00:52.1
ito kasi tungkol sa pag-play ng music.
00:54.0
Sa mga karindirya.
00:56.3
Small restaurants.
00:58.1
Okay? Dapat exempted daw sila.
01:03.3
to craft a more equitable copyright system,
01:05.5
the Supreme Court has recommended that exemptions for small businesses be considered by Congress
01:10.8
in addition to the existing limitations in copyright infringement cases
01:15.6
under the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines.
01:20.7
Meron na kasi kaya tayo mga exemptions sa copyright.
01:24.9
Katulad ng fair use.
01:26.3
Gusto nilang itagdag, pag small business ka,
01:29.4
exempted ka rin sa copyright infringement.
01:35.2
Sabi niyang ganyan,
01:36.3
this was part of the ruling laid down by the Supreme Court's 3rd Division
01:39.4
in a decision penned by Associate Justice Maria Filomena D. Singh.
01:44.2
Tandaan niyo mga kabatas natin, no?
01:45.8
This is a direct call to the Congress na.
01:49.2
Na parang sinasabi nila, gawa naman kayo ng batas na ganito, please.
01:56.3
That's how our laws should work.
01:59.4
It should apply according to the present situation.
02:11.2
Ngayon, sabi niyang ganyan dito,
02:13.0
this was part of the ruling laid down,
02:14.8
blah, blah, blah, blah.
02:16.0
Denying the petition for review on certiorari filed by Iceberg's Food Concept Incorporated
02:20.8
and Alan John T. Young,
02:23.1
the petition challenged the rulings of the Court of Appeals which had,
02:26.3
affirmed the Regional Trial Court's decision finding Iceberg's liable
02:29.7
for copyright infringement.
02:33.4
Sabi niyang ganyan kasi dito,
02:34.9
Iceberg's, mga kabatas natin, ito yung negosyo,
02:37.3
operates several branches of restaurants in the Philippines.
02:40.3
In 2014, a complaint for copyright infringement was filed before the RTC
02:44.6
against Iceberg's and Young, its president and general supervisor
02:48.4
by Filipino Society of Composers, Authors, Publishers, Incorporated.
02:53.1
Ito yung Phil's Cap.
02:54.4
So ito, mga kabatas natin, may restaurant.
02:56.3
Yung restaurant na ito,
02:58.6
finailan ng copyright infringement ng Phil's Cap.
03:06.5
sabi niyang ganyan,
03:08.8
ah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
03:11.0
Phil's Cap claimed that Iceberg's continuous and regular and authorized public performances
03:16.9
through the playing of radios in its restaurant
03:19.9
of Phil's Cap's musical works constituted copyright infringement
03:24.0
under the intellectual property.
03:29.1
Itong Iceberg na ito, mga kabatas natin,
03:31.5
nagpapatugtog siya ng radyo.
03:33.7
Pag titignan nyo kasi nakasanayan na rin natin nangyayari yan eh.
03:38.2
Wala namang pakialam na kasi yung mga tao noon.
03:40.6
Kasi syempre, pag makikinig ka sa radyo,
03:43.6
yun, makikinig ka sa radyo,
03:45.3
tapos nandiyan, tumutugtog yung mga pinapatugtog sa radyo.
03:52.8
Okay lang naman makinig sa radyo.
03:54.8
Wala namang problema doon.
03:56.3
paggagamitin mo kasi yan for commercial purposes.
03:58.7
Like for example,
03:59.5
in these restaurants.
04:03.7
It's copyright infringement.
04:07.7
Sabi niyang ganyan,
04:08.7
the RTC found Icebergs guilty of copyright infringement.
04:12.0
This ruling was affirmed by the CIA,
04:13.9
prompting the present petition.
04:16.2
The court in applying its 2022 ruling in Phil's Cap vs. Asprey
04:20.3
reiterated that the act of playing radio broadcasts
04:23.1
containing copyright music through the use of loudspeakers
04:26.1
amounting to public performance,
04:28.1
a right that belongs to the copyright holder.
04:30.6
Tandaan nyo dito mga kabatas natin ha.
04:32.6
They played the music directly.
04:34.6
Hindi ito parody.
04:36.6
Kapag parody, iba na yon.
04:39.6
Because parody is an exemption.
04:44.6
Kaya nga dito, sinasabi ng Supreme Court
04:48.6
at sinuggest nila na dapat yung mga maliliit na businesses
04:53.1
exempted na sa copyright.
04:58.5
they can play copyrighted music
05:01.5
pag small business ka.
05:03.5
Yun yung gusto nilang mangyari dito.
05:08.5
Sabi niyang ganyan,
05:09.5
Thus, Icebergs' act of playing copyrighted music
05:11.5
albeit through a radio in its restaurants
05:15.5
amounted to a public performance of the said copyrighted music
05:18.5
constituting copyright infringement
05:21.5
and making Icebergs liable to Phil's Cap for damages.
05:27.5
the court noted how it should not ignore
05:29.5
the far-reaching consequence that
05:31.5
the ruling in this case may have on small businesses
05:34.5
if no distinction is made between
05:36.5
the big businesses such as the Icebergs restaurant
05:39.5
and the small businesses such as
05:41.5
small eateries, canteens, carinderias, food carts, and the like.
05:46.5
So dito, itong Icebergs kasi mga kabatas natin,
05:50.5
malaking chain of restaurant yan.
05:52.5
Tapos ginawa nila yon.
05:54.5
Ngayon, sabi ng Supreme Court dito,
05:57.0
dapat gumawa tayo ng distinksyon.
05:59.0
Pag small businesses lang yan,
06:01.0
itong mga eateries, carinderia, food cart,
06:05.0
kung nagpiplay sila ng radio,
06:08.0
dapat exempted sila, sabi niya.
06:12.5
Sabi niya kasi dito,
06:14.0
If the court makes a sweeping ruling that
06:16.0
all those in the position of Icebergs
06:18.0
are copyright infringers,
06:20.0
there would be a ripple effect such that
06:22.0
all businesses, including small ones,
06:24.0
where it could hardly be said that
06:26.0
ambience is a consideration for customers
06:28.0
which play music through radios,
06:30.0
would also be subject to suit for copyright infringement.
06:35.0
Anong iniiwasan ng Supreme Court dito?
06:40.0
Yung pagfafile ng copyright infringement na yan.
06:43.0
Kasi nga, marami ang mga small carinderias na
06:51.0
they don't actually use those
06:54.0
music to create the ambience.
06:59.0
Yung ambience, wala naman silang pakialam.
07:02.0
Nandiyan lang yan.
07:03.0
Parang nakasanayan lang nilang tumutugtog.
07:06.0
Sabi nila, dapat hindi sila kasali.
07:12.0
Kasi nga, would also be subject to suit.
07:21.0
Anong iniiwasan niya dito?
07:22.0
Makasuhan yung mga taong yun.
07:27.0
The court, however, noted that there currently
07:29.0
exists no exemption for small businesses
07:37.0
Anong exemption lang natin doon?
07:42.0
Tsaka yung iba pa.
07:44.0
To continue ignoring this gap in our law
07:47.0
will be tantamount to sanctioning
07:49.0
the expansion of the scope
07:52.0
the expansion of the scope of copyright
07:55.0
in violation of its core objective
07:57.0
of achieving the common good.
08:02.0
Achieving the common good.
08:04.0
Yun naman talaga ang
08:07.0
intention ng batas.
08:12.0
Ngayon, pakikinigan kaya ng Senado natin ito?
08:16.0
Anong ating mga mambabatas?
08:19.0
Napakagandang batas.
08:21.0
Napakagandang batas ito.
08:24.0
Gawa ka ng exemption.
08:27.0
I-amend mo yung Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines.
08:32.0
ng isang paragraph doon
08:34.0
o kaya isang section na magsasabi
08:37.0
na yung mga small businesses na ganito lang yung kinikita
08:40.0
o ganito yung kapital,
08:45.0
Sa copyright infringement kapag nagpatutog siya
08:48.0
ng mga musika galing sa radyo.
08:51.0
This will help a lot of businesses.
08:60.0
Ang ganda-gandang batas ito.
09:02.0
It added that the Congress' attention should be thus
09:06.0
should thus be drawn to this deficiency and
09:09.0
in the meantime, the court in applying the law on intellectual property
09:12.0
must strike a careful balance between the rights of the owners
09:15.0
to be compensated for the use of their works
09:18.0
and the right of the public to enjoy.
09:22.0
Di ba ang ganda nung sinabi ni Justice Singh?
09:27.0
We must strike a careful balance between the rights of the owners
09:31.0
to be compensated for the use of their work
09:33.0
and the right of the public to enjoy
09:38.0
After all, these creations, especially music,
09:42.0
are for enjoyment.
09:44.0
Ngayon, if you restrict
09:49.0
people who consume
09:51.0
this kind of products, music, too much,
09:55.0
sinasakal mo din yung music industry.
10:02.0
The court further recommended that the three-step test proposed by
10:06.0
Associate Justice Alfredo Benjamin S. Cagiwa
10:10.0
in his concurring opinion be considered by Congress.
10:14.0
The test provides three conditions to the limitations and exceptions
10:17.0
of a copyright holder's rights,
10:19.0
establishing the regal parameters for reproducing the work.
10:24.0
Under the three-step test,
10:25.0
the exemptions to copyright holder's rights must
10:27.0
cover only certain special cases.
10:31.0
Not conflict with the normal exploitation of the work
10:35.0
and not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interest
10:40.0
of the copyright holder.
10:45.0
To propose small business,
10:48.0
exemption pertains to smaller commercial establishments
10:51.0
that are unlikely to significantly impact the market
10:54.0
for copyrighted work,
10:56.0
and thus must concentrate on the establishment's size,
10:59.0
type, usage, and the manner in which the music is transmitted.
11:06.0
Ultimately, the objective of the three-step test
11:09.0
is to ensure that the right of the copyright holders is protected
11:13.0
and that at the same time,
11:14.0
the right of small businesses to use their creations
11:17.0
in accordance with the limitations set forth in the three-step test.
11:24.0
The Court concluded by suggesting that Congress,
11:27.0
in its bid to fill the gap in our current copyright laws,
11:30.0
should consider the three-step test in order to craft a more equitable copyright system
11:36.0
that caters to the unique challenges faced by small Filipino businesses
11:40.0
and indeed our society in general without undermining the rights of small businesses.
11:44.0
think between the rights of copyright holders.
11:49.0
If you're really smart,
11:51.0
you can just cover all this up immediately.
11:54.0
Why don't we put this kind of people in the Senate?
11:58.0
They fill the gaps in our laws.
12:02.0
Not those that at least helped us.
12:12.0
hindi yung at least
12:30.9
so much party bars
12:45.7
copyright infringement
13:00.6
yung video okay music
13:09.1
nabasa tungkol dyan
13:11.0
itong watch party sa bars
13:14.2
ito lang kasi tungkol
13:16.0
sa pagpiplay mismo
13:17.5
even if through the radio
13:19.2
pag-aaralan ko yan
13:24.7
pag-aaralan ko yan
13:36.5
tapos pag kunwari
13:38.4
tapos gagawa ka ng batas
13:40.4
o di mayroon na yung
13:41.0
na-solve kang problema
13:42.1
hindi yung puro hearing
13:44.7
puro hearing ng hearing
13:45.8
tas walang nangyayari
13:57.4
attorney through radio
13:58.7
example FM stations
14:00.0
or digital streaming
14:02.7
if you have the CD
14:04.9
as long as you do
14:06.3
public performances
14:07.3
it means it caters
14:23.4
sa mga contest sa TV
14:24.8
copyrighted din yun
14:28.6
I think they ask permission
14:30.5
pinag-aaralan ko pa naman
14:40.9
ang gusto ko talagang
14:43.1
mga kabatas natin
14:45.6
yun ang better term
14:46.9
i-highlight dito yung
14:48.1
nandyan na yung batas
14:50.7
ganda na yung batas
14:55.2
simple yung simple na lang
14:56.6
supreme court na rin
15:17.3
kaya kapag magtatayo
15:18.4
kayo ng coffee shop
15:19.3
ang unan yung pondohan
15:20.8
ay 100 songs na original
15:26.5
yung mga coffee shop
15:27.2
nagpiplay na lang sila
15:28.2
ng mga royalty free music
15:31.9
wala na kayong naririnig
15:32.9
ng mga sikat na tugtugin
15:40.4
mga kapatas natin
15:41.8
tulad ng lagi kong sinasabi
15:43.0
matulog po tayo ng mahimbing
15:45.1
na yung natutulog ng mahimbing
15:46.5
sya yung laging panalo
15:47.9
paalam pong pansamantala
