Close
 


FISCAL EJ VS. KAMATIS ANALYSIS UNIT- SLAPP SUITS
Hide Subtitles
Click any subtitle word to view Tagalog.com dictionary results.
Computer Shortcuts: Left / Right arrows to jump 2 seconds back or forward. +Enter or Space to toggle Play/Pause button. Full Screen Mode
FISCAL EJ VS. KAMATIS ANALYSIS UNIT- SLAPP SUITS TIKTOKnatin: https://www.tiktok.com/@batasnatin https://www.tiktok.com/@attylibayan Eto po bagong FB natin para sa videos: https://www.facebook.com/BATASnatin-107860591437195 https://www.facebook.com/Atty-Ranny-Randolf-B-Libayan-154012243457531 Alternate YT channel po for livestreams: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCskZGSV52krMvXgb8OXXx1g WEBSITE: https://batasnatin.com/ LAW FIRM: https://firm.batasnatin.com/ FACEBOOK PAGE: https://www.facebook.com/BATASnatin/ INSTAGRAM: https://www.instagram.com/batasnatin/ YOUTUBE CHANNEL: https://youtube.com/BATASnatinLive TWITTER: https://twitter.com/BATASnatin LAWYERS: Atty. Kristina Louise Magalong Atty. Ranny Randolf B. Libayan FIRM ADDRESS: #31 Gen. Luna St., Tuktukan, Taguig City, NCR (Across Taguig City Hall) Email: BATASnatin@gmail.com Telephone nos: +63915-954-6080 (+632)359-4203 We are a full-service Law Firm We handle and are experienced in litigating
BATASnatin
  Mute  
Run time: 29:21
Has AI Subtitles



Video Transcript / Subtitles:( AI generated. About AI subtitles » )
00:00.0
Alright, yan! Magandang araw mga kabatas natin at welcome sa isang mga livestream.
00:06.4
Alam niyo mga kabatas natin, ang daming nag-i-issue sa akin ngayon dito tungkol sa sinasabi ko nga na magandang mag-face reveal.
00:13.0
Maganda naman talaga mag-face reveal.
00:15.1
Tingnan niyo, si Fiscal EJ noon, hindi naman siya nagpapakita din siya ng mukha niya noon eh.
00:20.6
O ngayon nagpakita siya ng mukha niya, diba okay?
00:23.9
Diba mas ayos?
00:25.9
Kasi at least nakikita mo kung sino yung kausap mo.
00:28.1
O ito mga kabatas natin, Fiscal EJ versus ChatGPT.
00:34.6
Ito kasi mga kabatas natin, alam niyo kung bakit nag-ugat ito?
00:37.8
Kasi I am advocating the creation of the anti-slap law.
00:44.8
Ngayon mga kabatas natin, I believe also na yung mga finafile ni Raffy Tulfo ng mga kaso sa mga tao,
00:54.1
especially the small vloggers,
00:57.6
ako,
00:58.1
ako nga mga kabatas natin, limang kaso na ang meron sa akin.
01:01.5
No, limang kaso na ang na-efile sa akin in relation to Raffy Tulfo.
01:06.0
And I believe those are slap suits.
01:09.3
Gusto nilang patahimikin ako.
01:11.5
Okay?
01:12.5
Ngayon, itong si Fiscal EJ, of course,
01:16.3
kailangan niyang mag-explain about slap suits.
01:19.6
Wala daw slap suit dito sa Pilipinas.
01:23.1
Ngayon, syempre,
01:23.9
parang gusto niyang palabasin na mali yung sinasabi ko,
01:32.9
na slap ka ng slap, walang slap dito sa Pilipinas.
01:37.7
Ay syempre, yung posisyon ko may slap.
01:39.9
Ngayon, dinibank siya ni Kayu.
01:46.5
Ngayon, mga kabatas natin, lumabas na naman yung self-defeating statements
01:50.6
at sya kayong mga bangayan maneuvers.
01:53.9
Di ba?
01:56.0
O ngayon, tignan natin kung anong nangyari dito.
01:59.3
Di ba yung na-explain ko na guys?
02:01.5
Slap is a phenomena.
02:03.3
There's no law about slap because it's promoting slap
02:06.8
if there's a law about slap, right?
02:09.7
Yun nga. Kaya kailangan natin anti-slap.
02:15.1
Kid you not, mga kabatas natin.
02:17.1
Tulad na sinabi ko sa inyo.
02:19.2
I have extensive studies about slap law.
02:23.9
Slap suits. Slap suits na and the anti-slap law.
02:28.0
If ever man, mga kabatas natin, may ipasa ito.
02:32.0
We really need it.
02:33.9
Ngayon, merong slap suits dito sa Pilipinas.
02:39.0
Everywhere there is a slap suit even if there is no anti-slap law.
02:44.3
It does not follow na dahil walang batas na nagbabawal dito,
02:50.5
ibig sabihin, hindi na ito nagagawa.
02:53.9
O ginagawa.
02:55.0
O nag-eexist.
02:57.2
Simpleng-simple lang.
02:58.4
Sabi ni Adorable Chaps, makakontra lang talaga.
03:01.4
Pero yun naman ang gusto natin talaga, Adorable Chaps.
03:04.1
For people to show their true colors.
03:08.6
Di ba?
03:09.7
It's okay.
03:11.5
Gusto ko yung ginagawa ni Fabry na ganyan.
03:17.3
Sabi ni Addictus Rex, copyright infringement,
03:19.9
dalawang counts yung copyright infringement eh.
03:22.8
Cyber libel na dalawang.
03:24.7
Isa kay Rafi Tulfo, isa kay Atty. Tungol.
03:28.9
Nag-result din yun dahil sa Rafi Tulfo.
03:30.9
Yung disbarment ko, dahilin dun sa Rafi Tulfo yun.
03:33.9
Dahil din sa mga comments ko kay Rafi Tulfo.
03:36.9
So lima, dalawang copyright infringement as of the moment,
03:40.9
dalawang cyber libel sa piskal, tapos isang disbarment.
03:47.9
All because of Rafi Tulfo and Rafi Tulfo in action.
03:50.9
Okay, lahat dun may Rafi Tulfo yun.
03:53.9
Tuloy natin.
03:54.9
So, dapat merong law sa anti-slap.
03:59.9
Gets niya?
04:01.9
Yun nga. Ang hindi niya... Hindi ko nga maintindihan.
04:03.9
That's very simple.
04:07.9
That's very easy to understand.
04:10.9
I don't get it why they don't understand it.
04:16.9
Sabi ni I'm Not Robot, last year din na nga ako si attorney niyang merch.
04:20.9
Oo nga. Sorry, sorry nga ako nang sorry sa merch na yan.
04:22.9
Ang dami ko kasing ginagawa.
04:26.9
Next year daw, this year na daw, sabi ni attorney Magalong.
04:30.9
Promise niya daw yun. Kasi siya yung ano yun.
04:33.9
Siya yung umako na.
04:37.9
Sabi ni Chris Tito, may slap. Walang anti-slap.
04:41.9
Yes!
04:43.9
It's like...
04:48.9
Sabi ni I'm Not Robot.
04:50.9
Nonsense. Pag left and right slap suits din para may...
04:53.9
Para may cases ba tawag dito?
04:57.9
Pwede.
04:58.9
Pwede, pwede.
05:01.9
Mag-vlog ka na kasi para makoblo ka din.
05:05.9
Tuloy natin.
05:06.9
Anti-slap kasi. Right, right, right. Mahina, mahina, mahina, mahina.
05:11.9
Okay lang yan. Okay lang yan. Okay lang yan. Wala tayong magagawa.
05:14.9
Nag-iisa yata ang fiscal kasi doon. Anyway, sabi lang yun ha. Game, game.
05:20.9
Okay, okay. Sige, sige, sige.
05:23.9
Harsh ka. Harsh ka masyado, kayo.
05:26.9
Tuloy natin.
05:29.9
Okay.
05:30.9
Slap
05:32.9
is a phenomenon.
05:33.9
Okay?
05:35.9
Okay.
05:37.9
And then I already made a distinction.
05:38.9
Dapat sabihin mo kasi kayo,
05:40.9
slap is a phenomenon. Tama-mali.
05:42.9
Tama. Diba? Tama.
05:44.9
Tapos kami, sasabihin namin tama. Ganun.
05:47.9
Question about the letter of the law.
05:49.9
the letter of the law, and the phenomenon.
05:52.7
That's a categorical error
05:54.3
or a fallacy.
05:56.3
You are making two categories
05:58.2
in one basket, which is not
06:00.3
good.
06:02.3
Okay? Alright.
06:06.3
We are talking about
06:08.3
slap dito sa Pilipinas, ha?
06:10.6
Hindi.
06:12.9
Okay.
06:14.2
Sa Pilipinas, ha?
06:16.3
Okay. Slap sa US.
06:18.3
Wala tayo.
06:48.3
Ang isang phenomenon
06:49.8
like the slap suit or slap
06:52.6
na slap suits
06:54.2
na mga ito, hindi kailangan na
06:56.1
i-recognize yan ng batas natin
06:58.5
for it to exist.
07:01.3
Okay?
07:02.7
Parang ganito lang, no?
07:04.7
Parang sa botany
07:06.7
o kaya sa zoology.
07:09.4
Okay?
07:10.4
Hindi dahil yung isang
07:12.2
langgam ay hindi pa
07:14.0
nadidiscover
07:14.8
o kaya
07:16.7
hindi pa napapangalan.
07:18.3
Sa mga
07:19.6
zoology books.
07:22.5
Yung langgam. May nakita kang langgam.
07:24.2
Kakaiba.
07:26.1
Bagong-bagong langgam ito. Wala pang
07:28.1
nakaka-discover.
07:30.1
Tawagin natin natin yung langgam na serapi.
07:32.4
Gano'n. Serapensis
07:34.5
kasunensis.
07:39.0
Yun. Yung pangalan.
07:40.5
Yun yung gagawin
07:42.2
eventually na scientific name
07:44.3
ng langgam na yun.
07:45.7
Pero yung langgam na yun,
07:48.3
serapi lang yung pangalan niya.
07:51.7
Doon sa locals.
07:54.2
Yung iba,
07:55.2
hindi nila alam na may serapi.
07:59.2
Ngayon, mga kapatid natin,
08:00.5
pwede mo ba sabihin na
08:01.5
ay wala sa libro.
08:04.1
Hindi pa nasusulat yung serapi na yan.
08:06.9
Hindi yan nag-i-exist.
08:11.2
So, mag-i-exist lang yung serapi na yun
08:13.6
kapag nagkaroon na siya
08:15.0
ng scientific name at na-discover na
08:17.8
ng isang serapi.
08:18.3
Hindi ganun.
08:19.7
Kasi parang gano'n yung sinasabi nila dito eh.
08:22.0
Dahil wala pa daw slap law,
08:24.3
wala daw slap dito sa Pilipinas.
08:27.2
It doesn't work that way.
08:30.1
May slap na.
08:31.0
Kaya nga ang pinapasa
08:32.2
anti-slap law.
08:37.9
Diba?
08:41.2
Puro kakaguhan
08:42.4
ng wordplay.
08:43.5
Mayigipang tumain na lang ako.
08:45.0
Tama. I-hide nyo na yan. Tatay daw siya.
08:48.3
Isipin mo.
08:53.3
Ito, ito, ito.
08:54.1
Ito ang hindi mo nakita dito.
08:55.9
Kayo eh.
08:57.8
Kayo.
08:58.8
Itong si Mark Bayagan.
09:00.1
Bayagan na ito.
09:01.6
Ang hindi mo nakita dyan,
09:03.4
isipin mo.
09:04.8
No?
09:05.7
Pinagpalit ka sa pagtae.
09:08.2
Importante ang pagtae.
09:10.6
Mahirap pigilan ang tae.
09:13.2
Pero,
09:14.1
dahil sa sobrang importante ka,
09:17.1
pinigilan ni Mark Bayagan.
09:18.1
Ang tumae.
09:20.1
Inuna niya munang manood sa iyo
09:22.1
bago tumae.
09:26.1
That's an honor.
09:28.1
Ba't niyo inaid?
09:30.1
Tagalan mo ha.
09:32.1
Tagalan mo ha.
09:34.1
Itakay mo na rin sa mamuutak mo.
09:36.1
Okay. Game.
09:38.1
Yung pakial...
09:40.1
That's an honor.
09:42.1
Ang hirap kaya
09:44.1
mag-hold ng tae.
09:46.1
Kaya nga, di ba yung mga tao,
09:48.1
kapag natatay, tumatakbo,
09:49.1
nagdadrive na mabilis.
09:54.1
Ayun, para lang manood sa iyo.
09:56.1
Hinold niya yung pagtae.
09:58.1
Ginawa kang priority.
09:59.1
Di ba?
10:03.1
Ginawa kang priority.
10:10.1
What a coincidence.
10:12.1
Kumakain ako.
10:14.1
Sorry, sorry sa mga kumakain.
10:16.1
Happy New Year.
10:17.1
Sabi ni Alpha, nasunog yung fiskal.
10:19.1
Hindi pa naman. Hindi pa naman.
10:20.1
Nandyan.
10:21.1
Mamaya pa.
10:22.1
Ay, hindi. Tapos na pala ito.
10:24.1
Rine-replay lang pala natin.
10:25.1
Outlay natin.
10:26.1
Alam sa slap ng ibang bansa.
10:29.1
Wala daw siya paket.
10:30.1
Ito po ang sinabi...
10:32.1
Sabi ni Zenia Jade,
10:33.1
ibalik niya yung mga mods.
10:35.1
Nagsasakripisyon.
10:36.1
Oo nga. Dapat nga gawin yung mod yan eh.
10:39.1
Isipin mo yung human necessity to poo.
10:47.1
Ang priority si Kayu?
10:52.1
Sabi niya.
10:54.1
Wala daw siyang pakelam sa slap ng ibang bansa.
10:58.1
Tama ba yun? Tama ba yung pagkakaano?
11:02.1
Tama ba yung guys yung pagkakarinig natin?
11:05.1
Tama ba?
11:06.1
Alam niyo mga kabatas natin ha?
11:09.1
May ipapakita ko sa inyo na ginagawa ko.
11:12.1
Yung isa sa pinaka ano no.
11:15.1
Isa sa pinaka ano.
11:16.1
Isa sa pinaka-ginagamit, mga kabatas natin.
11:27.2
Isa sa pinaka-ginagamit na linyahan against cyber libel dito sa Pilipinas.
11:36.2
Yung pagpa-file ng mga kabatas natin, ng mga slap suits, galing din sa Amerika.
11:44.8
Okay?
11:46.1
Ito yung kasong US versus Bustos.
11:55.3
Ito, papakita.
11:56.9
Ginagamit ko na rin naman yung ano eh.
11:59.1
Ito, papakita ko na sa inyo.
12:00.5
Kasi ito na rin yung counter-affidavit ko kay Rafi Tulfoy.
12:05.7
Papakita ko sa inyo yung citation ko, ha?
12:10.6
Nakikita niyo ba?
12:12.6
This is also a US case.
12:15.7
Okay?
12:16.1
So, hindi mo pwede talaga sabihin na meron tayo, na wala kang pakialam sa US, sa batas ng US.
12:26.1
Kasi, secondary source ng Philippine law, kapag walang makuha sa Pilipinas na batas,
12:34.8
humihiram yung ating Supreme Court sa Amerika.
12:38.6
O, total, ginagawa ko na ito.
12:40.1
Sabi niya,
12:40.9
The Supreme Court in Philippine Daily Inquirer,
12:43.9
Incorporated et al.
12:45.4
Versus in real,
12:46.1
In this connection, the court declares its continued recognition, blah, blah, blah, blah.
12:51.6
Tapos, ito, mga kapatid natin.
12:55.0
Of the right of every citizen to enjoy a good name and reputation.
12:58.5
The court, however, is equally cognizant of the important role that the continuing guarantee of the freedom of the press serves to our nation.
13:06.1
As the words of Justice Malcolm in the early case of US versus Bustos.
13:12.2
Mga kapatid natin.
13:13.3
That is a US case.
13:16.1
And Justice Malcolm, mga kapatid natin, is a justice in America.
13:21.1
Okay?
13:21.9
Sabi niya,
13:22.8
The interest of society and the maintenance of good government demand a full discussion of public affairs.
13:29.2
Complete liberty to comment on the conduct of public men is a scalpel in the case of free speech.
13:35.9
The sharp incision of its probe relieves the abscesses of officialdom.
13:41.9
Men in public life may suffer under a hostile and unlawful,
13:46.1
unjust accusation.
13:47.7
The word can be assuaged with the balm of a clear conscience.
13:51.8
A public officer must not be too thin-skinned with reference to comment upon his official acts.
13:59.6
Tignan niyo, mga kapatid natin.
14:01.0
Too thin-skinned.
14:04.6
Diba?
14:05.5
Dapat hindi ka too thin-skinned.
14:10.8
Okay?
14:11.4
That is an American case.
14:14.9
Miranda.
14:17.6
Yung Miranda Doctrine.
14:20.0
That is also a case borrowed from the US.
14:24.7
Okay?
14:30.3
Tuloy natin.
14:31.6
Tignan naman.
14:33.8
Pagka.
14:37.6
Pagka tayong pakialam sa islap ng ibang bansa.
14:42.2
Right?
14:43.6
Tama ba?
14:44.9
Wait.
14:51.6
Sige, sige, sige.
14:53.6
Wala tayong pakialam.
14:55.9
Sabi ni attorney, yung too thin-skinned is said by the court doon sa case ni Trillianis versus Mukauson.
15:03.3
Talo si Trillianis doon.
15:06.3
Kaya nga, hiniram natin sa Amerika yun.
15:09.7
US versus Falcom.
15:10.9
Ginagamit na rin ng Supreme Court natin yan.
15:13.6
Okay?
15:13.9
Okay?
15:14.2
Oh, Alfredo.
15:14.8
Pa dito.
15:15.2
Happy New Year sa'yo.
15:17.4
Sabi niyo natin.
15:18.0
Okay.
15:31.1
Ito.
15:32.3
Ito yung pinapakita ni Kayo ngayon dito.
15:35.8
Yung...
15:36.8
In the 1980s by University of Denver,
15:41.5
Professors Penelope Kanya and George W.
15:44.7
Pring,
15:45.8
an original defined as a lawsuit involving communications
15:49.5
made to petition for a governmental action or outcome,
15:54.1
which resulted in a baseless suit
15:57.3
filed against individuals or non-governmental organizations
16:01.3
on a substantive issue of some public interest.
16:05.9
Di ba yun yung pinanalo niya?
16:08.7
Oh, my God.
16:12.7
It seems that we do.
16:14.1
We do care about it.
16:16.8
Alam niyo kung bakit.
16:18.5
Alam niyo kung bakit hindi niya pinakita to.
16:22.2
Bakit hindi niya pinakita to.
16:24.0
Asa na yan?
16:24.5
Asa na yan?
16:25.3
Eto.
16:26.6
Eto, eto, eto, eto.
16:29.4
Tinanong ko ngayon.
16:31.2
Ay, hindi, hindi.
16:31.8
Lakyan natin.
16:33.6
Tinanong ko si Jules.
16:36.3
Bakit yun ang ginamit niyang generic,
16:38.5
hindi yung tinanong ko sa Philippines?
16:40.5
Bakit masusunog kasi siya sa Philippines?
16:42.7
O, eto.
16:45.4
What is slapsuit in the Philippines?
16:48.4
Di ba?
16:49.0
Hindi niya ginamit yun.
16:51.0
Isn't it weird?
16:52.5
Anyway.
16:54.4
Yung dagdagdagdagbawas eh, no?
16:57.1
Of my knowledge,
16:58.8
update in January 22.
17:00.7
2022.
17:01.5
Oh, that's good.
17:02.7
The Philippines had not yet enacted specific legislation
17:05.4
addressing slapsuits.
17:07.2
Oh.
17:07.7
I said it.
17:09.1
However, discussions and proposals...
17:11.8
Tignan niyo, mga kapatid.
17:12.6
Ito yung slapsuit.
17:12.7
Lagyan natin yung terminology na ginamit, no?
17:15.6
Ano?
17:16.1
Addressing slapsuits.
17:17.6
So, existing talagang slapsuits dito sa Pilipinas.
17:20.9
Regarding anti-slap legislations were ongoing.
17:23.9
Tanong ko sa'yo.
17:25.2
Adit Eddie Bear.
17:26.4
Okay?
17:26.7
P6 Major.
17:31.0
Alam niyo na kung bakit.
17:33.4
Members of the press,
17:35.3
peasants,
17:36.1
workers,
17:36.8
students,
17:37.6
or even again,
17:38.8
ordinary citizens
17:39.5
to prevent them
17:40.4
from fully exercising their right
17:42.1
to participate
17:42.6
in the matter of public concern.
17:45.4
Oh.
17:49.7
Hindi talaga nila nag-guess.
17:51.4
Ang sakit sa ulos.
17:53.3
Comment,
17:54.0
bilib na bilib kay Piskal.
17:55.7
Hi, Kayo.
17:56.2
Working right now.
17:56.7
Yun nga, hindi ko rin maintindihan eh.
17:58.5
Na parang,
17:59.4
parang,
18:00.2
this is not actually a matter of law.
18:04.5
Understanding that the existence of slapsuits
18:07.9
is not a matter of law.
18:12.6
Tapos,
18:14.6
itadrag mo siya into a legal,
18:19.4
ano, legal discourse
18:21.3
when in fact,
18:22.4
it's merely the existence of slapsuits.
18:25.2
It's not the existence of an anti-slap law.
18:31.3
Hay nako.
18:31.9
Hindi na, walang ikinig lang ako
18:34.6
through earpads ko.
18:36.4
Go.
18:39.6
Walang pansa.
18:41.5
Right?
18:42.6
Okay.
18:45.6
Tingnan nga natin kung ano.
18:47.3
Ano na?
18:48.1
7-6-48.
18:52.6
A passage of the Fed Law
18:54.3
is also actually in line
18:56.1
with the recommendation
18:56.9
of the 2016 UN Committee
18:59.3
on the...
18:59.9
Oh my goodness!
19:01.2
UN Committee!
19:03.0
Gumamit!
19:04.1
Oh my goodness!
19:05.6
Wala daw paki!
19:07.2
Kala mo lulusot sakin yung ganyan.
19:09.7
E di wow!
19:12.0
So,
19:12.6
sunog.
19:13.1
Sunog.
19:20.9
Natignan pa natin.
19:22.7
Yunin!
19:23.7
Na may pakialam tayo
19:25.1
while gusto niya nga lang
19:26.1
i-quote sa batas natin.
19:30.0
Oh, man!
19:32.9
Akala ko without care.
19:37.5
Except,
19:39.1
kung gagamitin ko,
19:40.4
that's special,
19:41.2
special thing.
19:42.6
The reason why
19:43.5
it's enacted into law?
19:46.0
U.S. Convention?
19:47.9
Come on!
19:49.5
The age of sexual consent.
19:50.9
Huwag natin mag-usapan yan.
19:52.2
Age of sexual consent.
19:53.6
Oh my goodness.
19:54.7
Oh my goodness.
19:57.0
The information...
19:57.9
Meron dito.
20:00.4
Kung yan lang yung point mo,
20:02.5
ayan o,
20:03.1
ako rin yung nag-provide.
20:08.4
Tapos na!
20:09.5
Kasama si Kavit Teddy,
20:10.6
content mo ba?
20:11.6
Dude,
20:13.1
karating mo lang ba?
20:15.8
This is it.
20:16.5
Ito yun.
20:17.0
Ito yun.
20:17.6
Usapan, ChatGPT.
20:18.8
Can you actually do...
20:19.9
Can you actually raise that issue?
20:22.8
As a defense.
20:24.3
Ito tayo sa dulo.
20:27.9
ChatGPT.
20:30.1
Walang ego and pride.
20:33.3
Alam nyo, ito lang.
20:35.8
Dito ako mag-e-end.
20:37.3
Yung usapan nila
20:38.2
tungkol sa reliability.
20:39.7
Kasi nagtanong dito
20:40.5
si Fisca DJ,
20:41.2
between you and the lawyer
20:42.7
who is more reliable.
20:47.9
Hindi nga naman talaga
20:49.0
tama yung tanong na yan.
20:50.6
Kasi I will admit,
20:52.0
mga kabatas natin.
20:52.8
Tsaka dun sa mga nagsasabi din
20:54.0
na parang dinebank tayong pareho
20:55.7
ni Kayu.
20:57.9
Well,
20:58.7
pareho nga kami ng posisyon
20:59.9
ni Kayu eh.
21:00.6
Hindi ko nga maintindihan
21:01.5
kung bakit kasali ako
21:02.4
sa debunk na yun.
21:04.3
Eh gusto niya lang naman
21:05.3
kasi ganun eh.
21:06.1
Parang yung si Rafi Tulfo
21:07.6
nag-endorse ng isang
21:09.6
Ponzi company
21:10.9
at yung
21:11.2
si Mayor Magalong din
21:13.2
nag-endorse ng isang
21:14.2
Ponzi company.
21:15.5
Ngayon itong si Fiscal EJ
21:16.7
ganyan yung sinabi niya
21:18.0
at dahil lawyer siya
21:19.4
tapos dinebank niya
21:20.3
si Fiscal EJ
21:22.6
dinebank niya rin ako.
21:25.1
Hindi ko maintindihan din
21:26.3
yung ginagawa nyo na ganun
21:28.0
mga Tulfonatics
21:29.5
tsaka Ampalayagang
21:30.5
parang ganito lang yung simple.
21:32.4
Ganito lang yung dulo niyan
21:33.7
kasi.
21:34.4
No?
21:35.4
Ako,
21:36.4
yung punto ko
21:37.3
existing yung slap
21:38.6
dito sa Pilipinas.
21:40.4
Kahit walang
21:41.2
slap law.
21:42.6
Okay may slap suits.
21:44.1
Ang wala
21:44.5
anti-slap law.
21:46.5
Alam, maraming beses
21:47.5
ko nang pinaliwanag yan.
21:49.2
Yun din yung sinasabi ni
21:50.3
Kayo.
21:52.1
Existing yung phenomenon.
21:53.6
Ngayon,
21:53.9
ginamit ko rin yung
21:54.6
environmental cases noon.
21:56.4
Kasi nag-research nga ako
21:57.4
tungkol sa slap law
21:58.2
dito sa Pilipinas.
21:59.2
Ang nakita kong slap law
22:00.4
and
22:00.9
yung
22:02.4
anti-slap
22:03.6
sorry
22:03.9
yung anti-slap law
22:06.2
dito sa Pilipinas.
22:07.2
Tapos ang nakita kong
22:07.9
anti-slap doon
22:09.0
and nando doon
22:10.1
sa environmental cases.
22:11.2
So it only covers
22:13.4
environmental cases
22:14.6
at merong
22:15.1
pronouncement yung
22:15.8
Supreme Court tungkol dyan.
22:17.3
Kaya pinaliwanag ko din yun
22:18.5
na sana magkaroon tayo
22:19.5
ng anti-slap law
22:20.5
which will cover
22:21.5
all cases
22:22.8
and not only
22:24.0
environmental laws.
22:25.5
Because it is not only
22:26.8
in relation to
22:27.7
environmental suits
22:28.9
na nagkakaroon
22:29.8
ng slap suits.
22:32.0
Ganun lang kasimple.
22:33.0
Ganun din kasimple
22:33.8
yung gustong ipaliwanag
22:34.8
ni Kayo.
22:35.8
Kaya lang syempre
22:36.5
makakontra lang
22:37.6
doon sa sinasabi ko
22:38.9
na slap suits
22:39.8
sasabihin nila
22:40.9
walang slap suits.
22:41.2
Ang slap suit dito
22:41.8
sa Pilipinas.
22:43.3
Joke.
22:44.4
Right?
22:45.0
Ngayon mga kabatas natin
22:46.0
bakit ko ba pinagdidiilan
22:47.3
yung slap suit dito?
22:48.4
Because I have a purpose.
22:50.4
Because I want
22:51.6
if this
22:52.6
if ever
22:53.2
the case is filed
22:54.5
against me
22:55.1
goes the extra mile.
22:57.5
No?
22:58.8
Lahat itong lima na ito
23:00.2
umabot sa Supreme Court.
23:01.7
Ibig sabihin
23:02.2
makukonvict ako
23:03.1
hanggang sa Supreme Court
23:04.7
mga kabatas natin.
23:06.5
Tingnan natin
23:07.1
how it will hold.
23:10.1
Okay?
23:10.5
Kasi
23:11.3
these five cases
23:13.0
that I have now
23:13.9
at sabi nila
23:14.7
dadami pa daw
23:15.7
all related to Rafi Tulfo
23:18.4
mga kabatas natin
23:19.7
eh
23:20.5
slap suits.
23:26.5
Diba?
23:27.7
So ngayon
23:28.3
mga kabatas natin
23:29.8
itong si ano
23:31.8
itong si
23:32.7
si ano
23:34.2
si
23:34.6
Fiscal EJ
23:35.6
wala daw.
23:37.5
Tapos ito yung tinanong niya
23:39.3
who is more reliable?
23:40.5
Between you and a lawyer
23:42.2
who is more reliable?
23:44.7
Ngayon,
23:45.4
aaminin ko sa inyo
23:46.2
mga kabatas natin.
23:48.3
Hindi talaga maganda
23:49.1
yung tanong na yan.
23:50.6
Kasi nga
23:51.1
mas reliable
23:52.9
si ChatGPT sa akin.
23:56.1
Mas reliable siya sa akin.
23:58.2
Pero
23:58.7
mas reliable siya sa akin
24:01.9
sa pag-compute
24:02.7
ng Pai.
24:08.0
Mas reliable siya sa akin
24:10.0
sa pag-compute
24:10.5
sa pag-solve
24:12.1
ng mathematical equations.
24:14.8
Mas reliable siya sa akin
24:17.0
sa pag-update
24:20.0
sa mga tao
24:20.8
sa latest news
24:22.2
and current events.
24:27.0
Pero
24:27.8
mas reliable ako sa kanya
24:30.0
kung kaalaman
24:31.6
sa batas
24:32.2
dito sa Pilipinas.
24:37.4
Malamang ikakatna naman nila yan.
24:39.6
Pero
24:40.5
I'm admitting.
24:45.0
ChatGPT
24:45.8
may be superior
24:47.3
but not
24:48.4
all the time superior.
24:50.0
Depende sa galing mo.
24:53.7
Ito,
24:54.5
sino ang mas magaling?
24:56.3
Alfredo Palita,
24:57.4
nandiyan ka.
24:58.4
Ikaw o si ChatGPT?
25:01.3
Sino mas reliable?
25:05.1
Aaminin ko sa inyo
25:06.1
ang edge ko lang
25:07.0
kay ChatGPT
25:08.3
ay yung law.
25:10.5
Di ba?
25:15.8
Yun.
25:16.7
Kasi nagpatakam,
25:17.8
nagpakadalubasa ako
25:18.8
dokol doon eh.
25:19.8
Si ChatGPT, hindi.
25:21.3
Pero si ChatGPT,
25:22.4
mga kabatas natin,
25:23.1
tanungin mo siya ng
25:23.8
ah,
25:24.9
what is the
25:25.7
what is the
25:27.8
ang tawag doon
25:29.2
scientific name
25:30.3
of Sampaguita?
25:32.3
Hindi ko alam.
25:35.2
Suko ako dyan.
25:37.3
Sino ang mas reliable?
25:39.2
Si ChatGPT.
25:39.5
ChatGPT.
25:40.5
Pero ang ginawa kasi dito
25:42.1
ni Fiscal EJ,
25:42.9
between you and a lawyer
25:44.0
who is more reliable,
25:45.4
it's the wrong question,
25:46.9
you get the wrong answer.
25:52.4
Di ba?
25:53.2
Pero tulad ng sinabi ko rin dati,
25:55.0
you have to verify.
25:56.2
Pero most likely,
25:57.3
if it's about facts,
25:59.5
kasi nasa search nila
26:00.5
sa internet yan,
26:03.4
malamang tama siya.
26:05.2
Pero not all the time.
26:06.8
Of course,
26:07.4
because that's
26:08.3
artificial intelligence.
26:10.5
Okay, si, ano,
26:14.5
si Johan,
26:15.2
sabi niya,
26:15.6
walang latest news
26:16.5
si ChatGPT.
26:18.5
Gated sa December 21,
26:20.1
2022
26:20.7
ang data ni ChatGPT.
26:22.6
Mas may edge ka pa din,
26:23.7
attorney.
26:24.5
Ah,
26:25.4
very good.
26:26.8
At least.
26:28.4
Pero ano,
26:29.5
si Copilot.
26:31.6
Tanungin natin si Copilot.
26:33.0
Ah, hindi.
26:33.6
Sige nga,
26:34.1
tignan natin si ChatGPT.
26:37.8
Tanungin natin siya
26:39.0
doon sa lindol
26:39.8
sa, ano,
26:40.5
tanungin natin siya
26:45.5
tungkol sa lindol
26:46.3
doon sa, ano,
26:48.2
ah,
26:53.7
ano ba naman?
27:01.5
Bulok mag-type.
27:08.7
When is
27:09.9
when,
27:10.5
kung ano naman yun?
27:17.5
Wala nga.
27:22.5
Punta tayo
27:23.3
kay Copilot.
27:26.0
Tignan natin si Copilot.
27:29.5
Ah,
27:29.6
ah,
27:29.6
ah,
27:35.5
ah,
27:36.0
ah,
27:36.5
ah,
27:38.5
ah,
27:39.7
ah,
27:39.7
ah,
27:39.7
ah,
27:39.9
ah,
27:39.9
ah,
27:40.0
ah,
27:40.1
ah,
27:40.1
ah,
27:40.5
ah,
27:41.1
ah,
27:41.1
ah,
27:41.1
ah,
27:41.1
ah,
27:41.2
ah,
27:41.2
ah,
27:41.2
ah,
27:41.3
ah,
27:41.3
ah,
27:41.4
ah,
27:45.4
ah,
27:45.5
ah,
27:45.5
ah,
27:45.5
ah,
27:45.6
ah,
27:45.6
ah,
27:45.6
ah,
27:45.7
ah,
27:45.7
ah,
27:45.7
ah,
27:45.7
ah,
27:45.8
ah,
27:46.0
Ito,
27:46.6
meron siya.
27:49.7
Ito kasi daw si
27:50.9
Copilot,
27:51.9
ChatGPT4
27:52.8
ito eh,
27:53.2
no?
28:01.1
Ito sabi niya.
28:04.4
The latest
28:05.4
The latest
28:09.7
earthquake in
28:10.3
Japan occurred on
28:11.3
New Year's Day
28:12.3
2024.
28:13.3
It was
28:14.3
magnitude 7.6
28:15.3
earthquake that
28:16.3
struck western
28:17.3
Japan.
28:18.3
The quake triggered
28:19.3
tsunami waves of
28:20.3
around 1 meter.
28:21.3
Ang nabalit ako nga 3
28:22.3
meters eh.
28:23.3
Please note that
28:24.3
this information is
28:25.3
accurate as of the
28:26.3
time of your
28:27.3
question.
28:28.3
For the most
28:29.3
recent updates,
28:30.3
I recommend you
28:31.3
checking a reliable
28:32.3
news source.
28:33.3
Stay safe.
28:34.3
Sabi niya.
28:35.3
Ito yung mga
28:36.3
sabi niya.
28:37.3
Ito yung mga
28:38.3
sabi niya.
28:39.3
Ito yung mga
28:40.3
sources niya.
28:41.3
Rappler,
28:42.3
CNN,
28:44.3
at saka
28:45.3
ito.
28:47.3
Inquirer.
28:49.3
So dito mga
28:50.3
kapatid natin,
28:51.3
mas reliable tong
28:52.3
AI na ito.
28:53.3
Kasi nga,
28:54.3
alam niyo kung ilang
28:55.3
magnitude,
28:56.3
alam niyo kung kailan
28:57.3
nangyari.
28:58.3
Alam ko nangyari
28:59.3
yung earthquake.
29:00.3
Hindi ko alam na
29:01.3
New Year's Day pala
29:02.3
doon nangyari.
29:05.3
Maraming salamat
29:06.3
mga kapatid natin.
29:07.3
At syempre,
29:08.3
tulad ng lagi
29:09.3
po tayo ng Mahimbing
29:10.3
dahil alam natin
29:11.3
na yung natutulog ng
29:12.3
Mahimbing,
29:13.3
siya yung laging panahon.
29:14.3
Paalam po,
29:15.3
pansamantala.