THE LANDMARK CASE OF H3H3 PRODUCTIONS VS. BOLD GUY IN RE: RAFFY TULFO IN ACTION
* AI ("Artificial Intelligence") subtitles on Tagalog.com are generated using "Whisper" by OpenAI (the same company that created ChatGPT and DallE2). Results and accuracy may vary.
* The subtitles do include errors occasionally and should only be used as a tool to help with your listening practice.
* You can request this website to create a transcript for a video if one doesn't already exist by clicking the "Request AI Subtitles" button below a video. Transcribing usually takes 30-40% of the length of a video to complete if there are no other videos in
the queue. For example, a 21 minute video will take 7-8 minutes to transcribe.
* Running a super fast cloud GPU server to do these transcriptions does cost money. If you have the desire and financial ability, consider
becoming a patron
to support these video transcriptions, and the other tools and apps built by Tagalog.com
00:01.0
All right, yan. Magandang araw mga kabatas natin at welcome sa isa namang live stream.
00:07.2
Mga kabatas natin, madami kasing nag-request na nag-iwan daw tayo ng papanoorin nila habang nagaantay doon sa Noche Buena.
00:19.7
Pero mga kabatas natin, ang pag-uusapan natin ngayon, syempre because it's sharing, let's talk about a landmark case.
00:27.1
Okay? Ito po yung landmark case ng H3H3 Productions. This is a copyright infringement case na finial sa Amerika.
00:39.3
Okay? And mga kabatas natin, sa mga nagtatanong, mamaya, if we can have time, well, if we can find the setup, pwede natin gawin siguro yun yung batian portion, live stream takeover.
00:52.9
Pero for the meantime, let's talk about this one.
00:55.8
This is a landmark case.
00:56.9
This is a landmark case in the United States of America, mga kabatas natin. Tapos ano ba yung nangyari dito?
01:01.5
The same thing na ginagawa natin. Okay?
01:05.4
Itong si na, ano, Ethan at Hila Klein, or Hila Klein, mga kabatas natin, sila ay gumagawa ng mga reaction videos.
01:15.7
Ano yung ginagawa nila doon sa reaction videos nila? Nagpe-play din sila ng video, tapos nagre-react sila dito.
01:22.7
Exactly the way I'm doing it. Okay?
01:26.9
Many YouTubers, exactly the way many YouTubers are doing it.
01:31.2
So pag titignan niyo, mga kabatas natin, simple search ng H3H3 Productions, copyright infringement case, lalabas diyan.
01:38.2
Judge sides with YouTubers Ethan and Hila or Hila Klein, Math Hozenzade, pala Ethan Klein and Hila Klein, sabi niya.
01:49.2
Ito yung official na pag-aaralan natin, mga kabatas natin, na summary mula sa copyright office ng United States.
01:56.9
Maraming nagtatanong sa akin, attorney America naman yan, hindi unapplicable dito sa Pilipinas.
02:02.0
Mga kabatas natin, I have told you already na yung mga decisions sa Amerika ay parte ng ating, hindi naman parte, but they are secondary sources of Philippine law.
02:13.1
Pag makikita niyo, mga kabatas natin, marami akong pinapakita sa inyo ng mga jurisprudence kung saan yung Supreme Court natin, no less than the Supreme Court of the Philippines,
02:22.4
actually used cases from the United States as sources.
02:26.9
Of Philippine law.
02:28.6
Ano ang pinakamagandang example dito?
02:30.5
Yung Miranda Rights, mga kabatas natin.
02:32.6
Yung Miranda Rights na yan, hiniram natin sa Amerika yan.
02:36.6
Galing actually sa Amerika yan.
02:38.8
Ngayon, mga kabatas natin,
02:41.8
YouTube stars win fair use battle.
02:44.6
Reaction video deemed fair use in YouTube court battle.
02:48.5
YouTube stars H3H3 win landmark court case against blah blah blah blah.
02:54.0
YouTubers Ethan and Hila Klein win,
03:12.8
This was decided, mga kabatas natin, August 23, 2017 pa.
03:21.3
So ito, mga kabatas natin,
03:23.6
Merry Christmas sa inyong lahat,
03:25.9
and syempre, ito ang ating titignan.
03:31.7
Babasahin ko na lang, mga kabatas natin.
03:33.9
These are the key facts.
03:40.5
Hindi ko na babasahin yung last name niya
03:42.0
kasi medyo hindi ko alam naman kung paano i-pronounce yan eh.
03:45.2
Jose Inza, di ba?
03:47.0
Matt na lang yung plaintiff, no?
03:48.8
Plaintiff Matt, ito yung nag-file ng kaso
03:50.8
pag plaintiff ang sabi, no?
03:52.6
In relation to, ano, to this case kasi,
03:55.8
this is a civil case.
03:58.3
Yung final ng Rafi Tulfo in action na copyright infringement case sa akin
04:02.9
ay, ano, mga kabatas natin,
04:07.0
it is a criminal suit.
04:10.7
But we will not be talking about
04:12.4
the copyright infringement case ni Rafi Tulfo.
04:15.3
We'll be talking about this one.
04:17.6
Hindi yung Rafi Tulfo in action.
04:19.0
Let's talk about this one.
04:20.5
Sabi niyang ganyan, no?
04:21.7
Plaintiff Matt is a filmmaker
04:23.8
who created a video posted,
04:26.7
a short five-minute skit
04:28.2
about his character,
04:30.5
pursuing a woman.
04:32.5
So, ito, mga kabatas natin,
04:33.6
may video din na linabas sa YouTube.
04:36.3
Defendants Ethan Klein
04:39.5
o the Klein's na lang, no?
04:40.9
Defendants na lang ang tawag sa atin.
04:43.4
Created a 14-minute reaction video
04:46.8
commenting on plaintiff's video
04:49.2
and also posted it to YouTube.
04:52.5
So, yung din ang ginawa nila,
04:53.9
may video yung isa,
04:55.2
tapos sila, gumawa sila
04:56.9
ng reaction video nila dito
04:58.6
at pinost sa video.
05:01.3
Ngayon, in so doing,
05:03.5
nung ginawa nila yun,
05:04.5
mga kabatas natin,
05:05.4
defendants showed portions.
05:08.6
Ito, mga kabatas natin, no?
05:09.7
About three minutes.
05:12.1
Tatlong minuto ang pinakita,
05:13.9
mga kabatas natin,
05:15.0
doon sa video nung nagkaso.
05:18.8
Of plaintiff's video.
05:20.8
Plaintiff sent YouTube
05:22.8
a takedown notification
05:24.0
and YouTube removed the video.
05:25.2
Defendants then sent
05:27.5
a counter notification
05:28.6
challenging the takedown
05:30.0
on the basis of their video
05:31.4
was inter alia fair use
05:33.6
and non-commercial.
05:35.5
Plaintiff filed an action
05:36.9
alleging copyright infringement
05:38.7
and seeking 512 damages
05:42.5
due to defendants having
05:43.6
made alleged misrepresentation
05:45.3
in their counter notification.
05:48.2
Defendants then posted
05:49.5
another video discussing the lawsuit.
05:52.0
After which, plaintiff amended
05:54.2
his complaint to include
05:55.2
a defamation claim.
05:57.4
Both parties filed motion
05:58.8
for summary judgment.
06:01.7
So, nagkasuhan na sila.
06:04.2
Ngayon, mga kabatas natin,
06:07.0
whether defendants' reaction video
06:09.2
showing a large portion.
06:11.0
So, malaki pa daw yung portion.
06:12.3
Kasi, mga kabatas natin,
06:13.2
dito, eight minutes lang yung video.
06:14.9
Na ginawa nung tao
06:19.3
Eight minutes lang.
06:20.3
Tapos, three minutes.
06:21.5
No, mga kabatas natin.
06:23.9
sorry, five minutes lang.
06:25.2
Ang pala, mga kabatas natin,
06:26.6
five minutes lang yung video.
06:28.5
Tapos, ang ginamit doon sa video,
06:33.1
So, mas malaki, mga kabatas natin,
06:35.7
yung ginamit, no,
06:38.6
na re-reactionan,
06:42.4
No, malaki, malaki.
06:43.7
Very substantial part.
06:46.8
Very substantial part.
06:48.1
Ngayon, mga kabatas natin,
06:49.4
ito yung ruling ng judge.
06:51.9
Ito yung sabi ng judge.
06:52.8
After conducting a four-step analysis,
06:55.2
the court found that
06:56.5
defendant's use was fair
06:58.0
as a matter of law
06:59.5
and granted their motion.
07:01.4
The court concluded
07:02.3
the first factor,
07:03.6
purpose and character
07:04.9
of infringing work
07:07.6
in defendant's favor
07:09.1
because their video is
07:10.7
quintessential criticism
07:13.9
The second factor,
07:15.1
nature of the copyrighted work
07:17.2
favored plaintiff
07:18.8
because the work was
07:19.9
entirely scripted
07:23.0
So, dito, sinabi niya,
07:23.9
mga kabatas natin,
07:24.7
hindi naman lahat,
07:26.5
mga kabatas natin,
07:27.9
doon sa mga kriteriya,
07:31.8
hindi lahat doon sa mga kriteriya
07:33.5
na tinitignan natin
07:37.3
Na ipanalo nung plaintiff
07:39.4
o kaya ng defendant.
07:41.5
May naipanalo yung plaintiff,
07:43.0
may naipanalo yung defendant.
07:45.8
mga kabatas natin,
07:48.0
naipanalo nila ito.
07:50.3
Yung first factor,
07:51.8
purpose and character
07:52.7
of infringing work,
07:54.1
mga kabatas natin,
07:54.7
pumasok sa mga defendants.
07:56.8
Yung video kasi nila,
07:58.3
criticism and comment.
07:59.9
Yung second factor naman,
08:01.3
nature of the copyrighted work,
08:04.2
o yung nagkaso naman,
08:05.9
mga kabatas natin,
08:08.2
The second factor,
08:09.2
nature of the copyrighted work
08:10.4
favored plaintiff
08:12.2
was entirely scripted
08:15.6
Yung third factor naman,
08:16.9
mga kabatas natin,
08:17.8
amount and substantiality
08:19.8
of the portion used,
08:23.8
because to comment,
08:24.7
and on a critique a work,
08:31.0
and critique a work,
08:33.1
yung pala yung sinabi niya,
08:34.4
clips of the original may be used.
08:36.6
So, mga kabatas natin,
08:38.3
dito, sinabi ng korte,
08:40.6
Sinabi ng korte dito,
08:43.9
ay magko-comment naman
08:47.2
kung gaano karami
08:49.8
Sabi niya ganyan.
08:51.8
kailangan mo naman talagang
08:55.2
It is necessary to use part
08:57.0
or substantial part
09:02.2
It's plainly necessary
09:05.7
the transformative purpose
09:08.1
critical commentary.
09:11.7
Ngayon, mga kabatas natin,
09:12.9
but at the same time,
09:14.1
a great deal of plaintiff's work
09:17.2
The final factor,
09:18.6
effect on the use
09:19.6
upon the potential market
09:21.7
weighted in favor of defendant
09:23.7
because their video
09:25.4
as a market substitute.
09:28.3
So, ibig sabihin naman doon,
09:30.0
pagpagtitignan nyo dito,
09:31.1
kasi mga kabatas natin,
09:34.4
doon sa first factor,
09:36.6
nakuha yun ng defendants.
09:38.2
Doon sa second factor,
09:39.4
mga kabatas natin,
09:46.7
Doon sa third factor,
09:49.8
kailangan naman talagang
09:51.7
Pero mga kabatas natin,
09:56.0
sinabing ganyan dito,
09:57.2
panalo yung defendants
09:58.4
because their video
10:00.0
as a market substitute.
10:02.9
Kasi mga kabatas natin,
10:04.3
it's a commentary.
10:07.1
and the criticism.
10:08.4
They don't go there
10:09.2
for just watching
10:20.3
Yun ang sinabi doon,
10:21.2
mga kabatas natin.
10:24.1
sabi niyang ganyan,
10:27.3
plaintiff's video,
10:28.7
since it responds
10:31.2
plaintiff's video
10:43.3
for summary judgment.
10:45.3
The court also dismissed
10:46.4
plaintiff's claims
10:48.5
under section 512F
10:50.7
because it had found
10:54.7
defendants' argument
10:56.4
and not a misrepresentation
11:00.4
to have a subjective
11:01.7
good faith belief
11:05.7
to avoid such damages.
11:08.0
So, pag titignan nyo dito
11:08.9
kasi mga kabatas natin,
11:10.1
ang pinaka-importante
11:12.0
yung final factor.
11:13.5
What is the final factor?
11:14.8
It's the transformation
11:17.0
it's the transformative
11:22.9
copyrighted work.
11:28.6
So, pag titignan nyo dito
11:29.7
mga kabatas natin,
11:31.7
Yung mga tao kasi
11:33.4
well, alam nyo naman
11:36.7
especially if they are
11:38.7
parang sinasabi nila
11:42.3
mga kabatas natin
11:44.1
copyright infringement
11:48.4
It's not necessary.
11:49.8
What is necessary
11:51.5
yung factors na yun
11:53.5
mga kabatas natin
11:54.0
yung factors na yun
11:55.2
ang necessary lang doon
11:59.8
kasi factors lang yun
12:01.4
na iko-consider eh.
12:03.2
Hindi parang ano yun
12:04.3
hindi dapat pumasok
12:07.8
as copyright infringement.
12:12.0
of copyright infringement.
12:14.9
Just like for example
12:18.6
video for commentary
12:20.6
bakit neutral yun
12:22.8
because how can you
12:24.0
comment on a video
12:25.5
if you don't show the video
12:33.8
magkakomment tayo sa video
12:35.2
tapos you will not show the video
12:36.9
so how will people
12:40.4
ang sinasabi ng maraming tao eh.
12:43.5
hindi gumamit ng video
12:44.9
o video ng ibang tao.
12:47.4
Pag titignan nyo dito
12:48.4
mga kabatas natin
12:49.4
and I'll show you once again
12:51.8
mga kabatas natin
12:54.0
sige tignan nyo dito
12:59.2
ito yung sinabi nya
13:06.8
amount and substantiality
13:08.7
of the portion used
13:10.5
because to comment
13:11.5
and critique a work
13:12.8
clips of the original
13:15.1
and their use of clips
13:17.1
was plainly necessary
13:21.7
the transformative
13:23.4
of the commentary.
13:31.4
tapos at the same time
13:33.4
ang laki din ng portion na kinopia
13:35.4
kasi nga more than half
13:38.4
eh five minutes lang yung video.
13:42.4
So pag titignan nyo
13:43.4
mga kabatas natin
13:45.4
walang hindi pa pa-pass
13:47.4
yung mga argument ng mga tao na
13:49.4
hindi mo naman kailangan i-play yan.
13:51.4
It's it's it's the point.
13:55.4
I mean the point is
13:56.4
that the court who said here
13:57.4
actually that it's
13:58.4
plainly necessary
14:01.4
the transform at transformative
14:02.4
purpose of critical commentary.
14:04.4
Ayun mga kabatas natin.
14:05.4
I just want you to
14:06.4
I just want to share you
14:08.4
this was decided in
14:12.4
alam niyo naman yung ako din
14:13.4
ang purpose ko din dito
14:17.4
kung sinasabi sa inyo
14:20.4
yung mga kabatas natin
14:21.4
sa pagkakataon ito,
14:22.4
What I like also is to contribute
14:29.9
To the laws of the land
14:32.0
And if I can do it
14:37.0
So, antayin natin mga kabatas natin
14:43.2
Kahihinatnan ng mga kaso
14:46.7
Na final ni Rafi Tulfo sa akin
14:48.5
Okay, yan, maraming salamat
14:50.4
Merry Christmas mga kabatas natin
14:51.8
At syempre tulad na lang yung sinasabi
14:53.4
Matulog po tayo ng mahimbing
14:54.6
Dahil alam natin na yung natutulog ng mahimbing
14:56.5
Siya yung laging panalo
14:58.0
Paalam po, pagsamantala
