Video Transcript / Subtitles:( AI generated. About AI subtitles » )

* AI ("Artificial Intelligence") subtitles on Tagalog.com are generated using "Whisper" by OpenAI (the same company that created ChatGPT and DallE2). Results and accuracy may vary.
* The subtitles do include errors occasionally and should only be used as a tool to help with your listening practice.
* You can request this website to create a transcript for a video if one doesn't already exist by clicking the "Request AI Subtitles" button below a video. Transcribing usually takes 30-40% of the length of a video to complete if there are no other videos in the queue. For example, a 21 minute video will take 7-8 minutes to transcribe.
* Running a super fast cloud GPU server to do these transcriptions does cost money. If you have the desire and financial ability, consider becoming a patron to support these video transcriptions, and the other tools and apps built by Tagalog.com

They are asking that the others comply with UNCLOS, pero sila they will not comply.

China is the only country claiming that the high seas are its national territory.

Kasi yung South China Sea may high seas yan eh, about 25% of the South China Sea are high seas.

Sabi ng China, oh that is under the 9-dash line, amin yan, that's our national territory.

And nobody has supported that. Not even Cambodia or Laos has said tama.

So it's only China, but ang kapal ng mukha nila eh.

Let us comply with international law and UNCLOS.

Eh sila nga ang number one violator ng international law and UNCLOS eh.

Okay.

Speak.

Speaking of kapal ng mukha, isa-isahin natin yung statement coming from the Chinese Foreign Ministry.

Sabi nila, in isa-isa ko, binilang ko yung kanilang nirattle off na dahilan in gaslighting the Philippines.

Sabi nila, the root cause ng problema is the Philippines has number one, changed its long-standing policy stand.

Number two, reneged on its own commitments.

Number three, continued to provoke.

And number four, undermine China's legal rights.

Puntahan muna natin yung number four.

Ano ba itong pinagsasabi nilang China's legal rights?

Eh yun nga, ang legal right raw nila, they own the South China Sea, 85.7%.

But that's against international law.

Wala namang, there is no international law that says that they own 85.7% of the South China Sea.

The international law allows them up to 12 nautical miles, just like any other state.

So, they will say under international law,

they cannot point out a law which says that they can own the entire sea.

Wala na yun eh.

The last time that a country claimed the entire sea, that was in the 17th century.

They signed the own clause, hanggang 12 nautical miles.

12 nautical miles lang ma-claim nila from their baseline, from their coast.

So, they will say, under international law, we own this.

Wala namang international law na kanila yung high seas eh.

Sure, ito na yung legal rights.

Tsaka nga pati po yung nine-dash line, yung basis nun,

ay sinabi ng PCA, eh walang kwenta, walang basis, di ba?

Sabi nila, since 2,000 years ago, eh 1947 lang yan eh.

Renewing yan ng kumintang government in 1947 lang.

Hindi walang 2,000 years ago yan.

Eh talagang ano, it's fiction that they are telling the world.

Kaya nobody bought their claim.

Not one of the judges of the tribunal bought their outlandish claim, no?

Since 2,000 years ago.

Eh 2,000 years ago, nobody knew.

Nobody knew that there was oil in the sea.

Hindi pa nga gumagamit tayo ng oil 2,000 years ago eh.

Ikiniclaim na nila yung oil sa South China Sea 2,000 years ago.

Wala eh.

The industry started to offshore drilling early, mga 19 ano lang eh.

Middle of, mga 1920s lang nagumpisa yan eh.

Yung offshore drilling for oil and gas.

Pag nakikita ko yung mga pahayag ng China na legal rights,

naisip ko po rito eh.

I don't know kung pareho po tayo nang naisip minsan.

Diba nung unang panahon dito sa Pilipinas, may nag-aangkin ng tulay?

O kaya yung mga land grabber, diba sabihin?

May nakover na akong ganyan before eh.

Akin yan, may titlo ako dyan.

Akin yan.

O, parang sinasabi mo na akin yung Jones Bridge, gusto mo bilihin.

O, parang ganun po eh na budol.

O.

Ang dami ng, ilang beses na nabenta yung Jones Bridge ha.

Umabot na sa Supreme Court yan.

Ah, totoo ba yan yung Jones Bridge?

May nagbenta?

Kasi gusto rin po yung mga land grabbing, diba?

Yung sinasabi, may titlo ako ng ganitong kalaking lupa.

Magari dyan sa Rizal, diba? May mga ganun mga kwento before.

Pero bogos.

Meron nga nag-claim na estate nila yung buong Pilipinas eh.

Parang ganun.

Yan ang naisip ko po pag binabanggit ng China yung legal rights eh.

Anyway, sige po. Let's move on, no?

So, apat yung binanggit kasi nila na root cause daw

kung bakit daw tumataas ang tension dyan sa West Philippine Sea.

Nauna-una nga, ulitin ko po sa mga tagapakanig natin,

tsaka tagapanood, wala pong business whatsoever dapat ang China dyan.

They shouldn't be there in the first place.

Pero dahil nandyan sila, bully sila, sige, pag-usapan natin.

Yung sinasabi po nila na ano,

I mean, did we really change our policy stance regarding this?

Well, from the very start, we followed UNCLOS, no?

UNCLOS is 1980.

The China participated in drafting UNCLOS.

So, we claimed 12 nautical miles and then our EEZ,

200 nautical miles from our baselines.

That was consistent.

And then, and we claimed the Spratlys,

since 1734, at the latest,

because yung 1734 Pedro Murillo-Verali map,

which is official map of Philippine territory,

the first official map of Philippine territory during the Spanish regime,

kasama yung Spratlys as part of Philippine territory,

kasama yung Scarborough Shoal.

So, 1734 pa, kineclaim na natin yung Spratlys.

And then, you had the 1808 map of Spratlys,

and then, you had the 1875 map of Philippine territory under the Spanish regime.

And doon rin yung Spratlys and Scarborough Shoal.

And the last official map of Philippine territory under the Spanish regime was 1875.

Kasama, more detailed na ang mga isla sa Spratlys.

And doon yung T2, which we call Pag-asa.

And doon yung E2ABA, 1875.

Pangalan niyan sa mapa natin, E2ABA na.

Okay.

Baita, andoon din.

Ngayon,

and China has no map.

1947 lang sila nagpakita ng mapa eh.

Tayo, 1734, 1808, 1875.

Sila, 1947 lang.

So, wala silang mapakita talaga.

And in fact, even Vietnam, Malaysia, and Brunei,

and Indonesia, wala namang mapakita eh.

Tayong may mapa na ganyan eh.

But of course, Brunei is not claiming, except for its island there in front of its coastline,

isa lang, yung Louisa Reef, no?

We're not claiming Louisa Reef.

Indonesia is not claiming any island territory in the Spratlys,

but yung kanilang EEZ is encroached by the nine-dash line.

So, dapat ang gawin natin, we challenge China,

let's submit this to arbitration, kasi sabi ng China, kanila yun, sabi natin natin yun.

So, let's present it to an independent tribunal.

That's the way it should be settled under the UN Charter,

if there is a territorial dispute,

hindi kayo, you cannot resolve it between yourselves,

then you submit it to arbitration.

Kasi the UN Charter,

the UN Charter says, all disputes must be settled by peaceful means,

by negotiation, mediation, and finally by arbitration or judicial settlement, no?