ICC PROSECUTOR PWEDE MAG IMBESTIGA! VIETNAM AT CHINA PROBLEMA NG AFP SA WPS.
00:35.6
Thank you, thank you.
00:37.2
And Sibla, thank you.
00:39.4
Estrelita, Esther, Roseland, Japan.
00:43.4
Thursday morning nga po ngayon.
00:45.8
Uy, katapusan na pala ng November.
00:49.8
November 30 sa Pilipinas.
00:52.1
Philippine Standard Time, 5.53 pa lang pala.
00:59.3
Hopefully, okay ang ating signal.
01:03.2
Salamat o, Darwin Jose Civil.
01:07.3
Salamat, Martin Marquez ng US.
01:14.3
Bill Ma, Dang Tayan.
01:16.5
Salamat, good morning.
01:18.2
Morning po sa inyo.
01:20.1
Medyo Aquino ng Las Vegas.
01:22.7
Kung may mga ganda lugar na dito, namimiss ko tuloy.
01:26.3
Ayan, si Bill Ma pala ay taga London.
01:31.4
9.52 p.m. sa kanila.
01:34.8
Sa Europe, kasi iba-iba rin ang oras.
01:37.3
Merong alas 10 na, merong alas 11 na.
01:39.3
Ayan naman, mga alas 10.
01:41.2
Pero gabi pa lang sa kanila.
01:42.6
Matutulog pa lang ang mga taga Europe.
01:45.0
At saka ho, taga Middle East.
01:47.1
Ibang oras sa kanila.
01:48.3
Joseph Ko, ano ha?
01:50.3
Ha, Willie, thank you.
01:53.6
Sabadin, thank you.
02:06.0
Si sa akladay, taga Australia.
02:08.3
Alejandro Pereira.
02:11.6
Salamat po sa inyo.
02:13.4
Adelaida Bosalpa.
02:19.0
Hinita or Magtibay.
02:21.4
Ba, taga patangga siya tayo, Magtibay ha.
02:35.6
Morning, morning.
02:36.6
Rominito Corbita.
02:38.7
Uy, maraming nag-PPM sa akin.
02:41.3
Sir Mike, hindi nyo nababanggit yung aming pangalan.
02:44.0
Pakishut out naman.
02:46.1
Pag hindi po kayo nakasama dito sa live,
02:50.4
hindi ko makikita talaga yun.
02:52.6
Ang inyong mga pangalan after.
02:54.8
Doon sa mga, sa comment section.
02:56.9
Doon ko makikita.
02:57.8
Pero mamaya pa yun.
02:58.6
Pero, pagka whole live at sumali kayo sa live,
03:02.0
dito ko makikita nyo yung mga pangalan.
03:03.6
So, ito binabanggit ko.
03:07.8
Mr. Reyes, good morning.
03:10.8
Estelita Estereiro.
03:11.8
Silaging kasama sa live natin.
03:19.3
Thank you, thank you.
03:25.1
Arlene Ocampo ng New York.
03:29.4
Basta sumali po kayo ng live.
03:31.6
Facebook and YouTube channel.
03:34.4
Sige, salamat po.
03:36.3
Helen Villanueva.
03:40.4
Ito yung ating pag-usapan ngayon.
03:42.6
Kasi kahapon, talagang, alam nyo, matyaga akong mag-monitor, eh.
03:46.6
Nakapalo po ako sa Senado, sa Kongreso, at saka RTBM.
03:50.4
Salamat sa Radio TV Malacanang.
03:52.3
Lahat ng activities ng Pangulo na mamonitor ko yan.
03:54.9
Kasi ang RTBM ang nagmamonitor.
03:60.0
Yung iskla, Bella.
04:04.1
Kahapon, kung di ako nakakamali, mga hapat na oras yata yung hearing ng committee.
04:07.5
Dalawang committee kasi.
04:08.8
Committee on Justice at Committee on Human Rights.
04:14.0
Ang topic nga po ay yung tungkol sa tatlong resolusyon ng Kongreso.
04:17.9
Dalawang resolusyon doon, ang gusto nila makipag-coordinate ang gobyerno sa ICC.
04:23.5
Yun namang isang resolusyon doon, yung 1477, kung di ako nakakamali, ni Lagman,
04:28.6
Ang purpose doon, inuutosan niya, inaatasan niya,
04:31.7
ang lahat ng agency ng pamahalaan makipag-coordinate sa ICC.
04:35.2
So kahapon po, pangalawang hearing.
04:37.5
At tinapos na nila.
04:39.1
Grabe ho yung, ano, grabe ho yung mga opinion, interpretation, suggestion,
04:45.0
at yung opinion ng matindi ng mga legal expert.
04:47.8
Sa gobyerno, nandun si Sekretary Edardo Guevara,
04:53.8
dating Justice Sekretary, ngayon Solicitor General ng Marcos Administration.
04:57.1
Tapos yung may mga taga-UP, may mga oposisyon, may mga polis, at may mga taga-CHR.
05:06.4
So sa tindi po ng mga opinion at tanungan, lumabas doon at ilang beses inulit
05:11.5
ni Sekretary Guevara, dating Justice Sekretary ng panahon ni Duterte,
05:16.0
at ngayon eh, Solicitor General,
05:18.6
pwede palang pumasok, ICC Prosecutor, pwede palang pumasok,
05:23.0
pwedeng mag-imbestiga.
05:24.4
Dahil hindi daw naman pinipigilan yung Prosecutor,
05:27.1
kasi iba yung Prosecutor mag-iimbestiga.
05:29.6
So yung pag-iimbestiga pala ng International Criminal Court Prosecutor,
05:34.3
hindi pala yun, no?
05:35.7
Hindi pala pinagbabawal nila yun.
05:40.2
Pwede mag-imbestiga pala.
05:42.7
Dahil yun ang panayawala nila ng Solicitor General,
05:48.5
pwede mag-imbestiga ang ICC Prosecutor.
05:54.8
syempre nag-question and answer mga Kongresman,
05:57.1
itinanong ngayon yung mga nandodon kung sila'y willing bang makipag-coordinate.
06:00.9
Iyan, inamin ng PNP na sila'y willing makipag-coordinate kung papasok ang Prosecutor.
06:06.5
Ang CHR, ganun din.
06:08.6
Ang medyo nakakalito lang, bakit ng PNP walang official record
06:11.7
kung ilan ang victim casualties dun po sa kampanyang niyan
06:17.8
ng nakarang administrasyon sa illegal drugs?
06:20.7
Kasi sa record ng Department of Justice kahapon,
06:23.7
dyan sa hearing na yan lumabas,
06:25.4
7,732 yung casualties.
06:31.4
Fatalities, ano, ganun ang karami.
06:33.4
Kala natin 6,000 lang, hindi pala.
06:35.4
7,732 yung victim.
06:39.4
Casualties po ito. Wala nang buhay ito.
06:41.4
Pero sa CHR, ang natanggap nilang formal complaint o reklamo o nag-file ng kaso
06:49.4
dahil nga sa human rights violation ay mahigit lang 3,900, more or less 4,000.
06:55.4
Walang kalaw na 4,000 yung kasong nakarating sa CHR.
07:00.4
So magsusumiti pa raw sila ng panilang record.
07:06.4
Obvious naman ha, di naman talaga maglalabas na official record ang PNP kung di mo hihingan.
07:11.4
Kasi sila nga yung involved dyan eh.
07:13.4
Dahil sila yung inatasan sa War on Drugs campaign ng nakarang administrasyon.
07:18.4
So kung inyo pong gustong madeneg or review,
07:23.4
i-reviewin po ninyo yung public hearing kahapon.
07:26.4
Medyo mahaba, 4 hours.
07:27.4
Alas 10 yata yan.
07:28.4
Tapos alas 2 na yan.
07:29.4
At doon po nagkaroon talaga ng ano.
07:31.4
Medyo naipig dyan si Sigar, si Solicitor General Guevara.
07:35.4
Pero sinagot naman niya ang lahat.
07:37.4
Misa may mga pagkakataon parang naging redanda na.
07:40.4
Pero yung, yung tanong isa yung,
07:42.4
pwede bang mag-imbestiga ang ICC prosecutor?
07:45.4
Sabi niya, pwede silang pumasok.
07:46.4
Hindi naman namin pwedeng pigilan yan eh.
07:50.4
So, syempre, iba yun.
07:51.4
At yun ang gusto ng mga tao.
07:52.4
Inungin ang gusto ng iba.
07:54.4
Pero may mga limit ang galaw.
07:57.4
So, at ang issue kong isa na lumabas, nilabas ni dating congressman,
08:01.4
Atty. Eric Colminares,
08:04.4
ay yung mga basic or dahilan.
08:08.4
Mga dahilan kung bakit sila nagpunta ng International Criminal Court.
08:13.4
Bakit doon nagpunta yung mga komplena.
08:15.4
Sandali. Pakilig ko nga sa inyo ito.
08:17.4
Kasi may mga importante siyang pinakita
08:21.4
kung ano ang mga dahilan.
08:23.4
Noong 2017 pa pala eh.
08:25.4
Noong magpayas sila ng kaso, member pa tayo ng ICC.
08:29.4
Sandali ah kung makukuha natin.
08:31.4
Palagi kong makukuha naman ito.
08:34.4
Kasi malinaw naman.
08:38.4
At importanteng maraming yan eh.
08:40.4
It's a bit of a timeline, Mr. Chair.
08:42.4
Since 1996, the Philippines under President Ramos
08:46.4
took an active role in the ICC's establishment
08:49.4
and was even a member of the drafting committee,
08:52.4
which is what Gilbert just said.
08:54.4
So we did not only sign the Rome Statute,
08:57.4
we helped draft it, Mr. Chair.
08:59.4
Kaya later on, yung claims to sovereignty,
09:02.4
parang nagsintunado siya, Mr. Chair,
09:04.4
kasi we helped draft the Rome Statute.
09:06.4
December 28, 2001, it was signed or ratified by President Estrada.
09:12.4
And August 30, 2011, with the support of President Taquino,
09:16.4
the Senate concurred in the ratification.
09:18.4
Three presidents, Mr. Chair,
09:20.4
from different political parties,
09:22.4
President Ramos of Lacaz,
09:24.4
President Estrada of Partido ng Masang Pilipino,
09:27.4
President Aquino of Liberal Party,
09:30.4
all supported the Rome Statute.
09:32.4
It is not something personal.
09:34.4
It is not about any person in a sense
09:38.4
because all political parties supported it
09:42.4
and it was really supported by the Philippine government.
09:50.4
Atty. Jude Sabio files a case
09:52.4
called communication,
09:53.4
they call it communication,
09:54.4
before the ICC firm was murdered.
09:58.4
Sen. Trillanes in 2017 filed a supplement there.
10:02.4
it was filed before the Philippine withdrew.
10:06.4
On August 18, 2018,
10:08.4
Rise Up for Life and AJK Victims
10:11.4
and disclosure, Mr. Chair,
10:13.4
I'm one of the councils of the families of AJK victims,
10:16.4
we filed the case in August of 2018.
10:19.4
And mainly, of course,
10:20.4
those complaints mainly centered on a President,
10:23.4
a former President Duterte.
10:25.4
That's why we keep on asking,
10:27.4
is he being prosecuted?
10:29.4
Because that is in relation to what Gilbert,
10:33.4
Atty. Gilbert just said.
10:35.4
Precisely, it was a question of the victims of the family.
10:38.4
On March 17, 2019,
10:40.4
the Philippines withdrew.
10:42.4
So, before the Philippines withdrew,
10:44.4
was there a matter,
10:45.4
under consideration by the ICC?
10:48.4
The answer is yes.
10:49.4
It was already filed before that.
10:51.4
It's a matter under consideration.
10:53.4
If you look at Article 127 later on,
10:55.4
we will find out what our interpretation is.
10:59.4
Next slide, please.
11:01.4
So, next slide, please.
11:04.4
So, on November 23, 2021,
11:08.4
the Office of the Prosecutor
11:10.4
the first investigation giving the Philippines 30 days.
11:13.4
That was the request of the Philippines.
11:16.4
Up to December 22.
11:20.4
the Philippines again sought for a 3-month extension.
11:23.4
More or less up to March.
11:25.4
The Prosecutor granted the request again.
11:28.4
And when did the ICC start the pre-trial chamber,
11:33.4
authorize the prosecution?
11:35.4
It was in 2023, Mr. Chair.
11:37.4
Ibig sabihin, mula 2021, 22, 23,
11:41.4
binigyan ng ICC ang Pilipinas ng extension, in a sense,
11:45.4
sige, sabihin niyo,
11:46.4
ang iniimbestigan niyo ba?
11:47.4
Pinoprosecute niyo ba?
11:49.4
Hindi ito parang inapakan ng ICC ang Pilipinas eh.
11:52.4
So, on 26 January of 2023,
11:55.4
after appeals by the Philippines,
11:58.4
the pre-trial chamber authorized the prosecution
12:01.4
to resume investigation.
12:02.4
Mahaba na po ang nangyari.
12:08.4
But that's because
12:09.4
the ICC recognized the due process rights
12:12.4
of the Philippine government.
12:13.4
Gusto niyo mag-a-a-a,
12:14.4
gusto niyo mag-imbestiga?
12:15.4
Sige, imbestiga kayo.
12:16.4
We'll give you a chance.
12:17.4
Gusto niyo mag-prosecute?
12:18.4
Sige, prosecute kayo.
12:19.4
We'll give you the chance.
12:20.4
But in 2023, sabihin ng ICC,
12:22.4
Mahaba na nito eh.
12:23.4
So, on July 18 of 2023,
12:24.4
the ICC appeals chamber
12:25.4
will allow the prosecutor
12:26.4
to continue the investigation.
12:27.4
So, yun ang timeline.
12:28.4
Next slide, please.
12:30.4
ang binabanggit na complementarity provision,
12:31.4
which the government,
12:33.4
may nilabanggit na
12:35.4
may nilabanggit na
12:37.4
may nilabanggit na
12:39.4
may nilabanggit na
12:46.4
Ang sabi ng 17 ang court,
12:50.4
inadmissible ang isang kaso
12:52.4
against certain person.
12:55.4
if the case is being investigated
12:57.4
or prosecuted by a State
12:59.4
with just jurisdiction over it.
13:01.4
So, ang tanong na naman
13:04.4
kung soong tingnan niyo yan
13:06.4
yun ang crucial sentence.
13:08.4
Yung unless the State
13:10.4
is unwilling or unable
13:11.4
to carry out the investigation
13:13.4
Sin舞tas Iceland to
13:14.4
will only be triggered
13:16.1
if there is prosecution.
13:19.0
If there is no prosecution,
13:20.8
it is not even an issue for the ICC.
13:23.9
Sabihin ng ICC, sabihin ng Pilipinas,
13:26.5
eh, willing naman kami.
13:27.6
Yeah, yeah, okay, you're willing, you're able,
13:29.7
your justice system is functioning,
13:31.6
but are you prosecuting him?
13:35.4
Aba, kung usapan natin.
13:37.3
You're not prosecuting him.
13:40.1
So, why do you even get?
13:43.4
O, yeah, yeah, sige lang.
13:45.4
But if you're not prosecuting him,
13:47.3
may jurisdiction ng ICC.
13:49.4
It's a proof stage formula, Mr. Chair.
13:53.3
And the willingness and the inability
13:55.9
only becomes an issue
13:57.8
if the state is prosecuting.
14:00.3
Kasi pag pinaprosecute mo
14:01.6
at sabihin ng mga biktima,
14:03.5
actually, unyari lang yan,
14:05.3
hindi naman yan, hindi genuine.
14:07.7
As Attorney Andres said,
14:09.4
hindi naman genuine.
14:12.1
di yung defense naman ng kabila,
14:16.9
Doon nalang yan pag-usapan.
14:18.5
But as long as you're not prosecuting
14:20.4
or investigating that person,
14:22.3
there is even no need to talk
14:24.3
about your willingness.
14:25.8
Because you may be able,
14:28.3
but you're not investigating
14:31.3
So, next slide, please, Mr. Chair.
14:34.1
I think I'm just three slides.
14:35.7
Ano ang definition?
14:36.7
Sige na, pumunta na tayo sa unwillingness
14:38.8
kung gusto nating pag-usapan,
14:41.3
although sinasabi ko it's not even an issue.
14:43.4
Anong definition ng Article 17,
14:47.0
Unwillingness is,
14:48.1
the proceedings are being undertaken
14:50.1
was made for the purpose of
14:52.4
shielding the person concerned
14:54.0
from criminal responsibility.
14:56.3
Ibig sabihin, yung prosecution,
14:58.1
actually, intention,
14:59.5
kunyak-kunyari lang,
15:00.5
but actually to shield the person.
15:02.8
In that case, kahit pinuprosecute nyo,
15:06.1
may jurisdiction kami,
15:07.8
you're actually trying to shield him.
15:10.7
Or, look at Letter B,
15:13.4
sa Paragraph B, Mr. Chair.
15:15.5
There has been an unjustified delay in the proceedings.
15:18.6
Hindi ba delay yun?
15:19.6
2017, 2018 pa na,
15:21.7
2023 na, wala pang kaso.
15:24.3
So, that actually already shows your unwillingness
15:27.9
under the definition of the Rome Statute
15:30.4
which we have draft.
15:32.8
We have draft that provision.
15:35.1
So, we cannot now say,
15:37.1
we didn't intend that.
15:38.5
Kasi, you have draft it.
15:41.7
the moment you're committing unjustification,
15:42.9
unjustified delay in the proceedings,
15:44.8
you're unwilling.
15:45.7
We agreed to that.
15:48.1
So, or the proceedings were not conducted
15:50.4
independently or impartially.
15:52.6
So, I don't see any debate at all
15:55.4
on Section, on Article 17,
15:58.2
on complementarity, Mr. Chair.
16:01.3
Kasi, ang tanong lang naman,
16:03.1
itong prosecute nyo ba yung tao,
16:04.5
hindi itapos ang usapan, di ba?
16:07.1
Last two slides, I think, Mr. Chair.
16:09.4
Next slide, please.
16:10.8
So, why does ICC have to do this?
16:12.8
ICC has jurisdiction over the case in 2017-2018.
16:15.8
Well, tingin namin,
16:17.3
because it was President Duterte
16:19.6
who was the main,
16:20.9
kung baga, accused or responded then.
16:24.1
Tingin namin, it's not being prosecuted.
16:27.1
So, the ICC has jurisdiction.
16:30.5
And then, of course, unwillingness.
16:32.8
Yun na naman, naihingi ng pamilya ng biktima,
16:36.8
In fact, nagpumunta sila sa amin
16:38.8
noong panahon yun.
16:41.1
attorney, pwede ba kami mag-file dito?
16:42.8
Sabi ko, pag nag-file kayo dito against him,
16:45.7
madi-dismiss ng korte yan.
16:48.3
Eh, he will claim presidential immunity.
16:55.2
O di, saan kami mag-file?
16:57.0
So, ICC na lang muna tayo.
16:59.9
Kaya nasasaktan ako
17:02.0
pag binibira ang pamilya ng biktima
17:05.1
ba't doon kayo pumunta?
17:06.8
Ba't doon kayo dumulog?
17:09.3
Eh, papa, dismiss mo yung kaso
17:14.0
that's really for me
17:17.0
na naghanap na nga
17:18.2
ng paraan ng ustisya
17:19.5
ang mga pamilya ng biktima
17:20.8
tapos durug-durugin mo
17:24.4
That's my opinion, Mr. Chair.
17:32.3
ito na yun na nga.
17:34.9
Pialiwanag niya yung mga proseso.
17:38.4
yung nag-file ng kaso
17:40.7
So, binigyan ng pagkakataon
17:43.5
mula 27 hanggang 22
17:46.8
ang Philippine government.
17:48.8
Hindi naman nila pinakikialaman
17:49.9
at hindi naman pinipigilan.
17:51.5
Mayroong jurisdiction
17:52.2
ng Philippine government
17:55.1
Mag-file ng kaso.
17:56.1
Eh, mukhang hindi naman po
17:58.8
itaniliwanag na rin.
18:00.2
Paano nga nga gagalaw
18:08.8
hindi talaga gagalaw.
18:09.8
Kasi ang iba pa nila,
18:11.6
ang kakasuhon nila,
18:14.1
Ay, ang presidente nga po
18:15.2
sa ilalim ng saligang batas
18:16.5
hindi pwedeng kasuhan
18:20.7
hitting president,
18:21.6
hindi pwedeng kasuhan
18:23.3
mayroong immunity.
18:26.3
Hindi siya pwedeng kasuhan
18:27.2
sa ilalim ng saligang batas.
18:28.7
So, yun ang dahilan.
18:31.1
at doon sila nag-file ng kaso.
18:33.9
Yun ang lumalabas ngayon.
18:35.2
Na lagi sinisising.
18:38.7
jurisdiction ng Pilipinas.
18:40.3
Sayang yung ating mga batas.
18:41.7
Sayang yung ating
18:43.8
tayo may karapatan.
18:45.3
So, ayun pala yung dahilan.
18:47.6
pero hindi ginawa.
18:52.4
at bigyan ng justisya
19:00.1
E, paano mo kakasuhan
19:05.2
sa lahat ng kaso.
19:06.5
Ayun ang mga issue.
19:13.4
sinasabi ni Col. Minaris
19:18.5
at mag-file ng kaso.
19:23.0
gusto na silang pumasok.
19:24.7
Tapos, yun na nga
19:25.3
nagkaroon po ng mahaba
19:26.4
kasi apat na oras
19:28.1
Hindi naman debate.
19:31.8
sa yung mga nag-uusap.
19:33.9
Si Sekretary Guibara
19:34.9
siya ang kinatawa ng gobyerno
19:36.7
Hindi siya naipit
19:37.3
kung hindi umamin siya.
19:39.1
hindi naman nila pinipigilan
19:40.3
ang ICC Prosecutor.
19:46.6
Pwedeng mag-imbestiga
19:47.7
ang ICC Prosecutor
19:49.2
dyan sa kaso ngayon.
19:51.8
tinanong ng mga congressman
19:53.9
na makipag-coordinate?
19:57.2
willing daw sila.
20:00.9
makipag-coordinate
20:05.5
kung papasok sila.
20:06.7
Kaya kung papasok sila
20:07.8
huwag na tayo magulat
20:09.1
pala ang nangyari.
20:11.2
Kaya nga ako tinapos
20:12.0
nakahapon yung hearing
20:16.2
Committee on Justice.
20:18.6
yung mga pro-Duterte
20:24.7
or mga ka-Duterte,
20:27.7
yung nangyari niya
20:29.6
maintindihan niya.
20:31.1
Wala tayong magagawa.
20:33.3
pipilitin kayo ng Congress
20:34.2
maniwala kayo o hindi.
20:35.4
Ang aking binabalita rito,
20:39.1
Dahil trabaho ko yun.
20:42.5
dito sa aking channel,
20:43.4
ibalita ang nangyari.
20:44.6
Yun ang nangyari.
20:46.1
At walang fake news diyan.
20:47.1
Hindi tayo katulad
20:48.3
na nagpe-fake news.
20:50.2
Kung hindi kayo naniniwala,
20:53.4
puntahan nyo yung record
20:55.5
Yung apat na oras.
20:56.4
Hindi ko naman kasi pwede
20:58.1
yung apat na oras na hearing.
21:01.1
Puntahan nyo yung hearing na yan.
21:02.9
Nakarecord naman yun
21:04.5
Nandun yung palitan
21:05.4
ng mga paliwanag.
21:06.6
Dun yung pag-amin
21:08.5
na pwedeng pumasok
21:10.4
ang ICC prosecutor
21:14.6
Although kanyang pinaninindigan
21:15.9
na inirespeto niya
21:17.9
siyempre ang Pangulo
21:18.7
kung ano ang magiging desisyon.
21:21.1
Kasi sabi ni Guevara kahapon,
21:23.2
dalawang isyo sinabi niya.
21:25.5
ng Pangulong Marcos,
21:28.2
ay yung kung tayo
21:35.0
ni Guevara on record yan.
21:37.2
para malinaw lang,
21:38.1
ang sinabi ng Pangulo,
21:39.7
aaralin ang malalim
21:41.0
ng Office of the President,
21:44.0
kukonsultahin ng lahat
21:45.6
kung dapat tayong bumalik
21:47.2
o hindi as member.
21:49.5
Tapos sinabi niya,
21:50.4
ang paninindigan ng Pangulo,
21:52.0
ayaw niyang pumasok
21:56.1
Kasi baka sinasabing
22:01.3
hindi po magkaiba.
22:02.3
Ang sinasabing aaralin
22:03.4
yung pagiging member
22:04.5
kung tayo may babalik
22:06.8
Kailangang paniniwala
22:08.5
ba mag-imbestigahin?
22:11.7
huwag natin papasukin.
22:13.8
Pero ang sinasabing ni Guevara,
22:15.5
sa kanyang pagkakaalam,
22:16.7
dahil siya ngayong abogado,
22:18.1
Solicitor General,
22:19.1
abogado ng gobyerno.
22:21.1
Yung Department of Justice
22:22.9
abogado ng taong bayan.
22:25.5
Napareho niyang pinanggalingan.
22:26.8
Nandiyan pa nga siya.
22:32.1
as Justice Secretary
22:33.5
panahon ni Duterte.
22:35.6
Solicitor General,
22:39.3
under President Marcos.
22:41.1
Magkaibang posisyon niya.
22:42.2
Para maintindihan niya.
22:44.0
sa inyo na po yan.
22:44.7
Kaya pinapaliwanag ko
22:45.7
kung saan kayo may iniwala.
22:47.5
At yan po yung nangyari.
22:50.0
At napagkasunduan kahapon
22:51.8
bago na tinapos yung hearing
22:53.0
na makikipag-coordinate sila
22:55.7
dahil mayroong counterpart
23:03.3
Inaatasa ng gobyerno
23:04.5
makipag-coordinate sa ICC.
23:06.4
So, ibig sabihin,
23:07.2
three resolutions sa Congress
23:09.0
approved na sa committee
23:13.0
Magkakaroon ng debate yan.
23:14.7
Tingnan natin kung anong mangyari.
23:16.7
counterpart resolution
23:17.5
naman doon sa kabila.
23:19.1
apat na resolusyon na yan.
23:21.2
Senate in Congress.
23:29.3
ang tawag nila dyan.
23:34.2
sa iba nating issue,
23:36.3
baka makalimutan natin
23:41.4
Kailan ba ninyo yung,
23:43.9
binabantayan ng ating
23:50.0
agresivo na rin dyan po
23:51.1
sa West Philippines.
23:51.9
Maliit na bansa yan,
23:54.6
Hindi katulad ng China,
23:58.7
problema rin pala.
24:01.7
ng mga estruktura dyan.
24:03.5
Pero binabantayan din,
24:06.8
National Security Council,
24:09.5
National Security Advisor,
24:11.8
Department of National Defense
24:13.9
Forces of the Philippines.
24:17.8
ng dalawang bansang ito
24:20.9
sa West Philippines.
24:23.3
pinababayaan yan.
24:33.8
China dun po sa ano?
24:38.5
at saka ng Australia.
24:40.3
naisahan sila ro.
24:42.3
Australian government
24:43.9
Philippine Air Force
24:46.6
na dumikot-ikot dyan.
24:48.0
Ang problema dyan sa China,
24:48.9
kaya sila nagagalit,
24:50.1
eh hindi nila matanggap
24:52.9
yung West Philippines.
24:55.2
gawin ng Pilipinas
24:58.7
wala sila magagawa.
24:59.9
Inang ayaw na ayaw
25:13.3
Kasi ang ginagawa
25:14.7
ng gobyerno nila,
25:16.8
kanilang mga mamamayan,
25:23.3
kanilang ginagawa.
25:45.5
na si Xi Jinping.
25:53.8
ang mga mamamayan
26:48.0
tapang at talino,
27:04.3
Defense Secretary.
27:15.7
Chinese government
27:28.7
Dahil mas maraming
28:40.3
nakikipag-ugnayan
30:08.0
kasi hindi yata nila alam
30:15.5
yung kailang mga galaw
30:16.3
talagang hindi pepede ako dun
30:19.3
ang may prinsipyo dun
30:21.2
ang prinsipyo ko dun
30:26.6
kasi hindi ko gusto
30:27.6
yung kailang binagawa
30:28.4
lalo na yung kailang
30:32.7
nakita mo yung stand nila
30:33.6
pakinggan nyo sila
30:40.9
ang galaw ng lahat
30:41.7
ng mga program dyan
30:43.8
yung mga pro-China
30:50.7
pero ako hindi ako
30:51.2
huwag lang yung monitor
30:52.9
sabi ng kongreso eh
30:57.7
hindi trabaho ng media yan
31:03.3
kasi ang frequency
31:07.2
privilegio lang yan
31:15.1
kalabang ka ng Estado
31:16.2
pag kinampihan mo yung
31:20.0
sa national security
31:21.7
malaking problema yan
31:25.7
kapag kagukinawa yan
31:26.9
pwede kayong tanggalan
31:29.1
kasi threat sa national security
31:31.5
ba't yung kakampihan
31:35.8
o yung tungkol sa ICC
31:38.4
syempre maraming magagalit
31:40.0
kasi may mga sarado
31:41.6
kakaunti naman yun
31:44.2
bakit ayaw nyo sa ICC?
31:46.7
pero bakit hindi kayo
31:48.0
nagigilty sa inyong sarili
31:53.2
sa teritoryo natin
31:59.2
ang ginagawa ng China
32:01.3
anong klaseng pag-iisip yan?
32:06.7
nagsasabi ng totoo
32:09.2
wala akong paalam
32:12.2
ang channel na ito
32:16.3
and YouTube channel
32:26.0
hindi sa ilang tao
32:27.6
hindi sa isang pamilya
32:31.5
kung anong dahilan
32:32.3
kung bakit gano'n sila
32:34.9
bakit kayo gano'n?
32:37.6
pero pabor na pabor
32:40.5
o baka yung ginagawa
32:42.1
paborhan din ninyo
32:43.3
anong klaseng pag-iisip yan?
33:01.9
bigyan ng justisya
33:23.2
bigyan ng mustisya
33:25.7
sa hearing kahapon
33:35.8
pinagbigyan pala ng ICC
33:37.3
hindi tayo nag-imbestiga
33:38.4
so tapos na yung ilang taon
33:40.1
sila naman ang gusto
33:41.4
hinaharap nung iba
33:44.1
tinatanong ko lang ulit
33:49.4
ngayon magagalit kayo
33:50.4
baka iba naman sabihin nyo
33:51.7
ang sabi ni Gibara
33:55.8
pwedeng mag-imbestiga
33:57.5
yan ang lumabas sa hearing
33:58.7
kung hindi nyo alam
33:59.8
punta nyo yung hearing kahapon
34:05.6
ang public hearing kahapon
34:09.9
over time na tayo
34:16.0
save the Philippines
34:19.1
ang kaisipan ng mga Pilipino
34:20.5
na sana yung magkaisa
34:22.6
para sa nakakarami
34:24.0
magkaisa para sa bansa
34:27.3
para sa iisang grupo lang
34:29.7
o para sa kanilang
34:31.1
personal and political interest lang
34:37.1
para sa mamamayan
34:47.6
see you this afternoon
