BANGAYAN MOVE! FISCAL EJ VS. KAMATIS ANALYSIS UNIT- SLAPP SUITS
* AI ("Artificial Intelligence") subtitles on Tagalog.com are generated using "Whisper" by OpenAI (the same company that created ChatGPT and DallE2). Results and accuracy may vary.
* The subtitles do include errors occasionally and should only be used as a tool to help with your listening practice.
* You can request this website to create a transcript for a video if one doesn't already exist by clicking the "Request AI Subtitles" button below a video. Transcribing usually takes 30-40% of the length of a video to complete if there are no other videos in
the queue. For example, a 21 minute video will take 7-8 minutes to transcribe.
* Running a super fast cloud GPU server to do these transcriptions does cost money. If you have the desire and financial ability, consider
becoming a patron
to support these video transcriptions, and the other tools and apps built by Tagalog.com
00:01.0
All right, yan. Magandang araw mga kabatas natin at welcome sa isang mga livestream.
00:06.3
Sabi ninyo, nonsense, 3-0 na po. Huwag na pagbangayan.
00:12.3
Oo nga, yung bangayan maneuver na yan, ginawa yan dun sa debate namin eh.
00:17.1
Bakit nyo pa inuungkat niya?
00:20.5
Pero maganda kasi, no?
00:25.5
Maganda rin kasi yung bangayan move na yun.
00:27.6
Ang bangayan maneuver. That was good.
00:31.0
Ang title nito, bangayan move.
00:33.2
Bangayan maneuver. Fiscal EJ versus Kamatis Analysis Unit.
00:38.3
Tungkol sa slap din.
00:39.4
Tulad na sinabi ko sa inyo mga kabatas natin,
00:41.6
nag-ugat itong usapang slap na ito dahil sabi ko nga sa inyo,
00:45.3
I want the passage, I crave for the passage of an anti-slap lot.
00:51.3
Sinasabi ko rin sa inyo na slap suits, no?
00:56.9
Na in my opinion, slap suits yung fina-file sa akin ni Raffy Tulfo.
01:04.0
Ngayon, mga kabatas natin,
01:07.6
itong ano, no? Itong...
01:09.6
Itong balikan nila ni Kayu at saka ni Fiscal EJ, ano,
01:19.4
eh, tungkol sa slap suit.
01:23.4
Ngayon, tungkol din ito sa relationship.
01:26.9
Itong liability ng AI.
01:30.6
Chat GPT, Copilot.
01:33.0
Tapos, sinabi nila, sinabi ko kasi sa inyo mga kabatas natin na gagamitin ko si Chat GPT.
01:37.6
Gagamitin ko si Copilot.
01:39.4
Sabi nila, hindi naman niya siguro gagamitin yan.
01:42.0
Gagamitin ko, sinabi ko nga sa inyo, eh.
01:43.9
Ginamit ko. Okay?
01:45.2
Yung pinakita ko sa inyo, mga kabatas natin,
01:48.0
yung pinakita ko sa inyo,
01:49.8
yun yung ipapakita ko sa inyo.
01:52.9
Hindi ako nagbibiro.
01:56.9
Kinopy-paste ko pa nga ng todo yun, eh.
02:13.0
Hindi ko nga tinanggal yung ano, eh.
02:16.1
Hindi ko tinanggal yung...
02:28.5
Can a death wish and...
02:30.7
Can a death wish and a death threat be the same?
02:36.5
While a death wish and a death threat are distinct concepts,
02:39.6
there may be situations where they overlap or coexist,
02:43.7
blurring the lines between the two.
02:47.4
Tapos, ginamit ko rin si Copilot.
02:50.9
Kailangan ko pala ano dito.
02:53.2
Kung saan sinabi niya,
02:54.3
however the interpretation can depend on the context,
02:56.9
and perception of the person receiving the message.
03:05.5
Pero sabi niya, hindi niya gagamitin.
03:07.6
O, tingnan natin kasi mga kabatas natin,
03:09.2
hindi daw kasi reliable.
03:10.5
O, tingnan natin.
03:14.5
May question pala ako dyan.
03:16.2
Tukol sa lawyer ko.
03:17.8
Reliable itong...
03:18.9
For the sake of argument,
03:21.2
let us assume na reliable itong si ChatGPT.
03:27.2
So, it's reliable.
03:30.9
Even if we don't take it for the sake of argument.
03:33.8
Like, for example,
03:36.1
Tool si ChatGPT, di ba?
03:39.8
Ano bang magandang paliwanag para maintindihan ni Fiscal EJ?
03:51.2
Saan mo ginagamit yung martilyo?
03:53.8
Ginagamit mo yung martilyo
04:08.9
Ngayon, gamitin mo yung martilyo na yan
04:17.0
Ipanit mo yung martilyo na yan
04:24.9
Napakasimple na yan, ha?
04:30.3
nakakainis yung martilyo na yan.
04:37.0
Gamitin mo pang luto.
04:38.6
Sasabi mo, nakakainis yung martilyo na yan.
04:42.9
Eh, mali yung gamit mo, eh.
04:46.8
Ito, ginagamit ba ni Kayo
04:49.5
Ikaw kasi, mali yung gamit mo kasi tinanong mo
04:51.9
between a lawyer and you,
04:54.9
who is more reliable.
04:58.9
Gamitin mo yung, yung ano,
05:01.0
kutsara na pampukpuk.
05:02.7
Anong sasabihin mo sa kutsara?
05:11.1
Di ba, si Sir Gabriel?
05:13.7
Tamang gamit lang.
05:17.3
Pagpupo sa ulo mo, eh.
05:18.7
Mmm. Tamang gamit.
05:24.9
O, yun. Simple na yun, ha?
05:31.3
Pag-compute-in ko ng mathematical equations
05:33.7
si ChatGPT, magagawa niya.
05:36.6
Reliable siya doon.
05:43.6
May question pala ako dyan.
05:45.0
Tukol sa lawyer to, eh.
05:46.1
Ewan ko, mga lawyer lang makakasagot nito, eh.
05:49.3
Tinanong ko mismo si ChatGPT
05:51.4
kung sino ang mas kapanipaniwala.
05:54.9
Siya ba, meaning si ChatGPT ba,
05:57.2
o ang isang abogado
05:59.5
or legal professional.
06:00.8
Maganda yung talong niya, di ba?
06:03.4
Ito po ang sagot ni ChatGPT.
06:06.0
O, di ba, na-explain ko na yan.
06:08.4
Let's move on to other points here.
06:11.1
Between you and a lawyer who is more reliable.
06:15.8
Ayan, tinanong niya.
06:16.8
Ayan, o. Sa taas, o.
06:19.3
O, tinanong ko, doctor and you
06:21.0
who's more reliable.
06:22.8
So, ibig sabihin mali yung lawyer.
06:26.9
Eh, dito kasi pinapaliwanag ni, ano, ano.
06:29.9
Ayun, o. Sabi niya, o.
06:31.7
Between you and a lawyer
06:33.2
who is more reliable.
06:38.8
Pero, pag, pag, ano.
06:42.1
Punta nga tayo ulit kay ChatGPT.
06:44.0
May gusto kong tanongin, ha.
06:50.8
Siguro maganda itong tanongin to.
06:53.3
Magandang tanong to.
06:54.9
A doctor and a lawyer
07:00.8
who is more reliable.
07:13.6
Sino kayang mas reliable?
07:29.3
Between a doctor and a lawyer
07:31.2
who is more reliable.
07:34.8
Good question, din, di ba?
07:38.1
Reliability is not inherently determined
07:40.6
by one's profession,
07:42.2
but rather by the individual's commitment,
07:45.5
ethical standards,
07:48.4
Both doctors and lawyers
07:49.8
play crucial roles in society,
07:51.8
but they serve different purposes.
07:54.9
Just like ChatGPT and a lawyer,
07:59.7
they serve different purposes.
08:02.2
Asano maintindihan niyo na ito, ha?
08:04.6
Doctors are manggagamot.
08:06.8
Lawyers are mangkakaso.
08:21.0
Ano ba hindi maintindihan diyan?
08:24.9
So, tanongin ko si ChatGPT, no?
08:54.9
I don't know what you're talking about.
09:01.3
Yung mathematical equation.
09:11.2
multiplied by 834.984
09:22.7
Ngayon, nung ginawa niya ito,
09:29.1
bago niya nasolve.
09:30.9
Tanongin mo yung tao
09:32.1
kung gaano niya kabilis
09:35.0
masolve itong equation na binigay ko.
09:37.2
Yung hindi gifted, ha?
09:38.8
Yung normal na tao.
09:41.6
Tapos, tanongin mo kung...
09:42.7
Tapos, sabihin mo na hindi reliable
09:46.3
Kasi ginagamit mo sa ibang paraan.
09:57.5
You have to use your tools properly.
10:00.7
And you cannot say that it is unreliable
10:05.1
it may be reliable
10:08.9
if you use it properly.
10:11.9
Just like when I ask mathematical equations
10:14.5
or ask it to make codes.
10:26.3
So, sasabihin mo na hindi siya reliable.
10:29.2
Hindi talaga siya reliable
10:30.4
kung mali yung gamit mo.
10:32.0
Tulad nga na sinabi ko sa iyo,
10:34.0
gamitin mo pangkain,
10:37.6
kutsara yung martilyo.
10:41.2
Tapos yung martilyo,
10:44.8
isubo mo sa bunganga mo,
10:46.2
lagyan mo yung pagkain yun.
10:50.0
Hindi talaga reliable.
10:58.7
Wala siyang iniingatan.
11:00.9
He's just gonna give you what's true.
11:03.9
True or false based on logic.
11:06.7
Hindi, hindi yan yung pinag-uusapan natin.
11:18.6
Di ba sabi ko nga,
11:20.0
katulad nang sinabi ko sa post ko,
11:22.5
the source of errors are always...
11:24.8
Eh, isipin mo, mga kabatas natin, no,
11:27.4
ang medyo, ano lang dito, no,
11:32.0
gumawa lang si Fabry ng a short...
11:34.3
Tignan yung title kasi ng video ni, ano,
11:40.7
A short discussion about slap suits.
11:45.1
Naging super long na.
11:51.3
Why would you ask that stupid question?
11:53.6
That's a false dichotomy.
11:56.4
Tignan na, tignan.
11:57.2
Why would you ask that stupid question?
11:58.2
Are always humans.
12:01.4
The source of errors are always humans.
12:06.5
Why would you ask that stupid question?
12:08.9
That's a false dichotomy.
12:12.1
Hindi lang ang option is lawyer at chat GPT.
12:16.7
Nag-gets mo, Fiscal EJ?
12:17.9
At saka ito pa, ito pa, no?
12:21.4
In relation, para, para i-bolster lang natin yung mga points ni Kayo dito, ano,
12:27.3
kung sinasabi mo na unreliable si chat GPT,
12:31.1
subukan mong kulitin
12:32.6
yung kaibigan mo,
12:40.4
ng sunod-sunod na tanong.
12:45.5
Tignan natin kung magre-reklamo yun.
12:47.9
Tapos, subukan mo rin si chat GPT.
12:50.6
Sabihin mo lahat ng sama ng loob mo kay chat GPT.
12:54.1
Tanungin mo sa kanya lahat ng mga tanong mo,
12:56.5
kahit yung mga walang kwentang nangyayari sa buhay mo.
12:59.9
Sabihin mo, ikwento mo.
13:03.1
Sino mas reliable?
13:09.4
Sino mas reliable?
13:15.8
Tanungin nyo lang yun.
13:19.9
Ang tawag doon, false dichotomy.
13:22.4
Let's ask chat GPT.
13:28.3
Ito, maganda rin kasing, ano, maganda rin kasing pag-aralan itong mga tinuturo ni Kayo
13:33.3
katulad ng false dichotomy na yan.
13:36.3
Nagkakaroon ng two choices.
13:38.5
Na hindi naman talaga dapat magkaroon ng dalawang choices lang.
13:43.1
Para pag-aralan natin siya tanungin.
13:45.9
Baka sabihin, siyempre doktor yan.
13:55.8
Between you and a carpenter,
14:00.4
who is more reliable?
14:11.9
Pero, dito ulit tayo sa dulo.
14:16.1
Hanap tayo ng iba.
14:16.8
Nako, napaliwanag.
14:20.3
Kitang-kita niya naman siguro dito kung ano yung ibig sabihin ng ano, no?
14:23.4
Yan, ito yung false dichotomy.
14:25.3
In a false dichotomy, sabi niya ganyan,
14:27.0
the choices presented are often extreme opposites.
14:30.0
And the argument suggests that one option must be accepted while rejecting the other
14:34.2
without considering other no-ones or intermediate positions.
14:39.0
This can lead to a distorted understanding of the issue at hand
14:43.4
and limit the exploration of alternative solutions or perspectives.
14:47.8
Mga kabatas natin, itong pagkakaroon ng false dichotomy,
14:54.7
and explain ko rin sa inyo dito na it is somehow related to having a tunnel vision.
14:59.7
Nakatingin ka na lang doon eh.
15:02.5
Kung nagkakaroon ka rin ng false dichotomy kasi,
15:05.4
ang nangyayari, nakatingin ka lang sa dalawang bagay.
15:09.4
Hindi mo na nakikita yung iba.
15:12.4
Kasi nga, pinipilit ka lang mamili sa dalawa.
15:16.1
Ngayon, pag sa tunnel vision,
15:17.3
mga kabatas natin, wala kang ibang nakikita, yun lang.
15:21.1
So kahit ano ang gawin mo,
15:24.1
it will just lead you to one thing,
15:26.9
and that is what you want to see
15:31.6
or what you are seeing.
15:36.5
Yun lang yung nangyayari dyan, mga kabatas natin.
15:39.4
So hindi maganda na i-adapt natin
15:43.1
yung mga ganun na galawan.
15:52.0
It's important to critically evaluate situations
15:55.4
and be aware of false dichotomies to avoid making decisions.
16:02.6
Sabi ni Mark Bayagan,
16:04.7
sa sobrang genius nyo, i-debunk nyo naman si Einstein.
16:07.9
Sabihin mo, gawa siya ng video
16:09.5
para may i-debunk namin siya.
16:17.1
sabihin mo sa kanya.
16:24.8
Based on overly simplified or misleading choices.
16:31.9
May papahuli ako sa inyo dito sa ginawa ni Fiscal EJ, ha?
16:35.8
Natandaan yung tanong niya.
16:41.5
ang sabi ko tungkol sa batas,
16:42.8
no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.
16:46.4
hindi ko pwede sa akin ilusot yan.
16:48.9
The liability depends on the usage or task.
16:52.9
Naging uling na yung sinusunog mo.
16:55.1
Ito, may lulusot siya.
16:56.6
Of course, lulusot siya.
16:59.0
Tignan, tignan, tignan, tignan sa akin.
17:00.6
Sige na, sige na, sige na.
17:01.8
Masyado mo rin mo hinahipe.
17:08.1
mas magandang pangalitan mo,
17:11.8
Mas magandang pangalitan mo yung pangalan mo ng Mark Bangayan.
17:16.4
Para mapag-usapang kalagi.
17:21.0
Gets mo yun, Mark?
17:23.7
Palitan mo yung pangalan mo ng Mark Bangayan
17:26.6
para ma-mention ka lagi.
17:31.4
Mahina ka rin eh.
17:34.9
Gusto mo pala laging na-mention eh.
17:37.4
Palitan mo ng Bangayan.
17:39.2
Pumili ka na nga ng pangalan,
17:48.9
slap the legendary Bangayan move.
17:51.5
Ako rin, daming kong video,
17:52.7
tinatanong ko nasan sa Bangayan yun.
17:55.8
I give you a good idea for a name.
17:58.7
Gusto mo pala lang na ma-mention,
18:13.7
I'm talking about the loss.
18:16.4
you ask, ChatGPT.
18:19.7
between you and a lawyer,
18:21.1
who is more reliable?
18:26.7
Hindi ka pwedeng lumusot na,
18:28.2
I'm just talking about the law.
18:31.4
No, that's not what you ask.
18:34.3
Between you and...
18:35.0
Oo nga, kasi hindi naman,
18:36.3
hindi naman talaga pwede yun.
18:38.5
Kasi alam mo naman na hindi lawyer yung,
18:40.7
you're not talking.
18:43.5
kapag you are talking about the law,
18:46.4
tapos AI yung kalaban mo,
18:51.9
tapos it's about memorization
18:58.7
So, mas reliable pa rin si ChatGPT.
19:03.7
Kasi pag tatanungin mo,
19:05.5
when was the family code?
19:16.4
Code of the Philippines
19:38.7
This is about the law.
19:46.4
Even if you talk about the law,
19:49.4
there are instances
19:50.5
that ChatGPT is also reliable.
19:53.9
The family code of the...
19:55.1
Ito yung tanong ko.
19:56.1
When was the family code of the Philippines enacted?
19:58.6
The family code of the Philippines
20:00.0
was enacted on July 6, 1987.
20:02.6
It was signed into law
20:03.6
by the then President Corazon Aquino
20:05.3
and became effective on August 3, 1988.
20:09.0
The family code governs
20:10.2
family and property relations
20:11.7
in the Philippines
20:13.4
covering aspects such as marriage,
20:15.1
legal separation,
20:15.8
and element property relations
20:18.5
and other related matters.
20:21.1
this answer of ChatGPT
20:26.0
O, tanungin mo pa.
20:27.5
What is article...
20:31.0
Magbigay kayo ng random number.
20:50.8
Hindi ako makatayp kasi may kable dito eh.
21:04.8
As of my last knowledge,
21:06.8
update in January 2022,
21:09.4
the Philippines does not have
21:15.8
Ah, tanungin natin.
21:18.7
Huwag na lang 69.
21:27.3
The Constitution.
21:31.8
as of my last knowledge,
21:33.5
the 1987 Constitution
21:35.0
of the Republic of Philippines
21:36.3
does not have an Article 3.
21:38.1
The Constitution is organized
21:40.5
and Article 3 is one of them.
21:42.5
However, if you are referring
21:43.7
to the Bill of Rights
21:44.4
in the Philippine Constitution,
21:45.8
which is a significant part
21:48.7
then Article 3 is indeed
21:50.3
the Bill of Rights.
21:51.7
It outlines the fundamental rights
21:53.4
and freedoms of individuals
21:55.1
in the Philippines.
22:15.8
Philippine Constitution?
22:24.9
Sa tingin nyo ba,
22:25.6
alam niya rin, ah.
22:38.5
Ah, kasi kaya ayaw niya.
22:47.4
Hindi ba reliable yan
22:48.9
tungkol sa batas yan?
22:54.1
And as far as I can see,
22:55.9
mukhang tama naman.
23:01.0
banggitin lahat sa inyo yan?
23:05.1
Hindi ko memorize to
23:06.5
kahit matagal na rin ako
23:08.3
nagpa-practice ng batas.
23:12.4
Although, pinamemorize
23:13.6
sa atin naman yan.
23:15.2
pinamemorize na rin.
23:15.8
Pagka-practice lahat yan noon.
23:16.8
Pero ngayon, nakalimutan ko na.
23:31.1
Hindi reliable siya dyan, oh.
23:39.1
Ano ba ba tungkol sa batas?
23:42.8
That's tungkol sa...
23:44.0
So, even if you...
23:48.3
Or you limit it only
23:49.9
to Philippine law,
23:57.5
chat GPT is not unreliable.
24:01.2
Chat GPT is reliable.
24:04.7
Or maybe reliable.
24:14.5
Kaya kahit ilimit,
24:15.8
yan yung argument niya ng sinasabi ko lang,
24:19.5
may instances like that,
24:21.3
giving those information,
24:27.3
More reliable siya
24:28.3
than sa akin as a lawyer.
24:31.8
hindi ko naman minemorize
24:33.1
yung lahat ng gano'n.
24:37.9
I'm just gonna give it to you.
24:39.9
Wala siyang pride.
24:42.2
sino mas reliable?
24:43.8
Yung mataas yung ego,
24:49.0
Naku, sinasaktan mo talaga kayo.
25:09.1
so mas may tiwala ka
25:13.1
Between you and chat GPT,
25:15.1
mas may tiwala ako
25:18.5
Sabi ko nga sa'yo,
25:20.8
Depende sa sitwasyon.
25:25.2
Mas may tiwala ako.
25:27.8
Mas may tiwala ako
25:28.6
kay chat GPT kaysa sa'yo.
25:33.7
Yun ba yung tanong mo?
25:44.0
Walang vested interest.
25:51.9
Tatanungin ko si chat GPT.
26:20.1
Ano ang gusto niya dito?
26:25.1
Sino po yung person X na yan?
26:26.1
Ano po naman yan?
26:27.1
Ba't meron na naman?
26:38.1
a self-defeating statement
26:40.1
for a person to say
26:41.1
Ako kong talaga si Kayong ito?
26:43.1
person X is unreliable
26:52.6
can be considered
26:55.6
making the statement
27:00.6
This is a logical
27:02.6
because it implies
27:04.6
is both unreliable
27:13.6
if someone is unreliable
27:17.6
are generally not trustworthy
27:18.6
so using them as proof
27:20.6
undermines the credibility
27:21.6
of that statement itself.
27:23.6
Nasagot ka dito Crystal Lee.
27:25.6
Mas may tiwala talaga ako
27:36.6
to maintain consistency
27:37.6
and avoid contradictions.
27:41.6
Diba lagi kong binabanggit yan?
27:45.6
Walang contradictions.
28:00.6
Yung contradictions.
28:02.6
yung contradictions.
28:06.6
Kasasabi mo palang
28:07.6
kukontrahin mo na.
28:16.6
yung self-defeating.
28:36.6
Consistent naman sila
28:38.6
sa pagiging inconsistent.
28:42.6
Si Manlo onions ko rin.
28:48.7
na Lramas F Lego?
29:12.6
At sinabi niya, is a self-defeating statement.
29:17.4
Ito'y walang pride, yung fiscal niya meron.
29:20.5
Pero self-defeating, sasabihin mo, unreliable siya,
29:23.1
tapos siya rin yung magsasabi sa'yo ng gagawin yung source
29:26.8
ng unreliability.
29:29.5
Ewan ko, basta, wala na kayo.
29:38.1
Sarili mo, kalaban mo, grabe.
29:40.3
Pero lagi kasi sinasabi yun eh.
29:41.9
Hindi ko rin gusto yun eh.
29:43.9
Ang kalaban ko lang dito, sarili ko.
29:47.8
Parang ganito kasi yun, may five contestants.
29:51.6
Yung ibang contestant, ang kalaban nila apat lang.
29:56.0
Pero ikaw, lima yung kalaban mo.
29:59.6
Kasi, pati sarili mo, kalaban mo.
30:04.2
What is worse, yung kalaban mo yung sarili mo.
30:15.1
Ay, nagpapal afect.
30:18.8
Maraming salamat mga kapatas natin.
30:21.7
Tulad lahat yung sabihin, matulog po tayo ng mayimbing.
30:25.1
Dahil alam natin na inatutulog ng mayimbing,
30:27.4
siya yung laging panalo.
30:28.4
Happy New Year po sa inyong lahat.
30:30.0
Paalam pansamantan.
30:33.9
Thank you for watching!
30:34.1
Subscribe for more videos!
30:35.8
Artists with motion...
30:38.0
Artists with motion...
30:38.1
Artists with motion...
30:38.2
Artists with motion...
30:38.2
Artists with motion...
30:38.3
Artists with motion...
30:39.3
Artists with motion...
30:39.4
Artists with motion...
30:39.4
Artists with motion...
30:39.5
Artists with motion...
30:39.6
Artists with motion...
30:39.6
Artists with motion...
30:39.7
Artists with motion...
30:40.5
Artists with motion...
