The following bullet points summarize the specific topics discussed in the Tagalog video:

- The speaker poses a question to the audience about whether Atty. Libayan is a liar or not and encourages viewers to comment with their answer and reasons.
- The discussion revolves around a claim made by Atty. Libayan regarding the start date of his YouTube presence.
- Atty. Libayan reportedly claimed he had not started on YouTube by 2019. This statement is examined for its truthfulness.
- A petition on regulating Rafi Tulfo's programs is mentioned, which allegedly began on November 22, 2019, and the speaker expresses surprise at this fact.
- The petition, which was started four years prior to the video, had 101 signatures and was attributed to someone called "para kay Juan."
- The speaker suggests that even though anyone can start a petition, it is not guaranteed to gain support.
- Atty. Libayan's claim of not being on YouTube in 2019 is called into question as the speaker examines data from Social Blade.
- Social Blade indicates that Atty. Libayan actually commenced his social media presence in 2016, three years before the time mentioned in the petition.
- The speaker further investigates the starting period of Atty. Libayan's social media accounts, showing evidence that his YouTube channel had content from five years ago, contradicting Atty. Libayan's claim about when he started on social media.
- The audience is left with the implication that there is a discrepancy between Atty. Libayan's statement and the actual start date of his YouTube activity, inviting the viewers to comment on who they believe is lying.

The video seems to be addressing a discrepancy about someone's stated online presence and the actual data available on that topic.