01:03.2
Okay? So mga kabatas natin, with that, papakinggan natin siya.
01:08.6
Tapos mga kabatas natin, isa sa mga intriguing pronouncements niya dito, sinabi niya decriminalizing libel
01:13.9
kasi tinanong siya dito, yung parang, tinanong ni Kato Nying yung parang kaso ni Rafi Tulfo.
01:19.8
Okay? Although hindi binanggit si Rafi Tulfo dito, pero parang kaso ni Rafi Tulfo dyan.
01:26.0
Bibisitahin din natin yung finile ni Senator Jingoy Estrada nung January 22, 2024
01:33.3
na decriminalization ng libel. Di umano at magko-comment ako mga kabatas natin
01:39.6
and I also make suggestions on how to actually pass this bill. Okay?
01:45.1
Okay, dito na tayo sa juicy part agad mga kabatas natin.
01:47.7
So din yan po, pinaboboto po natin sila kahit sila ay nasa mga kulungan.
01:52.2
Opo, e paano po yung may final conviction ha?
01:54.9
Meaning may final...
01:56.0
final decision na ng Korte Suprema, ang kaso ay libel.
01:59.8
Hindi ba, Konyol, hindi ba nagdi-disqualify sa isang tao na magpa-exercise ng kanyang political rights?
02:08.3
Okay. So ito mga kabatas natin, Rafi Tulfo, Rafi Tulfo, no?
02:14.0
Political rights, of course. Political rights include the right to elect and be elected in office. Okay?
02:21.5
So klarong-klaro, yung tanong dito mga kabatas natin ni Kato Nying,
02:26.0
eh, final conviction ng libel. Ibig sabihin, parang yung kaso ni Rafi Tulfo at saka si Michael Guy.
02:34.0
Okay? Ah, let's go. Anong sagot? Anong sagot?
02:37.3
Alam nyo kasi, Kato Nying, ang libel po kasi ay na-decriminalize ng ating kagalanggalang na Supreme Court.
02:43.0
Okay. I have to disagree with that. I'm sorry, Comilag Chairman.
02:49.3
Na-decriminalize daw ng ating kagalanggalang na Supreme Court.
02:56.0
So, I have to dissent on this one.
02:59.8
The Supreme Court doesn't have the capacity to decriminalize something
03:05.0
because they are only allowed to interpret the law, not change it.
03:11.9
Okay? They cannot amend, they cannot repeal it.
03:16.8
Okay? They can only interpret it according to the spirit when it was made.
03:24.3
Yung iba kasi sinasabi nila,
03:26.0
ikaw ina-amendahan ng Supreme Court yung mga batas.
03:37.0
I don't want to term it amend.
03:39.9
They are interpreting it according to the true intent or the spirit of the law.
03:46.3
Although there are many instances kung saan, yung Supreme Court, mga kabatas natin,
03:50.5
hindi nila napupunto agad kung ano yung intention ng mga mababatas.
03:56.0
Mga kabatas natin, sa mga batas na ini-interpret nila.
03:59.5
That's why sometimes, mga kabatas natin, they abandon or overturn cases like the Tolentino case.
04:05.5
Mga kabatas natin, naalala nyo yung kaso ni Kausing.
04:09.9
Ni Attorney Kausing, mga kabatas natin.
04:12.3
Dineclare nila sa Tolentino case na 15 years yung prescription ng cyber libel.
04:17.4
Then eventually, sinabi nila, we are abandoning or overturning the Tolentino case
04:23.1
and we are declaring now na...
04:26.0
One year lang yung prescriptive period ng cyber libel because there is no new crime.
04:33.3
Ngayon, nagkaroon ba ng amendment doon?
04:37.9
No, there was no amendment actually.
04:40.4
They just abandoned the interpretation.
04:43.5
That is previously not the true intent of the law.
04:48.5
Kaya pag makikita nyo, mahaba yung discussion eh.
04:51.1
Diniscuss nila na ito dapat.
04:54.6
In other words, they are just correcting themselves.
04:59.6
After all, we have to adapt to the changes.
05:07.7
So dito, sinabi niya, dinicriminalize.
05:13.7
Alam nyo kasi, Captain Ying, ang libel po kasi ay nadicriminalize ng ating kagalanggalang na Supreme Court.
05:19.2
Ibig sabihin, mag-uso na isang kasong krimen kung hindi meron lang kagalanggalang na Supreme Court.
05:24.6
Ibig sabihin, mag-uso na isang kasong krimen kung hindi meron...
05:28.1
Ibig sabihin, parang sinabi, ibig sabihin di na ito isang kasong krimen kundi...
05:32.5
...lamang parang civil liability.
05:34.7
O, parang civil liability lang sabi niya.
05:39.7
So I have a fresh new set of cyber libel cases.
05:44.9
It was filed December lang this year, mga kabatas natin.
05:49.7
If it was decriminalized, then we shouldn't have gone through the process.
05:54.6
Prosecutor's Office.
05:55.9
Dapat, pag hindi kriminal in nature ang isang kaso,
05:59.7
diretsyo kayo sa korte at hindi dadaan sa Prosecutor's Office.
06:04.3
So doon pa lang, based on my personal experience,
06:07.4
and of course as a lawyer, I don't agree with Atty. George Garcia,
06:11.4
Comeleg Chairman, in his pronouncement that it was decriminalized.
06:17.1
Ano ba yung tama doon?
06:18.3
In my opinion, ha?
06:19.5
Siyempre, mga kabatas natin, nag-aaral tayo dito.
06:23.3
Marami na naman magsasabi.
06:24.6
Itong si Atty. Libayan, nagmamagaling na naman.
06:27.9
We are studying here.
06:30.5
Kung hindi mo pa nasubukan na pumunta sa isang lugar kung saan yung mga tao ay nag-aaral,
06:36.5
then masyasyak ka talaga kung bakit yung mga tao, kahit abogado,
06:41.0
nagkakaroon ng iba't ibang opinion.
06:46.3
Ito na isang kasong krimen kung hindi meron lamang parang civil liability.
06:51.5
O, parang civil liability.
06:53.8
Actually, mga kabatas,
06:54.6
mga kabatas natin, pinaliwanag rin yan doon sa kaso ni Rafi Tulfo
06:58.6
noong na-convict siya sa libel.
07:01.4
Kasi nga, fine lang yung pinataw sa kanya doon.
07:04.6
Sinabi, fine, yung fine o yung pagbayad niya lang ng pera
07:09.2
ay hindi civil in nature, kundi kriminal.
07:14.2
So, it is still considered a crime.
07:18.3
Tapos, may fine na criminal in nature.
07:23.1
Ngayon, mga kabatas natin,
07:24.6
dahil convicted pa rin si Rafi Tulfo,
07:27.7
it means he is still convicted by a crime involving moral turpitude.
07:35.3
So, I don't understand kung saan siya kumukuha niyan.
07:39.1
Pakinggan pa natin.
07:40.4
In fact po, wala nang pagkakakulong ang mga kakukundrik ng life.
07:44.0
Yan, sabi niya, wala nang pagkakakulong.
07:49.3
As far as I know,
07:51.1
I don't know how to term this.
07:54.0
Kasi yung mga tao na naman,
07:56.1
eh, nagmasmagaling ka pa sa Comedic Chairman.
08:01.9
I cannot fight with myself
08:05.5
and just agree with things that I think
08:09.6
are not correct in my opinion
08:14.0
sa sarili kong pag-aaral.
08:17.7
Kaya nga may do your own research eh.
08:20.1
So, kunwari, ganyan.
08:24.0
kahit Comedic Chairman siya,
08:28.4
umuuna lang tayo lahat sa sasabihin niya?
08:37.0
O, ito, tingnan nyo.
08:39.5
Ito na isang kasong krimen,
08:41.9
kung hindi meron lamang parang civil liability.
08:44.8
So, in fact po, wala nang pagkakakulong
08:46.9
ang mga kakukundrik ng life.
08:51.0
Ganto rin kasi yung,
08:53.2
there was another wrong interpretation
08:56.7
in relation to this.
08:58.1
Pinaliwanag ko na rin ito.
08:59.5
Nagkaroon nga yung pronouncement,
09:01.2
yung Supreme Court noon,
09:02.4
na nagkaroon ng preference of application of penalties.
09:07.5
Nangyari rin yan mga kabatas natin noon
09:11.7
Kasi nga, noon, mga kabatas natin,
09:13.8
ang daming nakakasuhan ng BP-22,
09:16.4
ginagawa ng mga tao, no,
09:20.0
na collection agency,
09:23.2
At saka, syempre,
09:25.8
marami kasing natatalbogan ng cheque
09:27.8
na hindi naman nila sinasadyang tumalbog yung cheque nila
09:30.9
kasi nalugi sila ng negosyo.
09:33.5
Ay nagkaroon sila ng problema sa kanilang finances.
09:37.0
hindi deliberately na gusto nilang tumalbog yung cheque nila.
09:40.7
Sinabi ng Supreme Court ngayon,
09:42.4
okay, ang gagawin natin,
09:50.6
hindi nabanggit ni Atty. Tikman,
09:53.2
na dekriminalize na pala ang libel.
09:55.2
Well, sinasabi niya, dekriminalize eh.
09:59.0
Ang nangyari, ito, no, ang nangyari,
10:01.0
sinabi ng Supreme Court,
10:03.0
ah, ito ang gawin natin.
10:07.0
the judiciary, in the judiciary,
10:09.0
what we are actually
10:11.0
trying to aim for is justice.
10:15.0
In relation to BP-22 cases,
10:17.0
ito ang magiging preference
10:21.0
Sabi niya, as much as possible,
10:23.0
huwag kayong magbigay
10:27.0
ng imprisonment, sabi niya.
10:31.0
unang-una na i-consider nyo,
10:35.0
that you only give fine
10:39.0
But it is still criminal
10:41.0
in nature, because it is fine.
10:43.0
Ipapaliwanag ko sa inyo
10:45.0
kung paano hindi magiging kriminal na ito
10:47.0
mamaya pag tinalakay natin
10:49.0
yung bill ni Sen. Ginggo Estrada.
10:51.0
Ganto rin yung ginawa niya,
10:52.9
yung ginawa ng Supreme Court ngayon,
10:58.9
hindi niya din i-criminalize.
11:02.9
Binagbigay din siya ng
11:04.9
preference of penalties.
11:06.9
Sabi rin ng Supreme Court,
11:08.9
pag libel, kasi nga ang daming
11:12.9
Yung slap suits nga, diba?
11:14.9
Sabi ng Supreme Court,
11:16.9
para mas maprotektahan
11:18.9
yung freedom of speech
11:20.9
hindi ma-abuso yung pag-file
11:24.9
tao na bumabatikos
11:26.9
sa sino mang personalidad,
11:30.9
of penalties na rin tayo.
11:34.9
of penalties niya, number one, dapat
11:38.9
niyo na ibigay lang yung
11:48.9
may kulong. Pero,
11:50.9
hindi recommend, sabi ng Supreme Court,
11:52.9
na fine yung ibigay niyo.
11:54.9
Did it decriminalize libel?
11:56.9
It did not. There was
11:58.9
only a recommendation
12:00.9
in relation to the
12:04.9
applicable penalties.
12:06.9
Kasi pwedeng fine, pwedeng kulong,
12:08.9
pwedeng fine at kulong
12:10.9
nasabay. So, ang sinabi niya,
12:12.9
ang priority, fine lang.
12:18.9
Diba? Sabi ni Kayo,
12:20.9
na under attack yung
12:22.9
cyber libel ngayon as being
12:24.9
unconstitutional based doon sa oral
12:26.9
argument sa Supreme Court. Oo nga,
12:28.9
napanood ko rin yun doon sa channel mo.
12:36.9
Sabi ni Weirdogs,
12:38.9
kung nakulong si Idol sa kaso
12:40.9
ng libel, baka nagkita sila
12:42.9
ni Perrion at Tagol sa loob
12:46.9
Loob ng oblo talaga. Pero,
12:48.9
alam nyo, yun nga kasi ang maraming nagtatanong, na hindi
12:50.9
sila naniniwala na convicted si Rafi
12:52.9
Tulfo. Kasi nga, hindi
12:54.9
naman daw siya nakulong.
12:56.9
So, ito kasi yung explanation din noon.
12:58.9
Okay? So, magtatanong na fake news, fake news.
13:00.9
May Supreme Court decision
13:02.9
na convicted siya for cyber, ay,
13:06.9
Sabi ni Brix Bala,
13:08.9
mali yata yung choice of words ni
13:10.9
chairman. Hindi e. Kasi
13:12.9
kung choice of words lang, ibig sabihin,
13:14.9
mali yung nasabi niya,
13:16.9
pero tama yung explanation
13:18.9
niya. Pero dito, yung
13:20.9
explanation niya, hindi rin ako
13:28.9
Recool, huwag kang ganyan.
13:36.9
you're ano, you are on a
13:38.9
tightrope if you say that. Ah, tignan nyo.
13:42.9
Ito yung sinasabi nila na wrong choice of words?
13:44.9
Well, I don't think so.
13:46.9
Kasi ay na-decriminalize.
13:48.9
Oo, na-decriminalize. So, ano
13:50.9
yung choice of words na mali?
13:52.9
If we will, like, consider the wrong
13:54.9
choice of words, yung na-decriminalize,
13:56.9
di ba? Yung kagalanggalang na Supreme Court.
13:58.9
Ibig sabihin, hindi ito na isang kasong
14:00.9
krimen, kung hindi meron lamang
14:02.9
parang... Hindi na ito isang kasong
14:04.9
krimen, sabi niya. Civil
14:06.9
liability. Tapos, civil liability.
14:08.9
So, I don't think
14:10.9
so. I don't think it's a
14:12.9
wrong choice of words.
14:14.9
Sabi niya, consistent yung explanation
14:16.9
dun sa choice of words. Tama. Di ba?
14:18.9
Ano yung mga words na ginamit niya?
14:20.9
Ah, na-decriminalize.
14:24.9
criminal in nature. Hindi na
14:26.9
kriminal. Tapos, pangatlo,
14:28.9
civil liability na lang.
14:32.9
wala nang pagkakakulong ang mga
14:34.9
makukundrik ng libel. Yun.
14:36.9
Hindi. It's only preference
14:38.9
of penalties. Although,
14:40.9
siyempre, most likely,
14:42.9
hindi na nga mag-iimpose ng kulong
14:48.9
mga judges natin. Kasi nga,
14:50.9
iyon ang mandato ng
14:52.9
Supreme Court eh. Although, hindi na sila
14:54.9
mag-iimpose ng penalty ng kulong, mga kabatas
14:56.9
natin, ang magiging issue
14:58.9
talaga dyan, eh...
15:08.9
Unless you change the law.
15:12.9
Therefore, sa ating palagay, wala po
15:14.9
yung mismo disqualification na iyan.
15:20.9
palagay, wala daw yung
15:22.9
disqualification na iyon.
15:24.9
So, we will relate it. Although,
15:26.9
wala silang binanggit doon kay Rafi Tulfo,
15:28.9
ire-relate natin doon. Yun, parang naiisip
15:30.9
niya walang disqualification kasi nga
15:32.9
na-decriminalize yung libel.
15:42.9
yung lumang libel,
15:44.9
yung lumang libel, tama kayo.
15:46.9
Parang na-decriminalize na iyan. Pero
15:48.9
yung bagong... Hindi, eh. Hindi, eh. Kasi nga,
15:50.9
Aka Tuning, if you're
15:54.9
Sinabi ng Supreme
15:56.9
Court na rin na yung lumang libel
15:58.9
tsaka yung bagong libel, pareho
16:00.9
lang. There is no new crime.
16:02.9
There is just a new manner of
16:04.9
committing it, which is through
16:06.9
information and communication technology.
16:12.9
Sabihin lang naman, eh.
16:18.9
Ang final test niyan ay kumuha ng
16:20.9
NBI clearance sa IDOL. Kapag civil case,
16:22.9
diba wala sa records? Wala, oo.
16:24.9
Pero sasabihin nga nila,
16:28.9
Ito yung lalabas ngayon, kayo, tignan nyo.
16:30.9
Luma na. Kasi parang yung
16:32.9
bagong libel, which is cyber libel, which is wrong.
16:34.9
It's not a new crime.
16:36.9
The Supreme Court said that
16:38.9
already in the Causing
16:42.9
it's not a new crime. It's just
16:44.9
the old crime committed
16:48.9
through information and
16:50.9
communications technology. Tuloy natin.
16:54.9
cyber libel, eh may
16:58.9
May kulong po yun. Opo, may kulong po yun.
17:00.9
At syempre, nakadependent... Doon na lang.
17:02.9
Nag-contradict na agad. Kasi nga kung may
17:04.9
kulong yun, eh sinabi ng Supreme Court na
17:06.9
there is no new crime.
17:10.9
Mali yung Supreme Court. Hindi.
17:12.9
Joke lang. Joke lang. Hindi. Mali yung
17:14.9
Supreme Court. Tama yung Supreme Court.
17:16.9
Nagdi-disagree ako kay Comelec, chairman.
17:18.9
At saka, ka Tunying,
17:24.9
Kung yan sa quest. Kung yan
17:26.9
ay maglalagay ng isang disqualification. Usually po,
17:28.9
ka Tunying, pagka may isang
17:30.9
krimen, mayroong tinatawag na principal
17:32.9
penalty at mayroong tinatawag na
17:34.9
accessory penalty. Kapag principal
17:36.9
halimbawa yung kulong, may accessory naman.
17:38.9
Halimbawa, disqualification,
17:40.9
for civil and political rights. Halimbawa,
17:42.9
kasama po yun. Well,
17:44.9
pero, pero, nakalagay
17:46.9
din sa batas natin na yung
17:48.9
prohibition ng pagtakbo
17:52.9
doon sa penalties.
17:54.9
Okay. Ito rin ang lilinawin ko
17:56.9
kay Comelec, chairman.
17:58.9
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
18:00.9
Yung disqualification,
18:02.9
wala doon sa penalties,
18:04.9
kundi nando doon sa
18:06.9
eligibility mo na tumakbo.
18:08.9
Bakit? Sabing ganyan
18:10.9
kasi pag tatakbo ka sa isang
18:12.9
posisyon sa gobyerno, you must possess
18:14.9
all of the qualifications
18:18.9
disqualifications. Kayo ang magaling
18:20.9
dito, hindi ako. So correct me
18:22.9
if I'm wrong. You must possess
18:24.9
all the qualifications and
18:26.9
none of the disqualifications
18:28.9
for you to be eligible to run
18:30.9
for office. Ngayon,
18:32.9
yung sinasabing yung penalty
18:34.9
na disqualification to
18:36.9
run from office, yun yung sinasabing
18:38.9
yung penalty na secondary na ibig
18:40.9
ibigay ng huwes. Pero
18:42.9
yung pinaghuhugutan natin,
18:44.9
eh hindi naman based on the
18:46.9
penalty, but based on the
18:50.9
na nakalagay doon sa batas
18:52.9
kapag tatakbo ka.
18:54.9
Ano yung nakalagay
18:56.9
sa batas kapag tatakbo ka?
18:58.9
You must not be convicted
19:00.9
of any crime involving
19:06.9
may ilagay sa disisyon yun
19:08.9
because it's already provided
19:12.9
Diba? So magkaibang
19:14.9
magkaiba yung pag-uusap
19:18.9
Hindi naman kailangan nang sabihin
19:20.9
nung judge na, oh disqualified kang tumakbo.
19:22.9
Hindi na kailangan. Why?
19:24.9
Because it's already provided
19:26.9
for by law na if you are
19:30.9
of a crime involving moral
19:32.9
turpitude, just like libel, you
19:34.9
are disqualified from running.
19:36.9
Tulad ng sinabi ko, you must possess
19:38.9
all the qualifications and none
19:40.9
of the disqualifications. If you
19:42.9
have that disqualification, you
19:44.9
are convicted of a crime involving
19:46.9
moral turpitude regardless
19:52.9
of the secondary penalty, primary
19:54.9
penalty, it does not
19:58.9
So yun usually po
20:00.9
ay sinasama ng Korte
20:02.9
sa kanyang disisyon, sa dispositive
20:04.9
portion ng ikang disisyon.
20:06.9
So kapag ka sinabi ng Korte sa
20:08.9
prema na guilty ka sa libel
20:10.9
with final conviction pero wala
20:14.9
pwede ka nang kumandidato nun.
20:16.9
Pwede ka nang bumoto nun.
20:18.9
Pwede naman po. Pwede nang tumali ba na lang?
20:26.9
No, I don't agree sir. I'm
20:30.9
Pwede na kahit convicted ka ng libel,
20:32.9
pwede kang tumakbo.
20:34.9
Meron yung prohibition
20:36.9
five years lang, di ba?
20:38.9
Kasi may batas tayo dyan eh.
20:40.9
What should I do?
20:42.9
Pwede ka nang bumoto nun.
20:46.9
Pwede ka nang bumoto nun.
20:48.9
Pwede ka nang bumoto nun.
20:50.9
Pwede ka nang bumoto nun.
20:52.9
Pwede ka nang bumoto nun.
20:54.9
Pwede ka nang bumoto nun.
20:56.9
Pwede ka nang bumoto nun.
21:00.9
Pwede naman po. Mali ba na lang kung merong
21:02.9
nakalagay doon sa desisyon ng Korte na
21:04.9
but with accessory penalty.
21:08.9
Do we need that? No.
21:12.9
Parang kunwari, kailangan ba sabihin ng
21:14.9
Supreme Court na dapat Pilipino
21:16.9
citizen ka? Pagtatakbo
21:20.9
Pilipino citizen ka, hindi kailangan.
21:22.9
Why? Because it's already provided
21:24.9
for by law. Merong
21:26.9
nakalista doon ng qualifications and may
21:28.9
nakalista doon ng disqualifications.
21:30.9
And one of the disqualifications is
21:32.9
if you are convicted of
21:34.9
a crime involving moral turpitude.
21:38.9
ilagay pa ng Korte yun
21:40.9
para ma-disqualify ka when it is
21:42.9
already provided for by law?
21:48.9
isa sa umatake, I'd prefer to be
21:50.9
libeled in email kesa TV or radio.
21:52.9
Kasi mas konti ang sa email.
21:54.9
Pero pasok ang email
21:58.9
I-send to many mo.
22:08.9
Well, pinag-usapan din natin
22:10.9
yan kay Atty. Pichay noon.
22:12.9
Worrying he was disqualified to run pero after 5 years.
22:14.9
Kasi yun yung prohibition na.
22:20.9
Alam nyo, alam nyo
22:22.9
kung, alam nyo kung
22:26.9
balahibo ko tumatayo
22:28.9
na I don't know how to
22:30.9
I don't know how to
22:32.9
deal with this. Maybe I'm
22:34.9
wrong. So please correct me.
22:36.9
Kasi ganyan na naman
22:38.9
yung sa Axie eh. Bakit ikaw lang?
22:44.9
doon sa desisyon ng Korte na
22:46.9
but with accessory penalty.
22:48.9
Hindi naman po Korte, kung wala ng kulong
22:50.9
eh wala yung accessory. E paano po kung
22:52.9
biglang minilagay na accessory penalty naman
22:54.9
na kahit wala yung principal.
22:56.9
Hindi naman kailangan yung accessory
22:58.9
penalty kasi nga yung conviction
23:00.9
ang tinitignan eh. If you are convicted
23:02.9
of a crime involving moral
23:04.9
turpitude, automatically
23:06.9
you are disqualified to run.
23:08.9
Whether or not there is a secondary
23:14.9
principal na ngayon, lalabas, hindi
23:16.9
kulong kung hindi yung fine,
23:18.9
yung pagbabayad ka. Pero may
23:20.9
accessory penalty pa rin,
23:22.9
mayroong pwedeng ma-addict. Ang isang
23:24.9
pwede o Korte Suprema sa kanyang desisyon.
23:26.9
Kung multa lang po pero hindi po
23:28.9
in-specify ng Korte Suprema na
23:30.9
na hindi ka disqualified
23:32.9
o disqualified ka, paano po
23:38.9
Alam na this Komilek Chairman.
23:46.9
Nandilisik yung ano... ay nandilisik.
23:52.9
Nagkaka-goosebumps ako.
23:54.9
Nagkaka-goosebumps ako.
23:56.9
Nagkaka-goosebumps ako.
23:58.9
Nagkaka-goosebumps ako.
24:00.9
Nagkaka-goosebumps ako.
24:02.9
Nagkaka-goosebumps ako.
24:04.9
Ayan. Yan natin titignan ngayon.
24:06.9
Yung provision ng batas.
24:08.9
Kung kahit na hindi banggutin
24:10.9
yung mismong accessory penalty,
24:12.9
automatic yun kapag ka-convicted
24:14.9
sa isang krimen na katulad po niya.
24:20.9
Automatic yun kapag ka-convicted
24:22.9
sa isang krimen na katulad po niya.
24:24.9
Ito po yung magiging batayan natin.
24:26.9
Pabalik po tayo doon sa provision ng batas.
24:28.9
Tama po ba intindi natin
24:30.9
ang kasong libel involves moral
24:34.9
Very good question.
24:36.9
Hanggat hindi ito binabago ng batas?
24:42.9
official capacity. Pero sa
24:44.9
personal capacity po, meron po kasi akong
24:46.9
isang naging decision dyan sa isang kaso
24:48.9
dati involving a congressman
24:54.9
Tandaan niyo mga kabatas natin.
25:06.9
there is nothing left
25:08.9
to do but to apply it.
25:10.9
Bakit may personal
25:12.9
opinion ka tapos meron kang
25:20.9
capacity as a public servant,
25:22.9
of course, dapat hindi
25:24.9
yung personal opinion mo ang
25:28.9
Pero nakita niyo, no?
25:30.9
Iwas si chairman. Nag-iba yung
25:32.9
boses ni chairman, no? Nung narinig
25:34.9
yung personal capacity.
25:48.9
Pakinggan natin ulit. Nasyashok ako.
25:50.9
Opo. Pero sa personal capacity,
25:52.9
meron po kasi akong isang naging
25:54.9
decision dyan sa isang kaso dati
25:56.9
involving a congressman
25:58.9
sa House of Representatives Electoral Tribunal
26:00.9
at namanggit po doon that
26:02.9
libel is a crime involving moral
26:04.9
solitude. Hindi ko na po na-monitor
26:06.9
kung yan ay na-reverse
26:08.9
sa mga... o yung doktrinang
26:10.9
yan ay na-reverse sa mga subunod na
26:12.9
mga desisyon ng Korte. Subalit yung po
26:14.9
sinabi po... Siguro dapat alam mo.
26:16.9
Kasi komeleg chairman ka.
26:22.9
Nagugulat talaga ako.
26:30.9
involving moral solitude.
26:32.9
Kaya po yung congressman ay natanggal po
26:34.9
bilang member ng House of Representatives.
26:36.9
Kaya yung mga nakikinig sa atin
26:38.9
na nangangarap maging politiko,
26:42.9
involves moral solitude batay doon sa
26:44.9
binanggit niyong kaso.
26:46.9
Tama po. Tama po kayo.
26:48.9
May reversal yung ating Korte
26:50.9
yung problema. Wala.
26:56.9
Ewan ko kung may sisingit pa natin
26:58.9
itong bill ni ano. Gusto kong
27:00.9
pahabaid din eh. Itong
27:02.9
bill ni ano. Isunod na lang natin mga
27:08.9
mas magandang we will extensively
27:10.9
discuss this also.
27:12.9
Para suggestion ko lang doon sa
27:14.9
kung gusto nilang gumawa ng batas
27:16.9
tungkol sa decriminalization
27:18.9
ng libel. Parang medyo magulo kasi
27:22.9
Maraming salamat mga kabatas natin.
27:26.9
Tumatay pa rin yung balaibo ko
27:42.9
Kaya hindi ko maintindihan
27:44.9
tong si Kayo bakit hindi ka batch 1 eh.
27:46.9
Sarcastic si Katulnyang
27:56.9
Sabi ni Tun Karagay,
27:58.9
sayang dapat na itanong niya
28:00.9
about kay Idol bakit siya nakapasok. Actually,
28:02.9
impliedly na itanong niya.
28:04.9
Indirectly na itanong niya.
28:06.9
Indirectly na itanong niya.
28:08.9
Kaya hindi ko maintindihan ito.
28:10.9
Kaya hindi ko maintindihan ito.
28:14.9
Yan. Maraming salamat mga kabatas natin.
28:16.9
I need to recover.
28:18.9
Hindi ko napanood yung buong yun
28:20.9
kasi pinunog ko yung kalahat eh.
28:22.9
Tapos maganda na panuorin ng buong.
28:24.9
Sinear din recall yun eh.
28:30.9
Medyo bumigat yung
28:32.9
dibdib ko. Yan. Maraming salamat
28:34.9
mga kabatas natin. At syempre tulad na lagi
28:36.9
sinasabi matulog tayo ng mahimbing
28:38.9
dahil alam natin na yung natutulog ng mahimbing
28:40.9
siya yung lagi yung panalo. Paalam po.
