Close
 


SUMAGOT DAW SI FABRI, INTERESTING ITO!
Hide Subtitles
Click any subtitle word to view Tagalog.com dictionary results.
Computer Shortcuts: Left / Right arrows to jump 2 seconds back or forward. +Enter or Space to toggle Play/Pause button. Full Screen Mode
SUMAGOT DAW SI FABRI, INTERESTING ITO! Eto po bagong FB natin para sa videos: https://www.facebook.com/BATASnatin-107860591437195 https://www.facebook.com/Atty-Ranny-Randolf-B-Libayan-154012243457531 Alternate YT channel po for livestreams: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCskZGSV52krMvXgb8OXXx1g WEBSITE: https://batasnatin.com/ LAW FIRM: https://firm.batasnatin.com/ FACEBOOK PAGE: https://www.facebook.com/BATASnatin/ INSTAGRAM: https://www.instagram.com/batasnatin/ YOUTUBE CHANNEL: https://youtube.com/BATASnatinLive TWITTER: https://twitter.com/BATASnatin LAWYERS: Atty. Kristina Louise Magalong Atty. Ranny Randolf B. Libayan FIRM ADDRESS: #31 Gen. Luna St., Tuktukan, Taguig City, NCR (Across Taguig City Hall) Email: BATASnatin@gmail.com Telephone nos: +63915-954-6080 (+632)359-4203 We are a full-service Law Firm We handle and are experienced in litigating many kinds of cases. Please do not hesitate to contact us. We will be happy to assist you with
Atty. Ranny Randolf B. Libayan
  Mute  
Run time: 33:03
Has AI Subtitles



Video Transcript / Subtitles:( AI generated. About AI subtitles » )
00:00.0
All right!
00:08.2
Ayan!
00:09.1
Nag-error daw.
00:10.2
Magandang araw mga kapatid natin
00:11.8
at welcome sa isa ng live stream yun.
00:13.6
Salamat kayo.
00:20.3
Minsan nagbigay nito.
00:22.0
Ready na ba kayo?
00:23.9
Na-string ko na eh.
00:30.0
Pentatonic.
00:44.7
Si Boss Neil.
00:46.3
Ayan.
00:47.8
Salamat, salamat
00:48.7
sa pag-ano
00:49.6
sa pag-fuel sa bisyo.
00:53.3
Anyway,
00:54.4
sa sunod na yan.
00:55.6
Ito yung
00:56.5
Pumiiyak ka na
00:60.0
naman
01:01.1
Langya talaga
01:06.0
wala ka bang
01:07.9
ibang alam
01:09.5
Ayan.
01:26.2
Sabi ni Ano
01:27.0
at least
01:27.9
sa wakas
01:29.7
after 10 years
01:31.2
sumagot din.
01:33.4
Hindi naman 10 years.
01:34.6
Tignan natin, no?
01:36.4
Tignan natin kung ilang months.
01:39.3
Okay.
01:39.9
Ito,
01:40.5
nangyari yung video
01:41.8
mga kapatid natin, no?
01:43.6
This is
01:44.5
sa batas with
01:45.5
Atty. Claire Castro
01:46.6
The Debate
01:47.3
Atty. Levian
01:48.2
vs. Fiscal EJ
01:49.3
Age of Sexual Consent
01:51.2
3 months ago
01:52.6
September 18, 2023
01:54.8
So, mga kapatid natin
01:56.3
after
01:57.2
3 months naman
01:58.6
no?
01:59.4
After 3 months
02:00.6
mga kapatid natin
02:01.7
sumagot
02:03.3
si Fabry.
02:05.3
Siyempre!
02:07.0
Dahil sumagot siya
02:08.2
mga kapatid natin
02:09.3
and
02:10.5
meron siyang 3 months
02:12.1
para sagutin
02:13.4
yung bangayan maneuver
02:15.3
mga kapatid natin
02:16.6
eh
02:17.2
we are expecting
02:20.1
a very good answer.
02:22.4
Di ba?
02:23.0
We are expecting
02:24.6
a very good answer.
02:29.4
Matagal pinag-isipan.
02:31.0
Matagal nag-research.
02:32.9
Di ba?
02:33.2
Ewan ko kung tinap niya pa
02:34.6
yung 100 lawyers dito.
02:36.4
Okay, pinag-research niya pa
02:37.6
yung mga students niya.
02:39.0
3 months.
02:40.6
No?
02:41.2
Ito,
02:42.1
23 hours ago.
02:45.1
So, wala pang
02:45.7
ano?
02:46.5
Wala pang
02:47.2
24 hours.
02:50.6
Wala pang isang araw.
02:52.0
Tayo.
02:52.5
Sasagot na tayo agad.
02:54.2
Tapos, mga kapatid natin
02:55.8
ewan ko may play-play natin
02:56.9
yung buong video.
02:57.6
Hindi ko rin napanood yung buo eh.
02:59.1
Pero,
02:59.4
a huge part of it
03:01.8
na panood ko.
03:03.0
Ah, let's go!
03:05.9
Magandang araw po sa lahat.
03:07.8
Bago natin sagotin.
03:08.8
Magandang araw,
03:10.0
Fiscal EJ.
03:11.4
Fabry.
03:12.2
Sagotin ang matagal
03:13.3
ng inaasam-asam
03:14.5
ni Ginong Libayan
03:15.4
na sagotin ko.
03:16.6
Yes!
03:17.5
Matagal na!
03:18.8
Talaga!
03:20.2
That's why I am expecting
03:22.2
a really good answer,
03:24.1
Fabry.
03:25.3
Ah, let's go!
03:25.8
Ang pinaparatang niya
03:27.7
na bangayan maneuver
03:28.9
di umano.
03:29.4
Pakinggan muna natin siya
03:31.4
sa mga patutsada niya
03:32.6
laban sa akin.
03:34.1
Panoorin mo yung videos
03:35.4
bago mo sagot.
03:38.8
Hindi yung humi...
03:40.0
Yun din yung unang-unang
03:41.2
comment ko doon.
03:42.9
Yun din yung unang-unang
03:44.2
comment ko
03:45.8
doon sa nag-react ako doon
03:47.3
sa Fiscal EJ
03:48.7
versus Attorney Libayan mo.
03:50.0
Hindi ko alam kung saan galing
03:51.4
yung mga sinasabi mo.
03:53.6
Okay?
03:55.3
And so far,
03:58.4
consistent siya.
03:59.4
At makikita nyo dito
04:00.6
sa ginawa niya dito,
04:01.7
mga kabatas natin.
04:04.2
Fabry is very consistent.
04:07.4
Atunin natin.
04:08.2
Tapos sinasabi mo pa ngayon
04:09.3
na ako ang may misleading statements.
04:11.3
Yan po ang unang patutsada
04:12.9
ni Ginuong Libayan.
04:14.5
Nagre-react.
04:15.4
Ops!
04:15.9
In the first place,
04:17.2
ikaw yung
04:18.1
nag-claim
04:19.6
ng misleading statements.
04:23.5
Tapos,
04:24.8
ngayon,
04:25.3
ang tanong,
04:26.4
ano ba yung pinag-uusapan natin
04:28.8
doon sa misleading statements?
04:31.2
Okay?
04:32.1
O, nagre-react daw ako
04:33.3
na hindi mo na pinapanood
04:34.7
ang video niya.
04:36.8
Sige.
04:37.9
Anong sagot?
04:38.7
Nagre-react daw ako
04:39.3
na hindi ko muna
04:40.3
pinapanood ang video niya.
04:43.0
Even if you trace back
04:44.2
what I said in this video,
04:46.7
in-react ko lang
04:47.5
yung statement mo,
04:48.9
Attorney Libayan.
04:51.0
So, ang tanong,
04:53.5
sinagot mo ba?
04:56.8
Is it responsive?
04:58.8
Ang usapan,
05:00.6
kung pinapanood mo ba yung video?
05:08.7
Ah, baka naman sasagutin mamaya.
05:10.7
Baka sasagutin.
05:11.6
Baka sasagutin mamaya.
05:13.2
Let's go, let's go.
05:14.1
Eh, iba na naman eh.
05:16.0
Why? Why?
05:17.7
Let's try coherence.
05:21.2
Diba?
05:21.6
Let's try to be coherent here, please.
05:24.1
Ah, tuloy, tuloy, tuloy, tuloy.
05:25.3
Kung saan sinabi mo
05:26.6
in this particular live stream of yours,
05:28.8
na may mga slapsuits,
05:30.9
kahit...
05:31.7
Pinanood mo ba?
05:34.3
O hindi?
05:35.6
Tapos slapsuits?
05:36.7
Wala pang batas na nagsasabing
05:38.5
ito nga ay mga slapsuits.
05:41.1
So, saan dyan ang misleading sa sinabi ko, ha?
05:44.2
Libyan.
05:44.6
Ops!
05:46.1
Ops!
05:47.4
Hindi yan yung sinabi ko na misleading.
05:50.5
Ang sinabi ko na misleading, Fabri,
05:54.4
yung
05:54.9
claim mo kasi.
05:57.5
No?
05:57.7
Yung claim mo, Fabri,
05:58.8
sinabi mo
05:59.8
na
06:00.6
yung mga
06:02.9
kung natalo
06:04.7
ako
06:05.3
doon sa kaso
06:06.6
ng copyright infringement,
06:09.6
ibig sabihin matatalo na rin yung mga tao.
06:13.2
Tapos, sinabi mo
06:14.5
na hindi tama yun.
06:18.4
Sinabi mo
06:19.4
na yun yung misleading statement ko.
06:23.8
Doon ako sumagot.
06:25.7
Sinabi ko,
06:26.9
ikaw ang nagbimislead.
06:28.1
Sinabi ko,
06:28.8
dahil
06:29.6
linabas ko
06:30.7
yung Latin Maxim
06:32.8
na
06:34.9
Stare Decisis.
06:41.0
Bakit?
06:41.8
Bakit iba na yung pinag-uulapan natin, Fabri?
06:45.9
Bakit?
06:47.9
Aba ka naman may punto siya.
06:49.8
Pagbigyan natin.
06:52.1
Halatang ikaw tong kumukuda
06:54.4
na hindi mo napapanood
06:56.1
o napakikinggan ang mga sinabi ko.
06:58.8
Ikaw ito.
07:00.5
No!
07:02.1
We watched your video!
07:03.8
We were watching your video!
07:06.6
Tumigil lang noon!
07:08.2
Kasi nga,
07:09.1
nung nadun ako sa Japan,
07:10.9
medyo may problema yung internet.
07:13.7
Pero we watched it.
07:15.7
We patiently watched it.
07:17.8
And,
07:18.7
Fabri,
07:19.4
this is also my suggestion to you.
07:22.3
Panuorin mo rin yung mga videos mo.
07:27.7
Panuorin mo rin yung mga videos mo.
07:28.6
Panuorin mo rin yung mga videos mo
07:30.1
para alam mo kung ano yung mga sinasabi mo doon.
07:35.2
Nag-react ka doon sa punto
07:38.1
tungkol sa copyright infringement
07:44.0
doon sa kaso
07:45.0
na wala kang pakialam, sabi mo.
07:47.6
Tapos, minimislid ko yung mga tao
07:49.5
na kapag natalo ako dito,
07:51.3
matatalo na rin sila.
07:58.6
Fabri!
08:00.3
Nasaan ka?
08:03.2
Where are you going?
08:06.3
Oh my goodness!
08:09.5
O tuloy natin!
08:10.3
Itong naglalagay ng mga salita sa bibig ko
08:12.8
na hindi ko naman sinabi
08:14.5
tapos ako pa ngayon ang misleading?
08:18.5
You were the ones who said that.
08:21.4
It was in a video.
08:23.8
Wait, wait!
08:24.7
Pwede na yata natin i-play ngayon.
08:28.6
Kung hindi mo tinanggal, ha?
08:49.3
Sandali.
08:50.2
Nulong krimen.
08:52.6
Yan.
08:53.1
Misleading statements.
08:58.3
Ito.
08:58.4
Ito, ito.
09:00.0
Hindi mo pinapanood yung videos mo.
09:05.3
Misleading statements.
09:06.8
Slap suits.
09:08.7
Diba?
09:09.8
O, nag-umpisa ka dyan sa misleading statements na yan.
09:12.9
Sa opinion ko ay
09:14.1
masyadong misleading.
09:17.2
By the way, Atty. Libayan,
09:19.0
just like sa slap suit
09:20.3
ng ibang bansa na wala akong pakialam
09:22.6
dahil hindi natin batas yun,
09:25.5
wala rin akong pakialam
09:26.7
kung manalo o matalo ka.
09:28.4
O manalo o matalo man
09:30.3
ng RTIA
09:31.3
sa copyright infringement case.
09:34.6
O, diba?
09:35.3
We're talking about the copyright infringement case.
09:38.6
Ito yung in-issue ko sa kanya
09:40.1
na numero unong
09:41.7
misleading statement niya.
09:44.4
Yes.
09:45.9
And to my listeners,
09:47.9
huwag po tayong maniwala
09:49.2
sa sweeping generalization
09:51.0
na pag may isang natalo
09:53.4
sa infringement case,
09:54.7
e damay-damay na lahat.
09:57.4
No.
09:57.6
Ah.
10:00.4
Diba? Yan yung sinasabi mo
10:02.0
na minimislead ko yung mga tao
10:03.5
sa isang sweeping generalization?
10:07.5
Then I told you,
10:08.9
you are the one misleading people
10:10.6
because you are the one
10:12.1
who is making a sweeping generalization
10:14.5
and not me?
10:17.4
Kasi nga,
10:18.3
meron yung principle na story
10:20.0
decisis na yung people who are
10:21.8
situated in the same
10:24.1
circumstances should be decided
10:26.2
in the same manner.
10:27.6
If it was already decided
10:29.7
by the court?
10:33.5
Ah.
10:35.0
That is a foolish and reckless
10:37.5
exaggeration.
10:40.0
You did that
10:41.4
exaggeration.
10:43.3
Not me.
10:47.7
Fabry.
10:49.7
Kaya, pinanood ko itong
10:51.6
sagot mo.
10:53.0
What the heck is happening
10:55.5
here?
10:57.6
Why?
10:59.1
Because the determination of
11:01.1
fair use of a copyrighted work
11:03.4
is to be determined
11:04.9
via the so-called
11:06.4
four-factor test.
11:09.4
Diba?
11:11.6
Diba?
11:12.7
O. Yan yung pinag-usapan natin.
11:15.7
Tingnan natin. Balikan natin siya.
11:23.1
Sabi niya, I'm putting words
11:25.0
in his mouth daw.
11:26.5
Maybe he can be specific.
11:27.6
Specific this time.
11:28.8
Kasi pag titignan nyo dito, mga kabatas natin,
11:31.5
he was not specific.
11:33.9
Sinabi niya, nagre-react lang siya dito.
11:35.9
Ako, I'm very specific.
11:38.0
I played your video, Fabry.
11:43.0
Nagre-react lang ako dito,
11:44.6
sabi niya.
11:45.6
Pero,
11:47.5
hindi specific yung sagot niya.
11:49.5
Clips.
11:51.0
Halatang, ikaw tong kumukudintas
11:53.1
na nagsasabing ito nga ay mga
11:55.2
slap suits. So, saan dyan
11:57.3
ang misleading sa sinabi ko, ha?
11:59.9
Ah, ang sinabi kong
12:01.3
misleading, yun. Ba't hindi mo sinagot yun?
12:04.4
Yung sweeping generalization
12:05.6
at starry decisies.
12:11.8
And,
12:13.2
I still stand by. Ito, hindi mo rin
12:15.3
lininaw ito, eh. Ano ba ang punto mo?
12:17.2
Nag-i-exist ba talagang slap suit o hindi?
12:21.2
Dyan ka nagkakaproblema, eh.
12:25.3
Dyan ka nagkakaproblema, Fabry.
12:27.3
You don't know where you stand.
12:30.4
You're all over the place.
12:33.4
O, tuloy natin.
12:34.1
Na may mga slap suits.
12:35.9
Kahit wala pang batas na nakare-
12:37.7
Dyan, ito.
12:39.0
Even if you trace back what I said
12:41.3
in this video, kinorect ko lang
12:43.7
yung statement mo.
12:45.1
At Tony Libayan, kung saan sinabi mo
12:47.0
in this particular live stream of yours
12:48.9
na may mga slap suits.
12:50.9
Tandaan nyo, sinabi niya kinorect ko lang, ha?
12:54.1
Pero, meron yung
12:55.1
sweeping generalizations. Hindi niya
12:57.2
sinali yun. Eh, doon nga ako
12:59.2
mostly nag-react.
13:01.7
Naglabas pa ako ng
13:02.7
story decisies. Oh my God, Fabry.
13:07.4
Slap suits. Kahit wala pang
13:09.0
batas na nagsasabing ito nga
13:10.9
ay mga slap suits.
13:12.8
So, saan dyan ang misleading sa sinabi ko, ha?
13:16.5
Panoorin mo yung
13:17.3
video. Inulit ko na naman
13:19.2
ngayon.
13:22.6
Kung ganto na lang tayo magsasagutan, Fabry,
13:26.0
it's a waste of time.
13:27.2
It's a waste of time.
13:32.9
Just watch my past video.
13:34.7
Ganyan din yung ginawa mo noon doon sa ano eh.
13:37.9
Inulit mo lang yung sinabi mo
13:39.3
para ikaw yung may last say.
13:40.9
Pero, hindi mo naman rinibat
13:43.0
yung mga linabas ko nung usapan natin
13:45.1
tungkol sa reckless driving.
13:48.5
Lang, sabi mo pa, ha?
13:51.8
Oh, let's go.
13:52.9
Libs, halatang
13:54.8
ikaw tong kumukuda na hindi mo
13:57.1
napapanood o napakikinggan
13:59.1
ang mga sinabi ko.
14:00.7
Ikaw ito.
14:02.5
Nope.
14:04.1
Itong naglalagay ng mga salita sa bibig ko
14:06.6
na hindi ko naman sinabi, tapos
14:08.8
ako pa ngayon ang misleading?
14:12.6
But why aren't you being
14:14.8
specific?
14:18.0
Saan ako naging
14:18.7
misleading?
14:24.1
Saan?
14:26.2
Saan?
14:27.1
For those who are new
14:30.9
to this tit-for-tat between me
14:32.7
and Atty. Libayan with regards to the
14:34.8
topic on slapsuits, you may
14:36.9
want to take a glimpse of what I said
14:39.1
in these videos and judge
14:41.0
for yourselves kung sino sa aming
14:42.9
dalawa ang misled at
14:44.8
kumukuda ng mga misleading
14:46.7
statements.
14:49.0
Panoorin nyo rin yung videos ko.
14:51.3
Kasi ako, I'm very specific
14:53.3
in answering.
14:54.3
I don't
14:56.3
I don't do generic shit.
14:59.5
Generic stuff.
15:00.5
I don't do that.
15:05.6
Again, for the record,
15:07.7
never kong sinabi
15:09.0
na ginamit mong depensa
15:10.6
ang slap sa copyright
15:12.3
infringement case mo.
15:14.4
Okay, okay.
15:16.3
Siguro ang gusto mong sabihin, parang
15:18.3
parang ano?
15:21.6
Parang sinabi mo na
15:23.2
hindi mo sinabi na
15:25.1
na ginamit ko.
15:26.3
Yon. Pero, pag titignan mo
15:28.6
kasi, ha?
15:32.9
Fiscal EJ.
15:33.9
Hmm.
16:01.9
How will we interpret this?
16:03.8
Fiscal EJ.
16:03.9
Fiscal EJ.
16:05.6
Attorney Libayan versus Fiscal EJ.
16:08.4
Not powered by ChatGPT
16:09.9
Slapsuits. Meron nang
16:11.8
nag-invoke ng slap in
16:13.7
2018 pero dinismiss
16:16.1
ng Supreme Court.
16:20.6
Rights.
16:23.4
The enforcement of environmental
16:25.6
laws, protection
16:27.6
of the environment, or
16:29.2
assertion of environmental rights.
16:33.9
Meron na palang nag-invoke ng
16:35.8
slap suit dito sa Pilipinas.
16:38.3
2018 pa.
16:40.4
Pero ang
16:40.7
So, sino ang
16:46.5
sino ang sinasabihan mo dito na
16:49.5
nag-invoke ng slap suit?
16:52.7
Bakit mo
16:53.4
bakit mo ginagamit itong
16:55.9
2018 slap suit na ito
16:58.0
na nag-invoke
16:59.3
bilang isang depensa
17:00.9
kung hindi naman pala
17:02.7
applicable dito sa
17:04.2
Attorney Libayan versus Fiscal EJ
17:06.6
not powered by ChatGPT
17:08.3
Slapsuits?
17:11.7
Meron na.
17:19.3
The implications
17:20.9
are there.
17:27.1
I'm disappointed.
17:30.5
Sabi nga ng Supreme Court is that
17:32.6
the concept of slap
17:34.2
is applicable lamang in those cases
17:36.8
claimed.
17:37.6
So, ito diba ginamit
17:39.2
bilang depensa?
17:42.6
Ano ba yung sinasabi dyan
17:44.3
sa kampo nyo?
17:45.8
Ginamit ko bilang depensa.
17:48.9
O sige, kahit hindi ikaw yung
17:50.1
nagsabi. Ano ito?
17:55.5
Sabi ni
17:56.3
Riders Diary.
17:57.8
Nag-example siya para saan?
17:59.3
Ewan ko sa kanya!
18:00.1
Kaka-usapin nyo!
18:02.6
O, balikan na naman natin.
18:15.6
What's the purpose of that then?
18:18.5
Oh my goodness.
18:19.7
I said, I
18:20.8
Sabi niya, meron na rin.
18:23.1
Meaning, sinabi niya, ginawa mo din.
18:26.9
Ewan ko ba sa kanya?
18:28.5
Damage control.
18:29.5
O, let's go!
18:30.0
I have no interest whatsoever
18:32.2
talking about your case.
18:34.4
You're basically barking at the wrong tree,
18:37.1
Atty. Libay.
18:38.2
I'm not barking at you.
18:40.8
I don't need to bark at you.
18:45.6
Diba magtuturo tayo ng batas?
18:50.4
O, tuloy natin.
18:51.1
Yan, dahil mukhang ibang piskal yata
18:53.1
ang nagsabi na ginamit.
18:55.5
Alam niya, ito, itong mga taong ito,
18:58.0
no?
19:00.3
You're not funny.
19:02.2
It's not funny.
19:03.7
Pero, magsisingit kayo ng laugh track.
19:07.3
Pathetic.
19:09.1
It's so pathetic.
19:11.2
Kumit mong depensa ang slap
19:12.9
sa copyright infringement case
19:15.2
and definitely, it is not me.
19:19.6
Pakinggan natin ang pangalawang patutsada.
19:23.2
Ah, sige, sige, sige.
19:24.4
Baka meron naman mga sagot pa dito.
19:26.7
Ni Ginoong Libayan.
19:28.5
Supreme Court, o ako.
19:30.2
Eh, you took me out of context.
19:32.2
Sabi ni Atty. Libayan, I took him out of context daw.
19:36.9
No, I did not take you out of context.
19:40.1
Precisely, pinutol ko ang portion kung saan nagdi-disagree ka sa isang abogado dahil ako mismo,
19:46.6
quite surprisingly, I agree with you na hindi prerequisite ang pag-file mo na...
19:52.0
Parang hindi maganda para sa'yo yung pupuntahan niyo ito, Fabry ah.
20:11.0
So you agree with me?
20:21.1
Then?
20:21.8
Then?
20:22.0
Then, what did you do that for?
20:26.9
Para saan mo ginawa yun?
20:29.9
Oh my goodness.
20:32.1
Oh, agree.
20:32.8
Quite surprisingly, nag-agree daw siya sa akin.
20:39.7
Parang dun sa age of sexual consent, nag-agree ka na rin eventually.
20:45.8
You took our stance.
20:49.1
Na parang kayo na.
20:50.5
Na, yung pinaglalaban, yung pinaglalaban namin.
20:58.0
At tignan natin, tignan natin.
20:59.8
Quite surprisingly, I agree with you na hindi prerequisite ang pag-file mo ng kaso
21:05.5
bago mo masabi na slapsuit or slapsuits ang kaso o mga kaso na kinountercharge ng taong sinampahan mo ng kaso.
21:15.4
So does that mean, Fabry, you also agree that slapsuits exist?
21:20.5
Because you agree with me.
21:26.1
Doon sa sinabi ko doon.
21:29.3
For you to agree with that, you have to agree first.
21:32.9
That there are slapsuits.
21:40.1
GG.
21:43.1
Debunk si Rizal.
21:48.3
O, tuloy natin.
21:49.3
And I'm sure the lawyer can sufficiently explain himself sa paninindigan niya.
21:54.8
He does not answer for me and neither do I for him.
21:59.0
We...
21:59.4
What are you talking about?
22:12.9
Wala na siya doon.
22:14.7
Because what happened
22:15.9
is I
22:19.3
gave an opposing opinion.
22:23.2
Contrary opinion.
22:24.6
And you gave a contrary opinion to me.
22:28.0
Also.
22:30.3
Kaya nga versus eh.
22:33.0
Hindi tayo magkakaroon ng versus, Fabry, kung agree-agree tayo doon.
22:37.2
Kaya nga versus yun dahil ang ipupunto natin
22:40.6
ay yung mga bagay na hindi tayo agree.
22:44.8
Agree?
22:46.1
Dapat mag-agree ka doon.
22:49.3
Kasi hindi na magiging versus kapag agree.
22:52.4
Agree.
23:04.3
We respect each other's views.
23:08.4
Kahit na magkaibigan kami, hindi naman sa lahat ng issue nag-a-agree kami.
23:16.3
So ngayon, ang pag-uusapan natin yung friendship.
23:19.2
This is a waste of time.
23:30.2
So kung magkaibigan kayo, hindi kayo nag-a-agree.
23:33.8
Mag-agree ka sa akin.
23:36.3
Pero versus.
23:37.8
Pero I don't think nag-agree ka sa akin.
23:40.4
Okay.
23:40.5
Hindi naman kami miyembro ng isang kulto na iisa ang paniniwala kahit mali-mali.
24:02.9
We don't care.
24:05.3
And it's not funny.
24:07.7
But you made a blatant mistake.
24:10.1
Atony Libayan, when you.
24:11.8
Okay.
24:12.4
Please, please educate me.
24:14.6
Fabury, educate me please.
24:16.8
Explaining na hindi kailangang may maunang kaso,
24:20.4
made a general statement na ang slap suits are not meant to be retaliations.
24:28.0
See? You're taking me out of context again.
24:33.9
I was reacting to your friend.
24:36.5
Friend.
24:36.7
Ayta.
24:40.1
Is that a general statement?
24:46.7
No.
24:47.5
Why?
24:48.0
Because there are facts, Fabry.
24:51.9
Ganyan din yung ginawa mo doon sa copyright infringement.
24:56.3
Na basta may kasong copyright infringement, natalo ka, talo na lahat.
25:02.9
May facts ako dyan.
25:04.6
Yung facts ko galing sa friend mo.
25:06.7
So is that a generalized statement?
25:18.0
I was referring to your friend, Atty. Rizal.
25:22.9
Yan yung facts doon.
25:29.9
Oh my goodness.
25:33.3
How low can you go?
25:36.7
O, uulitin ko ang sinabi mo ha, Libs?
25:40.4
Ang sinabi mo, slaps are not meant to be retaliations.
25:45.5
Kahit na i-play ko pa ang buong video mo.
25:49.1
Well, i-play mo yung buong video.
25:52.3
Intindihin mo rin sana.
25:54.3
I was referring to Atty. Rizal.
25:57.9
Doon ako nag-comment kay Atty. Rizal tungkol dyan.
26:01.6
Yan.
26:01.7
And you also agreed, you said.
26:12.7
Why would I say that?
26:14.3
Sige, sige.
26:15.1
Fabri, I will make life easier for you.
26:21.5
Why will I say this?
26:24.8
Slapses are not meant to be retaliations.
26:29.2
Why would I say this?
26:31.0
Why would I say this?
26:31.1
Why would I say this?
26:31.1
Bakit ko ba sinabi yan?
26:33.3
Ano ba ang dahilan kung bakit ko sinabi yan, Fabri?
26:37.7
Hindi ba dahil sa kaibigan mo?
26:40.7
Nadinebank mo din na sinabi mo, pareho tayo ng punto.
26:46.2
Surprisingly.
26:50.8
The same point.
26:52.9
Bakit mo linabas yung ginamit na rin
26:55.8
yung slapsuit?
27:01.1
Pero dinismiss ito ng Supreme Court.
27:16.6
Context.
27:19.6
Ito, abogado tayo.
27:24.0
Merong facts of the case.
27:26.5
May issue.
27:27.7
Tapos may decision.
27:29.3
Hindi pwede.
27:31.1
Na yung facts of the case
27:33.3
ilipat mo sa ibang kaso
27:37.1
tapos imemaintain mo yung issue at saka yung decision.
27:41.6
Why?
27:43.4
It's wrong.
27:45.2
Hindi pwede na I'm talking about a specific
27:48.3
legal matter
27:52.0
na diniscuss ng kaibigan mong abogado
27:54.9
tapos yung
27:56.6
specific na sinasabi ko
27:59.4
tungkol sa diniscuss ng kaibigan mong abogado.
28:00.9
Yung mga kaibigan mo,
28:01.9
gagawin mong generic.
28:10.8
Hindi pwedeng kukuha ka lang
28:12.5
ng sinabi ko
28:13.3
tapos ika-copy-paste mo
28:14.7
kung saan mo gusto.
28:15.9
That's not how it works
28:17.0
and you know that.
28:21.7
That's not how it works
28:23.0
and you know that.
28:25.0
Agree ka nga sa akin
28:26.0
noong umpisa palang
28:26.7
linabas mo pa ito.
28:27.7
Talo ka na dito.
28:30.9
O tuloy natin.
28:32.5
It will still sound like a separate general statement
28:36.0
that does not put context to your earlier statement.
28:39.5
Tignan mo, tignan mo ha.
28:41.6
Di ba sinabi niya noong una?
28:45.1
Sinabi niya noong una
28:46.4
na do not put words in my mouth.
28:52.7
O tuloy natin.
28:53.3
Separate general statement.
28:55.4
It will still sound like a separate
28:58.8
It will sound
29:02.2
Grabe magpalusot.
29:08.7
It will still sound like a separate statement.
29:14.5
Comprehension left the earth.
29:21.0
So kunwari, magdidiscuss ako
29:23.4
tungkol sa isang topic
29:26.4
bahala ka na.
29:28.8
Kung merong marinig ka doon
29:31.2
kahit meron akong isang topic
29:34.0
na dinidiscuss
29:35.8
kung yung sound niya
29:38.1
ay
29:38.9
generic
29:41.0
bahala ka na.
29:44.8
Hindi mo nakukunin yung konteksto
29:46.2
ng usapan.
29:48.7
O
29:49.1
sinasadya mo yan.
29:55.7
Yan nyo.
29:56.9
Slaps are not meant to be
29:58.7
retaliations.
30:00.8
Kahit na i-play ko pa
30:02.4
ang buong video mo,
30:04.2
it will still sound like a separate
30:06.5
general statement
30:07.9
that does not put context
30:10.1
to your earlier statement.
30:12.1
Kaya,
30:16.3
tanong ko sa iyo, Fabry.
30:20.3
Bakit itong statement na ito
30:22.3
ang maglalagay ng kontekst?
30:26.4
Eh, this is my reaction.
30:28.7
To the legal opinion of your friend.
30:33.7
Di ba dapat yung
30:34.4
kontekst kinuha mo doon
30:36.2
sa legal opinion ng friend mo?
30:40.0
Kasi yun ang usapan natin?
30:43.0
Do you even know what
30:44.3
kontekst means?
30:49.9
Pakigugal.
30:52.6
Pakigugal lang.
30:54.0
Kita binasahan ng
30:55.5
definition ng slapsuit
30:56.9
as enunciated in the
30:58.7
that FCF Minerals case.
31:03.1
I know that already.
31:07.8
To emphasize
31:09.0
and to remind you
31:10.5
that slapsuits are in essence
31:12.9
retaliation suits.
31:15.0
Filed.
31:19.6
You really want to take me
31:21.5
out of context, no?
31:23.9
If you will do that,
31:25.3
I can do that to you too.
31:28.7
But that is bad faith, Fabry.
31:32.6
Hindi magandang gawin yan
31:34.0
kaya hindi ginagawa yan.
31:36.6
Hindi ko maintindihan
31:37.8
kung bakit ginagawa mo.
31:42.7
Alam mo yung usapan doon.
31:46.0
It's very specific.
31:50.4
Do you think
31:51.5
I don't know the definition
31:52.9
of slapsuit?
31:53.6
Mga kapatid natin,
32:00.5
lalagyan natin ng part ito.
32:02.1
Kasi sabi niya,
32:02.6
hindi ko daw pinapanood.
32:03.6
O di, papanoorin natin.
32:05.9
Okay?
32:06.7
Papanoorin natin.
32:09.0
Pero yun,
32:10.3
kontekst.
32:11.8
And, and,
32:12.8
please, please, Fabry,
32:15.3
don't assume
32:18.1
na hindi ko alam
32:22.0
ang ibigay natin.
32:23.4
Ibig sabihin
32:24.0
ng sang slapsuit.
32:27.6
In the first place,
32:29.9
I don't think
32:32.5
I can find anyone
32:33.7
here in YouTube
32:34.8
who is advocating
32:37.0
the anti-slap law
32:38.7
or an anti-slap law
32:40.4
more than me.
32:46.0
Okay?
32:48.2
Yan. Maraming salamat
32:49.7
mga kapatid natin.
32:52.3
Yan lang yung sinasabi.
32:53.4
Matulog po tayo
32:54.1
ng mahimbing
32:54.5
dahil alam natin
32:55.5
na yung natutulog
32:56.6
ng mahimbing,
32:57.7
siya yung laging panalo.
32:58.9
Paalam po.
32:59.6
Pansamatan.