00:52.3
Mga kabatas natin, this is a temporary.
00:55.4
Temporary Restraining Order.
01:01.1
Pagtitignan nyo dito, Tape Incorporated has filed a petition seeking a temporary restraining order
01:07.2
and preliminary mandatory injunction regarding the court decision of the Itbulaga Trademark.
01:16.4
Nalito na siguro kayo.
01:18.0
Nakita ko nga dito eh. Nakita ko dito sa comment.
01:22.3
Sabi ni No Way TV.
01:24.8
Injunction to an injunction.
01:29.0
So, ito kasi mga kabatas natin.
01:32.9
Pinaliwanag ko naman na sa inyo noon na ang isang injunction ay isang ancillary remedy.
01:39.1
May main action ka.
01:41.4
Tapos pwede kang humingi ng TRO o temporary restraining order o kaya injunction in relation to the main action.
01:51.7
Ito nga yung main action nila mga kabatas natin.
01:54.1
Eh yung copyright infringement daw.
01:56.7
In relation to the use of Itbulaga and its symbols, the words, bla bla bla bla.
02:04.7
Doon sa desisyon mga kabatas natin ng Marikina Regional Trial Court,
02:11.3
pumanig ito sa Itbulaga.
02:13.0
Nung pumanig ito sa Itbulaga, in-injoin.
02:16.1
O kaya pinigilan mga kabatas natin ang Tape Incorporated at GMA na gamitin ang Itbulaga.
02:24.1
Sa kahit anumang form nito.
02:28.5
In other words, mga kabatas natin, in simple, in layman's term, ito ay yung pagpipigil doon sa paggamit sa kahit anumang legal na paraan.
02:44.3
Siyempre, pag ginamit pa rin nila yan, illegal na paraan na.
02:48.5
Doon sa mga simbolo at saka sa pangalan na Itbulaga.
02:55.4
Ngayon, mga kabatas natin, pipigilan din nila.
03:00.4
Yung desisyon para maipatupad.
03:04.7
Actually, mga kabatas natin,
03:07.0
kung babasahin nyo nga ito mga kabatas natin,
03:11.5
babasahin natin kasi ito, medyo nakakalito rin talaga.
03:15.8
Kasi doon sa desisyon, may kasamang injunction.
03:20.0
Di ba? May main cause of action ka, tapos may ancillary remedy,
03:23.4
tapos yung injunction na yun, mga kabatas natin,
03:27.0
it is immediately executory or it is self-executory
03:31.1
kung sinabi ng korte na ganun na ganun na yun.
03:35.3
Tulad ng ganun sinabi ko, unless it is lifted
03:37.3
by the court itself that issued it
03:40.2
or a higher court, like for example, the Court of Appeals,
03:45.5
pwedeng tanggalin yun.
03:48.3
tignan natin yung diskarte ng abogado.
03:53.1
ng TAPE Incorporated.
03:56.9
nagkaroon ng 53-page petition na finial before the Court of Appeals.
04:01.4
Ngayon, yung TAPE hiningi,
04:04.0
yung Court of Appeals na ianal yung order for TAPE and GMA to cease
04:08.4
use of the Itbulaga or EB trademark registrations, logos, names,
04:14.4
as well as the songs and audiovisual recordings of episodes and segments
04:18.2
prior to May 31, 2023.
04:23.1
So, ito, TRO din.
04:27.0
Tsaka, injunction.
04:30.8
Pero, iaanal yung order.
04:37.4
Order dun sa injunction.
04:41.2
Well, siguro, ito, mga kabatas natin,
04:43.5
sinusubukan ko kasi I want to make sense
04:47.5
of the, ano, no, of the
04:50.6
diskarte ng abogado.
04:53.1
Siguro, yung anal, gusto niyang ilift
04:58.5
Kung merong injunction.
04:59.8
Kasi, if you want to anal an order or a decision,
05:05.5
hindi pa naman final yun.
05:07.0
Kapag hindi siya final, ibig sabihin,
05:09.8
hindi pa siya pwedeng i-execute.
05:13.8
Hindi pa siya pwedeng i-execute.
05:16.4
Ngayon, ito, mga kabatas natin,
05:19.8
sabi niya, prior to May 31, 2023,
05:23.1
ito yung, sabi niya,
05:24.2
Ito, ito, ito yung sinabi ng abogado.
05:34.8
The legal counsel and spokesperson,
05:36.5
Atty. Maggie Garduque, said,
05:38.5
that the decision is a blatant violation
05:41.0
of the rules and the disrespect
05:43.3
of the jurisdiction of the
05:45.3
intellectual property office
05:46.8
on the pending trademark cases.
05:50.6
Parang sinasabi dito kasi ng abogado,
05:52.6
mga kabatas natin,
05:53.1
ng Tape Incorporated,
06:02.4
Ano ba yung Ultravires Act?
06:03.7
Ang Ultravires Act, mga kabatas natin,
06:05.8
ay isang bagay na gagawin ng isang
06:13.6
juridical or natural person,
06:16.5
kung saan gagawa siya
06:17.7
ng isang bagay beyond its power.
06:21.1
So, dito, mga kabatas natin,
06:25.1
doon sa kanyang jurisdiction.
06:29.4
tumapak na siya doon sa jurisdiction
06:31.3
ng intellectual property office.
06:34.5
Yun ang sinabi niya.
06:35.7
Kasi nga, nagkaroon daw ng ruling
06:37.6
sa trademark case.
06:40.2
Garduque added that TVJ's complaint
06:41.9
only asked the court whether or not
06:43.9
tape and GMA-committed copyright infringement
06:46.4
and unfair competition when it aired
06:48.4
replace of past episodes
06:53.1
ito yung argument nila eh.
06:56.9
Ito yung clinic claim nila.
06:59.7
Actually claim, tama.
07:01.2
Nag-commit daw silang copyright,
07:02.6
ang hinihingi lang daw ng TVJ,
07:05.8
eh, nag-commit sila ng copyright
07:07.0
infringement and unfair competition
07:09.4
sa pag-ere lang ng replace
07:11.1
of past episodes of Itbulaga
07:19.1
Pero, bakit copyright infringement?
07:20.8
Copyright infringement dahil sa ginawa nila
07:25.2
Pero, syempre, kapag,
07:27.3
well, ang sa akin lang ha,
07:29.1
ang sa akin lang, it necessarily follows
07:31.0
na if you are talking about copyright infringement,
07:34.5
tapos natalo ka dun sa copyright infringement,
07:38.0
committed copyright infringement,
07:42.8
you may be prevented
07:48.1
Or to further use
07:52.7
material. Ibig sabihin,
07:57.7
posisyon pa rin ng korte,
08:00.2
ito, mga kabatas natin, ano lang ha,
08:02.4
academic discussion lang ha,
08:04.4
ibig sabihin, nasa posisyon pa rin ng korte,
08:10.2
kung nakita nga nila na nag-commit ka ng copyright
08:12.6
infringement, they can stop you
08:16.0
doing additional damage.
08:22.7
Pero ang argument dito,
08:25.1
nung ano, nung abugado nila,
08:28.1
may disrespect daw sa jurisdiction
08:30.5
ng IPO on the pending
08:34.4
Pero mga kabatas natin,
08:37.2
copyright infringement and unfair
08:38.6
competition ang hiningi.
08:42.5
Ito yung issue. Meron bang copyright
08:44.5
infringement? So kung may copyright infringement,
08:46.7
ibig sabihin, pwede kang pigilan
08:48.8
ng korte to commit further
08:50.5
acts of copyright infringement.
08:57.1
pwedeng magkaroon ng injunction.
08:59.6
She added that there is
09:00.8
nothing in the complaint asking the court to
09:02.7
rule on trademark ownership
09:04.0
or to cancel the registered trademarks
09:06.5
of tape on itbulaga.
09:11.6
Ito kasi, mga kabatas
09:15.4
kung meron silang hiningi.
09:18.8
Most likely, kung humingi silang
09:20.5
injunction, mga kabatas natin,
09:23.5
Tape Incorporated and GMA
09:31.5
material, yung itbulaga
09:33.4
at saka EB, then it's
09:35.3
within the jurisdiction.
09:39.5
Tignan nyo, what is needed is for the court
09:41.2
to decide if TVJ and Fere
09:43.1
have copyright ownership
09:45.2
over these audiovisual recordings of past
09:47.2
episodes of itbulaga.
09:51.1
whether copyright infringement and unfair competition,
09:52.7
are committed, the issue on trademark ownership
09:55.4
and cancellation is irrelevant
09:56.8
and off-tangent in this case.
10:00.6
Pero I think they, well,
10:05.2
Kasi, like I said,
10:13.0
like for example, the EB logo
10:14.5
and itbulaga, mga kabatas natin,
10:19.1
registered trademark, it may be
10:21.0
covered by intellectual property.
10:25.1
violate the laws on intellectual
10:27.0
property, you might be liable
10:29.0
for copyright infringement.
10:38.3
Pero ito, ito kasi yung sinasabing niya, no?
10:41.7
The issue on trademark
10:43.0
ownership and cancellation is irrelevant
10:45.0
and off-tangent in this
10:49.2
Cancellation is irrelevant.
10:52.7
Kinancel ba niya yung
10:55.2
trademark ownership?
10:57.5
Pero mga kabatas natin,
10:59.6
yun yan sinasabi ko eh.
11:01.0
It's about copyright infringement.
11:02.8
Like for example, kung meron
11:05.0
kasing issue in relation to copyright
11:07.1
infringement, tapos
11:08.9
ini-infringe yung inyong intellectual
11:11.0
property, the court
11:12.6
may order you to stop doing it
11:17.7
To prevent further
11:22.7
Ito, nagpalit naman sila eh.
11:30.6
Ito mga kabatas natin, no?
11:31.8
Ang ano ko lang, isasummarize ko na lang
11:34.3
sa inyo lahat kung ano yung nangyari dito.
11:37.7
Bilang nabasa na natin yung lahat nito.
11:46.4
the intellectual property law,
11:52.7
dyan na-canceled na, pero it is
11:54.6
still ongoing appeal.
11:57.9
Ngayon, mga kabatas natin,
11:59.0
nagkaroon ng kaso
12:00.2
for copyright infringement
12:03.2
because they showed
12:07.3
of itbulagadaw noon.
12:10.3
Ngayon, mga kabatas natin,
12:11.9
of course, in showing
12:13.4
those itbulagadaw
12:14.9
previous episodes,
12:16.4
eh, it is covered by
12:18.4
intellectual property.
12:20.4
Ngayon, itong itbulagad,
12:22.3
eb, tapos yung logo niya, kasi mga kabatas
12:24.6
natin, they were registered
12:29.2
Tape Incorporated.
12:32.0
Kaya lang, kung wala kang trademark sa isang
12:34.3
creation of art mo,
12:36.5
well, kahit hindi naman art, no?
12:41.0
No? Kung wala kang trademark,
12:42.5
like, for example, you didn't register it,
12:46.6
as intellectual property.
12:50.3
and if someone uses,
12:56.2
against your favor,
12:57.9
or against your will,
13:00.4
eh, mga kabatas natin, they can be liable
13:02.3
for copyright infringement. So, I think,
13:04.9
yun ang hinahabol
13:07.6
itbulaga, ng TVJ.
13:11.1
Yun ang hinahabol ng TVJ.
13:14.4
ang trademark ay nasa kanila,
13:16.5
ang hahabulin namin,
13:17.9
copyright infringement, kasi sa amin yan.
13:22.3
Okay? Ganon. Pero ang sinasabi
13:24.4
naman dito, nung GMA,
13:27.1
at saka ng Tape Incorporated,
13:28.7
actually, Tape Incorporated lang yung nandito.
13:30.5
Ang sinasabi nila, eh,
13:32.6
trademark ang usapan na yan.
13:34.6
Kasi nga, niregister namin yan
13:39.0
Ngayon, hindi kayo pwedeng mag-rule
13:40.6
in relation to that.
13:43.8
Parang ganon yung
13:50.1
Parang ganon yung nangyayari.
13:51.4
Okay. This is very interesting.
13:52.8
Like I said, ano to, eh, bagong...
13:55.2
Well, it is, ano,
14:03.7
the laws of the Philippines,
14:06.5
in relation to jurisprudence.
14:08.6
Walang ganitong kasikat
14:11.6
ang nilitis ever since.
14:14.8
And it is really good if this
14:16.7
will go to Supreme Court. Kahit sino
14:18.8
man ang manalo. Bakit?
14:20.7
Kasi magkakaroon tayo ng basihan in relation
14:22.9
to this. Kasi pag titignan nyo,
14:25.0
ganyan talaga yung mga abogado, mga kabatas
14:26.9
natin, they have differing opinions.
14:28.6
Especially if you belong to different sides.
14:33.0
Okay? That is normal.
14:35.3
So, yun ang abangan natin.
14:37.7
Pero parang, ano, no?
14:38.9
Parang magkaibang, magkaibang,
14:41.0
magkaiba yung atake
14:44.9
nitong Tape Incorporated.
14:50.7
Pero so far, dito sa nangyaring ito,
14:53.0
sino ang lamang? Siyempre, lamang ang
14:56.9
nakakuha sila ng, ano yun,
14:58.8
injunction eh. Eh, naging tahan
15:01.0
ng pinakamasaya yung kabila.
15:03.4
So, sila yung lamang.
15:04.7
Kaya lang, mga kabatas natin, siyempre, hindi pa
15:06.8
tapos yung laban.
15:10.7
ya, apila yan. Kaya lang, dahil
15:12.7
sa, ano, injunction na na-i-issue
15:15.0
sa kanila na pinipigilan silang gamitin
15:17.2
o pinipigilan ng tape na gamitin
15:23.8
it's, ano, lamang.
15:30.2
Good luck. Good luck sa parehong
15:35.7
This will nourish
15:37.0
our jurisprudence. Maraming salamat po.
15:39.5
At siyempre, tulad na lagi ang sinasabi, matulog po tayo
15:41.4
ng mahimbing. Dahil alam natin
15:43.3
na inatutulog ng mahimbing, siya yung
15:45.2
laging panalo. Paalam po, pansamantala.
