japanese
17:04.9
and manufacturing investment
17:06.4
kung titignan mo
17:07.4
yung mga billionaires
17:08.4
sa Thailand
17:09.1
a lot of them
17:10.1
are even ethnically similar
17:11.3
to our billionaires here
17:12.3
they're Sino-Thai
17:13.6
for instance
17:14.2
they're more involved
17:16.0
in telecommunications
17:17.2
in the case of
17:18.6
Itaksin
17:22.1
and a lot of them
17:22.6
are involved
17:23.4
in manufacturing
17:24.3
automotive industry
17:25.9
et cetera
17:26.3
so the incentives
17:27.2
for them to just have
17:28.2
Hashendero style life
17:29.8
although of course
17:30.8
Thailand has a different
17:31.6
political economy history
17:32.6
compared to us
17:33.2
but still
17:33.6
nevertheless
17:34.2
it's a very unequal society
17:35.5
it's a South Asian country
17:36.3
I kind of see your argument
17:38.3
because in Thailand
17:39.2
a lot of their big rich people
17:40.9
a lot of them Sino-Thai
17:42.0
they're very involved
17:43.7
in more high value added
17:45.5
productions
17:46.5
manufacturing
17:47.3
automotive
17:47.9
telecommunications
17:48.9
rather than the typical
17:50.4
Pinoy style
17:51.5
of landed elite
17:52.5
land
17:52.6
landlord
17:53.1
and essentially
17:53.7
the oppose of
17:56.9
our
17:57.5
Robert Barons
17:59.0
back in the day
17:60.0
during the colonial era
18:01.0
I'm just trying to see
18:02.9
what are the
18:03.7
reasonable
18:04.9
and appropriate
18:05.7
lessons we can draw
18:06.8
and I kind of understand
18:08.0
if you look at Thailand
18:09.0
their manufacturing
18:09.9
pickup
18:10.7
and uptake
18:12.1
over the past 20 years
18:13.3
kind of perhaps
18:14.5
gives us an idea
18:15.9
how things could also work
18:16.9
in the Philippines
18:17.4
short of a kind of
18:18.3
Maoist
18:19.1
aggressive
18:20.0
bloody reign of terror
18:21.6
land
18:21.9
yeah
18:22.5
which I think
18:23.0
some of our friends
18:23.7
in the left
18:24.2
essentially imply
18:25.3
if not openly
18:26.1
I just don't think
18:27.3
that will work
18:27.9
I mean
18:28.3
for our friends in the left
18:30.5
na parang may Vietnam
18:31.5
and I really recommend
18:33.1
this book called
18:33.7
Alec Holcomb's
18:34.9
Mass Mobilization
18:35.7
in the Democratic Republic
18:37.1
of Vietnam
18:37.6
1945 to 1960
18:39.1
it looks at really
18:40.4
yung mobilization efforts
18:41.7
and yung displacement
18:42.7
ng mga tao
18:43.5
sa Vietnam
18:44.3
during land reform efforts
18:45.7
kasi for example
18:46.8
parang because it was
18:47.8
so ideological
18:48.5
the Chinese gave them
18:49.5
a number
18:50.0
they said like
18:50.9
X percent
18:52.5
of people
18:53.4
are evil landlords
18:55.9
so because they had
18:57.1
to conform to that number
18:58.4
kahit yung mga kaalyado nila
18:59.9
tinitigok nila
19:00.8
and then eventually
19:01.6
ang nangyayari dyan
19:02.7
as like the war on drugs
19:04.4
ginagamit yung law
19:05.3
as an excuse
19:06.0
to get back
19:07.0
at your enemies
19:07.8
so sasabihin mo
19:08.5
landlord ito
19:09.3
i-displace mo ganyan
19:10.5
parang yung tokang dati
19:11.6
parang
19:12.0
drug lord sila landlord
19:13.4
so drug lord
19:14.6
kayo digong landlord
19:15.6
sa kanila
19:16.1
exactly
19:16.4
so that's what
19:18.0
happened to them
19:18.7
yeah
19:19.9
Alec Holcomb
19:21.8
is a
19:22.3
is a
19:22.6
is a terrific
19:23.2
anti-communist historian
19:24.5
who actually worked
19:25.5
in our departments
19:27.1
at Berkeley
19:27.5
so highly recommended
19:28.7
fascinating
19:29.5
again
19:29.9
it just confirms
19:31.0
that you know
19:31.5
like I like a lot of things
19:32.5
about Vietnam
19:33.3
but let's not forget
19:34.2
how they got
19:34.9
where they are
19:36.3
and a lot of that
19:36.9
was not really democratic
19:38.0
and remember
19:39.2
there's one country
19:40.3
that can give us an idea
19:41.4
about how things
19:42.0
could go wrong
19:42.6
if we go down
19:43.2
the Maoist way
19:44.1
Spain
19:45.4
if you look at
19:46.1
the civil war
19:46.8
in Spain
19:47.3
when the far left
19:48.6
pushed the envelope
19:49.4
that's where
19:50.1
fascism came in
19:51.2
the whole general
19:52.3
Franco phenomenon
19:53.9
was a response
19:54.7
to the progressive
19:55.4
movement
19:55.7
and then the
19:58.3
milder version
19:59.2
if the socialist
20:00.2
left version
20:01.1
of of course
20:02.2
Salvador Allende
20:03.5
and how that created
20:04.8
the fascist
20:05.5
response
20:06.1
pero pare
20:07.4
americano naman
20:08.2
ang sumagot naman doon
20:09.5
americano
20:10.0
ang problema mo doon
20:12.0
si Kissinger
20:12.6
walang American influence
20:13.8
sa Philippines
20:14.3
right
20:14.8
you think
20:15.4
you think Americans
20:16.5
will stand with the
20:17.4
landed elite
20:18.2
who are their friends
20:19.1
not today
20:21.2
yeah yeah
20:22.3
just the Allende
20:24.4
backlash is also
20:25.4
a kind of Kissinger
20:26.3
Kissinger backlash
20:27.7
I would say
20:28.7
yeah although
20:30.1
interestingly
20:31.0
so di ba
20:31.7
anniversary
20:32.2
ng
20:32.7
I mean
20:34.3
you know
20:35.1
the whole coup
20:35.8
against Allende
20:36.5
the other month
20:38.0
and a
20:39.3
number of very
20:40.5
well-informed Chileans
20:42.3
including
20:42.5
former finance minister
20:43.8
among others
20:44.5
were interviewed
20:45.7
and their argument
20:46.2
is that actually
20:46.9
which is something
20:47.8
very close to my heart
20:48.8
this idea that
20:50.1
it was Kissinger
20:51.4
and I don't know
20:52.1
what's happening
20:52.9
to him
20:53.4
and that he was
20:54.4
like
20:55.1
I don't know
20:55.7
I don't know
20:56.1
I don't know
20:56.6
I don't know
20:57.1
I don't know
20:57.6
I don't know
20:58.1
I don't know
20:58.4
I don't know
20:58.6
I don't know
20:59.1
but I'm
20:59.8
disappointed
21:00.2
what he was saying
21:01.3
is that
21:01.6
that is
21:02.7
like factor number
21:04.1
nine
21:04.7
right
21:05.1
because he was
21:05.8
saying that
21:06.2
actually there was
21:06.9
a very
21:07.4
almost fascistic
21:08.8
ultra conservative
21:10.0
constituents
21:10.6
in short
21:11.1
do not
21:11.8
underestimate
21:12.3
the agencies
21:13.0
of indigenous
21:14.8
trapos
21:15.7
to do
21:16.6
the job
21:17.4
and that they
21:17.9
don't need
21:18.5
your new
21:19.4
liberal
21:19.8
Chicago boys
21:20.8
to come in
21:21.3
and do
21:21.5
so parang
21:22.0
the idea
21:22.3
is that
21:22.9
that semi
21:24.6
leftist
21:25.1
conspiracy
21:25.5
theory
21:26.0
there is
21:26.2
a grain
21:26.5
of truth
21:26.9
but it's
21:28.9
kind of
21:29.2
exaggerated
21:29.9
at the expense
21:30.6
of appreciating
21:31.4
the agency
21:32.1
or yung
21:34.0
example dyan
21:34.8
yung 65
21:35.4
killings
21:35.9
sa Indonesia
21:36.5
one of the
21:37.3
worst acts
21:38.2
of mass
21:38.6
killing
21:38.9
we've ever
21:40.0
seen
21:40.3
in Southeast
21:41.3
Asia
21:41.9
I mean
21:42.5
there is
21:43.0
evidence
21:43.5
that the
21:44.0
United States
21:44.7
supported
21:45.3
the military
21:46.7
there
21:47.2
there is
21:47.8
in fact
21:48.1
evidence
21:48.5
that
21:48.8
supported
21:49.3
the military
21:50.6
there
21:50.8
because he
21:51.3
allowed for
21:51.7
the
21:51.9
training
21:52.2
of Indonesian
21:52.7
troops
21:53.0
in
21:53.2
Hacienda
21:53.5
Luisita
21:54.1
so merong
21:54.8
external
21:55.2
support
21:55.7
but man
21:56.5
you don't
21:57.0
get
21:57.5
like
21:58.0
the mass
21:58.9
murder
21:59.3
of close
21:59.8
to a
22:00.2
million
22:00.5
suspected
22:01.1
communists
22:02.0
if
22:03.3
it is
22:04.0
not a
22:04.5
domestic
22:05.0
phenomenon
22:05.6
as well
22:06.3
it was
22:06.8
a horrible
22:08.5
domestic
22:09.2
right wing
22:10.4
backlash
22:11.1
in Indonesia
22:11.8
that
22:12.8
can be
22:14.3
blamed
22:14.5
on external
22:15.0
forces
22:15.4
but ultimately
22:16.1
it has to
22:16.6
be blamed
22:17.2
on yung
22:17.6
dynamic
22:18.2
right wing
22:19.1
sa Indonesia
22:19.6
na napakakadiri
22:21.5
nung time
22:21.9
na yun
22:22.1
because Suharto
22:22.6
was really
22:23.0
a mass
22:23.4
murderer
22:23.8
and he would
22:24.3
have been
22:24.5
a mass
22:24.9
murderer
22:25.2
even if
22:26.3
he did
22:26.8
he did
22:27.1
not get
22:27.5
the support
22:27.9
of the
22:28.3
US
22:28.7
diba
22:31.0
Oppenheimer
22:31.6
din yung
22:31.9
pangalan
22:32.3
niyan
22:32.4
yung
22:32.6
documentary
22:33.2
yung
22:33.4
guy
22:33.6
who
22:33.7
made
22:33.9
the
22:34.0
documentary
22:34.5
Joshua
22:35.1
Joshua
22:36.3
Oppenheimer
22:36.9
no this
22:37.2
is not
22:37.5
the
22:37.7
Oppenheimer
22:38.1
in the
22:38.5
Hollywood
22:38.8
but I
22:39.6
suggest
22:39.9
you check
22:40.3
it I
22:40.5
think you
22:40.7
can find
22:41.0
it for
22:41.2
free on
22:41.7
YouTube
22:42.1
it talks
22:42.9
about the
22:43.3
killing
22:43.5
fields
22:43.9
in
22:44.0
Indonesia
22:44.4
I was
22:46.1
really
22:46.4
haunted
22:46.7
because I
22:47.7
was writing
22:48.1
dun sa
22:48.8
libro
22:49.2
kung isang
22:49.8
latest book
22:50.5
one chapter
22:51.1
in Indonesia
22:51.6
to really
22:52.0
go through
22:52.3
the
22:52.4
Oppenheimer
22:53.0
documentaries
22:54.2
so that
22:55.3
could happen
22:55.8
in the
22:56.0
Philippines
22:56.3
if you
22:57.0
had the
22:57.6
left
22:57.8
going
22:58.1
aggressively
22:58.7
yeah
22:58.9
exactly
22:59.3
there could
23:00.3
be very
23:00.7
violent
23:01.2
fascistic
23:01.7
backlash
23:02.3
kaya nga
23:03.3
I don't
23:03.6
buy the
23:04.1
leftist
23:04.5
approach
23:04.9
because
23:05.2
you're
23:05.8
not
23:05.9
looking
23:06.2
at the
23:06.4
countervailing
23:07.0
forces
23:07.4
and balance
23:07.9
of forces
23:08.4
in the
23:08.7
reality
23:08.9
kailangan magingat
23:09.5
ka ng konti
23:10.0
this is not
23:12.1
about blaming
23:12.8
the left
23:13.3
for yung
23:14.2
acts of
23:14.6
murder
23:15.0
but of
23:15.5
course
23:15.8
of course
23:16.4
not
23:17.1
I mean
23:17.7
there were
23:17.8
the victims
23:18.3
here in
23:18.7
the case
23:18.9
of Indonesia
23:19.4
in fact
23:21.5
I would
23:21.8
say
23:22.0
that
23:22.2
na-exaggerate
23:23.1
din
23:23.3
yung
23:23.6
role
23:23.9
ng
23:24.2
influence
23:25.6
ng
23:25.8
Maoism
23:26.3
and
23:26.6
communism
23:27.1
dun
23:27.5
and if you look at
23:28.4
also Sukarno
23:29.3
we can have a
23:30.5
debate
23:30.8
Sukarno had
23:31.6
leftist
23:32.2
predilections
23:33.0
but I think
23:33.6
he was a
23:33.9
much more
23:34.4
centrist
23:35.2
guy than
23:35.7
many people
23:36.4
appreciate
23:36.8
but yeah
23:37.2
unfortunately
23:37.8
nga
23:38.1
the
23:38.3
fascistic
23:39.1
forces
23:39.5
they're
23:39.8
grabe
23:40.1
they took
23:40.4
it
23:40.5
in
23:40.6
next
23:40.8
level
23:40.9
and
23:41.2
in fact
23:41.6
up until
23:42.0
today
23:42.3
in
23:42.4
Indonesia
23:42.8
hush hush
23:43.9
lang
23:44.2
you really
23:45.5
cannot talk
23:45.9
about it
23:46.3
up until
23:46.9
today in
23:47.3
Indonesia
23:47.6
this issue
23:48.1
cannot be
23:48.6
discussed
23:49.0
I mean
23:49.5
I was
23:50.5
doing
23:52.1
I take
23:53.6
Indonesian
23:54.0
lessons
23:54.4
and I have
23:54.8
an online
23:55.2
Indonesian
23:55.6
teacher
23:56.0
my
23:56.2
Indonesian
23:56.6
teacher
23:56.9
doesn't
23:57.2
want to
23:57.5
believe
23:57.8
me
23:58.1
when I
23:58.4
say that
23:58.7
there were
23:59.1
mass killings
23:59.7
in 1965
24:00.6
and mass
24:01.1
graves
24:01.4
he doesn't
24:02.9
want to
24:03.1
believe me
24:03.7
it's just
24:04.0
new
24:05.0
information
24:05.6
to me
24:06.4
grabe
24:08.3
no
24:08.5
it's
24:09.7
talagang
24:10.1
mass
24:10.3
amnesia
24:10.9
and the
24:12.3
Oppenheimer
24:12.7
documentary
24:13.2
it's crazy
24:14.0
because the
24:14.5
people who
24:14.9
are involved
24:15.4
in the
24:15.8
pogroms
24:17.2
were so
24:17.9
proud
24:18.4
they
24:19.4
did it
24:20.1
in a
24:20.4
mafioso
24:20.8
way
24:21.2
and they
24:25.8
reenacted
24:26.5
the
24:26.7
massacres
24:27.3
they were
24:27.5
doing
24:27.7
and then
24:28.1
the
24:29.0
incredible
24:29.6
thing about
24:30.1
the
24:30.2
documentary
24:30.6
is that
24:30.9
you realize
24:31.3
as they
24:31.7
reenacted
24:32.5
they
24:33.0
realized
24:33.6
wait
24:33.9
parang may
24:34.4
ginawa kaming
24:35.2
mali
24:35.6
but they're
24:36.0
still in
24:36.3
denial of
24:36.8
it
24:36.9
so
24:37.0
it's
24:37.9
a very
24:38.5
harrowing
24:39.2
and
24:39.4
haunting
24:39.8
kind of
24:40.3
documentary
24:40.8
about
24:41.1
this
24:41.4
essentially
24:41.9
repressed
24:42.7
part of
24:43.6
Indonesia's
24:44.7
more or
24:45.4
less
24:45.5
contemporary
24:46.1
history
24:46.6
this is
24:47.0
1960s
24:47.9
this is
24:48.2
not
24:48.4
yeah
24:48.8
yeah
24:49.2
yeah
24:49.4
we should
24:50.2
do an
24:51.2
episode
24:51.5
on
24:51.9
Indonesia
24:52.9
so
24:54.2
you know
24:55.5
that's what
24:55.8
I'm saying
24:56.1
now of
24:56.4
course
24:56.5
Philippines
24:56.8
is not
24:57.2
Indonesia
24:57.6
Philippines
24:58.1
is not
24:58.4
Thailand
24:58.7
Philippines
24:59.1
is not
24:59.4
Vietnam
24:59.7
but I'm
25:00.1
saying if
25:00.4
there's
25:00.5
some
25:00.7
lessons
25:01.0
to draw
25:01.5
from our
25:01.9
neighbors
25:02.3
and all
25:02.8
I don't
25:03.7
know it
25:03.9
looks like
25:04.3
a Thailand
25:04.8
one seems
25:05.3
to be
25:05.6
the most
25:06.0
you know
25:07.8
how should
25:08.8
I say
25:09.1
the least
25:09.8
radical
25:10.3
but not
25:10.9
necessarily
25:11.2
the worst
25:11.8
one
25:12.2
right
25:12.7
I am
25:13.4
all for
25:14.0
radical
25:14.6
reforms
25:15.1
but not
25:15.5
for radical
25:16.4
methods
25:17.1
actually
25:18.3
I super
25:19.5
agree
25:22.1
I don't
25:22.5
believe
25:23.1
in Singapore
25:23.7
envy
25:24.1
it's not
25:25.0
a development
25:25.5
path that's
25:26.3
available to
25:27.0
us
25:27.3
I have
25:29.0
Bangkok
25:29.4
envy
25:29.8
I have
25:30.3
real
25:30.6
Bangkok
25:31.1
envy
25:31.4
every time
25:31.9
I go
25:32.2
to
25:32.4
Bangkok
25:32.6
I'm like
25:33.0
this is
25:33.8
what
25:34.6
Manila
25:34.9
could be
25:35.6
and I
25:36.1
think
25:36.4
it's a
25:38.4
fair
25:38.8
comparison
25:39.5
it's a
25:40.0
fair
25:40.2
challenge
25:40.7
we should
25:41.1
challenge
25:41.6
ourselves
25:42.0
to become
25:42.5
a little
25:43.2
bit more
25:43.6
like
25:43.8
Bangkok
25:44.2
Bangkok
25:44.5
is an
25:44.8
extremely
25:45.2
livable
25:45.6
place
25:46.1
I love
25:47.6
it
25:47.9
and
25:48.7
hopefully
25:49.8
Filipinas
25:50.6
can have
25:50.9
some
25:51.0
of course
25:51.6
you know
25:51.8
it's not
25:52.1
perfect
25:52.5
there's
25:53.4
an element
25:53.8
that
25:54.1
hides
25:54.6
the
25:55.6
poor
25:56.1
why
25:56.7
is
25:57.1
this
25:57.1
the
25:57.3
poor
25:57.7
in
25:57.9
the
25:58.0
urban
25:58.2
bank
25:58.5
because
25:58.7
it's
25:58.9
being
25:59.0
taken
25:59.4
away
25:59.6
there's
26:02.8
something
26:03.0
in
26:03.2
the
26:03.3
public
26:03.6
transportation
26:08.7
system
26:09.2
for
26:09.3
example
26:09.7
which is
26:10.0
a lot
26:10.2
better
26:10.4
than
26:10.6
ours
26:10.7
things
26:12.3
like
26:12.5
that
26:12.7
I
26:14.0
completely
26:14.3
agree
26:14.5
that's
26:14.8
why
26:15.0
I
26:15.2
know
26:15.4
on
26:15.7
the
26:15.8
surface
26:16.1
Philippines
26:16.4
and
26:16.6
Thailand
26:16.8
look
26:17.1
very
26:17.8
different
26:18.1
but
26:18.4
actually
26:18.7
they're
26:19.0
not
26:19.4
I
26:19.7
mean
26:20.4
if
26:20.5
they're
26:20.7
two
26:20.9
countries
26:21.2
that are
26:21.4
most
26:21.6
comparable
26:22.0
in
26:22.2
Southeast Asia
26:22.7
I would
26:22.9
say
26:23.0
Philippines
26:23.3
and
26:23.6
Thailand
26:23.8
and
26:24.3
if
26:24.4
you
26:24.4
were
26:24.5
in
26:24.7
Bangkok
26:25.1
25
26:25.6
years
26:26.0
ago
26:26.3
or
26:26.4
so
26:26.6
it
26:27.1
was
26:27.3
as
26:27.5
bad
26:27.8
as
26:28.0
Manila
26:28.4
in
26:28.6
terms
26:28.9
of
26:29.0
traffic
26:29.6
I
26:29.8
remember
26:31.9
the
26:32.1
last
26:32.3
time
26:32.4
I
26:32.6
was
26:33.1
next
26:36.4
to
26:36.6
the
26:37.2
main
26:37.5
rivers
26:37.9
and
26:38.0
you're
26:40.5
talking
26:40.7
to your
26:41.0
friends
26:41.6
about
26:41.9
democracy
26:42.5
and
26:42.7
we
26:44.2
were
26:44.9
wondering
26:45.2
can
26:45.5
I
26:45.6
do
26:45.7
the
26:45.9
same
26:46.1
thing
26:46.2
with
26:46.4
Pasig
26:46.8
River
26:47.1
one
26:47.4
day
26:47.6
can
26:48.0
I
26:48.2
write
26:48.5
about
26:48.7
Pasig
26:49.1
River
26:49.3
the
26:49.5
same
26:49.7
way
26:50.0
that
26:50.1
Rizal
26:50.6
was
26:50.8
writing
26:51.1
about
26:51.4
Pasig
26:51.7
River
26:51.9
when
26:52.2
Simon
26:52.5
was
26:52.8
coming
26:53.1
back
26:53.3
remember
26:53.6
the
26:53.8
opening
26:54.1
scenes
26:54.7
and
26:55.4
they
26:57.5
passed
27:00.6
through
27:00.8
Pasig
27:01.1
if
27:01.3
I'm
27:02.1
going
27:02.2
to
27:03.0
complete
27:03.4
Rizal's
27:03.9
trilogy
27:04.2
I'm
27:04.7
not
27:04.9
sure
27:05.1
I
27:05.2
want
27:05.3
to
27:05.5
start
27:05.7
with
27:05.9
Pasig
27:06.4
Pasig
27:08.5
is the
27:10.7
beating
27:10.9
heart
27:11.2
of
27:11.4
Manila
27:11.8
and
27:11.9
yet
27:12.2
you
27:12.7
I
27:12.9
don't
27:13.1
see
27:13.3
much
27:13.5
of
27:13.7
life
27:14.0
there
27:14.3
but
27:14.8
it
27:15.0
could
27:15.1
be
27:15.3
fixed
27:15.6
I
27:15.8
think
27:16.0
Bangkok
27:16.4
and
27:16.7
Thailand
27:16.9
providers
27:17.4
and
27:17.6
of
27:18.2
course
27:18.4
you
27:18.6
and
27:18.7
I
27:18.9
I'm
27:19.5
sure
27:19.6
you
27:19.7
can
27:19.9
relate
27:20.1
to
27:20.3
this
27:20.5
and
27:20.6
by
27:20.7
the
27:20.8
way
27:20.9
I
27:21.1
owe
27:21.2
you
27:21.4
a
27:21.5
nice
27:21.8
dinner
27:22.2
Thailand's
27:27.1
food
27:27.2
diplomacy
27:27.7
is
27:28.0
gold
27:28.3
standard
27:28.9
how
27:29.6
they
27:30.1
promote
27:30.7
it
27:30.9
in
27:31.0
a
27:31.2
systematic
27:31.8
conscious
27:32.7
way
27:33.3
Ministry
27:35.0
of
27:35.3
Trade
27:35.6
Ministry
27:36.2
of
27:36.5
Industry
27:37.1
Ministry
27:38.5
of
27:38.7
Foreign Affairs
27:39.1
they
27:39.3
bring
27:39.9
in
27:40.1
the
27:40.2
chefs
27:42.7
and
27:43.3
next
27:43.5
thing
27:43.7
you
27:43.8
know
27:43.9
global
27:44.3
Thailand
27:44.7
became
27:45.0
a
27:45.3
reality
27:45.9
so
27:46.2
I
27:46.3
think
27:46.5
Thailand
27:46.8
is
27:47.9
what
27:48.1
the
27:48.2
Philippines
27:48.5
can
27:48.8
become
27:49.1
if
27:49.4
we
27:49.5
get
27:49.7
some
27:49.8
of
27:49.9
the
27:50.0
basic
27:50.3
things
27:50.6
right
27:50.9
of
27:51.4
course
27:51.6
with
27:51.8
different
27:52.2
flavor
27:52.7
literally
27:53.2
and
27:53.4
figuratively
27:53.9
yeah
27:54.3
now
27:56.6
I
27:57.2
wanted to
27:57.6
end on
27:57.9
this
27:58.1
point
27:58.5
on
27:58.8
Thailand
27:59.5
because
28:00.2
of
28:00.9
course
28:01.1
I
28:01.2
think
28:01.4
but
28:02.1
this
28:02.7
is
28:02.9
our
28:03.0
favorite
28:03.3
thing
28:03.6
industrial
28:04.1
policy
28:04.6
I
28:04.8
keep
28:05.0
on
28:05.2
bringing
28:05.4
this
28:05.6
up
28:05.8
in
28:05.9
fact
28:06.0
the
28:06.1
other
28:06.3
day
28:06.4
I
28:06.5
was
28:06.6
just
28:12.7
talking
28:27.7
about
28:27.7
me
28:27.9
right
28:28.2
I'm
28:28.8
of
28:28.9
course
28:29.1
they
28:29.2
should
28:29.5
but
28:29.8
but
28:30.5
it's
28:30.6
because
28:30.8
the
28:31.0
Philippines
28:31.3
is
28:31.6
more
28:31.8
important
28:32.2
or
28:32.7
let's
28:32.8
put
28:33.0
it
28:33.1
nicely
28:33.4
why
28:33.8
do
28:33.9
you
28:34.0
think
28:34.1
they
28:34.3
bothered
28:34.5
to
28:34.7
meet
28:35.1
BBM
28:35.8
so
28:36.1
much
28:36.4
not
28:36.6
because
28:36.7
BBM
28:37.0
is
28:37.3
the
28:37.9
next
28:38.2
level
28:38.5
leader
28:38.7
no
28:38.9
it's
28:39.0
because
28:39.2
Philippines
28:39.6
is
28:39.8
becoming
28:40.1
more
28:40.4
important
28:40.8
it's
28:41.0
in
28:41.2
a
28:41.3
strategic
28:41.6
sweet
28:41.9
spot
28:42.2
but
28:42.7
parati
28:43.1
ko
28:43.2
sinasabi
28:43.7
sana
28:44.1
it
28:44.3
goes
28:44.6
more
28:45.1
and
28:45.6
in
28:45.7
fact
28:45.9
our
28:46.3
Japanese
28:46.7
friends
28:47.0
were
28:47.2
saying
28:47.4
they're
28:47.6
interested
28:47.9
in
28:48.2
green
28:48.5
infrastructure
28:49.0
investment
28:49.8
they're
28:50.6
interested
28:51.6
in
28:51.8
making
28:51.9
the
28:52.1
Philippines
28:52.4
an
28:52.7
auto
28:53.5
manufacturing
28:54.1
hub
28:54.6
just
28:55.1
like
28:55.3
all
28:56.5
of
28:57.3
these
28:57.4
things
28:57.7
music
28:58.1
to
28:58.3
my
28:58.4
ear
28:58.6
but
28:59.1
of
28:59.2
course
28:59.3
always
28:59.8
politely
29:00.2
you'll
29:00.6
hear
29:00.7
something
29:01.0
in
29:01.2
between
29:01.4
the
29:01.6
lines
29:01.8
by
29:02.0
our
29:02.2
counterparts
29:02.7
not
29:03.2
necessarily
29:03.4
Japanese
29:03.9
only
29:04.2
sana
29:04.9
ayusin
29:05.3
ng
29:05.4
konti
29:05.7
yung
29:05.9
infrastructure
29:06.5
sana
29:06.9
ayusin
29:07.1
ng
29:07.2
konti
29:07.4
yung
29:07.5
corruption
29:07.9
sana
29:08.3
ayusin
29:08.6
konti
29:08.9
yung
29:09.0
red
29:09.3
tape
29:09.5
so
29:10.3
I don't
29:10.8
know
29:10.9
I'm
29:11.0
just
29:11.2
saying
29:11.5
this
29:11.8
industrial
29:12.2
policy
29:12.6
thing
29:12.8
is
29:13.0
just
29:13.2
not
29:13.4
sexy
29:13.9
again
29:14.5
I think
29:15.4
it's
29:15.5
very
29:15.7
sensible
29:16.2
in
29:17.5
the
29:17.6
case
29:17.7
of
29:17.8
the
29:18.0
Philippines
29:18.2
because
29:18.6
we're
29:18.8
getting
29:19.1
all
29:19.2
of
29:19.3
this
29:19.4
attention
29:19.8
and all
29:20.2
you know
29:20.4
that's
29:21.2
just
29:21.3
really
29:21.6
where
29:21.7
I'm
29:21.9
coming
29:22.1
from
29:22.4
in
29:23.3
terms
29:23.5
of
29:23.7
this
29:24.0
constant
29:24.5
emphasis
29:24.9
on
29:25.1
industrial
29:25.4
policy
29:25.8
and
29:26.1
of
29:26.6
course
29:26.8
just
29:27.1
connected
29:28.0
dun sa
29:28.3
conversation
29:28.9
natin
29:29.2
today
29:37.2
security
29:37.8
and
29:38.0
order
29:38.3
the
29:38.8
ADB
29:39.2
had a
29:39.4
very
29:39.6
good
29:39.8
paper
29:40.2
a few
29:40.4
years
29:40.7
ago
29:40.8
that
29:41.0
showed
29:41.4
the
29:41.6
synchronicity
29:42.6
you need
29:43.2
between
29:43.6
agricultural
29:44.4
development
29:45.0
and
29:45.2
manufacturing
29:45.8
development
29:46.3
because
29:47.0
the
29:47.1
problem
29:47.3
with
29:47.4
the
29:47.5
Philippines
29:47.8
is
29:48.0
service
29:48.8
oriented
29:49.4
economy
29:49.9
low
29:50.4
to
29:51.3
medium
29:51.6
end
29:51.8
service
29:52.1
oriented
29:52.7
industry
29:53.1
economy
29:53.9
most
29:54.5
of
29:54.6
our
29:54.7
conglomerates
29:55.7
are not
29:56.2
car
29:56.8
manufacturers
29:57.4
or
29:57.8
high
29:58.0
tech
29:58.2
manufacturers
29:58.8
they
29:59.5
are
29:59.7
you
29:59.8
know
30:00.2
I
30:01.2
almost
30:01.7
said
30:02.0
land
30:02.2
grabber
30:02.6
of
30:02.8
course
30:02.9
I
30:03.0
didn't
30:03.2
mean
30:03.4
that
30:03.7
real
30:05.2
estate
30:05.8
mayroon
30:07.1
din
30:07.6
baka
30:09.0
yung
30:09.2
isa
30:09.5
hindi
30:13.0
naman
30:13.4
okay
30:13.7
okay
30:14.0
wag na
30:14.3
tayo
30:14.5
mag
30:14.7
name
30:14.9
drop
30:15.1
masyado
30:15.7
baka
30:16.6
papagalitan
30:17.5
tayo
30:17.9
baka
30:18.2
bobo
30:18.6
ba
30:18.7
kayo
30:19.1
ayan
30:20.6
alright
30:21.3
thank you
30:22.4
very much
30:22.8
I enjoyed
30:23.3
this
30:23.6
I really
30:24.2
enjoyed
30:24.6
our
30:24.7
discussion
30:25.1
our
30:25.3
culture
30:25.5
next
30:26.1
episode
30:26.3
now
30:26.5
let's
30:26.7
go to
30:27.0
the
30:27.1
issue
30:27.2
of
30:27.4
coup
30:27.6
civil
30:28.9
military
30:29.3
relations
30:29.8
in
30:30.0
the
30:30.1
Philippines
30:30.6
I
30:31.2
think
30:31.4
Thailand
30:31.7
is a
30:32.0
great
30:32.2
country
30:32.6
to
30:32.8
end
30:33.1
Thailand
30:33.7
is a
30:34.0
great
30:35.3
country
30:35.6
to
30:35.8
end
30:35.8
to
30:35.9
start
30:36.2
with
30:36.3
for
30:36.5
our
30:36.7
next
30:36.9
episode
30:37.3
because
30:37.8
when it
30:38.1
comes to
30:38.3
coup
30:38.5
data
30:38.7
that's
30:39.1
where I
30:39.3
think
30:39.6
we
30:39.9
should
30:40.1
not
30:40.4
I
30:40.8
think
30:43.3
perfect
30:43.7
transition
30:44.8
salamat
30:45.5
thank you