Close
 


TAPE PINAPATIGIL ANG INJUNCTION NA PANIG SA EAT BULAGA
Hide Subtitles
Click any subtitle word to view Tagalog.com dictionary results.
Computer Shortcuts: Left / Right arrows to jump 2 seconds back or forward. +Enter or Space to toggle Play/Pause button. Full Screen Mode
TAPE PINAPATIGIL ANG DESISYON NA PANIG SA EAT BULAGA Eto po bagong FB natin para sa videos: https://www.facebook.com/BATASnatin-107860591437195 https://www.facebook.com/Atty-Ranny-Randolf-B-Libayan-154012243457531 Alternate YT channel po for livestreams: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCskZGSV52krMvXgb8OXXx1g WEBSITE: https://batasnatin.com/ LAW FIRM: https://firm.batasnatin.com/ FACEBOOK PAGE: https://www.facebook.com/BATASnatin/ INSTAGRAM: https://www.instagram.com/batasnatin/ YOUTUBE CHANNEL: https://youtube.com/BATASnatinLive TWITTER: https://twitter.com/BATASnatin LAWYERS: Atty. Kristina Louise Magalong Atty. Ranny Randolf B. Libayan FIRM ADDRESS: #31 Gen. Luna St., Tuktukan, Taguig City, NCR (Across Taguig City Hall) Email: BATASnatin@gmail.com Telephone nos: +63915-954-6080 (+632)359-4203 We are a full-service Law Firm We handle and are experienced in litigating many kinds of cases. Please do not hesitate to contact us. We will be happy to as
BATASnatin
  Mute  
Run time: 15:50
Has AI Subtitles



Video Transcript / Subtitles:( AI generated. About AI subtitles » )
00:00.0
All right, yan. Magandang araw mga kabatas natin at welcome sa isin mong livestream.
00:06.6
Mga kabatas natin, dito sa balita tungkol sa Tape Incorporated versus TVJ in relation to Itbulaga mga kabatas natin
00:19.2
and the intellectual property and the trademark, meron na namang update.
00:25.4
Itong update na ito mga kabatas natin, medyo nakakabulaga.
00:32.1
Nakakabulaga to say the least.
00:34.7
Okay, let me, ano muna mga kabatas natin, let me tell you what happened.
00:40.9
Ito kasi mga kabatas natin, ito yung title niya.
00:44.9
Tape 6 TRO versus Court Order on Itbulaga Trademark.
00:50.7
Okay, ano ang TRO?
00:52.3
Mga kabatas natin, this is a temporary.
00:55.4
Temporary Restraining Order.
00:58.0
Okay?
01:01.1
Pagtitignan nyo dito, Tape Incorporated has filed a petition seeking a temporary restraining order
01:07.2
and preliminary mandatory injunction regarding the court decision of the Itbulaga Trademark.
01:15.0
Okay.
01:16.4
Nalito na siguro kayo.
01:18.0
Nakita ko nga dito eh. Nakita ko dito sa comment.
01:22.3
Sabi ni No Way TV.
01:24.1
Ayos yan ah.
01:24.8
Injunction to an injunction.
01:27.9
Diba?
01:29.0
So, ito kasi mga kabatas natin.
01:32.9
Pinaliwanag ko naman na sa inyo noon na ang isang injunction ay isang ancillary remedy.
01:39.1
May main action ka.
01:40.5
Okay?
01:41.4
Tapos pwede kang humingi ng TRO o temporary restraining order o kaya injunction in relation to the main action.
01:51.7
Ito nga yung main action nila mga kabatas natin.
01:54.1
Eh yung copyright infringement daw.
01:56.7
In relation to the use of Itbulaga and its symbols, the words, bla bla bla bla.
02:04.7
Doon sa desisyon mga kabatas natin ng Marikina Regional Trial Court,
02:11.3
pumanig ito sa Itbulaga.
02:13.0
Nung pumanig ito sa Itbulaga, in-injoin.
02:16.1
O kaya pinigilan mga kabatas natin ang Tape Incorporated at GMA na gamitin ang Itbulaga.
02:24.1
Sa kahit anumang form nito.
02:27.8
Okay?
02:28.5
In other words, mga kabatas natin, in simple, in layman's term, ito ay yung pagpipigil doon sa paggamit sa kahit anumang legal na paraan.
02:44.3
Siyempre, pag ginamit pa rin nila yan, illegal na paraan na.
02:47.5
Okay?
02:48.5
Doon sa mga simbolo at saka sa pangalan na Itbulaga.
02:54.1
Pinigilan sila.
02:55.4
Ngayon, mga kabatas natin, pipigilan din nila.
02:59.2
Okay?
03:00.4
Yung desisyon para maipatupad.
03:04.7
Actually, mga kabatas natin,
03:07.0
kung babasahin nyo nga ito mga kabatas natin,
03:11.5
babasahin natin kasi ito, medyo nakakalito rin talaga.
03:15.8
Kasi doon sa desisyon, may kasamang injunction.
03:20.0
Di ba? May main cause of action ka, tapos may ancillary remedy,
03:23.4
tapos yung injunction na yun, mga kabatas natin,
03:27.0
it is immediately executory or it is self-executory
03:31.1
kung sinabi ng korte na ganun na ganun na yun.
03:34.8
Bakit?
03:35.3
Tulad ng ganun sinabi ko, unless it is lifted
03:37.3
by the court itself that issued it
03:40.2
or a higher court, like for example, the Court of Appeals,
03:45.5
pwedeng tanggalin yun.
03:47.1
No?
03:47.8
So,
03:48.2
so,
03:48.3
tignan natin yung diskarte ng abogado.
03:53.1
ng TAPE Incorporated.
03:55.1
Okay?
03:55.6
Sabi niya,
03:56.9
nagkaroon ng 53-page petition na finial before the Court of Appeals.
04:01.4
Ngayon, yung TAPE hiningi,
04:04.0
yung Court of Appeals na ianal yung order for TAPE and GMA to cease
04:08.4
use of the Itbulaga or EB trademark registrations, logos, names,
04:14.4
as well as the songs and audiovisual recordings of episodes and segments
04:18.2
prior to May 31, 2023.
04:23.1
So, ito, TRO din.
04:27.0
Tsaka, injunction.
04:30.8
Pero, iaanal yung order.
04:37.4
Order dun sa injunction.
04:41.2
Well, siguro, ito, mga kabatas natin,
04:43.5
sinusubukan ko kasi I want to make sense
04:46.0
of the,
04:47.5
of the, ano, no, of the
04:50.6
diskarte ng abogado.
04:53.1
Siguro, yung anal, gusto niyang ilift
04:55.4
yung injunction.
04:58.5
Kung merong injunction.
04:59.8
Kasi, if you want to anal an order or a decision,
05:05.5
hindi pa naman final yun.
05:07.0
Kapag hindi siya final, ibig sabihin,
05:09.8
hindi pa siya pwedeng i-execute.
05:12.9
Diba?
05:13.8
Hindi pa siya pwedeng i-execute.
05:16.4
Ngayon, ito, mga kabatas natin,
05:19.8
sabi niya, prior to May 31, 2023,
05:23.1
ito yung, sabi niya,
05:24.2
Ito, ito, ito yung sinabi ng abogado.
05:34.8
The legal counsel and spokesperson,
05:36.5
Atty. Maggie Garduque, said,
05:38.5
that the decision is a blatant violation
05:41.0
of the rules and the disrespect
05:43.3
of the jurisdiction of the
05:45.3
intellectual property office
05:46.8
on the pending trademark cases.
05:50.6
Parang sinasabi dito kasi ng abogado,
05:52.6
mga kabatas natin,
05:53.1
ng Tape Incorporated,
05:54.7
eh, nagkaroon ng
05:57.3
ng
05:58.9
Ultravires Act.
06:01.6
Okay?
06:02.4
Ano ba yung Ultravires Act?
06:03.7
Ang Ultravires Act, mga kabatas natin,
06:05.8
ay isang bagay na gagawin ng isang
06:08.7
kumpanya, tao,
06:12.2
o kaya, well,
06:13.6
juridical or natural person,
06:16.5
kung saan gagawa siya
06:17.7
ng isang bagay beyond its power.
06:21.1
So, dito, mga kabatas natin,
06:22.3
sinasabi niya,
06:23.1
na lumampas siya
06:25.1
doon sa kanyang jurisdiction.
06:28.0
Kasi nga,
06:29.4
tumapak na siya doon sa jurisdiction
06:31.3
ng intellectual property office.
06:34.5
Yun ang sinabi niya.
06:35.7
Kasi nga, nagkaroon daw ng ruling
06:37.6
sa trademark case.
06:39.2
Tignan nyo.
06:40.2
Garduque added that TVJ's complaint
06:41.9
only asked the court whether or not
06:43.9
tape and GMA-committed copyright infringement
06:46.4
and unfair competition when it aired
06:48.4
replace of past episodes
06:50.5
of Itbulaga.
06:52.3
So, ito,
06:53.1
ito yung argument nila eh.
06:56.1
No?
06:56.9
Ito yung clinic claim nila.
06:59.7
Actually claim, tama.
07:01.2
Nag-commit daw silang copyright,
07:02.6
ang hinihingi lang daw ng TVJ,
07:05.8
eh, nag-commit sila ng copyright
07:07.0
infringement and unfair competition
07:09.4
sa pag-ere lang ng replace
07:11.1
of past episodes of Itbulaga
07:12.9
at hindi naman
07:14.6
tungkol sa
07:16.2
copyright.
07:19.1
Pero, bakit copyright infringement?
07:20.8
Copyright infringement dahil sa ginawa nila
07:22.7
na gano'n.
07:25.2
Pero, syempre, kapag,
07:27.3
well, ang sa akin lang ha,
07:29.1
ang sa akin lang, it necessarily follows
07:31.0
na if you are talking about copyright infringement,
07:34.5
tapos natalo ka dun sa copyright infringement,
07:37.1
sinabi na you
07:38.0
committed copyright infringement,
07:41.2
necessarily,
07:42.8
you may be prevented
07:44.5
by the court to
07:46.0
use, diba?
07:48.1
Or to further use
07:50.4
the copyrighted
07:52.7
material. Ibig sabihin,
07:57.1
nasa
07:57.7
posisyon pa rin ng korte,
08:00.2
ito, mga kabatas natin, ano lang ha,
08:02.4
academic discussion lang ha,
08:04.4
ibig sabihin, nasa posisyon pa rin ng korte,
08:06.7
napigilan ka,
08:08.7
kasi nga,
08:10.2
kung nakita nga nila na nag-commit ka ng copyright
08:12.6
infringement, they can stop you
08:14.8
from further
08:16.0
doing additional damage.
08:21.2
Diba?
08:22.7
Pero ang argument dito,
08:25.1
nung ano, nung abugado nila,
08:28.1
may disrespect daw sa jurisdiction
08:30.5
ng IPO on the pending
08:32.1
trademark cases.
08:34.4
Pero mga kabatas natin,
08:37.2
copyright infringement and unfair
08:38.6
competition ang hiningi.
08:41.6
Diba?
08:42.5
Ito yung issue. Meron bang copyright
08:44.5
infringement? So kung may copyright infringement,
08:46.7
ibig sabihin, pwede kang pigilan
08:48.8
ng korte to commit further
08:50.5
acts of copyright infringement.
08:52.7
Diba?
08:55.3
So I think,
08:57.1
pwedeng magkaroon ng injunction.
08:59.6
She added that there is
09:00.8
nothing in the complaint asking the court to
09:02.7
rule on trademark ownership
09:04.0
or to cancel the registered trademarks
09:06.5
of tape on itbulaga.
09:11.6
Ito kasi, mga kabatas
09:12.8
natin, kailangan
09:14.8
mong alamin
09:15.4
kung meron silang hiningi.
09:18.8
Most likely, kung humingi silang
09:20.5
injunction, mga kabatas natin,
09:22.7
to prevent
09:23.5
Tape Incorporated and GMA
09:26.4
to further use
09:28.0
the infringed
09:31.5
material, yung itbulaga
09:33.4
at saka EB, then it's
09:35.3
within the jurisdiction.
09:39.5
Tignan nyo, what is needed is for the court
09:41.2
to decide if TVJ and Fere
09:43.1
have copyright ownership
09:45.2
over these audiovisual recordings of past
09:47.2
episodes of itbulaga.
09:50.3
The rule
09:51.1
whether copyright infringement and unfair competition,
09:52.7
are committed, the issue on trademark ownership
09:55.4
and cancellation is irrelevant
09:56.8
and off-tangent in this case.
10:00.6
Pero I think they, well,
10:03.3
I may be wrong.
10:05.2
Kasi, like I said,
10:07.8
if a particular
10:09.4
work,
10:12.6
okay,
10:13.0
like for example, the EB logo
10:14.5
and itbulaga, mga kabatas natin,
10:17.8
if it is not a
10:19.1
registered trademark, it may be
10:21.0
covered by intellectual property.
10:22.7
And if you
10:25.1
violate the laws on intellectual
10:27.0
property, you might be liable
10:29.0
for copyright infringement.
10:31.5
Diba?
10:38.3
Pero ito, ito kasi yung sinasabing niya, no?
10:41.7
The issue on trademark
10:43.0
ownership and cancellation is irrelevant
10:45.0
and off-tangent in this
10:47.1
case.
10:49.2
Cancellation is irrelevant.
10:52.7
Kinancel ba niya yung
10:55.2
trademark ownership?
10:57.5
Pero mga kabatas natin,
10:59.6
yun yan sinasabi ko eh.
11:01.0
It's about copyright infringement.
11:02.8
Like for example, kung meron
11:05.0
kasing issue in relation to copyright
11:07.1
infringement, tapos
11:08.9
ini-infringe yung inyong intellectual
11:11.0
property, the court
11:12.6
may order you to stop doing it
11:15.1
pag natalo ka
11:17.2
sa kaso.
11:17.7
To prevent further
11:19.8
damage.
11:22.7
Ito, nagpalit naman sila eh.
11:30.6
Ito mga kabatas natin, no?
11:31.8
Ang ano ko lang, isasummarize ko na lang
11:34.3
sa inyo lahat kung ano yung nangyari dito.
11:37.7
Bilang nabasa na natin yung lahat nito.
11:40.3
Okay?
11:43.1
Well, of course,
11:45.5
it's still under
11:46.4
the intellectual property law,
11:48.6
yung trademark.
11:50.5
Yung trademark
11:51.6
ng itbulagadyo,
11:52.7
dyan na-canceled na, pero it is
11:54.6
still ongoing appeal.
11:57.9
Ngayon, mga kabatas natin,
11:59.0
nagkaroon ng kaso
12:00.2
for copyright infringement
12:03.2
because they showed
12:04.8
replace
12:07.3
of itbulagadaw noon.
12:10.3
Ngayon, mga kabatas natin,
12:11.9
of course, in showing
12:13.4
those itbulagadaw
12:14.9
previous episodes,
12:16.4
eh, it is covered by
12:18.4
intellectual property.
12:20.4
Ngayon, itong itbulagad,
12:22.3
eb, tapos yung logo niya, kasi mga kabatas
12:24.6
natin, they were registered
12:26.2
as trademark
12:28.2
by
12:29.2
Tape Incorporated.
12:32.0
Kaya lang, kung wala kang trademark sa isang
12:34.3
creation of art mo,
12:36.5
well, kahit hindi naman art, no?
12:38.4
Logo.
12:41.0
No? Kung wala kang trademark,
12:42.5
like, for example, you didn't register it,
12:45.6
you own it
12:46.6
as intellectual property.
12:49.0
And if,
12:50.3
and if someone uses,
12:52.3
uses it against,
12:54.8
no,
12:56.2
against your favor,
12:57.9
or against your will,
13:00.4
eh, mga kabatas natin, they can be liable
13:02.3
for copyright infringement. So, I think,
13:04.9
yun ang hinahabol
13:06.8
ng
13:07.6
itbulaga, ng TVJ.
13:11.1
Yun ang hinahabol ng TVJ.
13:13.2
Dahil,
13:14.4
ang trademark ay nasa kanila,
13:16.5
ang hahabulin namin,
13:17.9
copyright infringement, kasi sa amin yan.
13:22.3
Okay? Ganon. Pero ang sinasabi
13:24.4
naman dito, nung GMA,
13:27.1
at saka ng Tape Incorporated,
13:28.7
actually, Tape Incorporated lang yung nandito.
13:30.5
Ang sinasabi nila, eh,
13:32.6
trademark ang usapan na yan.
13:34.6
Kasi nga, niregister namin yan
13:36.4
as a trademark.
13:39.0
Ngayon, hindi kayo pwedeng mag-rule
13:40.6
in relation to that.
13:43.8
Parang ganon yung
13:44.6
nangyayari dito.
13:47.5
Okay?
13:50.1
Parang ganon yung nangyayari.
13:51.4
Okay. This is very interesting.
13:52.8
Like I said, ano to, eh, bagong...
13:55.2
Well, it is, ano,
13:56.8
it is, um,
13:59.4
new
14:00.0
in relation to
14:02.7
to
14:03.7
the laws of the Philippines,
14:06.5
in relation to jurisprudence.
14:08.6
Walang ganitong kasikat
14:10.9
na kaso
14:11.6
ang nilitis ever since.
14:14.8
And it is really good if this
14:16.7
will go to Supreme Court. Kahit sino
14:18.8
man ang manalo. Bakit?
14:20.7
Kasi magkakaroon tayo ng basihan in relation
14:22.9
to this. Kasi pag titignan nyo,
14:25.0
ganyan talaga yung mga abogado, mga kabatas
14:26.9
natin, they have differing opinions.
14:28.6
Especially if you belong to different sides.
14:30.8
That is normal.
14:33.0
Okay? That is normal.
14:35.3
So, yun ang abangan natin.
14:37.7
Pero parang, ano, no?
14:38.9
Parang magkaibang, magkaibang,
14:41.0
magkaiba yung atake
14:42.2
ng TVJ at saka
14:44.9
nitong Tape Incorporated.
14:47.5
Di ba?
14:50.7
Pero so far, dito sa nangyaring ito,
14:53.0
sino ang lamang? Siyempre, lamang ang
14:54.7
TVJ. Kasi nga,
14:56.9
nakakuha sila ng, ano yun,
14:58.8
injunction eh. Eh, naging tahan
15:01.0
ng pinakamasaya yung kabila.
15:03.4
So, sila yung lamang.
15:04.7
Kaya lang, mga kabatas natin, siyempre, hindi pa
15:06.8
tapos yung laban.
15:08.8
Okay? Kaya nga,
15:10.7
ya, apila yan. Kaya lang, dahil
15:12.7
sa, ano, injunction na na-i-issue
15:15.0
sa kanila na pinipigilan silang gamitin
15:17.2
o pinipigilan ng tape na gamitin
15:19.0
ang itbulaga.
15:20.7
Well, it's,
15:23.8
it's, ano, lamang.
15:25.8
Lamang dito yung
15:27.0
TVJ. Okay? Yan.
15:30.2
Good luck. Good luck sa parehong
15:31.7
partido at yun.
15:35.7
This will nourish
15:37.0
our jurisprudence. Maraming salamat po.
15:39.5
At siyempre, tulad na lagi ang sinasabi, matulog po tayo
15:41.4
ng mahimbing. Dahil alam natin
15:43.3
na inatutulog ng mahimbing, siya yung
15:45.2
laging panalo. Paalam po, pansamantala.