00:49.6
sa pag-fuel sa bisyo.
01:33.4
Hindi naman 10 years.
01:34.6
Tignan natin, no?
01:36.4
Tignan natin kung ilang months.
01:40.5
nangyari yung video
01:41.8
mga kapatid natin, no?
01:45.5
Atty. Claire Castro
01:49.3
Age of Sexual Consent
01:52.6
September 18, 2023
01:54.8
So, mga kapatid natin
02:00.6
mga kapatid natin
02:07.0
Dahil sumagot siya
02:08.2
mga kapatid natin
02:10.5
meron siyang 3 months
02:13.4
yung bangayan maneuver
02:15.3
mga kapatid natin
02:20.1
a very good answer.
02:24.6
a very good answer.
02:29.4
Matagal pinag-isipan.
02:31.0
Matagal nag-research.
02:33.2
Ewan ko kung tinap niya pa
02:34.6
yung 100 lawyers dito.
02:36.4
Okay, pinag-research niya pa
02:37.6
yung mga students niya.
02:50.6
Wala pang isang araw.
02:52.5
Sasagot na tayo agad.
02:54.2
Tapos, mga kapatid natin
02:55.8
ewan ko may play-play natin
02:56.9
yung buong video.
02:57.6
Hindi ko rin napanood yung buo eh.
02:59.4
a huge part of it
03:05.9
Magandang araw po sa lahat.
03:07.8
Bago natin sagotin.
03:12.2
Sagotin ang matagal
03:14.5
ni Ginong Libayan
03:20.2
That's why I am expecting
03:22.2
a really good answer,
03:25.8
Ang pinaparatang niya
03:27.7
na bangayan maneuver
03:29.4
Pakinggan muna natin siya
03:31.4
sa mga patutsada niya
03:34.1
Panoorin mo yung videos
03:38.8
Hindi yung humi...
03:40.0
Yun din yung unang-unang
03:42.9
Yun din yung unang-unang
03:45.8
doon sa nag-react ako doon
03:48.7
versus Attorney Libayan mo.
03:50.0
Hindi ko alam kung saan galing
03:51.4
yung mga sinasabi mo.
03:59.4
At makikita nyo dito
04:00.6
sa ginawa niya dito,
04:01.7
mga kabatas natin.
04:04.2
Fabry is very consistent.
04:08.2
Tapos sinasabi mo pa ngayon
04:09.3
na ako ang may misleading statements.
04:11.3
Yan po ang unang patutsada
04:12.9
ni Ginuong Libayan.
04:15.9
In the first place,
04:19.6
ng misleading statements.
04:26.4
ano ba yung pinag-uusapan natin
04:28.8
doon sa misleading statements?
04:32.1
O, nagre-react daw ako
04:33.3
na hindi mo na pinapanood
04:38.7
Nagre-react daw ako
04:40.3
pinapanood ang video niya.
04:43.0
Even if you trace back
04:44.2
what I said in this video,
04:47.5
yung statement mo,
04:48.9
Attorney Libayan.
04:56.8
Is it responsive?
05:00.6
kung pinapanood mo ba yung video?
05:08.7
Ah, baka naman sasagutin mamaya.
05:11.6
Baka sasagutin mamaya.
05:13.2
Let's go, let's go.
05:14.1
Eh, iba na naman eh.
05:17.7
Let's try coherence.
05:21.6
Let's try to be coherent here, please.
05:24.1
Ah, tuloy, tuloy, tuloy, tuloy.
05:25.3
Kung saan sinabi mo
05:26.6
in this particular live stream of yours,
05:28.8
na may mga slapsuits,
05:36.7
Wala pang batas na nagsasabing
05:38.5
ito nga ay mga slapsuits.
05:41.1
So, saan dyan ang misleading sa sinabi ko, ha?
05:47.4
Hindi yan yung sinabi ko na misleading.
05:50.5
Ang sinabi ko na misleading, Fabri,
05:57.7
Yung claim mo, Fabri,
06:06.6
ng copyright infringement,
06:09.6
ibig sabihin matatalo na rin yung mga tao.
06:14.5
na hindi tama yun.
06:19.4
na yun yung misleading statement ko.
06:23.8
Doon ako sumagot.
06:26.9
ikaw ang nagbimislead.
06:41.8
Bakit iba na yung pinag-uulapan natin, Fabri?
06:47.9
Aba ka naman may punto siya.
06:52.1
Halatang ikaw tong kumukuda
06:54.4
na hindi mo napapanood
06:56.1
o napakikinggan ang mga sinabi ko.
07:02.1
We watched your video!
07:03.8
We were watching your video!
07:06.6
Tumigil lang noon!
07:09.1
nung nadun ako sa Japan,
07:10.9
medyo may problema yung internet.
07:13.7
Pero we watched it.
07:15.7
We patiently watched it.
07:19.4
this is also my suggestion to you.
07:22.3
Panuorin mo rin yung mga videos mo.
07:27.7
Panuorin mo rin yung mga videos mo.
07:28.6
Panuorin mo rin yung mga videos mo
07:30.1
para alam mo kung ano yung mga sinasabi mo doon.
07:35.2
Nag-react ka doon sa punto
07:38.1
tungkol sa copyright infringement
07:45.0
na wala kang pakialam, sabi mo.
07:47.6
Tapos, minimislid ko yung mga tao
07:49.5
na kapag natalo ako dito,
07:51.3
matatalo na rin sila.
08:03.2
Where are you going?
08:10.3
Itong naglalagay ng mga salita sa bibig ko
08:12.8
na hindi ko naman sinabi
08:14.5
tapos ako pa ngayon ang misleading?
08:18.5
You were the ones who said that.
08:21.4
It was in a video.
08:24.7
Pwede na yata natin i-play ngayon.
08:28.6
Kung hindi mo tinanggal, ha?
08:53.1
Misleading statements.
09:00.0
Hindi mo pinapanood yung videos mo.
09:05.3
Misleading statements.
09:09.8
O, nag-umpisa ka dyan sa misleading statements na yan.
09:14.1
masyadong misleading.
09:17.2
By the way, Atty. Libayan,
09:19.0
just like sa slap suit
09:20.3
ng ibang bansa na wala akong pakialam
09:22.6
dahil hindi natin batas yun,
09:25.5
wala rin akong pakialam
09:26.7
kung manalo o matalo ka.
09:28.4
O manalo o matalo man
09:31.3
sa copyright infringement case.
09:35.3
We're talking about the copyright infringement case.
09:38.6
Ito yung in-issue ko sa kanya
09:41.7
misleading statement niya.
09:45.9
And to my listeners,
09:47.9
huwag po tayong maniwala
09:49.2
sa sweeping generalization
09:51.0
na pag may isang natalo
09:53.4
sa infringement case,
09:54.7
e damay-damay na lahat.
10:00.4
Diba? Yan yung sinasabi mo
10:02.0
na minimislead ko yung mga tao
10:03.5
sa isang sweeping generalization?
10:08.9
you are the one misleading people
10:10.6
because you are the one
10:12.1
who is making a sweeping generalization
10:18.3
meron yung principle na story
10:20.0
decisis na yung people who are
10:21.8
situated in the same
10:24.1
circumstances should be decided
10:26.2
in the same manner.
10:27.6
If it was already decided
10:35.0
That is a foolish and reckless
10:49.7
Kaya, pinanood ko itong
10:53.0
What the heck is happening
10:59.1
Because the determination of
11:01.1
fair use of a copyrighted work
11:03.4
is to be determined
11:04.9
via the so-called
11:06.4
four-factor test.
11:12.7
O. Yan yung pinag-usapan natin.
11:15.7
Tingnan natin. Balikan natin siya.
11:23.1
Sabi niya, I'm putting words
11:25.0
in his mouth daw.
11:26.5
Maybe he can be specific.
11:27.6
Specific this time.
11:28.8
Kasi pag titignan nyo dito, mga kabatas natin,
11:31.5
he was not specific.
11:33.9
Sinabi niya, nagre-react lang siya dito.
11:35.9
Ako, I'm very specific.
11:38.0
I played your video, Fabry.
11:43.0
Nagre-react lang ako dito,
11:47.5
hindi specific yung sagot niya.
11:51.0
Halatang, ikaw tong kumukudintas
11:53.1
na nagsasabing ito nga ay mga
11:55.2
slap suits. So, saan dyan
11:57.3
ang misleading sa sinabi ko, ha?
11:59.9
Ah, ang sinabi kong
12:01.3
misleading, yun. Ba't hindi mo sinagot yun?
12:04.4
Yung sweeping generalization
12:05.6
at starry decisies.
12:13.2
I still stand by. Ito, hindi mo rin
12:15.3
lininaw ito, eh. Ano ba ang punto mo?
12:17.2
Nag-i-exist ba talagang slap suit o hindi?
12:21.2
Dyan ka nagkakaproblema, eh.
12:25.3
Dyan ka nagkakaproblema, Fabry.
12:27.3
You don't know where you stand.
12:30.4
You're all over the place.
12:34.1
Na may mga slap suits.
12:35.9
Kahit wala pang batas na nakare-
12:39.0
Even if you trace back what I said
12:41.3
in this video, kinorect ko lang
12:43.7
yung statement mo.
12:45.1
At Tony Libayan, kung saan sinabi mo
12:47.0
in this particular live stream of yours
12:48.9
na may mga slap suits.
12:50.9
Tandaan nyo, sinabi niya kinorect ko lang, ha?
12:55.1
sweeping generalizations. Hindi niya
12:57.2
sinali yun. Eh, doon nga ako
12:59.2
mostly nag-react.
13:01.7
Naglabas pa ako ng
13:02.7
story decisies. Oh my God, Fabry.
13:07.4
Slap suits. Kahit wala pang
13:09.0
batas na nagsasabing ito nga
13:10.9
ay mga slap suits.
13:12.8
So, saan dyan ang misleading sa sinabi ko, ha?
13:17.3
video. Inulit ko na naman
13:22.6
Kung ganto na lang tayo magsasagutan, Fabry,
13:26.0
it's a waste of time.
13:27.2
It's a waste of time.
13:32.9
Just watch my past video.
13:34.7
Ganyan din yung ginawa mo noon doon sa ano eh.
13:37.9
Inulit mo lang yung sinabi mo
13:39.3
para ikaw yung may last say.
13:40.9
Pero, hindi mo naman rinibat
13:43.0
yung mga linabas ko nung usapan natin
13:45.1
tungkol sa reckless driving.
13:48.5
Lang, sabi mo pa, ha?
13:54.8
ikaw tong kumukuda na hindi mo
13:57.1
napapanood o napakikinggan
13:59.1
ang mga sinabi ko.
14:04.1
Itong naglalagay ng mga salita sa bibig ko
14:06.6
na hindi ko naman sinabi, tapos
14:08.8
ako pa ngayon ang misleading?
14:12.6
But why aren't you being
14:27.1
For those who are new
14:30.9
to this tit-for-tat between me
14:32.7
and Atty. Libayan with regards to the
14:34.8
topic on slapsuits, you may
14:36.9
want to take a glimpse of what I said
14:39.1
in these videos and judge
14:41.0
for yourselves kung sino sa aming
14:42.9
dalawa ang misled at
14:44.8
kumukuda ng mga misleading
14:49.0
Panoorin nyo rin yung videos ko.
14:51.3
Kasi ako, I'm very specific
14:56.3
I don't do generic shit.
15:05.6
Again, for the record,
15:07.7
never kong sinabi
15:09.0
na ginamit mong depensa
15:10.6
ang slap sa copyright
15:12.3
infringement case mo.
15:16.3
Siguro ang gusto mong sabihin, parang
15:21.6
Parang sinabi mo na
15:23.2
hindi mo sinabi na
15:26.3
Yon. Pero, pag titignan mo
16:01.9
How will we interpret this?
16:05.6
Attorney Libayan versus Fiscal EJ.
16:08.4
Not powered by ChatGPT
16:09.9
Slapsuits. Meron nang
16:11.8
nag-invoke ng slap in
16:13.7
2018 pero dinismiss
16:16.1
ng Supreme Court.
16:23.4
The enforcement of environmental
16:27.6
of the environment, or
16:29.2
assertion of environmental rights.
16:33.9
Meron na palang nag-invoke ng
16:35.8
slap suit dito sa Pilipinas.
16:46.5
sino ang sinasabihan mo dito na
16:49.5
nag-invoke ng slap suit?
16:53.4
bakit mo ginagamit itong
16:55.9
2018 slap suit na ito
16:59.3
bilang isang depensa
17:00.9
kung hindi naman pala
17:02.7
applicable dito sa
17:04.2
Attorney Libayan versus Fiscal EJ
17:06.6
not powered by ChatGPT
17:27.1
I'm disappointed.
17:30.5
Sabi nga ng Supreme Court is that
17:32.6
the concept of slap
17:34.2
is applicable lamang in those cases
17:37.6
So, ito diba ginamit
17:42.6
Ano ba yung sinasabi dyan
17:45.8
Ginamit ko bilang depensa.
17:48.9
O sige, kahit hindi ikaw yung
17:50.1
nagsabi. Ano ito?
17:57.8
Nag-example siya para saan?
17:59.3
Ewan ko sa kanya!
18:02.6
O, balikan na naman natin.
18:15.6
What's the purpose of that then?
18:20.8
Sabi niya, meron na rin.
18:23.1
Meaning, sinabi niya, ginawa mo din.
18:26.9
Ewan ko ba sa kanya?
18:30.0
I have no interest whatsoever
18:32.2
talking about your case.
18:34.4
You're basically barking at the wrong tree,
18:38.2
I'm not barking at you.
18:40.8
I don't need to bark at you.
18:45.6
Diba magtuturo tayo ng batas?
18:51.1
Yan, dahil mukhang ibang piskal yata
18:53.1
ang nagsabi na ginamit.
18:55.5
Alam niya, ito, itong mga taong ito,
19:00.3
You're not funny.
19:03.7
Pero, magsisingit kayo ng laugh track.
19:09.1
It's so pathetic.
19:11.2
Kumit mong depensa ang slap
19:12.9
sa copyright infringement case
19:15.2
and definitely, it is not me.
19:19.6
Pakinggan natin ang pangalawang patutsada.
19:23.2
Ah, sige, sige, sige.
19:24.4
Baka meron naman mga sagot pa dito.
19:26.7
Ni Ginoong Libayan.
19:28.5
Supreme Court, o ako.
19:30.2
Eh, you took me out of context.
19:32.2
Sabi ni Atty. Libayan, I took him out of context daw.
19:36.9
No, I did not take you out of context.
19:40.1
Precisely, pinutol ko ang portion kung saan nagdi-disagree ka sa isang abogado dahil ako mismo,
19:46.6
quite surprisingly, I agree with you na hindi prerequisite ang pag-file mo na...
19:52.0
Parang hindi maganda para sa'yo yung pupuntahan niyo ito, Fabry ah.
20:11.0
So you agree with me?
20:22.0
Then, what did you do that for?
20:26.9
Para saan mo ginawa yun?
20:32.8
Quite surprisingly, nag-agree daw siya sa akin.
20:39.7
Parang dun sa age of sexual consent, nag-agree ka na rin eventually.
20:45.8
You took our stance.
20:49.1
Na parang kayo na.
20:50.5
Na, yung pinaglalaban, yung pinaglalaban namin.
20:58.0
At tignan natin, tignan natin.
20:59.8
Quite surprisingly, I agree with you na hindi prerequisite ang pag-file mo ng kaso
21:05.5
bago mo masabi na slapsuit or slapsuits ang kaso o mga kaso na kinountercharge ng taong sinampahan mo ng kaso.
21:15.4
So does that mean, Fabry, you also agree that slapsuits exist?
21:20.5
Because you agree with me.
21:26.1
Doon sa sinabi ko doon.
21:29.3
For you to agree with that, you have to agree first.
21:32.9
That there are slapsuits.
21:49.3
And I'm sure the lawyer can sufficiently explain himself sa paninindigan niya.
21:54.8
He does not answer for me and neither do I for him.
21:59.4
What are you talking about?
22:12.9
Wala na siya doon.
22:14.7
Because what happened
22:19.3
gave an opposing opinion.
22:23.2
Contrary opinion.
22:24.6
And you gave a contrary opinion to me.
22:30.3
Kaya nga versus eh.
22:33.0
Hindi tayo magkakaroon ng versus, Fabry, kung agree-agree tayo doon.
22:37.2
Kaya nga versus yun dahil ang ipupunto natin
22:40.6
ay yung mga bagay na hindi tayo agree.
22:46.1
Dapat mag-agree ka doon.
22:49.3
Kasi hindi na magiging versus kapag agree.
23:04.3
We respect each other's views.
23:08.4
Kahit na magkaibigan kami, hindi naman sa lahat ng issue nag-a-agree kami.
23:16.3
So ngayon, ang pag-uusapan natin yung friendship.
23:19.2
This is a waste of time.
23:30.2
So kung magkaibigan kayo, hindi kayo nag-a-agree.
23:33.8
Mag-agree ka sa akin.
23:37.8
Pero I don't think nag-agree ka sa akin.
23:40.5
Hindi naman kami miyembro ng isang kulto na iisa ang paniniwala kahit mali-mali.
24:05.3
And it's not funny.
24:07.7
But you made a blatant mistake.
24:10.1
Atony Libayan, when you.
24:12.4
Please, please educate me.
24:14.6
Fabury, educate me please.
24:16.8
Explaining na hindi kailangang may maunang kaso,
24:20.4
made a general statement na ang slap suits are not meant to be retaliations.
24:28.0
See? You're taking me out of context again.
24:33.9
I was reacting to your friend.
24:40.1
Is that a general statement?
24:48.0
Because there are facts, Fabry.
24:51.9
Ganyan din yung ginawa mo doon sa copyright infringement.
24:56.3
Na basta may kasong copyright infringement, natalo ka, talo na lahat.
25:02.9
May facts ako dyan.
25:04.6
Yung facts ko galing sa friend mo.
25:06.7
So is that a generalized statement?
25:18.0
I was referring to your friend, Atty. Rizal.
25:22.9
Yan yung facts doon.
25:33.3
How low can you go?
25:36.7
O, uulitin ko ang sinabi mo ha, Libs?
25:40.4
Ang sinabi mo, slaps are not meant to be retaliations.
25:45.5
Kahit na i-play ko pa ang buong video mo.
25:49.1
Well, i-play mo yung buong video.
25:52.3
Intindihin mo rin sana.
25:54.3
I was referring to Atty. Rizal.
25:57.9
Doon ako nag-comment kay Atty. Rizal tungkol dyan.
26:01.7
And you also agreed, you said.
26:12.7
Why would I say that?
26:15.1
Fabri, I will make life easier for you.
26:21.5
Why will I say this?
26:24.8
Slapses are not meant to be retaliations.
26:29.2
Why would I say this?
26:31.0
Why would I say this?
26:31.1
Why would I say this?
26:31.1
Bakit ko ba sinabi yan?
26:33.3
Ano ba ang dahilan kung bakit ko sinabi yan, Fabri?
26:37.7
Hindi ba dahil sa kaibigan mo?
26:40.7
Nadinebank mo din na sinabi mo, pareho tayo ng punto.
26:52.9
Bakit mo linabas yung ginamit na rin
27:01.1
Pero dinismiss ito ng Supreme Court.
27:19.6
Ito, abogado tayo.
27:24.0
Merong facts of the case.
27:27.7
Tapos may decision.
27:31.1
Na yung facts of the case
27:33.3
ilipat mo sa ibang kaso
27:37.1
tapos imemaintain mo yung issue at saka yung decision.
27:45.2
Hindi pwede na I'm talking about a specific
27:52.0
na diniscuss ng kaibigan mong abogado
27:56.6
specific na sinasabi ko
27:59.4
tungkol sa diniscuss ng kaibigan mong abogado.
28:00.9
Yung mga kaibigan mo,
28:01.9
gagawin mong generic.
28:10.8
Hindi pwedeng kukuha ka lang
28:13.3
tapos ika-copy-paste mo
28:14.7
kung saan mo gusto.
28:15.9
That's not how it works
28:17.0
and you know that.
28:21.7
That's not how it works
28:23.0
and you know that.
28:25.0
Agree ka nga sa akin
28:26.0
noong umpisa palang
28:26.7
linabas mo pa ito.
28:32.5
It will still sound like a separate general statement
28:36.0
that does not put context to your earlier statement.
28:39.5
Tignan mo, tignan mo ha.
28:41.6
Di ba sinabi niya noong una?
28:45.1
Sinabi niya noong una
28:46.4
na do not put words in my mouth.
28:53.3
Separate general statement.
28:55.4
It will still sound like a separate
29:02.2
Grabe magpalusot.
29:08.7
It will still sound like a separate statement.
29:14.5
Comprehension left the earth.
29:21.0
So kunwari, magdidiscuss ako
29:23.4
tungkol sa isang topic
29:28.8
Kung merong marinig ka doon
29:31.2
kahit meron akong isang topic
29:35.8
kung yung sound niya
29:44.8
Hindi mo nakukunin yung konteksto
29:49.1
sinasadya mo yan.
29:56.9
Slaps are not meant to be
30:00.8
Kahit na i-play ko pa
30:02.4
ang buong video mo,
30:04.2
it will still sound like a separate
30:06.5
general statement
30:07.9
that does not put context
30:10.1
to your earlier statement.
30:16.3
tanong ko sa iyo, Fabry.
30:20.3
Bakit itong statement na ito
30:22.3
ang maglalagay ng kontekst?
30:26.4
Eh, this is my reaction.
30:28.7
To the legal opinion of your friend.
30:34.4
kontekst kinuha mo doon
30:36.2
sa legal opinion ng friend mo?
30:40.0
Kasi yun ang usapan natin?
30:43.0
Do you even know what
30:54.0
Kita binasahan ng
30:55.5
definition ng slapsuit
30:56.9
as enunciated in the
30:58.7
that FCF Minerals case.
31:03.1
I know that already.
31:09.0
and to remind you
31:10.5
that slapsuits are in essence
31:12.9
retaliation suits.
31:19.6
You really want to take me
31:21.5
out of context, no?
31:23.9
If you will do that,
31:25.3
I can do that to you too.
31:28.7
But that is bad faith, Fabry.
31:32.6
Hindi magandang gawin yan
31:34.0
kaya hindi ginagawa yan.
31:36.6
Hindi ko maintindihan
31:37.8
kung bakit ginagawa mo.
31:42.7
Alam mo yung usapan doon.
31:46.0
It's very specific.
31:51.5
I don't know the definition
31:53.6
Mga kapatid natin,
32:00.5
lalagyan natin ng part ito.
32:02.6
hindi ko daw pinapanood.
32:03.6
O di, papanoorin natin.
32:06.7
Papanoorin natin.
32:12.8
please, please, Fabry,
32:22.0
ang ibigay natin.
32:24.0
ng sang slapsuit.
32:27.6
In the first place,
32:32.5
I can find anyone
32:34.8
who is advocating
32:37.0
the anti-slap law
32:38.7
or an anti-slap law
32:48.2
Yan. Maraming salamat
32:49.7
mga kapatid natin.
32:52.3
Yan lang yung sinasabi.
32:55.5
na yung natutulog
32:57.7
siya yung laging panalo.
