Close
 


ADMIRAL ONG ON AFP MODERNIZATION, TAIWAN, & WEST PHILIPPINE SEA
Hide Subtitles
Click any subtitle word to view Tagalog.com dictionary results.
Computer Shortcuts: Left / Right arrows to jump 2 seconds back or forward. +Enter or Space to toggle Play/Pause button. Full Screen Mode

Richard Heydarian VLOGS
  Mute  
Run time: 01:19:15
Has AI Subtitles



Video Transcript / Subtitles:( AI generated. About AI subtitles » )
00:00.0
Alright, good morning, good evening everyone, kung saan kayo sa mundo ngayon.
00:04.9
Thank you very much for joining us for this latest episode.
00:07.9
As I promised, ito na, pag-usapan natin ng mga issues na we discussed more in generic terms
00:13.2
in past episodes, as you remember, dun sa episode natin, including with former Senator Trillianes,
00:19.7
we discussed the issue of AFP modernization.
00:22.6
I also had a number of pieces recently dun sa itong $36 billion over 10 years of AFP modernization
00:29.4
program, but as they say, amateurs discuss strategy, experts discuss logistics, or something
00:38.0
like that.
00:38.5
So, in that regard, I thought of a perfect person who we also had on our podcast in the
00:46.3
past, and of course, also I had the pleasure of also having him on my own television program
00:50.8
sa Signal TV, TV5.
00:52.3
Thank you very much, Professor Ong, Admiral Ong, for joining us.
00:56.4
Good evening, Richard.
00:57.7
Good morning here in Manila.
00:59.4
Good morning.
01:00.3
Ito na, ito na.
01:01.3
Okay.
01:02.0
Let's get the ball rolling.
01:04.8
Yeah, I mean, first of all, what is your general impressions of itong announcement na we're
01:12.6
going to put aside, what, 2 trillion pesos over the next 10 years, or at least that's
01:17.0
the plan, for Third Horizon?
01:19.8
In fact, I think the term they're using is Re-Horizon 3, pagdating sa revised AFP modernization,
01:26.1
which former President and the late President Aquino committed.
01:29.4
I think the government offends more than a decade ago.
01:31.7
You know, what are the, what is the good, the bad and ugly, if I can put it that way?
01:36.3
I'm or what are, what are your general impressions of audit first, Admiral, before we go into
01:40.6
the details?
01:41.6
Okay.
01:42.6
Number one, the good side of it is finally where we have a manifestation of commitment
01:47.9
of the national government to support your modernization of our forces of the Philippines.
01:53.6
It's been a long time forthcoming.
01:55.3
We have a lot of things to catch up in terms of capability.
01:58.3
Yes, sir.
01:58.7
Yes, sir.
01:58.9
Thank you.
01:58.9
of capabilities.
02:01.4
Not naman
02:02.2
na negative side
02:03.1
but some things
02:04.2
that need to be
02:05.3
we have to cross
02:06.2
the peace
02:06.6
in some areas.
02:08.3
We need to also
02:08.9
look at
02:09.6
yung alignment
02:11.0
between
02:11.6
the modernization
02:12.6
program
02:13.2
and yung
02:14.8
strategy natin
02:15.9
to address
02:16.5
various concerns.
02:18.2
Not only
02:18.8
West Philippine Sea
02:19.5
kasi
02:19.7
as well as
02:21.5
other security
02:22.1
concerns.
02:23.6
The second
02:24.0
aspect of that
02:25.3
is yung
02:26.3
for structure
02:27.0
the organization
02:27.8
kasi
02:28.8
you might be
02:30.5
kumbaga
02:31.8
you might be
02:33.0
organized
02:34.1
like
02:34.5
for the
02:35.3
Napoleonic Wars
02:36.4
for linear
02:38.5
warfare
02:38.9
but you're already
02:40.4
introducing
02:41.0
equipment
02:41.6
that
02:42.5
like this example
02:44.0
the machine gun
02:44.8
that is actually
02:46.3
the solution
02:46.8
against linear
02:47.5
warfare.
02:48.4
So parang
02:48.9
logistics
02:51.6
or equipment
02:52.2
should be
02:53.0
aligned with
02:53.8
strategy
02:54.6
and organization
02:56.1
as well.
02:58.8
So that's the good part.
03:00.6
Are there things
03:01.4
that
03:01.7
it's still early pa
03:03.9
pero
03:04.2
meron bang
03:05.2
mga bagay dyan
03:06.1
Professor Ong
03:06.9
in terms of
03:08.2
are there areas
03:09.9
of concern
03:10.5
or are there areas
03:11.5
that you want to
03:12.1
see more details
03:13.4
and clarifications
03:14.4
from our officials?
03:16.7
Well, not exactly
03:17.6
details no
03:18.3
but
03:18.6
my concern is
03:20.0
yung
03:20.3
the supply chain issue.
03:22.9
For example,
03:24.3
you're gonna buy
03:25.1
a printer
03:25.8
tapos
03:27.3
when you bought
03:28.3
a printer
03:28.7
you're gonna buy
03:28.8
you only
03:29.2
plan for
03:30.9
one or two sets
03:32.5
of the cartridges
03:33.5
for it
03:37.7
then
03:38.5
you need
03:39.5
to look at
03:40.2
yung supply
03:41.0
of cartridges.
03:41.9
In this case,
03:43.0
when you buy
03:43.5
the equipment
03:44.0
you have to look
03:45.6
at yung logistics
03:46.4
strain
03:46.8
in terms of
03:48.4
sustainability.
03:50.2
More particularly
03:51.3
if you're buying
03:52.0
high-end type
03:52.9
of equipment
03:53.5
na merong
03:54.6
maintenance
03:55.7
intensive
03:56.4
and requires
03:58.4
training
03:58.7
not only
03:59.1
personnel
03:59.6
but actually
04:00.6
adhering to
04:02.9
yung maintenance
04:04.6
cycle
04:05.4
religiously.
04:07.3
So,
04:08.0
just one.
04:09.0
Pangalawa,
04:10.5
and this is arising
04:11.3
from yung
04:11.9
observations natin
04:13.0
from the
04:13.5
Ukraine-Russian
04:14.2
conflict
04:14.7
tapos yung
04:16.0
what's happening
04:16.5
now in the Red Sea
04:17.7
and also yung
04:19.5
Israeli-Hamas
04:20.6
conflict.
04:22.2
While we go
04:24.6
for sophisticated
04:25.3
weapon system
04:26.3
there is value
04:27.8
to
04:28.2
looking at
04:29.5
asymmetric
04:30.2
and cheaper
04:31.1
weapon system.
04:32.5
Kasi in terms of
04:33.7
sustainability
04:34.6
mas maganit.
04:36.1
And
04:36.4
hindi
04:38.8
we cannot rely
04:40.8
on yung
04:41.9
current business
04:43.4
model
04:43.8
that we buy
04:44.6
it from abroad.
04:47.1
If we opt
04:48.3
for
04:48.8
less sophisticated
04:50.0
cheaper
04:50.6
but effective
04:51.3
weapon system
04:52.0
we need to look
04:53.4
at developing
04:54.0
them in-country
04:55.0
rather than
04:56.4
buying them
04:56.8
from abroad.
04:57.4
So that takes
04:58.5
care of the
04:59.2
supply chain issue
05:00.2
that I was
05:00.7
talking about.
05:03.4
Right.
05:05.4
Please go ahead.
05:08.4
We need to rethink
05:09.9
yung solutions
05:11.8
natin to
05:12.9
tactical or
05:15.3
strategic problems.
05:16.3
For example,
05:18.4
in Ukraine
05:19.0
they were able
05:20.1
to
05:20.7
actually
05:22.2
contain yung
05:26.4
Russian black
05:27.3
sea fleet
05:28.0
with the
05:29.3
non-existent
05:30.4
Ukrainian Navy
05:31.7
based using
05:33.5
primarily
05:34.4
land-based
05:35.4
defense systems.
05:37.4
So that's
05:38.7
an asymmetric
05:39.4
solution to a
05:40.3
problem
05:40.7
which is the
05:41.2
Russian
05:41.5
black sea fleet.
05:44.7
So we need to
05:45.2
look,
05:45.7
we need to
05:46.2
think in those
05:46.8
terms.
05:47.5
We need to
05:49.9
think asymmetrically
05:51.0
when we look
05:52.7
at yung
05:53.3
mga
05:54.6
tactical problems
05:55.6
that are
05:55.8
confronting us
05:56.5
here in the world.
05:56.6
So we need to
05:56.7
look at
05:56.8
the tactical
05:57.2
and the
05:57.4
West Philippine
05:57.8
Sea and
05:58.1
other
05:58.2
specific
05:58.6
concerns.
06:00.4
Right.
06:00.9
I mean,
06:01.2
there's a lot
06:01.8
that we can
06:02.2
go to and
06:02.7
we can
06:03.0
talk from
06:03.6
the
06:03.8
Azerbaijan-Armenia
06:05.1
conflict
06:06.3
in the
06:07.0
Caucasus
06:07.5
all the way
06:08.0
to Ukraine
06:08.4
conflict,
06:08.9
especially in
06:09.3
the Black
06:09.6
Sea and
06:09.9
then what's
06:10.2
happening
06:10.5
in Houthi,
06:11.0
Red Sea,
06:11.9
among others.
06:12.4
But before
06:12.7
we go more
06:13.4
into detail
06:14.0
as far as
06:15.5
drone warfare
06:16.3
and all
06:16.9
sorts of
06:17.2
asymmetric
06:17.7
warfare is
06:18.1
concerned,
06:18.8
balikan natin
06:19.2
itong mga
06:19.6
conventional
06:20.2
capabilities
06:20.9
that we're
06:21.5
looking at
06:22.1
developing
06:22.8
in the
06:23.3
coming
06:23.6
years.
06:25.5
Of course,
06:25.8
isa dyan
06:26.3
yung mention
06:27.0
ng, of
06:27.8
course,
06:28.1
your Navy
06:28.6
po yung
06:28.8
background
06:29.1
niyo,
06:30.2
Admiral.
06:34.0
Submarines.
06:35.1
Talking about
06:35.9
two to
06:36.3
three submarines,
06:37.2
I mean,
06:37.4
I heard
06:37.8
some regional
06:38.6
specialist or
06:40.0
commentator
06:40.9
saying that
06:41.5
three is
06:42.2
the magic
06:42.6
number.
06:43.2
In fact,
06:43.4
I think
06:43.6
the South
06:44.0
China Morning
06:44.5
Post in
06:44.9
Hong Kong
06:45.3
had a
06:46.7
piece on
06:47.1
that,
06:47.4
that actually
06:47.9
three may
06:48.7
look very
06:49.4
few on
06:50.3
the paper,
06:51.0
but it
06:51.3
could give
06:51.7
us the
06:52.0
kind of
06:52.2
flexibility
06:52.7
and
06:53.0
operational
06:53.6
capabilities
06:55.7
that could
06:56.4
be
06:56.9
potentially
06:57.5
even game
06:58.0
changer
06:58.3
down the
06:58.8
road.
06:59.0
But obviously,
06:59.3
this is
06:59.7
very much
07:00.3
10 years,
07:00.9
15 years
07:01.3
from now.
07:02.4
But first
07:02.6
of all,
07:02.9
what is your
07:03.4
thought about
07:04.0
three submarines?
07:05.2
Not only
07:05.5
one,
07:06.0
not only
07:06.4
two,
07:07.3
but three
07:07.8
submarines.
07:08.5
Last time I
07:09.0
checked,
07:09.5
Vietnam has
07:10.2
six
07:10.9
kiloclass
07:11.6
submarines,
07:12.3
the more
07:12.6
modern
07:12.9
versions
07:13.3
they got
07:13.8
from
07:14.1
Russia.
07:15.8
Malaysia
07:16.2
has it.
07:16.9
If I'm
07:17.1
not missing,
07:17.4
even
07:17.6
Myanmar
07:18.0
has
07:18.6
submarines.
07:20.3
Isn't it
07:20.9
time for
07:21.3
the Philippines
07:21.7
to have
07:21.9
submarines?
07:22.5
And is
07:22.7
three the
07:23.2
magic
07:23.4
number?
07:25.3
Yeah,
07:25.5
I would
07:25.7
agree.
07:26.0
Three would
07:26.3
be the
07:26.5
magic
07:26.7
number.
07:28.4
Even
07:28.9
now,
07:29.4
currently,
07:30.1
the
07:30.3
Navy
07:30.7
uses
07:31.9
the
07:33.3
three
07:35.7
concept.
07:36.6
So
07:36.8
normally,
07:37.5
one is
07:38.9
up,
07:39.4
one is
07:39.8
under
07:40.0
training,
07:40.5
one is
07:40.9
under
07:41.3
maintenance.
07:41.9
So that's
07:42.2
the
07:42.4
minimum.
07:44.7
But of
07:45.1
course,
07:46.4
in
07:46.5
addition
07:48.0
to six
07:48.5
or to
07:48.8
nine.
07:49.1
So
07:49.2
multiples
07:49.5
of three.
07:50.6
So
07:50.9
three is
07:51.4
the
07:51.6
basic
07:52.0
one up,
07:54.0
one on
07:54.6
training,
07:55.1
and one
07:55.4
down.
07:55.7
So
07:56.2
in
07:56.7
terms of
08:01.0
the
08:01.9
submarines,
08:03.4
a number
08:04.3
of countries
08:04.7
have come
08:05.1
forward.
08:06.4
France,
08:07.1
of course,
08:07.5
at least on
08:07.9
the surface,
08:08.4
looks like
08:09.0
one of the
08:09.7
leading
08:10.3
candidates here.
08:11.4
We also
08:11.6
have South
08:12.1
Korea,
08:12.6
which has
08:13.0
already been
08:13.5
a major
08:14.0
provider to
08:15.3
us in
08:16.1
terms of
08:16.4
naval
08:16.6
capabilities.
08:18.0
Spain,
08:18.5
Spain,
08:19.0
even
08:19.1
Spain,
08:19.5
I think,
08:19.8
offered to
08:20.4
even build
08:21.2
a naval
08:21.9
base somewhere
08:23.2
in the
08:23.4
Visayas region.
08:24.5
I think,
08:25.0
if I'm not
08:25.3
mistaken,
08:26.3
there are
08:27.4
some
08:27.6
problems
08:27.9
here in
08:28.9
Washington,
08:30.3
D.C.
08:30.7
Maybe the
08:32.0
Italians,
08:32.8
you know,
08:33.0
the Italians
08:33.6
may also
08:34.3
come out
08:34.7
of nowhere.
08:35.6
I mean,
08:36.5
before,
08:37.2
I mean,
08:37.5
of course,
08:38.0
you're not
08:38.4
part of
08:38.7
the
08:38.9
bidding
08:39.2
commission
08:39.8
and all,
08:40.4
and I'm
08:40.7
not asking
08:41.2
you to
08:41.7
weigh the
08:42.6
scales and
08:43.2
all of
08:43.5
that,
08:43.7
but,
08:44.1
or,
08:44.3
you know,
08:44.6
put your
08:44.9
thumb,
08:45.4
sorry,
08:45.6
on the
08:45.9
scales,
08:46.4
but what
08:47.7
is your
08:47.9
sense with
08:48.3
all of
08:48.6
these
08:48.9
different
08:49.2
options
08:49.7
coming in?
08:50.3
I mean,
08:50.7
at least
08:51.1
on the
08:51.4
surface,
08:51.9
what do
08:52.3
you feel
08:52.5
about
08:52.8
it?
08:54.6
Okay.
08:55.3
Siguro,
08:55.7
before I
08:56.0
answer that,
08:56.4
I'll
08:56.5
backtrack
08:56.9
muna natin
08:57.3
why a
08:57.7
submarine.
08:59.5
Ayun nga pala,
09:00.5
we just said
09:01.0
bucket magic
09:01.6
number three,
09:02.4
pero we
09:02.7
didn't explain
09:03.3
why a
09:03.7
submarine.
09:04.6
Yeah,
09:05.1
because there's
09:06.7
a current
09:08.0
discourse,
09:08.8
there's another
09:09.6
side that are
09:10.3
actually criticizing
09:11.2
that project,
09:13.7
okay,
09:13.8
nasyadro expensive.
09:15.3
When we went
09:16.2
to do this,
09:16.7
yung discourse
09:17.6
on do we
09:18.4
acquire a
09:18.8
submarine,
09:20.4
dinurin namin
09:20.9
yung problem
09:21.5
sa,
09:21.9
ano,
09:22.8
ang major
09:23.5
challenge natin
09:24.2
sa South China
09:24.7
Sea is the
09:25.3
PLA Navy
09:26.0
surface fleet.
09:27.8
Okay,
09:28.0
we're talking
09:28.4
of the
09:28.7
destroyer,
09:29.2
the previous
09:29.6
and previous
09:30.0
muna.
09:30.9
And it's
09:31.3
the
09:31.6
preponderance
09:32.4
of surface
09:33.6
forces
09:34.6
in the
09:36.0
South China
09:36.4
Sea.
09:36.7
Okay.
09:38.0
Huwag na natin
09:38.9
isama yung ano
09:39.7
rito,
09:40.1
yung Chinese
09:41.4
Coast Guard
09:41.9
saka yung
09:42.2
militia.
09:43.1
Kasi that
09:43.6
initial also
09:44.8
already complicates
09:45.9
the situation
09:47.4
in terms of
09:48.1
numbers.
09:49.4
Okay.
09:49.9
So the
09:50.3
solution namin
09:51.0
is asymmetric.
09:52.0
We cannot
09:52.4
confront a
09:53.3
surface fleet
09:53.8
that is
09:54.1
superior to
09:54.9
us in
09:55.1
number and
09:55.7
capability
09:56.3
with an
09:57.4
equally
09:57.8
surface fleet
09:58.6
din.
09:59.5
Okay.
10:00.6
For one,
10:01.5
we do not
10:01.9
have the
10:02.2
industrial
10:02.6
capacity
10:03.2
that China
10:03.8
has.
10:05.2
Yung ship
10:05.6
building
10:05.9
capability
10:06.5
niya.
10:06.8
We don't,
10:07.2
even the
10:07.5
US has
10:07.8
problems.
10:08.9
Okay.
10:09.2
To match
10:09.6
that.
10:09.9
So,
10:10.9
parang
10:11.3
asymmetric
10:11.8
solution
10:13.6
will not
10:14.1
work.
10:14.4
So we
10:14.6
weren't
10:14.9
open to
10:15.5
asymmetry.
10:16.5
So dalawa
10:16.9
yung
10:17.1
actually
10:17.4
sa
10:17.6
solutions
10:18.0
namin.
10:18.9
Sir,
10:19.4
for the
10:20.0
purpose of
10:20.5
our audience,
10:21.2
when you
10:21.4
say
10:21.6
symmetric
10:22.2
minyan
10:22.8
head to
10:23.2
head,
10:23.6
no?
10:23.8
I mean
10:24.0
like on
10:24.4
a
10:24.5
conventional
10:24.9
basis.
10:25.4
So,
10:25.6
kung barko
10:29.3
yun siya,
10:29.7
barko rin
10:30.1
sa'yo.
10:31.3
And when you
10:31.7
say asymmetric
10:32.4
is not
10:33.0
necessarily
10:33.5
one-to-one
10:34.3
correspondence,
10:35.6
but actually
10:36.3
you can
10:36.6
still match
10:37.3
it,
10:37.7
kind of
10:37.9
jujitsu
10:38.4
your way
10:38.8
through it.
10:39.2
I mean,
10:39.5
we're just
10:39.9
trying to
10:40.2
explain to
10:40.8
folks who
10:41.2
are not
10:41.5
into the
10:41.8
defense
10:42.3
lingo and
10:42.8
all of
10:43.1
it.
10:43.9
Okay.
10:44.3
So,
10:44.5
yeah.
10:45.0
So,
10:45.5
yung dalawa
10:45.9
yung solutions
10:46.4
namin doon.
10:47.1
One of
10:47.5
them is
10:48.7
the
10:48.9
Rambos
10:49.4
Anti-Shipping
10:49.8
Science System
10:50.6
which is
10:51.2
for delivery
10:52.1
na.
10:53.1
The second
10:53.5
one is
10:53.9
Submarine
10:54.4
which is
10:54.7
still under
10:55.1
contention
10:55.6
in terms
10:56.1
of actually
10:56.7
acquiring it.
10:58.3
Now,
10:59.5
moving forward
11:00.5
yung question
11:00.9
mo,
11:01.2
which is
11:01.5
the better
11:02.6
alternative.
11:04.2
Now,
11:04.4
when we
11:04.6
frame the
11:05.1
acquisition,
11:07.1
ang ano
11:07.6
namin dito
11:08.1
is this
11:08.5
is not
11:08.8
a Navy
11:09.1
project.
11:10.0
This is
11:10.4
not even
11:11.0
an AFP
11:12.4
project.
11:13.1
This should
11:13.5
be framed
11:14.5
as a
11:14.8
national
11:15.1
project.
11:16.5
And when
11:16.8
we do
11:17.4
that,
11:18.3
we're not
11:18.6
just buying
11:19.4
the Submarine
11:20.2
whether that's
11:21.0
store-free.
11:21.9
We're buying
11:22.8
a capability
11:23.6
but also
11:24.5
yung industrial
11:26.1
ecosystem
11:26.7
to support
11:27.8
that.
11:29.1
Okay?
11:29.5
Kaya when
11:30.1
we are
11:30.7
into negotiation,
11:32.0
ang ano
11:32.3
namin is
11:32.8
ano yung
11:33.4
in terms
11:35.4
of what
11:36.1
do you add
11:36.9
to the
11:37.2
basket of
11:38.3
duties?
11:39.3
So,
11:40.0
we're asking
11:40.6
for technology
11:41.6
transfer.
11:42.0
Package,
11:42.6
no?
11:42.8
Package deal,
11:43.7
yeah.
11:44.2
Yung package na.
11:45.3
We're looking
11:45.8
at,
11:46.5
kasi we need
11:47.3
to link up
11:47.9
with private
11:48.3
sector.
11:49.1
Kasi private
11:49.4
sector will
11:50.1
be the
11:50.4
recipient
11:50.8
of the
11:51.4
industrial
11:52.0
component
11:53.7
of the
11:54.3
engagement.
11:57.8
Then we
11:58.1
were also
11:58.6
considering,
11:59.5
we will
11:59.7
also look
12:00.2
in negotiations,
12:01.4
we also
12:01.7
ask for,
12:03.0
can you
12:03.2
help us
12:03.9
improve
12:05.3
our STEM
12:06.0
education
12:06.7
in specific
12:07.5
schools?
12:10.6
Yung science,
12:11.2
technology,
12:12.1
engineering,
12:12.7
mga.
12:13.2
Kasi,
12:14.6
you need
12:15.2
yung manpower
12:16.5
part,
12:16.9
you need
12:17.2
those manpower,
12:18.2
number one,
12:19.0
to support
12:19.1
the industrial
12:19.8
base,
12:20.7
and later
12:22.1
in the future,
12:22.9
sila yung mag-operate
12:24.1
yung submarine.
12:25.6
Kasi,
12:26.3
you cannot
12:26.7
employ or use
12:28.4
people
12:28.8
na yung
12:30.4
training niya
12:32.0
or yung academic
12:33.0
or yung industrial
12:34.4
capacity
12:35.0
is the human
12:36.3
way also
12:36.9
to support
12:38.3
that entire
12:39.6
ecosystem
12:40.1
to support
12:40.8
the submarine.
12:41.3
Human capital
12:42.2
to operate
12:43.4
the hardware.
12:45.6
Admiral,
12:46.2
aside from the
12:46.8
human capital
12:47.4
to operate it,
12:48.5
of course,
12:49.1
there's also
12:49.7
a discussion
12:50.1
of kind of
12:50.6
an overarching
12:51.8
strategy
12:52.6
or grand
12:53.3
strategy.
12:55.8
What is the
12:58.0
broader
12:58.5
grand strategy
12:59.5
that you think
13:00.1
the Philippine
13:00.8
defense establishment
13:01.8
has to develop
13:02.5
in terms of
13:03.0
arm for the
13:03.5
Philippines?
13:04.6
You know,
13:04.8
we can talk
13:06.4
about the
13:06.9
military
13:07.8
industrial
13:08.3
complex,
13:09.0
we can talk
13:09.3
about people
13:09.9
are running
13:10.4
it,
13:10.6
but there
13:10.9
should be
13:11.2
also kind
13:11.5
of an
13:11.8
overarching
13:12.2
strategy,
13:12.9
right?
13:13.0
If you're
13:13.3
going to
13:13.5
build a
13:14.6
formidable
13:15.1
or decent
13:16.3
navy at
13:16.8
least for
13:17.3
a mid-sized
13:17.8
country like
13:18.3
the Philippines.
13:19.1
Well,
13:21.4
the Navy
13:22.6
has worked
13:23.1
on an
13:23.8
archipelagic
13:24.4
defense strategy
13:25.1
before,
13:26.1
and the
13:26.4
Marine Corps
13:26.9
independently
13:27.5
has developed
13:28.1
its own
13:28.5
archipelagic
13:29.4
coastal defense
13:30.7
strategy.
13:31.5
So,
13:31.9
that's the
13:32.2
grounding.
13:32.4
Can you
13:32.8
explain this
13:33.2
to again?
13:33.6
Sorry,
13:33.9
Admiral,
13:34.4
again,
13:34.8
our audience
13:35.5
is not
13:36.0
folks like
13:36.6
us.
13:36.9
Our audience
13:37.2
is just like
13:37.8
folks who are
13:38.5
not necessarily
13:39.4
here for
13:40.2
defense issues,
13:41.0
perhaps they're
13:41.3
here for
13:41.6
political issues
13:42.4
or marites
13:43.0
or,
13:43.7
I don't know,
13:44.2
glutathione.
13:45.8
So,
13:46.3
for the purpose
13:46.7
of our audience,
13:47.4
can you
13:47.6
explain what
13:48.2
do we mean
13:48.7
by,
13:49.1
by archipelagic
13:50.1
defense or
13:50.8
coastal defense
13:51.6
strategy?
13:52.5
Simpleng lang
13:53.3
natin para sa
13:54.3
ating audience.
13:55.4
Well,
13:55.6
in plain language,
13:57.3
ang Pilipinas
13:58.0
is made up
13:58.7
is an
13:59.8
archipelago.
14:01.6
So,
14:02.4
we are made
14:02.9
up of
14:03.4
7,100
14:05.1
islands,
14:07.2
low tide.
14:08.5
Low tide.
14:10.0
Okay,
14:10.3
so we need
14:10.8
to defend
14:11.2
all of those
14:12.2
islands within
14:13.1
the archipelago
14:13.9
now.
14:14.9
Because of
14:15.6
the unique
14:16.4
nature of
14:17.1
an archipelago,
14:18.1
meaning
14:18.4
multiple
14:19.2
islands
14:19.7
dispersed
14:20.3
and different
14:22.4
ingress-egress
14:24.0
o maraming
14:25.2
daungan
14:26.2
papasok.
14:27.4
Okay?
14:27.9
For the Philippines
14:28.5
alone,
14:29.0
we have
14:29.3
seven archipelagic
14:30.4
streets that
14:31.0
we need to
14:31.8
secure and
14:33.3
defend.
14:34.1
Okay?
14:35.3
So,
14:36.3
yun yung nature
14:37.0
ng archipelago.
14:38.5
So,
14:38.7
that means,
14:39.4
yung strategy mo
14:40.3
o yung
14:40.9
yung konsepto mo
14:42.7
para
14:42.9
depensahan
14:43.8
yung archipelago mo
14:45.1
should fit
14:46.5
the nature
14:47.0
of the
14:47.5
country.
14:48.4
Meaning,
14:50.7
you have to
14:51.0
consider na
14:51.6
marami tayong
14:52.1
island groups,
14:53.6
marami tayong
14:54.7
maraming
14:56.3
entrance
14:56.9
o access
14:57.8
ways
14:58.3
inside,
14:59.8
into,
15:00.3
and out of
15:00.9
the Philippine
15:01.8
archipelago.
15:03.0
So,
15:04.0
yung strategy
15:04.4
natin must be
15:05.2
able to look at
15:06.1
how do you
15:06.5
now defend
15:07.1
yung archipelago
15:09.0
natin.
15:11.3
Okay,
15:12.0
now that we
15:12.5
have clarified
15:13.1
some of these
15:13.6
basic terms,
15:14.3
yung archipelagic
15:15.0
defense or
15:15.5
coastal defense
15:16.1
capabilities,
15:17.3
so,
15:17.8
balikan natin
15:18.8
ito in terms of
15:19.6
conventional
15:20.1
capability development.
15:21.6
I mean,
15:21.8
is there like a
15:22.6
panim,
15:23.7
is there a
15:24.3
sequencing here?
15:25.6
Is there a kind of
15:26.5
like,
15:26.8
I don't know if you
15:27.2
can sandwich it
15:28.2
like a little bit
15:28.7
of this,
15:29.3
a little bit of
15:29.8
that?
15:30.5
Can you lasagna it?
15:31.8
Like,
15:32.3
what is the
15:33.7
optimal mix
15:34.8
of capabilities
15:35.8
we're looking at
15:36.6
given the
15:37.7
limitations of
15:38.4
our budget
15:38.9
and given the
15:39.6
time frame
15:40.1
we're looking at
15:40.7
and given the
15:41.2
urgency of the
15:41.9
threat that we're
15:42.4
facing?
15:43.1
I mean,
15:43.3
again,
15:43.7
if you were to
15:44.3
make up a menu,
15:45.5
right,
15:45.8
like parang
15:46.2
war simulation,
15:47.9
right,
15:48.0
you were given
15:48.3
10 points,
15:49.2
how are you
15:49.6
going to divide
15:50.0
it among
15:50.8
certain capability
15:51.9
development,
15:52.6
like one point
15:53.2
here,
15:53.5
two points
15:53.9
here,
15:54.2
one point
15:54.6
here?
15:55.6
What would
15:56.6
be the
15:56.9
reasonable
15:57.3
kind of
15:57.8
mixture for
15:59.2
you,
15:59.8
Admiral?
16:01.1
Well,
16:02.1
if resource
16:02.8
is an issue,
16:03.5
meaning your
16:04.3
budget is an
16:04.9
issue.
16:05.5
Your budget is
16:06.8
2 trillion pesos
16:07.9
over 10 years,
16:09.2
right?
16:09.7
So,
16:10.4
yeah.
16:11.1
So,
16:11.4
roughly,
16:12.6
roughly 200
16:14.0
billion a year,
16:15.1
something like
16:15.5
that,
16:15.9
right?
16:16.3
Yeah.
16:16.6
Three to
16:16.9
four billion
16:17.5
dollars,
16:18.0
a year,
16:18.2
let's say.
16:19.8
Okay.
16:20.1
Ang challenge
16:20.7
na yun,
16:21.0
and I haven't
16:22.1
seen the list
16:22.6
nung
16:23.2
re-horizon,
16:24.6
so we're
16:26.1
actually basically
16:26.7
speculating it.
16:28.3
But,
16:29.0
whatever's on
16:29.7
that list,
16:30.9
the question
16:31.3
now is,
16:33.0
yung capabilities
16:34.1
that you're
16:34.6
trying to
16:35.0
acquire,
16:35.6
will it
16:36.0
address the
16:37.4
immediate
16:37.7
challenges or
16:39.3
threats
16:39.7
sa
16:40.4
archipelago
16:40.9
mo?
16:41.6
Okay.
16:42.2
So,
16:42.5
I mentioned
16:42.9
yung,
16:43.1
I mentioned
16:43.8
yung,
16:45.5
on the
16:45.9
part of the
16:46.3
Navy,
16:46.8
ang
16:46.9
existential
16:48.5
challenge
16:49.1
sa amin
16:49.5
2016,
16:50.8
and I
16:51.0
think it's
16:51.3
still an
16:51.6
existential
16:52.4
challenge
16:52.8
even now,
16:54.1
is the
16:54.3
PLA Navy
16:54.9
surface
16:55.3
fleet.
16:56.6
Kasi yun yung
16:57.3
driver ng
16:58.0
strategy ng
17:00.3
China South
17:00.8
South China
17:01.3
Sea.
17:02.5
Okay.
17:03.4
So,
17:05.9
to deal
17:07.7
with that,
17:09.4
we have
17:09.6
considered yung
17:10.4
anti-ship
17:10.8
missile system,
17:11.6
we have
17:11.7
considered yung
17:12.3
submarine,
17:12.9
okay,
17:13.7
as yung
17:14.3
flagship weapons
17:15.2
mo to
17:15.4
address the
17:15.9
threat.
17:16.9
But yung
17:17.5
mid-level
17:18.7
threat,
17:19.4
yung Chinese
17:20.0
Coast Guard
17:20.6
and yung
17:21.7
Malaysia,
17:24.3
using an
17:25.0
anti-ship
17:25.4
missile system
17:26.0
is an
17:26.4
expensive
17:27.5
proposition.
17:28.5
Kumbaga,
17:29.1
yung
17:29.5
retirement
17:29.9
investment,
17:31.4
para bang
17:31.8
gumamit ka
17:32.4
ng
17:32.8
certain
17:33.7
weapon
17:34.0
system,
17:34.5
tapos ang
17:34.8
target mo
17:35.2
bangka.
17:36.5
Okay.
17:37.0
You will
17:37.3
obliterate it,
17:38.2
but the
17:38.8
question is,
17:40.1
is that,
17:41.5
that's not
17:42.0
the way to do
17:42.7
business in
17:43.3
terms of
17:43.6
ROI.
17:46.1
Saya,
17:46.9
you're wasting
17:47.5
resources.
17:49.0
So we need
17:49.5
to look at
17:50.0
yung mid-level
17:51.0
threat at
17:51.4
saka yung
17:51.7
low-level
17:52.0
threat.
17:52.7
For example,
17:53.3
yung
17:53.4
Malaysia.
17:54.5
Ang nakalimutan
17:55.1
kasi natin,
17:56.0
we look at
17:57.6
the
17:57.7
Malaysia,
17:58.2
yung
17:58.4
fishing
17:58.9
vessels,
18:00.0
tagaharang
18:00.6
at
18:00.7
nag-blockade
18:02.0
ng
18:02.9
Coast Guard
18:03.4
natin
18:03.7
at
18:03.9
supply
18:04.4
boat.
18:05.9
But,
18:06.5
remember,
18:08.0
these
18:08.2
platforms,
18:10.0
yung
18:11.1
design niya
18:11.7
can be
18:12.7
used for
18:13.3
mine
18:13.6
warfare.
18:14.7
Pwede sila
18:15.7
magdala
18:16.1
ng
18:16.4
naval
18:16.8
mines.
18:18.0
I-layout
18:19.2
yan doon sa
18:19.5
ating coastal
18:20.2
waters,
18:20.7
doon sa,
18:21.3
let's say,
18:21.9
Mount of
18:22.3
Manila Bay
18:22.8
or Subic Bay.
18:24.6
They can
18:25.0
be used for
18:25.4
surveillance.
18:26.9
And I
18:27.4
think the
18:28.1
larger
18:28.4
militia
18:28.8
vessels
18:29.4
can
18:30.3
accommodate
18:31.0
yung
18:31.9
lighter
18:33.3
or
18:33.8
smaller
18:34.2
missile
18:34.8
systems.
18:36.5
So,
18:36.7
yung
18:37.1
low-end
18:38.9
na yun,
18:40.5
I think
18:41.0
the
18:41.3
appropriate
18:41.8
weapon
18:42.1
system
18:42.4
would be
18:43.1
drones.
18:46.4
Para ma-address
18:48.3
yung problema
18:48.8
na yun.
18:49.5
And we need
18:50.2
kumbaga
18:52.6
expendable
18:53.4
drones
18:53.7
to address
18:54.1
the threat.
18:56.2
So,
18:56.3
that's one.
18:57.6
Now,
18:58.0
we also need
18:58.7
to look at
18:59.1
yung how
18:59.7
do we
19:00.0
defend
19:00.4
yung islands
19:01.2
natin.
19:03.2
If you
19:03.8
go back
19:04.2
to World
19:04.6
War II,
19:06.3
some of
19:07.2
our islands
19:07.9
were isolated
19:08.7
kasi binaypas
19:10.2
naman sila
19:11.7
ng Japanese
19:12.1
forces.
19:13.3
They were
19:14.0
isolated
19:14.6
until
19:16.3
binalikan
19:16.7
na lang
19:17.0
sila
19:17.3
nung
19:17.5
nag-consolidate
19:18.3
na yung
19:18.6
forces
19:19.3
ng Japan
19:20.2
sa
19:20.4
Pilipinas.
19:21.4
So,
19:22.3
we need
19:22.6
to design
19:23.2
yung defense
19:23.6
system
19:23.9
ng islands
19:24.5
natin
19:24.9
as
19:25.1
stand-alone.
19:25.9
They can
19:26.2
operate
19:26.5
independently.
19:27.7
Kasi unang
19:28.2
mag-breakdown
19:29.0
sa'yo
19:29.2
dyan,
19:29.8
communications
19:30.3
eh.
19:31.8
Okay?
19:32.1
You must
19:32.4
assume that
19:33.0
your
19:33.2
communications
19:33.7
will
19:34.0
break
19:34.2
down.
19:35.7
That
19:36.2
will be
19:37.1
the first
19:37.5
thing
19:37.6
na
19:37.8
i-detect.
19:39.1
At to
19:39.3
target
19:39.6
din
19:39.8
ng
19:39.9
kalaban.
19:41.4
So,
19:41.7
you must
19:42.1
design
19:43.4
yung
19:43.8
homeland
19:44.3
defense
19:44.8
mo
19:45.0
for
19:45.9
low-tech
19:46.3
warfare.
19:48.9
Low-tech
19:49.7
warfare
19:50.7
siya.
19:51.1
Kasi the
19:51.4
more low-tech
19:52.2
yung
19:52.4
warfare
19:52.8
mo,
19:53.2
the
19:53.3
more
19:53.5
resilient
19:54.0
yun.
19:55.2
Okay?
19:55.9
Kasi if
19:56.2
you go
19:56.5
for
19:56.7
sophisticated
19:57.3
web
19:58.7
systems,
19:59.3
whether
19:59.5
it's
19:59.8
weapons
20:00.2
or
20:00.7
support
20:01.4
systems,
20:03.5
doon
20:04.0
naman
20:05.4
nag-ooperate
20:08.4
yung
20:08.6
adversaries
20:10.2
natin.
20:11.2
So,
20:11.7
it's better
20:12.1
to look
20:13.6
for ways
20:14.1
in this.
20:14.7
Kung kailangan
20:15.2
na,
20:15.5
we go
20:15.7
back,
20:15.9
back to
20:16.1
Morse code
20:16.5
tsaka
20:17.0
ham radio
20:17.6
as a
20:20.0
backup system
20:20.7
just to
20:22.1
ensure that
20:22.6
yung homeland
20:23.2
defense mo
20:23.9
will continue,
20:24.8
will persevere
20:25.5
even in a
20:28.3
non-permissive
20:30.3
environment.
20:32.8
So,
20:33.2
then,
20:35.3
yeah.
20:36.3
Yes,
20:37.2
please,
20:37.5
Admiral,
20:37.8
go ahead.
20:40.9
Kasi we're
20:41.7
talking of
20:42.0
the physical
20:42.4
side,
20:43.0
whether yung
20:43.6
sa ere,
20:44.1
sa dagat,
20:45.6
o sa
20:45.8
lupa eh.
20:47.0
But yung
20:47.4
non-physical
20:48.6
should also
20:49.9
be considered.
20:50.8
So,
20:51.0
yung cyber,
20:52.4
maraming pa tayong
20:53.2
kailangan gawin
20:53.9
para to be able
20:55.4
to say na we are
20:56.4
confident in
20:58.2
defending our
20:58.8
cyberspace.
20:59.5
Kasi right now,
21:01.7
my personal
21:02.8
view is
21:03.3
private sector
21:04.1
is the one
21:04.5
taking the
21:05.0
cudgels
21:05.5
in terms of
21:07.2
defending yung
21:08.1
private sector.
21:11.0
And
21:11.6
government
21:13.0
is still
21:13.4
in that level
21:14.7
of trying to
21:15.3
step up.
21:15.8
To the
21:16.2
challenge.
21:17.4
The second
21:18.2
one is yung
21:18.9
public opinion
21:20.6
is also
21:21.5
a battle
21:21.8
space.
21:22.6
And alam mo naman
21:23.4
yung Richard eh,
21:24.1
meron tayong
21:24.4
information war
21:25.2
ongoing right
21:25.7
now.
21:26.4
Meron tayong
21:26.9
counter-propaganda.
21:27.4
I have no
21:27.9
idea.
21:28.4
I'm totally
21:29.1
shocked.
21:29.8
I've never
21:30.3
seen
21:30.7
any
21:30.9
China
21:31.6
club
21:32.5
around.
21:33.9
So,
21:35.3
that's also
21:36.3
part of
21:37.1
warfare.
21:38.1
And
21:38.5
I think
21:40.0
we've been
21:40.8
good at it,
21:41.7
encountering it,
21:42.5
but
21:42.7
who knows?
21:44.7
Don't be
21:45.9
complacent.
21:46.9
Yeah, yeah.
21:47.3
No room for
21:47.8
complacency
21:48.4
dito sa
21:48.8
cognitive
21:49.2
warfare nila.
21:50.5
Yeah.
21:51.3
Admiral,
21:52.2
again,
21:53.5
before we go
21:54.4
to the
21:54.8
asymmetric
21:55.4
and cyber,
21:56.3
I think those
21:56.9
stones are
21:57.3
definitely
21:57.6
important.
21:58.2
Thank you
21:58.4
for pointing
21:58.9
them out.
22:00.0
Ang point ko
22:00.7
lang kasi
22:01.1
may plano
22:02.3
talaga magkaroon
22:03.2
ng acquisition
22:03.8
sa mga
22:04.5
conventional
22:05.4
capabilities.
22:06.4
So,
22:06.5
a few
22:06.7
submarines,
22:08.0
multi-role
22:09.1
fighter jets,
22:11.6
perhaps
22:12.2
more of
22:13.9
a
22:14.5
supersonic
22:15.0
missile systems
22:15.9
if not
22:16.3
hypersonic.
22:17.3
Like,
22:17.9
I completely
22:18.4
get your
22:18.8
point.
22:19.2
Now,
22:19.4
we have to
22:19.8
go for
22:20.1
highest ROI
22:20.9
for what
22:22.1
we can
22:22.4
develop in
22:22.9
the shortest
22:23.7
possible time,
22:24.6
what we
22:24.9
can maintain,
22:25.7
get scanned.
22:26.4
But what
22:27.0
do you think
22:27.4
is the
22:27.8
minimum level
22:28.6
of conventional
22:29.6
arms acquisition
22:31.3
that we have
22:31.7
to go for?
22:32.4
Like,
22:33.2
three submarines
22:33.8
looks like
22:34.4
reasonable to
22:35.1
you,
22:35.3
right?
22:36.0
I know
22:36.5
this is
22:36.8
your Navy,
22:37.4
but in
22:38.0
terms of
22:38.6
fighter jets
22:39.6
capabilities,
22:40.3
are we
22:40.5
looking at
22:41.0
two or
22:41.9
three squadrons
22:42.8
realistically?
22:43.9
What kind
22:44.2
of multi-role
22:44.8
vessels are
22:45.3
we looking
22:46.2
at as
22:46.6
most reasonable
22:47.3
given
22:47.7
you're
22:48.6
facing
22:48.9
China,
22:49.6
which has
22:49.9
I think
22:50.2
about two
22:50.7
fifth-generation
22:52.0
developed
22:52.7
fighter jets
22:53.2
programs already?
22:54.5
So,
22:55.2
what are we
22:57.5
looking at
22:57.8
in terms
22:58.1
of the
22:58.6
minimum
22:59.2
conventional
23:00.3
capabilities
23:00.9
we should
23:01.5
have before
23:02.7
putting a
23:03.9
bigger part
23:04.3
of our
23:04.7
eggs perhaps
23:05.7
in the
23:05.9
basket of
23:06.4
asymmetric
23:06.9
and cyber
23:07.3
warfare?
23:08.2
Okay.
23:09.4
So,
23:09.9
I'll defer
23:10.1
to the
23:10.4
Air Force
23:10.7
in terms
23:11.0
of number
23:11.4
squadrons.
23:12.2
I think
23:12.5
they talked
23:12.9
to three
23:13.7
squadrons
23:14.2
I will
23:15.6
look at
23:15.9
it,
23:16.1
ano yung
23:16.4
mission na
23:17.1
gusto
23:17.3
may perform.
23:19.0
So,
23:20.0
historically,
23:21.0
the Air Force
23:23.2
because of
23:23.6
yung
23:23.7
counterinsurgency
23:24.5
campaign natin,
23:25.3
ang primary
23:26.8
mission niya
23:27.3
was close
23:28.1
air support.
23:30.4
Supporting
23:30.9
the Army
23:31.6
or the
23:31.9
infantry
23:32.3
in
23:32.8
counterinsurgency
23:33.5
operations.
23:34.1
That has
23:34.4
been its
23:34.7
principal
23:35.0
role for
23:35.4
the past
23:35.8
few
23:36.0
decades.
23:37.2
Now,
23:37.5
I think
23:37.8
the Air Force
23:41.1
they want
23:42.3
to go
23:42.5
conventional
23:43.0
in terms
23:44.1
of conventional
23:44.5
terms,
23:45.2
they are
23:45.6
looking into
23:46.1
air defense.
23:47.5
That means
23:48.4
they need
23:49.1
to establish
23:49.9
the ability
23:50.7
to protect
23:51.3
yung
23:52.7
PABIS natin,
23:53.6
yung
23:53.8
Philippine
23:54.4
Air Defense
23:55.2
Interdiction
23:55.7
Zone.
23:56.8
So,
23:57.4
you need
23:57.8
fighters,
23:59.1
I think,
23:59.3
air superiority
23:60.0
capability.
24:01.9
So,
24:02.4
maaaring
24:02.6
yung titingnan
24:03.2
nila.
24:04.7
Ang aking
24:05.2
concern naman
24:05.9
is,
24:06.3
ganun pa rin,
24:07.9
yung PLA
24:08.5
Navy
24:08.8
Service
24:09.1
Fleet.
24:10.1
So,
24:11.1
if I were
24:11.6
to ask
24:12.0
the Air Force,
24:12.5
I would
24:12.7
ask them,
24:13.2
can you
24:13.4
also
24:13.7
consider
24:14.1
the ability
24:14.8
of your
24:15.9
multi-role
24:16.5
aircraft
24:18.0
to carry
24:19.4
anti-ship
24:20.0
missile systems?
24:22.5
Kasi,
24:23.0
that will
24:24.4
give us
24:25.6
more
24:26.2
ability
24:30.3
to actually
24:31.0
counter
24:31.5
yung
24:31.8
surface
24:32.3
fleet nila.
24:33.6
So,
24:34.1
that's what
24:34.5
I'm going
24:34.8
to ask
24:35.1
a Navy
24:35.9
person.
24:36.6
Sana,
24:37.5
one of
24:37.9
the squadrons
24:38.4
will be
24:38.8
designed
24:39.2
as naval
24:40.5
strike,
24:41.2
for naval
24:41.9
strike
24:42.3
capability.
24:43.7
So,
24:44.1
that's
24:44.2
the
24:44.2
requirement.
24:47.2
For air
24:48.1
defense naman,
24:48.9
it's not that
24:49.3
we're talking
24:49.9
at merong
24:51.1
guns versus
24:52.1
missile
24:52.6
dichotomy.
24:54.3
Guns and
24:55.0
butter,
24:55.4
or you mean
24:55.9
trade-off?
24:57.4
Guns versus
24:58.2
missile,
24:58.9
in terms of
24:59.4
yung air
24:59.7
defense.
25:01.2
Kasi,
25:01.6
missiles are
25:02.5
expensive.
25:03.8
But I think
25:04.5
one of the
25:05.2
lessons,
25:06.0
again,
25:06.4
from the
25:06.8
Ukraine-Russian
25:07.4
conflict was,
25:09.1
they've used
25:09.8
an older
25:11.8
German
25:12.5
anti-air
25:13.7
defense system,
25:14.8
which is
25:15.1
gun-type.
25:17.6
And I'm
25:18.2
tying this up
25:19.0
to yung
25:19.4
discussion
25:21.3
earlier about
25:22.1
supply chain.
25:23.2
Kasi,
25:24.9
mas madali
25:25.6
yung supply
25:26.2
chain mo
25:26.6
kung bala
25:27.7
yung
25:29.2
yung
25:30.3
primary
25:33.1
munisyon mo
25:34.7
compared to
25:35.3
missile,
25:35.8
which is
25:36.0
more expensive.
25:37.4
So,
25:38.7
maybe,
25:39.7
consider a
25:40.4
mix,
25:40.8
if not
25:41.8
possible,
25:42.4
na ano.
25:43.2
Because,
25:43.7
a purely
25:44.2
missile-based
25:45.8
air defense system
25:46.6
might be
25:47.4
too expensive
25:48.2
for us.
25:49.6
So,
25:49.8
may konting
25:51.1
old-school
25:52.4
style,
25:53.3
rambo style.
25:55.2
May konting
25:55.6
rambo,
25:56.2
medyo may
25:56.7
konting
25:57.2
high-tech
25:58.0
style.
25:59.7
But there
26:00.0
are,
26:00.4
I think,
26:02.1
30s
26:02.5
one.
26:03.3
There are
26:03.6
providers of
26:04.4
gun-type
26:05.5
air defense
26:06.0
system.
26:06.8
Nang
26:07.4
puter na,
26:08.2
hindi yung
26:08.7
rambo.
26:12.3
Si rambo na,
26:13.5
isip ko,
26:14.0
nakaganyan siya.
26:15.9
Ratetan yung mga.
26:17.2
Okay,
26:17.8
what about
26:18.9
yung mga systems
26:19.7
like HIMARS
26:20.8
or
26:21.4
the Javelin
26:23.1
missile,
26:23.5
some of these things
26:24.1
that many thought
26:25.4
could be game changers.
26:26.9
At least,
26:27.6
we saw in the initial
26:28.6
phase of the
26:29.6
invasion of Russia
26:30.5
how some of the systems
26:31.6
were very effective.
26:32.7
What is your take
26:33.4
on those issues?
26:34.7
More army
26:35.3
atas yun to.
26:36.3
This is more in the realm
26:37.2
of army siguro
26:38.0
na pag HIMARS
26:38.8
and all.
26:40.4
I think HIMARS
26:41.3
is
26:41.6
a conversation
26:42.7
kind of
26:43.5
a current
26:43.9
conversation
26:44.4
between our
26:45.0
armed forces
26:45.7
natin
26:46.1
and the US
26:46.8
forces.
26:49.3
But yung HIMARS
26:50.5
na alam natin
26:52.6
is for
26:53.3
land
26:53.7
warfare.
26:57.1
I'm not sure
26:58.1
kung na-perfect
26:58.7
na nila yung
26:59.4
HIMARS na
27:00.4
pwede gamitin
27:01.6
for maritime
27:02.1
for maritime
27:04.2
environment.
27:05.5
But if there is,
27:07.3
I think
27:08.3
that would be
27:11.0
a good
27:11.4
accusation
27:13.5
as well.
27:14.2
Kasi we need to
27:14.8
balance
27:15.1
yung
27:15.4
yung
27:16.6
BRAMOS natin
27:17.7
at the
27:18.0
ship-to-sail system
27:18.8
is
27:19.2
I think
27:20.6
a range
27:20.9
is around
27:21.3
290 kilometers.
27:23.0
So that takes
27:23.8
care of our
27:24.3
exclusive
27:24.7
command zone.
27:26.1
But for
27:26.6
shorter ranges,
27:27.5
you need a
27:27.9
shorter range
27:29.1
weapon system.
27:30.0
So I think
27:30.5
the HIMARS
27:31.1
or a similar
27:33.6
system
27:34.1
with similar
27:34.9
capabilities
27:35.5
would fill up
27:36.2
that gap.
27:39.3
Now, I think
27:40.1
we kind of
27:40.8
covered some
27:41.3
of the conventional
27:41.9
part.
27:42.4
Although,
27:42.7
yun nga,
27:42.9
I know,
27:43.5
you're more
27:43.8
a Navy guy.
27:44.6
So sorry
27:45.4
kung I put you
27:46.0
on the spot,
27:46.6
Admiral,
27:47.0
on the Air Force
27:48.3
part.
27:48.7
Although,
27:49.1
we are all
27:49.5
following what's
27:50.1
happening with
27:50.5
the Air Force.
27:51.5
Some are
27:51.9
saying within
27:52.3
days,
27:52.7
we may have
27:53.3
some sort
27:53.7
of a
27:53.9
confirmation
27:54.4
whether we're
27:55.1
going to
27:55.3
go for
27:55.7
Gripen
27:56.2
with Sweden
27:56.9
over the
27:58.0
F-16
27:58.4
from the
27:58.8
United States.
27:59.4
I think
27:59.5
this will
27:59.9
later on
28:00.4
bring us
28:00.7
to the
28:01.0
more serious
28:01.6
conversation
28:04.8
about
28:05.4
U.S.-Philippine
28:06.8
Alliance,
28:07.2
especially as I
28:07.8
speak to you
28:08.3
now from
28:08.7
Washington,
28:09.5
D.C.
28:10.0
But before
28:10.5
going there,
28:11.5
need to say
28:11.9
U.S.-Philippine
28:13.5
partnerships,
28:14.5
et cetera.
28:16.0
Let's talk about
28:16.4
the asymmetric
28:16.9
part a little
28:17.4
bit more.
28:18.6
Let me push
28:19.3
things a little
28:19.8
bit.
28:20.2
I mean,
28:21.0
do you think
28:22.0
it makes sense
28:22.6
for the
28:23.0
Philippines also
28:23.6
to have
28:24.3
not only,
28:25.4
I don't know,
28:25.7
suicide drones,
28:27.1
autonomous suicide
28:28.0
boats,
28:28.6
yung mga ganyan
28:29.2
na ginagamit
28:30.2
ng some of
28:30.7
the forces
28:31.7
in the Middle East,
28:32.4
for instance,
28:33.0
as a kind of
28:33.5
a deterrent
28:34.0
on potential
28:34.6
weapons against
28:35.3
the U.S.
28:36.1
if things
28:36.5
go downhill
28:39.4
all the way.
28:40.8
But also
28:41.4
in terms of,
28:42.1
I don't know,
28:42.5
I mean,
28:42.8
pwede rin tayo
28:44.1
mag-develop
28:44.5
ng mga militias
28:45.3
natin,
28:46.1
put some of
28:46.9
our feistier
28:48.2
Filipino people
28:49.1
there.
28:49.4
I mean,
28:49.8
what are we
28:50.1
looking at here?
28:50.8
Kasi obviously
28:51.6
there's always
28:52.1
this escalation
28:52.9
domination,
28:53.6
right?
28:53.9
I mean,
28:54.1
if we have
28:54.9
for every
28:55.4
hundred drones
28:56.1
we can deploy,
28:57.0
I think the
28:57.3
Chinese can
28:57.7
deploy a
28:58.1
million drones
28:58.7
or something.
28:59.4
You get
28:59.7
what I'm
28:59.8
saying?
28:60.0
It's not
29:00.3
like China
29:00.8
is not a
29:01.9
master of
29:02.5
asymmetrical
29:03.1
warfare itself.
29:04.3
I mean,
29:04.5
in a way,
29:04.8
we're saying
29:05.1
let's do to
29:05.5
China what
29:06.0
China wants
29:06.4
to do to
29:06.8
the U.S.,
29:07.3
right?
29:08.5
Their
29:08.9
developments
29:09.5
of ACBMs,
29:10.5
their
29:10.6
developments
29:10.9
of all
29:11.2
these drone
29:11.7
systems.
29:12.4
What are
29:12.7
we looking
29:13.0
at here?
29:13.5
Do you
29:13.9
think that
29:14.2
the Philippines
29:14.5
should also
29:14.9
develop its
29:15.4
own drone
29:15.9
industry?
29:16.5
I think
29:16.6
Ukraine has
29:17.3
done a
29:18.1
pretty good
29:18.4
job of
29:18.8
going from
29:19.2
zero to
29:19.7
something,
29:20.2
not maybe
29:20.6
hero yet,
29:21.3
but
29:21.4
realistically,
29:23.5
in terms
29:23.7
of
29:24.3
kasi supply
29:25.1
chain,
29:25.4
do you
29:26.4
think the
29:26.7
Philippines
29:27.0
is also
29:27.4
in a
29:27.6
position to
29:28.2
develop
29:28.8
its own
29:29.2
drone and
29:29.8
some of
29:30.0
the
29:30.1
asymmetric
29:30.5
capability
29:31.3
development
29:31.8
industry?
29:32.8
Assuming we
29:33.2
can get
29:33.5
the semiconductors
29:34.4
and all
29:34.8
from Taiwan
29:35.3
and other
29:35.7
countries,
29:36.2
yeah.
29:38.9
I would
29:39.2
agree with
29:39.7
the proposal
29:40.2
to build
29:41.4
our own
29:41.7
drones
29:42.0
in the
29:43.2
Philippines,
29:43.7
but the
29:44.4
context
29:44.8
is that
29:45.3
we already
29:47.0
have
29:47.5
the
29:48.6
self-reliance
29:50.6
defense
29:50.9
program,
29:51.5
SRDP.
29:53.0
That should
29:53.6
be
29:53.7
established
29:54.3
because
29:54.8
there are
29:55.2
some
29:55.3
legal
29:55.7
things
29:57.8
that you
29:58.1
need to
29:59.1
undertake
29:59.6
first so
30:00.3
that can
30:00.9
be a
30:01.2
viable
30:01.5
industry.
30:01.8
So we're
30:02.2
not only
30:02.5
talking of
30:02.9
drones,
30:03.3
we're
30:03.6
talking of
30:04.0
how do
30:04.8
we create
30:05.2
a viable
30:05.7
defense
30:06.1
industry
30:06.4
in the
30:06.6
Philippines
30:07.0
to support
30:07.6
its own
30:08.5
requirements.
30:08.9
But in
30:12.5
our
30:12.7
conversation
30:13.3
with my
30:14.5
colleagues about
30:15.0
defense industry
30:15.8
kasi,
30:16.8
you cannot
30:17.6
develop that
30:19.5
type of
30:20.0
industry na
30:20.7
ang market mo
30:21.3
is arm
30:21.7
forces lang.
30:22.7
Hindi pwedeng
30:23.2
Pilipinas lang.
30:25.2
If you are
30:25.7
going to
30:26.3
pursue that
30:26.9
type of
30:27.9
industry,
30:29.0
you need to
30:29.5
think global.
30:31.0
You need to
30:31.5
think of a
30:32.6
global market
30:33.4
or at
30:34.5
least a
30:34.9
regional market
30:35.6
kasi kung
30:36.3
hindi siya
30:36.9
viable.
30:38.4
The worst
30:38.8
thing that
30:39.3
you can do
30:39.8
is to
30:40.3
produce
30:40.8
a certain
30:42.4
scale
30:42.9
with certain
30:43.4
market.
30:43.8
Otherwise,
30:44.2
your margin
30:44.7
is too
30:45.3
thin to
30:45.9
make it
30:46.3
viable.
30:47.7
Correct.
30:48.7
The point
30:49.0
is,
30:49.9
government
30:50.4
or the
30:50.8
armed forces
30:51.2
should not
30:51.7
be in
30:53.2
the business
30:54.1
of conducting
30:54.9
business.
30:55.9
We should
30:57.1
let private
30:57.6
sector
30:58.0
perform
30:59.0
this
30:59.3
function.
31:00.7
But for
31:01.1
private
31:01.4
sector to
31:02.0
have a
31:02.2
buy-in
31:02.8
on this
31:03.2
type of
31:03.6
activity,
31:04.6
it must
31:05.4
be profitable.
31:07.1
So the
31:08.4
ecosystem,
31:09.3
the legal
31:09.8
and the
31:10.5
industrial
31:11.5
ecosystem
31:12.0
for that
31:12.5
must be
31:12.9
illatag mo
31:13.7
muna.
31:14.6
Then we can
31:15.1
talk about
31:15.6
setting up
31:16.5
a drone
31:16.8
factory
31:17.1
in the
31:17.4
Philippines.
31:18.5
Whether that
31:19.3
is for
31:19.7
maritime
31:20.7
or land
31:21.3
or air.
31:22.9
Then,
31:23.7
naiayos mo
31:24.5
na yun
31:24.7
na illatag mo
31:25.3
ng
31:25.4
islands.
31:26.7
Right.
31:28.3
Interestingly,
31:29.0
just the
31:29.4
other week,
31:29.9
there was a
31:30.2
delegation of
31:30.8
more than
31:31.1
20 Indian
31:31.9
companies
31:32.5
that visited
31:33.7
the Philippines
31:34.4
and per
31:34.9
the Indian
31:35.6
ambassador,
31:37.0
what the
31:37.4
Indian companies
31:38.2
are looking
31:38.6
at is not
31:39.1
just making
31:39.9
us their
31:40.3
latest third
31:41.3
world client,
31:42.5
but they're
31:42.8
looking at
31:43.2
joint ventures.
31:44.1
They're looking
31:44.4
at giving
31:44.7
us even
31:45.2
soft loans
31:46.0
and all
31:46.4
to kind
31:47.0
of develop
31:47.4
our industry
31:48.2
in terms
31:48.9
of development
31:49.4
of armored
31:50.0
vehicles,
31:50.8
maybe drones,
31:51.8
some of
31:52.0
these things.
31:52.8
What do
31:53.0
you think
31:53.2
about that?
31:53.7
Do you
31:53.9
think maybe
31:54.6
that's the
31:55.0
way forward
31:55.5
that we
31:55.8
have joint
31:56.3
ventures?
31:56.9
I think
31:57.1
Indonesia,
31:57.7
for instance,
31:58.1
has a
31:58.3
joint
31:58.7
fifth
31:59.4
generation
31:59.9
fighter
32:00.2
program
32:00.6
with
32:00.9
South
32:01.2
Korea.
32:01.8
Do you
32:02.4
think that's
32:02.7
kind of
32:03.0
the way
32:03.9
forward?
32:04.5
Because I
32:04.7
imagine
32:05.0
behind the
32:05.7
curve
32:06.0
tayo,
32:06.5
but at
32:06.8
the same
32:07.0
time,
32:07.3
we're a
32:07.5
mid-sized
32:07.9
economy,
32:08.5
a fast-growing
32:09.0
economy.
32:10.2
I think
32:10.8
we can do
32:11.2
better than
32:11.7
just buying
32:12.3
from different
32:12.9
countries,
32:13.4
right?
32:13.7
But maybe
32:14.4
joint ventures
32:15.2
with some
32:15.7
of the
32:16.1
mid-level
32:17.4
countries like
32:18.0
India or
32:18.9
more than
32:19.6
mid-level
32:20.1
like South
32:20.6
Korea is
32:21.0
perhaps the
32:21.4
way forward?
32:23.5
Yes.
32:24.5
Joint
32:25.0
venture and
32:25.7
tech transfer
32:26.4
goes hand
32:27.7
in hand.
32:29.1
And of
32:29.4
course,
32:29.6
we'll talk
32:30.0
about that
32:30.3
earlier.
32:32.6
The
32:32.9
foundation
32:33.5
would be
32:35.7
for tech
32:38.2
transfer to
32:39.4
take place,
32:40.2
you also
32:40.5
need to
32:40.8
develop
32:41.2
the
32:41.3
industrial
32:41.6
capacity
32:42.1
and of
32:43.8
course,
32:44.1
the
32:44.2
STEM,
32:44.7
the
32:45.1
human
32:45.6
wear.
32:46.7
Now,
32:47.7
the
32:47.9
beauty
32:48.2
here,
32:49.5
in
32:49.8
Indonesia,
32:51.4
it's
32:52.3
actually
32:52.6
sad
32:54.0
because
32:54.8
we're
32:56.0
buying,
32:56.7
the
32:56.8
Air Force
32:57.1
is buying
32:57.5
aircraft
32:58.0
in
32:58.2
Indonesia.
32:59.9
No,
33:03.6
transport,
33:04.3
light
33:04.4
transport.
33:05.2
Oh,
33:05.5
yeah,
33:05.7
even the light
33:06.2
transport,
33:06.8
not to mention
33:07.3
the ships
33:07.9
that we
33:08.5
will get
33:09.0
from them.
33:11.1
But,
33:12.7
the
33:12.9
industry
33:16.4
they're
33:16.8
studying
33:17.0
is
33:18.5
the
33:19.3
corporation
33:21.3
here in
33:21.9
the Philippines.
33:23.5
They returned
33:24.0
to Indonesia
33:24.7
and they
33:25.5
made good
33:26.2
with running
33:27.1
that concept.
33:28.9
For us,
33:29.5
it pulled up,
33:30.3
it didn't
33:30.7
prosper.
33:32.4
It's like
33:32.9
the same
33:34.3
situation
33:34.7
as the
33:35.0
IRI,
33:35.4
the RICE,
33:35.7
the RICE.
33:36.2
As a RICE.
33:37.0
Vietnam,
33:37.6
Thailand,
33:38.0
learning from us.
33:38.8
They learned from us.
33:40.7
We cooked
33:41.1
our own oil.
33:43.8
Okay.
33:45.6
In Indonesia,
33:47.8
the shipyard,
33:49.3
I think
33:49.9
quality-wise,
33:51.7
we're still
33:52.0
better than them
33:53.4
in terms of
33:54.5
quality.
33:56.1
But,
33:57.5
they're just
33:58.1
better in terms
33:58.9
of
33:59.0
running
34:00.1
that industry.
34:03.9
And,
34:04.2
I don't know,
34:05.4
but,
34:05.7
there are
34:06.7
some factors here
34:07.6
that actually
34:09.6
prevents us
34:11.1
from
34:11.3
progressing.
34:13.8
I mean,
34:14.9
Admiral,
34:15.4
my understanding
34:16.1
of Indonesia
34:16.5
is that they have
34:17.2
a number of
34:17.7
large
34:18.2
state-owned,
34:19.9
state-backed
34:21.5
enterprises
34:22.1
involved in the
34:23.1
production of
34:23.7
advanced weapon systems
34:24.7
which President Jokowi
34:25.9
discussed when he visited
34:26.8
Manila.
34:27.9
I mean,
34:28.7
I'm not sure if the
34:29.7
Philippines is in that
34:30.6
position,
34:31.1
but in terms of our
34:31.8
private sector,
34:32.8
are there
34:33.2
particular
34:34.3
oligarchs?
34:35.7
For the lack
34:37.2
of a better term,
34:37.7
are there oligarchs
34:38.5
there in the Philippines
34:39.1
that you think
34:39.6
could be a
34:40.4
positive
34:41.0
contributor here?
34:42.1
I mean,
34:42.4
in India,
34:43.3
it's Tata,
34:44.0
right?
34:44.3
The Tata company
34:45.2
is involved in
34:45.9
everything,
34:46.4
car production.
34:47.3
I mean,
34:47.6
pretty modernized
34:48.8
some of the
34:50.2
quote-unquote
34:51.2
oligarchs
34:51.8
in India.
34:52.4
Do you think
34:52.6
we can have
34:53.1
a version of that?
34:53.9
I mean,
34:54.1
my understanding
34:54.5
is like Ayala,
34:55.2
for instance,
34:55.6
getting into
34:56.1
electric
34:57.0
bike production.
34:59.2
There are also
34:59.6
discussions,
35:00.1
joint venture
35:00.7
with EV
35:01.6
companies and
35:02.6
EV production.
35:03.8
Are there anyone
35:04.7
on the horizon?
35:05.7
Or is this
35:07.0
just a wish list
35:07.7
or something?
35:08.4
Visual thinking?
35:10.1
It's not profitable.
35:12.3
Nobody will
35:12.9
undertake that
35:14.2
activity.
35:15.2
Now,
35:16.2
there was a
35:18.3
time when
35:18.8
we were looking
35:19.3
at
35:19.5
getting
35:22.5
two more
35:23.5
amphibious
35:24.1
vessels,
35:25.8
the second
35:27.3
tranche
35:27.7
of the
35:27.8
Caralaclas
35:28.4
LPD.
35:30.0
And
35:30.4
BND was
35:31.7
trying to
35:32.5
look at
35:33.0
the idea
35:33.4
of having
35:34.6
a joint
35:35.0
venture
35:35.4
that
35:35.6
would
35:35.7
be
35:36.4
in the
35:36.7
Philippines
35:37.0
instead of
35:37.7
in the
35:38.7
second
35:41.5
tranche
35:41.8
of the
35:42.0
acquisition
35:42.3
instead of
35:43.8
in Indonesia
35:44.4
or
35:44.8
in South Korea.
35:46.6
But
35:46.7
what we learned
35:48.4
there was
35:49.2
the current
35:50.2
capacity
35:51.2
of our
35:51.8
shipyards
35:52.4
in the
35:52.7
Philippines
35:53.0
cannot absorb
35:54.5
transfer of
35:55.1
technology
35:55.7
yet.
35:56.8
So,
35:57.0
we still
35:57.1
need to
35:57.6
do a lot
35:57.8
of work
35:58.3
for that.
35:59.7
It's not
36:00.0
as simple
36:00.5
as
36:00.7
joint
36:01.3
venture
36:01.7
that we
36:01.9
will do
36:02.1
here.
36:04.1
So,
36:04.7
we go back
36:05.1
to industrial
36:05.6
capacity
36:06.0
and human
36:06.5
wear aspect
36:07.3
for us
36:09.8
to go
36:10.7
into
36:11.0
serious
36:11.8
undertaking
36:12.7
such as
36:13.1
building
36:14.9
that.
36:15.7
Now,
36:17.6
one way
36:20.5
of
36:20.7
the
36:20.9
problem
36:21.6
of
36:22.0
profitability
36:22.6
is if
36:23.3
national
36:23.6
government
36:24.1
will be
36:24.5
the
36:24.7
customer.
36:26.6
For
36:26.7
example,
36:28.5
most of
36:29.2
our
36:29.5
passenger
36:30.2
vessels
36:30.7
are
36:32.5
second
36:33.1
hand.
36:33.9
I think
36:34.2
they get
36:34.7
this
36:35.5
from Japan.
36:36.0
It's much cheaper
36:36.6
than every
36:37.1
country here.
36:38.7
But if
36:39.1
national government
36:40.4
subsidize the
36:41.6
project,
36:43.0
compel or
36:44.1
ask our
36:45.5
local
36:45.9
shipping
36:46.3
companies,
36:48.5
passenger and
36:49.2
commercial,
36:50.3
to get
36:51.2
their
36:53.0
vessels from
36:54.4
our local
36:56.1
shipyards.
36:57.0
Of course,
36:57.5
government
36:58.3
trying to
36:58.8
put up
36:59.1
a
36:59.2
guaranteed
36:59.9
market.
37:01.1
Then,
37:03.2
government
37:03.6
will put up
37:04.5
a soft
37:05.0
loan
37:05.3
to
37:05.5
pay
37:06.1
the next
37:06.6
number
37:06.8
of years
37:07.2
later.
37:08.5
Tapos,
37:09.3
ang maganda
37:09.8
ron,
37:10.3
baka pwede
37:10.9
military
37:13.4
specifications
37:14.2
from passenger
37:14.9
vessels
37:15.3
and commercial
37:16.0
vessels.
37:17.2
Such that,
37:18.5
they can be
37:19.7
used for
37:20.5
disaster
37:21.0
response,
37:21.8
they can
37:22.0
be used
37:22.3
for
37:22.5
troop
37:22.7
transport,
37:24.2
they can
37:24.8
be used
37:25.1
as
37:25.4
floating
37:25.7
hospitals.
37:26.6
Kasi,
37:26.8
yung design
37:28.9
niya,
37:29.6
pag-construct
37:30.6
niya,
37:30.9
designed as
37:31.6
if it is
37:32.1
a military
37:32.8
or naval
37:33.7
vessel.
37:35.5
Okay.
37:36.4
Pero,
37:36.9
civilian
37:37.2
companies are
37:38.7
the ones
37:39.0
using it.
37:39.8
So,
37:40.4
then,
37:40.6
they can be
37:41.0
part of
37:41.7
a larger
37:42.9
auxiliary
37:43.5
of our
37:46.1
reserve force
37:46.7
na later on
37:47.4
pag may
37:47.7
emergency,
37:48.6
o sige,
37:49.0
pahiram muna
37:49.5
nung barco mo,
37:52.1
ako,
37:52.4
bahala sa fuel
37:53.1
niya,
37:53.5
we'll just
37:53.8
use it
37:54.1
to transport
37:54.6
troops,
37:55.1
or we'll
37:55.4
just need
37:55.9
it kasi
37:56.3
mayroong
37:58.1
disaster
37:58.6
response
37:59.1
sa isang
37:59.4
island,
38:00.0
we need
38:00.4
to convert
38:01.6
yung
38:01.9
temporarily
38:02.9
as a
38:04.1
evacuation
38:05.3
area
38:06.5
or a
38:06.9
hospital.
38:07.6
So,
38:07.8
parang ganun.
38:08.8
So,
38:09.4
if the
38:09.7
national
38:09.9
government
38:10.3
is the
38:10.7
guarantor,
38:12.1
subsidizes
38:12.7
the program,
38:13.3
baka pwede
38:13.7
it to
38:13.9
work.
38:14.4
Industrial
38:14.8
policy.
38:15.9
Right.
38:16.1
This is a
38:16.5
military
38:16.8
industrial
38:17.3
policy,
38:17.8
yeah.
38:18.4
Or defense
38:18.9
industrial
38:19.2
policy,
38:19.8
sorry for
38:20.0
that matter.
38:20.9
I mean,
38:21.3
are there
38:21.8
like best
38:24.5
practices we
38:25.3
can look
38:25.6
at?
38:25.9
I mean,
38:26.3
for instance,
38:26.8
I've been
38:27.1
following the
38:27.6
case of
38:27.9
India under
38:28.5
Modi over
38:29.3
the past
38:29.7
decade,
38:30.3
you know,
38:30.5
they have
38:30.7
revised yung
38:32.0
kanilang
38:32.4
defense
38:33.3
acquisition,
38:34.5
procurement,
38:35.3
laws,
38:36.6
they have
38:36.8
focused more
38:37.5
on developing
38:38.2
their own
38:38.6
domestic
38:39.1
capacity.
38:40.5
Kasi India
38:40.9
has been
38:41.6
one of the
38:41.9
largest
38:42.2
importer
38:42.8
of defense
38:43.5
equipment
38:43.9
for a
38:44.9
very long
38:45.3
time.
38:45.6
A lot
38:45.7
of that
38:45.9
from Russia
38:46.5
and all,
38:46.9
but now
38:47.1
they're
38:47.4
moving
38:47.7
towards
38:47.9
developing
38:48.4
their own.
38:49.7
What are
38:50.0
the best
38:50.2
practices
38:50.6
from
38:50.9
comparable
38:51.5
countries?
38:52.1
I mean,
38:52.6
medyo masyadong
38:53.7
advanced na
38:54.2
in Japan
38:54.6
and NATO
38:55.6
countries,
38:56.1
but yung mga
38:56.8
other developing
38:57.5
countries or
38:58.2
dati lang
38:58.6
developing
38:59.1
countries like
38:59.6
South Korea.
39:00.9
I mean,
39:01.3
I think we
39:01.6
already discussed
39:02.3
Indonesia to
39:02.9
a certain
39:03.2
degree.
39:03.6
I mean,
39:03.7
even Pakistan,
39:04.7
yung mga
39:05.1
mas mahirap
39:05.7
pa ng
39:05.9
bansa sa
39:06.3
atin,
39:06.8
na nakaka-develop
39:07.5
sila ng
39:08.0
military-industrial
39:09.5
complex and
39:10.4
slightly more
39:11.6
developed
39:12.0
countries like
39:12.4
Turkey,
39:12.9
for instance.
39:14.0
Drone
39:14.4
superpowers na
39:15.3
sila.
39:15.7
So,
39:16.1
are there
39:16.3
like kind
39:16.6
of,
39:17.4
yun nga,
39:18.1
parang
39:18.5
ayoko na
39:19.3
ang dating
39:19.8
dito
39:20.0
sa
39:20.2
buwan.
39:21.3
At the
39:21.6
same time,
39:21.9
we don't
39:22.1
want to
39:22.4
be
39:22.5
complacent
39:23.1
or masyadong
39:23.6
long standard.
39:24.5
Kaya timitingnan ko
39:25.0
yung mga
39:25.3
other
39:25.8
middle-sized,
39:27.2
middle-income
39:27.8
countries or
39:29.8
rising developing
39:31.4
countries like
39:31.9
India,
39:32.3
for instance,
39:32.6
or Brazil,
39:33.5
what are things
39:34.1
that we can
39:34.4
learn from
39:34.9
them?
39:35.4
Are there
39:35.7
some best
39:36.1
practices in
39:36.8
mind?
39:38.7
Well,
39:38.9
number one,
39:40.0
there must
39:40.4
be a
39:40.6
plan.
39:41.3
It must
39:41.7
be part
39:42.1
of an
39:42.3
industrial
39:42.8
plan.
39:45.6
Otherwise,
39:46.5
it's good
39:47.2
for six
39:47.6
years lang,
39:48.1
then wala na.
39:50.3
Then there
39:51.0
must be
39:51.6
buy-in from
39:52.4
all stakeholders
39:53.2
doon.
39:54.0
So,
39:54.4
it's not a
39:55.4
political issue
39:56.1
but rather
39:56.6
something that
39:57.9
everybody can
39:58.7
agree on,
39:59.8
that it's
40:00.1
something that
40:00.5
needs to be
40:00.8
done,
40:01.3
no matter
40:02.2
who is
40:02.6
involved.
40:02.6
So,
40:03.4
it's not
40:03.9
a political
40:04.3
issue.
40:06.3
Another one
40:07.0
would be,
40:08.6
again,
40:09.1
I mentioned
40:09.6
we need to
40:10.5
strengthen
40:10.8
our STEM
40:11.2
education.
40:12.5
Because we
40:14.1
have this,
40:15.5
but where
40:15.9
will our
40:16.6
STEM education
40:17.8
graduates go?
40:19.2
They're not
40:20.5
staying here
40:20.9
because they
40:21.6
don't have
40:21.8
a catch system
40:24.7
or a
40:25.4
solution
40:25.7
when they
40:26.3
graduate.
40:27.5
So,
40:27.9
here,
40:28.1
we need
40:28.8
your STEM
40:29.6
education
40:30.1
infrastructure
40:31.4
because
40:32.6
with your
40:33.6
labor force
40:34.3
or your
40:34.8
market,
40:35.5
that will
40:35.8
accept it.
40:37.0
So,
40:38.0
at some point,
40:38.8
it needs to be
40:39.3
a closed system.
40:41.1
When you
40:41.9
graduate,
40:42.8
you come to me.
40:45.3
When you graduate,
40:46.4
say,
40:46.6
from
40:46.8
Philippines,
40:48.0
Philippine Science
40:48.5
High School,
40:49.8
after that,
40:50.9
you go to
40:51.3
college,
40:51.9
you take this
40:52.3
course,
40:52.8
and after that,
40:53.5
you are
40:53.7
employed,
40:54.2
guaranteed.
40:56.1
You can
40:57.8
serve for
40:58.4
X number
40:58.8
of years
40:59.1
later on.
40:59.6
You want to
40:59.9
go abroad,
41:00.3
that's up to you.
41:01.7
But at least,
41:02.1
there are
41:02.4
conditionals.
41:04.8
You get the
41:05.1
scholarship,
41:05.6
but two years,
41:06.2
you have to go back.
41:07.1
Something like that.
41:08.5
So,
41:09.8
you need those
41:10.2
base
41:14.5
to work with.
41:18.2
Pangatlo,
41:19.0
it must be
41:22.2
profit-driven,
41:23.3
of course.
41:25.8
It's based
41:26.5
on a realistic
41:27.1
appreciation
41:27.8
of the
41:28.3
regional
41:28.6
and global
41:29.2
market.
41:31.0
There's
41:31.5
a
41:31.7
certain
41:31.9
value
41:32.1
in that.
41:32.4
So,
41:32.9
you don't
41:33.2
have,
41:33.7
hindi mo
41:34.1
kailangan patulang
41:34.8
lahat ng
41:35.3
types of
41:35.8
equipment.
41:38.4
Only those
41:38.9
that will
41:39.2
work for you.
41:40.4
And it must
41:41.0
be done
41:41.5
at a much
41:42.2
better
41:42.7
and cheaper
41:45.3
way.
41:47.9
So,
41:48.5
you mentioned
41:49.0
about South
41:49.5
Korea.
41:50.0
South Korea
41:50.5
started off
41:51.5
with tech
41:51.9
transfer.
41:53.9
Tech transfer,
41:54.8
I think,
41:55.1
from Germany.
41:56.9
And,
41:57.5
pinakaralan nila
41:58.1
yung technology.
41:58.9
May reverse
41:59.3
engineering nila yun.
42:01.3
For,
42:01.8
for us to
42:02.8
reverse engineering,
42:03.6
that means you have
42:04.4
skilled persons
42:06.1
who understand
42:06.9
the system.
42:07.6
Otherwise,
42:09.1
superficial yung
42:10.4
pag-copy mo nung ano.
42:11.9
Pero walang
42:12.3
engineering.
42:13.9
Puro reverse lang.
42:15.4
Puro reverse lang.
42:17.0
Puro reverse lang.
42:18.7
Then,
42:19.6
kaya makita mo na
42:20.4
ano tawag na
42:21.2
South Korean
42:21.7
sa kanila ngayon.
42:23.0
What they call
42:23.8
themselves.
42:24.7
They are now
42:25.1
the new arsenal
42:27.2
of democracies.
42:29.9
Especially,
42:30.4
Trump yan yung
42:31.5
president nila ngayon.
42:32.5
So,
42:32.6
may pagkaganyan.
42:33.5
May,
42:33.6
may,
42:33.9
may.
42:34.9
They're now supplying
42:36.2
Ukraine,
42:37.2
EU countries.
42:39.0
Poland.
42:39.6
I think Poland
42:40.2
is one of their biggest
42:41.2
customers.
42:43.2
Yeah.
42:44.7
So,
42:45.1
they're actually,
42:45.9
ano eh,
42:46.2
yung,
42:47.2
yun yung tinasabi kong
42:48.1
yung,
42:49.7
they started with
42:50.4
a local market,
42:52.8
but,
42:53.5
kinapacitate nila
42:55.0
para mag-compete
42:55.9
sa global market.
42:57.3
Um,
42:58.5
but do you think,
43:01.5
how should I put it?
43:02.6
I mean,
43:03.0
again,
43:03.6
South Korea,
43:04.3
these countries are known
43:05.0
for really proactive
43:06.0
industrial policy,
43:07.4
ala meti Japan
43:08.2
and all of that.
43:09.0
We can have a long
43:09.5
conversation over that.
43:11.8
Because there's some people
43:12.7
that are asking questions here
43:13.6
about, for instance,
43:14.2
yung steel industry nat
43:15.4
and how depressing
43:16.1
things have turned.
43:16.9
But,
43:17.3
I know the Gokong Waste,
43:18.4
I think,
43:18.9
are quite involved
43:19.6
in the steel industry
43:20.4
and they're not doing too bad.
43:21.8
I think there are two or three
43:22.7
steel industry companies
43:24.8
in the Philippines
43:25.4
who have been defying
43:26.3
all sorts of odds.
43:28.0
Are we perhaps
43:28.5
also underestimating
43:29.6
our private sector's
43:30.4
capability to engage?
43:31.5
Increasingly sophisticated
43:32.7
and large-scale,
43:33.8
you know,
43:34.8
manufacturing
43:35.9
or industrial practices,
43:37.3
including
43:37.5
potentially defense
43:38.8
industry practices
43:39.6
down the road.
43:40.5
Magaling sila sana eh.
43:41.5
Paggawa ng kondominium,
43:43.4
paggawa ng
43:44.3
kung ano-ano,
43:45.1
diba?
43:45.6
But hopefully,
43:46.5
you know,
43:46.7
you want to move up
43:47.9
the ladder, right?
43:49.1
Value chain.
43:51.3
Oh,
43:52.6
kasi when you're
43:53.2
industrial-based,
43:54.2
merong supporting
43:54.8
industries
43:55.4
to factor that in.
43:57.3
So, example,
43:57.9
shipbuilding.
43:58.8
Of course,
43:59.0
you mentioned about steel.
44:00.5
But steel,
44:01.1
ang,
44:01.5
ano niyan,
44:02.4
is nickel
44:02.9
and ano pa rin eh,
44:03.9
yung components of steel.
44:06.5
So,
44:07.6
I'm not sure,
44:09.7
no?
44:10.4
What is the problem?
44:11.9
Ang problema,
44:13.0
if you want to revive
44:13.8
yung steel industry,
44:15.0
I am guessing,
44:15.6
I'm not an expert
44:16.6
on steel industry.
44:18.4
It's,
44:18.9
parang it's much cheaper
44:21.2
to get it from abroad
44:22.2
rather than developing
44:23.7
it locally.
44:24.7
So, I think
44:25.0
that's a challenge.
44:26.5
But if you're
44:27.1
willing to offset
44:28.4
yung,
44:28.9
ano na yun,
44:30.2
yung
44:30.5
kumbaga,
44:31.7
yung lugi mo,
44:32.9
just to make sure
44:34.3
that you build
44:35.0
your own steel industry,
44:36.7
well,
44:37.1
again,
44:38.5
that will take
44:39.0
a national government.
44:40.8
Yeah.
44:41.6
Kailangan ng
44:42.1
guarantor dyan.
44:43.6
Inflamatory.
44:44.4
Kumbaga,
44:45.5
never mind
44:46.0
if it's more expensive,
44:47.4
but
44:47.5
your steel goes
44:49.0
to my shipbuilding
44:49.8
industry.
44:52.1
Para, ano siya,
44:52.9
everything is sourced
44:54.0
locally.
44:55.2
So, you limit
44:56.3
yung vulnerability
44:56.9
ng supply chain mo.
44:59.0
Okay?
44:59.2
Like, for example,
45:01.7
you cannot
45:02.1
produce this aircraft
45:04.0
because yung chip nun
45:05.1
is sourced
45:05.9
from abroad.
45:07.3
So, that becomes
45:08.4
a supply chain
45:09.0
vulnerability.
45:10.9
Thank you for that,
45:12.4
Admiral.
45:12.8
I mean, the reason
45:13.4
I'm also asking this is
45:14.3
I just want to also
45:15.3
understand
45:16.3
how you folks
45:17.5
with background
45:18.2
in Navy
45:19.1
and, you know,
45:20.0
Naval Sciences
45:20.7
and Marine Engineering,
45:22.1
et cetera,
45:22.6
how you understand
45:23.3
this issue of industrial policy?
45:24.8
I mean, I had other guests
45:25.9
talking about
45:27.1
industrial policy,
45:28.2
development, et cetera.
45:29.1
So, I just want to
45:29.9
see where this is
45:31.3
coming from.
45:32.8
Now,
45:34.9
balikan natin
45:35.5
yung question ko ulit
45:36.3
dun sa asymmetric
45:37.1
before we go to
45:37.7
the Philippine-US Alliance.
45:39.0
Do you think the Philippines
45:39.9
should also develop
45:40.6
as a kind of militias
45:41.8
a la China?
45:43.8
Yung mga kunyaring
45:44.6
fishermen.
45:45.3
I mean,
45:45.8
do you think we have to
45:46.7
tapatan sila in their own game
45:48.2
or that's very dangerous
45:49.3
because, you know,
45:49.8
you're just giving them
45:50.5
more excuse to escalate
45:51.5
the situation and dominate?
45:53.4
We tried that,
45:54.4
but it didn't work for us.
45:56.4
Iba yung ano,
45:57.1
it's a system issue.
45:58.7
We don't have the same
45:59.8
yung,
46:03.3
kumbaga,
46:04.1
the base that we need
46:06.2
to work with
46:07.1
is not the same as China.
46:08.7
So, hindi siya sustainable.
46:11.5
For example,
46:13.8
most of our
46:14.6
major fishing companies
46:17.5
do not actually fish
46:19.2
in the South China Sea.
46:20.1
Doon sila sa Pacific.
46:22.2
Doon sila nakadeploy.
46:23.4
So, it's not
46:23.8
for us to divert them
46:25.7
to South China Sea.
46:27.5
That means,
46:28.3
we need to
46:28.5
we have to subsidize
46:30.1
their operations here.
46:31.9
Pangalawa,
46:34.3
yung milisya ng
46:35.3
China,
46:36.3
kuminista nga sila eh.
46:37.8
So, kaya nilang
46:38.4
i-press gang
46:39.8
yung mga
46:40.3
yung mga citizens nila
46:42.7
to perform these missions.
46:44.8
Okay?
46:45.5
But, hindi naman natin
46:46.7
pwede ipilit
46:47.4
yung ating
46:47.9
mga fisher folks
46:49.7
or those in the
46:51.0
fishing community
46:51.7
to perform
46:52.3
milisya duties.
46:54.5
Okay?
46:54.8
And, of course,
46:55.4
pag nangyari yan,
46:56.1
may compensation yan.
46:57.0
So, you're now going to
46:58.5
be, you know,
46:59.9
an issue of
47:01.2
how do you now
47:02.6
fund yung
47:03.1
personal service
47:04.0
auxiliary military
47:05.4
army.
47:07.0
So, it gets
47:08.0
complicated.
47:10.0
Now,
47:10.9
can we go to the issue
47:12.1
of the
47:12.8
Philippine-US alliance?
47:15.7
So, we discussed
47:17.0
joint ventures
47:18.0
with other countries,
47:19.1
best lessons we can get
47:20.2
from other developing countries.
47:21.8
Pero ang gusto mong pag-usapan dito,
47:23.3
Admiral, is
47:24.4
when it comes to our,
47:25.8
I mean, after all,
47:26.5
we're not alone
47:27.4
unlike Ukraine.
47:28.5
Ukraine didn't have
47:29.6
any kind of alliance
47:30.6
and all of that.
47:31.4
And let's be honest,
47:32.0
the reason na
47:32.7
tumulong ang West
47:34.9
sa Ukraine
47:35.4
is because
47:35.9
they showed resolve.
47:37.2
I think had the Ukrainians
47:38.4
not shown resolve,
47:40.1
tapos na ang usapan,
47:41.0
wala pang one week,
47:41.8
tapos na, di ba?
47:42.4
Na-decapitate na yung
47:43.6
buong leadership nila.
47:45.1
It's only when they realized
47:46.4
may laban itong mga Ukrainians
47:47.9
at yung mga laban
47:48.6
ng mga Ukrainians,
47:49.2
they began to invest in them.
47:50.5
Right?
47:50.6
So, the West was not just
47:52.0
throwing money out of
47:53.0
nowhere
47:53.6
or throwing money
47:54.5
at a sinking hole.
47:56.2
They were also assessing
47:57.1
how far Ukrainians
47:58.5
were willing to fight for that.
47:59.6
And as we speak here
48:00.6
dito sa US Congress,
48:02.7
malaking debate
48:03.4
about
48:03.9
should they continue
48:05.3
with this.
48:06.0
Now, speaking of that,
48:07.1
when it comes to
48:07.5
Philippine-US alliance,
48:08.5
what do you think
48:09.1
is the optimal,
48:11.5
reasonable,
48:12.4
and realistic
48:13.2
division of labor dito?
48:16.0
I say in terms of
48:16.6
strike capabilities,
48:17.7
di ba?
48:17.9
The Americans have that
48:18.9
because, you know,
48:19.7
I was just talking to
48:20.2
some folks here
48:20.9
and, you know,
48:22.3
one of the conversation
48:23.1
is should the Philippines
48:23.9
also develop
48:24.5
counter-strike capability,
48:25.9
the ability to hit
48:26.8
yung mga base nila
48:27.7
dyan sa fire
48:28.4
cross,
48:29.5
dyan sa
48:29.8
sand decay,
48:31.6
dun sa mga
48:32.2
areas na in-occupy nila
48:34.3
to paralyze
48:35.5
their ability
48:35.9
to threaten us,
48:36.9
di ba?
48:37.4
Parang ano yun,
48:38.1
di ba?
48:38.5
Parang sa boxing yan.
48:40.4
If you have this range,
48:41.4
you can counter-punch
48:42.4
right to it,
48:43.2
right to get near to you.
48:44.8
Or should we just
48:45.7
outsource this
48:46.5
to the Americans
48:47.1
in terms of the
48:47.9
counter-strike capability
48:48.9
and all,
48:49.4
and then focus tayo
48:50.1
dun sa proactive defense?
48:51.9
I mean,
48:52.4
what is the optimal
48:53.8
balance we're looking at
48:55.3
here in terms of
48:56.0
division of labor?
48:57.0
Should things go ugly
48:58.0
really?
48:58.4
With China
48:59.3
down there?
49:01.7
Okay.
49:04.0
There's such thing as
49:05.2
de-conflicting
49:06.5
yung
49:07.0
space.
49:09.2
Okay?
49:09.5
So, there's such thing as
49:10.3
airspace management.
49:12.1
There's also a need to
49:13.1
also manage
49:14.1
yung space
49:14.6
in terms of conflict.
49:15.5
Para hindi kayo magbunguan.
49:16.8
Yeah, parang...
49:17.5
Hindi kayo magbunguan
49:18.1
kasi,
49:18.8
kumaga,
49:20.0
pag nandito,
49:20.6
lahat ng nasa kanan
49:21.5
nitong linya,
49:22.8
forces namin yan.
49:24.6
Lahat ng sa kaliwan
49:25.7
ng linya,
49:26.5
sa inyo yan.
49:27.6
So, kumbaga,
49:28.2
kumbaga,
49:28.3
kumbaga,
49:28.3
kumbaga,
49:28.4
kumbaga,
49:28.4
bahala na kayo lahat dyan.
49:29.4
So, that's one way
49:29.9
of looking at it.
49:31.3
So, if we look at it
49:32.5
in terms of
49:33.1
managing battle space,
49:35.3
pwede natin sabihin
49:36.2
yung in terms of
49:36.9
division of labor,
49:38.5
anything outside of,
49:40.0
let's say,
49:41.7
the 12 nautical mile
49:42.7
territorial waters natin,
49:44.8
moving towards
49:45.7
the South China Sea,
49:46.7
sige,
49:47.3
bahala na kayo dyan.
49:48.7
We will focus on
49:49.7
defending the
49:50.4
archipelago.
49:52.1
Yung, ano,
49:52.6
yung archipelago.
49:54.7
And our
49:55.4
archipelagic trade.
49:56.2
So, that's one way
49:56.8
of looking at it.
49:57.4
the second one,
49:59.5
if you really want
50:00.5
to develop
50:01.3
an organic
50:02.3
domestic capability,
50:05.4
balik tayo ulit
50:06.0
sa Ukraine-Russia
50:06.7
in particular.
50:07.9
Okay?
50:08.6
Ano ba yung ginawa
50:09.1
ng Ukraine sa
50:09.9
Sebastopol?
50:10.7
Yung naval base
50:11.7
ng Russia doon.
50:13.9
Okay?
50:14.4
They use drones.
50:16.1
So, yung
50:16.4
counter-strike capability
50:17.6
nila,
50:18.2
they use
50:18.8
also drones
50:20.2
for that.
50:22.8
Which is
50:24.1
affordable,
50:24.9
right?
50:25.6
Cheaper, no?
50:26.2
Cheaper.
50:27.0
So, for example,
50:27.3
sa Spratlys
50:28.5
Group of Islands,
50:29.7
tatlo lang naman
50:30.4
yung major bases
50:31.2
nila dyan, eh.
50:32.4
Fiery Cross,
50:33.5
sa
50:34.1
Mischief,
50:35.6
tsaka
50:36.0
yung sa, ano,
50:38.4
pagkat-other one,
50:39.8
na may
50:40.1
harbour.
50:41.5
And we can,
50:42.1
let's say,
50:42.4
for example,
50:43.1
sa Pag-Asa,
50:43.8
we can deploy,
50:44.7
redeploy drones there.
50:47.0
Okay?
50:47.8
Doon sa
50:48.4
Ayunin Shoal,
50:49.2
the much
50:49.8
contested
50:51.4
Ayunin Shoal,
50:52.3
we can
50:52.7
deploy drones there.
50:54.7
Okay?
50:55.0
Itong drones natin
50:55.8
dito sa Ayunin,
50:56.7
ang target,
50:57.3
niya palagi,
50:57.9
is cheap rate.
50:58.8
Kasi,
50:59.5
konting distansya na lang,
51:02.0
pwede ka na doon, eh.
51:03.1
Okay?
51:04.0
So,
51:05.1
pwedeng ganun.
51:06.2
If you want to develop
51:07.4
counter-strike capability.
51:09.4
But,
51:10.5
ano kasi,
51:11.5
militarily,
51:13.4
yung
51:13.8
occupied isles
51:15.1
ang feature nila doon,
51:17.3
is not defensible.
51:18.9
We are in the same
51:19.9
boats as Pratlys, eh.
51:21.0
Even our features,
51:21.9
of course,
51:22.2
obviously,
51:22.7
are not defensible
51:23.3
militarily.
51:24.6
They are more of a
51:25.5
political statement, eh.
51:26.6
Ito yung
51:27.0
mohon natin
51:27.7
na nilagay
51:29.2
because we're saying
51:29.9
that is part of our
51:30.7
reality.
51:31.8
Okay?
51:32.7
And I'm gonna put
51:33.8
this mohon there
51:34.6
para to show na
51:36.6
amin yan.
51:38.0
We're claiming that.
51:39.3
So, yung
51:39.6
troops natin
51:40.4
tsaka yung facilities
51:41.2
natin doon
51:41.8
are mohon.
51:43.2
But,
51:43.7
if you're saying
51:44.4
employing them
51:46.8
or defending them
51:47.9
militarily,
51:48.5
of course,
51:49.8
medyo ano yun,
51:50.6
that's a different
51:51.5
proposition altogether.
51:53.6
Speaking of the
51:54.6
Philippine-US alliance,
51:55.6
I mean,
51:57.0
how should I put it?
51:59.2
I mean,
51:59.5
as we speak,
52:00.3
they're talking about,
52:01.1
I don't know,
52:01.6
how many billions of dollars,
52:03.2
50, 40 billions
52:04.2
given to Ukraine.
52:05.3
I understand the situation
52:06.2
in Ukraine.
52:06.7
And then you're talking about,
52:07.5
of course,
52:07.8
the ongoing conflict
52:08.6
in the Middle East.
52:10.7
Well,
52:11.1
in this case,
52:11.6
you're talking about
52:12.2
the US ally,
52:12.9
which is one of the
52:13.5
most advanced countries
52:14.7
on Earth,
52:16.2
especially in military terms.
52:18.5
So,
52:18.7
the question here is,
52:20.7
shouldn't the US
52:22.8
actually step it up
52:23.9
a little bit
52:24.4
considering the Philippines
52:25.5
is up against
52:26.7
someone,
52:27.0
like China?
52:27.6
Don't you think that,
52:28.7
of course,
52:29.2
I'm not drawing
52:29.8
an exact parallel
52:30.7
with Ukraine,
52:31.7
but,
52:32.7
I mean,
52:33.0
just look at how far
52:34.1
the Philippine Coast Guard,
52:35.3
the Philippine Navy has gone
52:36.5
in terms of pushing back
52:37.5
against China,
52:38.2
in terms of standing
52:39.4
its ground
52:39.9
in the situation
52:41.4
in the Second Tomas Shoal.
52:45.1
Don't you think
52:45.6
we have shown enough
52:46.5
resolve
52:47.3
and seriousness
52:48.0
and reliability
52:49.2
to make the Americans
52:52.0
think that we're also
52:53.3
worth investing in?
52:55.1
Although,
52:55.5
of course,
52:55.7
thank God,
52:56.3
we're not in a
52:57.0
total war situation
52:57.9
like what Ukraine is.
52:59.0
But, clearly,
52:59.6
there's that dynamic, right?
53:01.2
They're going to invest in you
53:02.2
if they see you're willing
53:02.9
to fight for yourself.
53:03.8
I mean,
53:03.9
you cannot be holier,
53:05.0
more Catholic than the Pope, right?
53:06.3
I mean,
53:06.4
they cannot fight it more.
53:07.7
Kasi,
53:08.0
I remember this very well,
53:09.2
Admiral.
53:09.9
There was an American,
53:10.8
Admiral,
53:11.2
I gave a talk
53:11.8
here in Washington, D.C.
53:13.1
a few years ago.
53:14.4
And we were talking
53:15.0
about Scar Barshall
53:15.8
at blah, blah, blah.
53:17.1
And then,
53:17.6
sabi niya,
53:18.8
we cannot want to fight
53:20.2
more for Panatak Shoal
53:21.5
or Scar Barshall
53:22.1
than your president.
53:23.7
We were talking about,
53:24.4
of course,
53:24.7
Mr. Jetski,
53:25.4
di ba?
53:26.4
You know,
53:26.7
when you have
53:27.4
a Filipino president
53:28.5
saying,
53:29.2
wala tayong mga gawa,
53:30.8
sabi ng Amerikano,
53:32.2
eh di,
53:32.8
iyon pala eh.
53:33.7
Kung wala mga gawa,
53:34.9
ba't kayo maasa sa amin
53:36.3
na poprotectahan kayo?
53:37.4
Eh kayo na nga,
53:38.1
hindi kayo lumalaban
53:38.9
para sa sarili niyo.
53:40.3
Well, at least,
53:40.8
thank God,
53:41.2
we don't have that kind of
53:42.0
president anymore
53:42.7
or leadership.
53:43.6
But,
53:44.4
you get what I'm saying, right?
53:45.6
I mean,
53:45.8
this is where I disagree
53:47.6
with folks who say,
53:48.8
salamat kayo digong
53:49.8
siniseryoso tayo na Amerika.
53:51.2
But,
53:51.4
there was a lot of cost
53:52.5
to having digong around, right?
53:53.9
It made us look like
53:55.5
a banana republic.
53:56.9
There was a lot of delay
53:57.7
in terms of developing
53:59.1
bilateral capabilities.
54:01.2
And,
54:01.4
I would argue,
54:02.6
kahit siguro
54:03.1
bakanting,
54:04.5
ano lang,
54:05.8
chair ang nilagay mo
54:06.6
sa Malacanang,
54:07.6
the U.S. has no choice
54:08.7
but to take us more seriously
54:09.8
because of our geography
54:10.9
and the situation with China,
54:12.7
right?
54:13.2
Regardless of,
54:14.3
this is really about
54:15.3
our geopolitical position,
54:17.1
right?
54:18.6
But then again,
54:19.4
I mean,
54:20.4
should we push more
54:21.3
for the Americans?
54:22.7
I mean,
54:22.8
we're talking about
54:23.7
tens of billions of dollars
54:25.2
given to
54:25.8
some countries that have
54:27.2
already one of the most
54:28.1
advanced militaries
54:29.1
in the world
54:29.5
and are up against,
54:30.4
I don't know,
54:30.7
some terrorist organization
54:31.7
here and there.
54:33.0
Well, in the case of Philippines,
54:34.3
we're up against
54:34.8
the biggest navy on earth.
54:36.4
I just see some
54:37.6
asymmetry
54:39.4
in a bad sense there,
54:40.4
right?
54:40.8
I mean,
54:41.3
or am I being,
54:42.6
am I expecting too much?
54:43.7
I mean,
54:43.9
how should we put it?
54:46.7
Okay, number one,
54:47.6
and I may get into trouble,
54:48.8
no?
54:48.9
Kasi,
54:49.8
in another program
54:50.8
I mentioned,
54:51.8
I said,
54:53.0
let's not,
54:53.7
let's not rely too much
54:54.5
on the Americans.
54:56.0
I think,
54:56.9
number one,
54:57.4
we need to look at
54:58.2
yung sarili mo na natin.
55:00.6
Kasi,
55:00.8
if you're not willing
55:01.4
to fight for your own country,
55:02.9
how can you expect
55:04.2
other countries
55:06.1
to fight for you?
55:07.5
Kasi,
55:07.7
basic yun eh.
55:09.3
If you are not able
55:10.2
to defend your national interests,
55:12.9
don't ask the Americans
55:13.7
to fight for us.
55:16.4
Kasi parang ano eh,
55:17.3
that's ridiculous eh.
55:19.0
But,
55:21.2
hindi natin control yung ano eh
55:22.6
and
55:22.9
you're there
55:23.7
in Washington DC
55:24.6
and I think
55:26.0
you're at the heart
55:26.7
of a very
55:27.4
controversial
55:29.1
debate
55:30.4
about
55:31.1
where the money
55:32.6
should go.
55:34.2
Kasi,
55:34.5
ang conversation
55:35.5
dyan ngayon
55:36.1
is why are we
55:37.1
why are we
55:38.1
supporting Ukraine?
55:39.2
Why are we
55:39.7
supporting
55:40.3
Israel?
55:42.3
We need to
55:43.1
invest money
55:45.9
to protect
55:46.5
yung southern border nila
55:47.6
to Mexico
55:48.7
because of
55:49.2
illegal migration.
55:51.1
So,
55:51.4
that's a
55:51.9
partisan debate.
55:53.7
That's ano eh.
55:55.1
So,
55:55.5
my point is
55:56.2
that they're saying
55:56.9
we should also focus on China
55:58.3
in the Pacific and Asia
55:59.8
because that's the real deal.
56:01.3
That's also,
56:02.0
I mean,
56:02.2
I had, for instance,
56:03.1
Elbridge Colby
56:03.9
who was the
56:04.8
architect
56:05.6
on my show before
56:07.0
and he's the guy
56:08.1
who's saying
56:08.5
we should focus on China.
56:09.9
China is really
56:10.5
the major
56:11.8
concern and threat
56:13.5
to the United States.
56:15.3
Yeah,
56:15.5
I agree with you.
56:16.2
I also agree with you
56:16.9
between Elbridge Colby.
56:18.4
Colby would be
56:19.2
the right person
56:20.0
if the Republicans
56:21.0
are in power.
56:21.8
So,
56:22.1
the Democrats
56:22.8
are the ones
56:24.4
in power.
56:25.0
So,
56:25.5
it's basically
56:26.0
a voice in the wilderness
56:26.9
in terms of
56:28.7
the strategic community
56:30.0
in Washington, D.C.
56:32.2
But,
56:33.3
one alternative
56:34.7
is if we cannot
56:35.6
do it alone
56:36.3
and the Americans
56:37.2
are distracted
56:38.8
kasi we have to accept
56:39.6
na they are distracted
56:40.3
with other global issues.
56:42.4
And,
56:43.1
we are competing
56:44.5
for ano eh,
56:45.6
yung para pansinin tayo.
56:48.0
And,
56:48.5
either we get
56:49.5
a better lobby
56:50.3
or...
56:50.7
Nasa linya tayo.
56:52.8
Or,
56:53.9
we need to...
56:54.8
We need a better way
56:56.2
of packaging ourselves
56:57.2
or Southeast Asia.
56:59.6
So,
56:59.9
we need to accept na
57:01.2
America is distracted
57:03.4
with other issues
57:04.4
globally.
57:06.0
And,
57:06.6
as much as they want
57:07.3
to focus on
57:08.3
East Asia,
57:10.6
the dynamics
57:11.6
both the global
57:12.8
and the domestic
57:13.8
politics nila
57:14.5
are causing
57:17.0
them to veer away
57:17.7
from this region
57:19.3
and focus on China.
57:21.0
Okay?
57:21.3
So,
57:21.4
that's one.
57:22.3
So,
57:22.8
ano natin is
57:23.4
hindi naman tayo
57:24.2
iiyakan na lang natin yun.
57:25.9
We look for alternatives.
57:27.8
And,
57:28.0
I think that means
57:29.0
doon papasok
57:30.1
we need to diversify
57:31.3
our alliances
57:32.0
and partnerships.
57:33.4
Not only relying
57:34.2
on the Americans
57:34.7
but look at
57:35.6
other countries
57:37.1
particularly
57:37.5
let's say Japan
57:38.1
or India
57:38.6
or maybe Australia
57:40.1
who are also
57:42.0
on the same
57:43.0
boat as us
57:44.0
but ang kagandaan nun
57:45.5
they are also
57:46.3
part of the barangay.
57:48.2
Kasi ang problema
57:48.8
sa Amerika
57:49.3
hindi siya member
57:50.4
ng barangay natin eh.
57:52.2
Ano siya eh?
57:52.8
America is not
57:54.4
a resident power
57:55.2
in East Asia.
57:57.2
Dumadalaw lang siya.
57:58.3
But we're
57:58.8
dealing with
57:59.6
India or Japan.
58:01.0
Guam?
58:01.6
They're in Guam
58:02.2
which is like
58:02.7
four hours flight
58:03.4
from Manila, right?
58:04.3
I mean,
58:04.9
they have bases
58:06.1
in Japan and Korea.
58:07.3
I mean,
58:07.4
I see what you're saying
58:08.3
but I think we have to
58:09.1
be careful about that argument.
58:10.2
That's what the Chinese
58:10.9
always use.
58:11.5
Oh, the Americans
58:12.0
are external powers
58:12.9
but last time I checked,
58:14.1
Guam,
58:14.9
that's an American territory
58:16.1
pero mga Pinoy pa dyan.
58:17.3
I think 50% are Pinoy.
58:18.7
A lot of them
58:19.1
may fellow Ilocano.
58:20.1
So,
58:20.8
they are a resident power
58:22.3
I would say.
58:22.9
They're not an Asian power
58:24.0
but they're in the Pacific power.
58:25.5
They are a Pacific power,
58:26.7
aren't they?
58:28.3
Well,
58:28.6
you're correct there.
58:29.5
Ang inaano ko lang is
58:30.2
ano eh,
58:30.7
because they have
58:33.7
other global interests
58:34.8
or global commitments.
58:36.9
Absolutely, yeah.
58:38.2
Hindi talaga
58:38.9
talaga makapokos
58:39.7
even if they want to.
58:41.0
Even if they want to.
58:42.0
Hindi talaga.
58:43.1
And that's why
58:43.7
one of the drivers
58:45.0
of instability
58:45.8
in the region
58:46.5
is what I call
58:47.7
the regional
58:48.5
naval balance of power.
58:51.2
Yung China is able
58:52.1
to concentrate
58:52.7
its forces
58:53.4
dito sa East Asia.
58:55.0
But,
58:56.0
America's different
58:58.2
various
58:58.8
naval feats
58:59.9
that deployed everywhere.
59:01.7
But yung barko
59:02.5
yung laman ng feats na yun,
59:04.7
they just
59:05.1
shift from one
59:06.1
to another.
59:07.5
So, as much as
59:08.5
they have the 7th Fleet here,
59:11.4
hindi rin siya makakonsentrate
59:12.7
lang dito sa region na to.
59:16.9
That's a good point.
59:18.0
Kaya nga sabi ko,
59:19.2
we have to be also careful
59:20.3
with this propaganda
59:21.2
na,
59:22.1
as the biggest
59:22.6
defense budget
59:23.8
in the world,
59:24.6
blah, blah, blah.
59:25.4
And I said,
59:26.2
but US is a global power.
59:27.6
They have to,
59:28.3
you know,
59:28.8
slice the pie
59:29.7
between how many,
59:31.2
you know, oceans.
59:32.3
Well, China is still
59:33.4
primarily an Asian power.
59:35.6
And then,
59:36.3
to a certain degree,
59:36.8
they're expanding
59:37.5
their tentacles,
59:38.5
Djibouti,
59:39.1
here and there.
59:39.9
So,
59:40.6
totally different situations.
59:41.9
Not to mention,
59:42.5
of course,
59:42.8
if you use proper
59:43.6
economic measures
59:44.4
like purchasing power parity,
59:46.3
China's defense budget
59:47.1
may be close to
59:47.7
600 billion, right?
59:49.3
Assuming we're even
59:50.1
counting the real budget
59:51.2
and dami mga Hindi,
59:52.1
they didn't declare.
59:52.8
So,
59:53.4
this is very correct
59:54.7
that the Chinese,
59:56.3
they can concentrate
59:57.2
themselves
59:57.9
as a regional power
59:59.2
due to sa theater
60:00.0
while the United States
60:01.4
as of now
60:02.1
may not be
60:02.7
in that position.
60:03.6
And actually,
60:04.0
there was just a research
60:04.8
that came out
60:05.4
from the
60:05.9
Congressional Research
60:07.2
Services
60:08.0
that shows that
60:08.9
the US at best
60:10.0
can fight,
60:11.0
what,
60:11.2
one and a half
60:12.0
major conflicts
60:13.5
simultaneously,
60:14.7
like barely two,
60:16.0
right?
60:16.5
And I'm already
60:17.4
looking at the map
60:18.4
and it's like
60:19.0
one in Ukraine,
60:20.2
one in the Middle East
60:21.1
right now,
60:22.1
you know,
60:22.9
because you have also,
60:24.2
you know,
60:24.4
I'm not talking about
60:25.3
Hamas and I'm talking
60:26.1
about other major
60:26.7
regional powers there
60:27.7
and Russia and China
60:28.5
also have an interest there.
60:29.9
And then here,
60:30.4
China,
60:30.7
so they're talking
60:31.3
about three theaters
60:32.3
of potential conflict,
60:34.3
right,
60:34.9
in the near future.
60:36.4
So,
60:37.0
that's why we're having
60:38.1
this conversation.
60:38.9
But then again,
60:39.4
I mean,
60:39.7
Admiral,
60:40.2
I understand
60:41.1
your caveats
60:42.8
and your
60:44.1
efforts to,
60:46.1
I don't know,
60:46.4
how should I put it,
60:47.8
to help us
60:48.6
to have reasonable
60:49.3
expectations about things.
60:50.7
Sorry,
60:51.1
it's 11.30pm,
60:52.1
I'm not at my sharpest
60:53.1
but I hope I'm making sense here.
60:54.6
Ang tanong ko lang dito is,
60:56.2
ano yung baseline
60:57.3
dapat natin
60:58.2
with the United States?
60:59.3
And I think this is my segue
61:00.4
to the last part
61:01.2
of our conversation
61:02.0
at least for today
61:02.8
and hopefully we'll have
61:03.8
more of this.
61:05.5
Because,
61:06.4
as we speak,
61:07.6
the Americans
61:08.2
are seeking for more
61:09.2
access to
61:09.9
Patanes,
61:11.5
more of our
61:12.1
northern bases.
61:14.3
My understanding
61:15.2
is that some of the bases
61:16.1
in the north
61:16.6
may be HADR,
61:17.9
supposedly,
61:18.5
but there are also
61:19.1
facilities there
61:20.2
to accommodate
61:21.1
fighter jets.
61:21.9
I mean,
61:22.3
we have some
61:23.9
very precious things
61:25.3
that are on the table
61:26.3
right now
61:26.8
which Marcus Jr.
61:27.7
has not
61:28.1
fully green-lighted.
61:30.2
So,
61:30.8
my understanding
61:31.6
is that,
61:32.7
you know,
61:33.2
even between allies,
61:35.1
there has to be
61:35.7
some sort of reciprocity,
61:37.0
right?
61:37.2
I mean,
61:37.5
definitely between allies.
61:38.9
You know,
61:39.1
as we allow the Americans
61:40.2
to have more presence
61:41.2
in the north
61:41.8
vis-a-vis Taiwan,
61:42.5
that's a very risky
61:43.1
thing for us.
61:43.8
And I understand
61:44.2
why BBM is very
61:45.4
equivocal about it
61:47.1
just to be nice,
61:48.6
I mean,
61:48.9
strategic ambiguity
61:49.8
if I can put it that way.
61:50.9
What is your take on that?
61:52.8
I mean,
61:53.0
what should be the baseline
61:54.0
from the U.S.?
61:54.7
I completely agree
61:55.8
that we should not rely
61:56.6
on America,
61:57.6
but at the end of the day,
61:58.7
Admiral,
61:59.2
iba yung treaty ally, eh.
62:00.9
Iba yung,
62:01.7
you know what I'm saying,
62:02.3
partner,
62:03.1
strategic partner.
62:04.0
I mean,
62:04.2
whatever you want to call them,
62:05.0
comprehensive strategic partner,
62:06.6
right?
62:07.0
All of these terminologies
62:08.6
that Vietnam has
62:09.7
for different countries,
62:10.8
right?
62:11.5
Iba pa rin yung treaty ally, eh.
62:13.0
It's at a totally
62:13.9
different level,
62:14.9
right?
62:15.5
So,
62:16.3
what should be
62:16.8
the baseline expectation
62:18.6
we should develop
62:20.0
vis-a-vis,
62:20.4
you know,
62:20.5
what is the thing
62:21.3
that our envoys here
62:22.8
should negotiate
62:23.4
for our ambassadors?
62:24.6
I mean,
62:24.7
let's say,
62:25.6
bukas tayo nag-replace kayo.
62:27.3
Hindi,
62:27.6
mahal natin si Ambassador Ramaldes,
62:29.3
but let's just say,
62:30.5
in theory,
62:30.9
you and I became
62:31.5
the ambassador tomorrow here.
62:33.2
Anong mga baselines
62:34.2
na dapat itarget natin
62:35.5
to get out of our alliance?
62:37.6
In a reasonable way,
62:38.9
that is actually also good.
62:40.4
I mean,
62:40.7
because U.S. security
62:41.7
is also tethered
62:42.6
to our security.
62:43.4
So,
62:43.6
if we're not secure,
62:44.4
we cannot defend ourself.
62:45.8
Problema din sa kanila yan.
62:46.8
So,
62:47.3
I'm just wondering,
62:47.8
what should be the baseline there
62:49.0
in terms of
62:49.5
Philippine-U.S. alliance?
62:50.5
Okay.
62:52.4
A problem, Richard,
62:53.5
with the baseline is
62:54.7
the baseline is defined
62:56.7
by
62:57.0
politics natin,
62:59.3
domestic politics.
63:00.7
If it's only purely
63:02.5
on military strategic conversation,
63:05.8
madali ilatag yan.
63:07.2
Kasi it's just,
63:08.7
ililista mo yung capabilities mo,
63:10.8
ililista mo yung requirements mo.
63:12.9
So,
63:13.4
when we define the alliance,
63:14.9
the Philippine-U.S. alliance,
63:16.1
in terms of
63:16.6
a corporate relation,
63:19.0
ano yung equity
63:19.8
nung
63:20.3
pang-pang-pang
63:20.4
ng partners eh,
63:21.8
ang equity ng U.S.
63:23.1
is yung capabilities niya eh.
63:25.1
Ang equity natin dito
63:26.3
is real estate.
63:28.3
Basically,
63:28.9
it's real estate.
63:30.3
Now,
63:30.9
ang question dito is
63:31.8
in terms of the baseline,
63:34.5
how much of
63:35.6
the real estate
63:36.6
are we
63:37.1
willing to
63:38.1
partake
63:40.4
as part of
63:41.6
the relation
63:42.2
of the engagement?
63:43.9
And at what level
63:45.2
of control
63:45.8
do we
63:46.2
allow
63:48.5
yung real estate
63:49.6
natin ganitin?
63:50.4
So,
63:51.2
it all still
63:51.9
access.
63:52.7
Oo.
63:53.4
Kasi,
63:54.2
let's say ideal.
63:56.2
Let's say ideal muna.
63:57.2
The ideal is
63:58.0
yung facilities natin
63:59.9
can accommodate
64:00.6
their forces
64:01.1
at any given time.
64:02.9
Okay?
64:04.7
They can
64:05.5
search their forces
64:07.8
within the
64:08.4
Philippine archipelago
64:09.4
at, let's say,
64:10.2
X number of days
64:11.1
from the time
64:12.3
na merong warning order.
64:13.8
So, that's yung
64:15.1
ano mo.
64:15.9
And when you say
64:16.6
accommodate,
64:17.2
that means
64:17.6
pag latag nila dito,
64:18.9
we can house
64:20.3
them,
64:21.3
we can safely
64:22.4
house them,
64:23.3
and they are able
64:23.9
to conduct
64:24.5
multi-domain
64:27.2
operations
64:28.0
after they have
64:29.6
arrived here
64:30.1
X number of days
64:30.9
or Y number of days.
64:32.4
Parang ganon.
64:34.2
Then, of course,
64:35.3
yung location
64:35.9
ng real estate.
64:37.0
Kasi, that may
64:37.6
real estates
64:38.6
are important
64:39.2
because
64:39.9
they should be
64:41.6
able to influence
64:43.1
yung area
64:45.0
that they were
64:45.6
situated in.
64:46.4
For example,
64:47.7
if you're looking
64:48.2
at Batanes,
64:48.9
that means
64:49.3
they're able to
64:50.3
whatever is
64:50.9
situated there,
64:52.1
whatever is
64:53.1
deployed there,
64:53.8
it can influence
64:54.6
Basi Channel Zone 3
64:55.8
and radiate
64:57.5
outwards to
64:58.2
South China Sea
64:58.8
and the Mid-Pacific.
65:00.5
So, yun yung
65:01.2
calculation na doon.
65:03.5
So, again,
65:04.5
it depends.
65:05.8
Kasi,
65:06.9
if the,
65:07.6
let's say,
65:07.8
for example,
65:08.3
yung sinaryo na
65:09.1
controversial,
65:10.7
something happens
65:11.3
in Taiwan
65:11.8
and the Americans
65:12.4
ask us,
65:12.9
can we use
65:13.5
your bases
65:14.0
to help Taiwan?
65:16.9
Our answer
65:17.8
would be a
65:18.3
political answer
65:19.1
kasi,
65:19.4
it's a
65:20.3
that would be
65:20.7
based on the
65:21.2
discernment
65:21.7
of the
65:21.9
commander-in-chief
65:22.5
or the
65:22.8
president.
65:23.9
Iwewe,
65:24.4
inya yung
65:24.8
ano eh,
65:25.2
yung,
65:26.6
ano eh,
65:27.2
papayag ba ako
65:28.0
o hindi?
65:29.1
And it's not
65:29.7
a clean solution
65:31.6
kasi may,
65:32.2
ano yan,
65:32.6
merong automatic
65:33.4
na negative,
65:35.4
ano yan,
65:35.7
negative implications.
65:37.2
So,
65:37.8
again,
65:38.1
yung baseline mo
65:38.9
would be dependent
65:41.4
on how
65:42.9
yung political
65:43.4
appreciation
65:44.1
ng commander-in-chief.
65:46.1
And it can move
65:46.9
left or right
65:47.9
depending sa
65:48.6
situation.
65:50.3
You're being very
65:51.3
diplomatic about this.
65:52.7
I mean,
65:52.9
I'm asking you
65:53.6
as a military,
65:55.0
former military guy,
65:56.2
I mean,
65:56.7
what is,
65:57.2
okay,
65:57.6
I understand,
65:58.5
there's the politics of it,
65:59.6
there's the operational,
66:00.7
military aspect of it,
66:01.9
but what is the
66:02.9
marriage of the two?
66:04.0
Like,
66:04.2
what is the,
66:05.1
if we split the difference,
66:06.4
let's say,
66:06.9
a realistic level
66:07.9
of political calculations
66:09.2
and discussion
66:10.4
and then
66:11.0
a reasonable level
66:12.4
of military capability
66:13.8
development?
66:14.5
Kasi,
66:15.2
ayaw naman natin forever
66:16.3
na hanggang real estate
66:17.3
na lang asset tayo.
66:18.2
We want to also be
66:18.9
a capable,
66:20.3
ally and partner
66:21.4
which can also
66:22.1
actively contribute
66:23.1
to international peace
66:24.0
and security, right?
66:25.3
At least in our
66:26.1
immediate region,
66:27.1
no?
66:27.3
Anti-piracy,
66:28.2
counter-terrorism,
66:29.2
et cetera,
66:30.1
not just in Mindanao
66:31.3
but beyond,
66:32.1
diba?
66:32.4
I mean,
66:33.0
the US has an interest
66:34.2
in developing the capability
66:35.4
of allies like the Philippines
66:36.5
do so that
66:37.1
we can contribute
66:38.1
to an international system
66:39.2
that is more stable
66:40.0
down the road.
66:41.4
Okay,
66:41.9
in that term,
66:44.3
if you notice
66:45.0
yung bilateral
66:46.0
security dialogues,
66:47.7
yung readout niya,
66:49.7
if you,
66:50.3
50% is on security
66:51.4
and 50% is on economy.
66:53.9
The reason being,
66:54.8
I think,
66:55.4
dito is,
66:56.5
babalik tayo sa
66:57.1
conversation
66:58.0
o industrialization.
66:59.2
Kasi,
66:59.6
the only way we can be
67:00.7
sustainably be able
67:02.0
to work
67:02.9
under an alliance framework
67:04.8
is if we capacitate
67:06.6
ourselves.
67:07.1
Hindi yung dependent.
67:09.7
Hindi yung mendicant
67:10.7
yung approach mo
67:11.5
dun sa relationship
67:12.3
or transactional.
67:14.1
Okay?
67:14.7
It should be,
67:15.3
you know,
67:15.6
at some point,
67:16.5
kaya natin
67:17.1
i-defend
67:18.6
sa sarili natin
67:19.3
with the
67:20.3
their help
67:20.7
but nakapasitate
67:22.1
natin sa sarili natin.
67:23.6
So,
67:24.5
baseline dun is
67:25.2
they need to help us
67:27.6
develop our
67:28.6
capabilities.
67:30.2
Not just
67:31.0
yung buying
67:32.1
from them equipment.
67:34.1
Kasi,
67:34.8
that's ano eh,
67:35.5
a business,
67:36.4
that's a business relationship
67:37.7
not an alliance
67:38.8
relationship.
67:40.2
And of course,
67:41.4
mahal yung equipment
67:42.0
nila eh.
67:42.6
Kaya nga we're buying
67:43.3
from other countries eh
67:44.6
which is much cheaper.
67:46.7
So, yun.
67:48.6
We mentioned about
67:49.7
drones.
67:50.7
Technology transfer.
67:53.6
And,
67:54.0
siguro,
67:54.8
making the Philippines
67:56.7
part of their
67:57.4
military supply chain
67:58.5
para we can draw
67:59.7
on the same
68:00.2
supply.
68:02.5
Kasi mayroon naman
68:03.1
basic yan.
68:03.8
There are basic
68:04.4
basic equipment
68:06.1
or simple equipment
68:06.9
that can be
68:07.7
common to us.
68:11.5
Yeah,
68:12.2
we're towards the
68:13.5
you know,
68:14.3
the last part
68:15.3
of this episode.
68:16.2
But,
68:17.3
before,
68:18.7
because I want you
68:19.8
also to
68:20.6
remind
68:21.7
yung ating mga kababayan
68:23.0
ba't mahalaga ito.
68:23.9
But, I want you to also
68:25.0
remind
68:25.5
siguro yung mga
68:26.7
Filipino-American
68:28.3
community
68:29.0
how they can be
68:29.7
helpful here.
68:30.5
Kasi as we speak,
68:31.4
one reason why
68:32.6
certain countries
68:33.7
get billions of dollars
68:34.7
of aid even if they're
68:35.6
developing region
68:36.4
of that is because
68:37.0
there's a lobby.
68:38.0
There's a powerful lobby
68:38.9
that pushes for stronger
68:40.6
bilateral security
68:41.5
cooperations.
68:43.0
The latest one
68:44.0
is actually Indians.
68:45.0
The Indian community
68:45.7
and Indian-American
68:46.9
community is very
68:47.8
very proactive.
68:48.5
And that has,
68:49.8
has been very
68:50.4
consequential in terms
68:51.8
of elevating
68:52.8
bilateral relationship
68:53.7
between India and US.
68:55.1
And India is not even
68:55.9
an ally of the US,
68:56.9
right?
68:57.2
And they're getting
68:57.7
access to,
68:58.4
you know,
68:58.7
an Airbus engine
68:59.7
development capability,
69:00.8
so on and so on.
69:02.7
But, before that,
69:05.4
itong Taiwan,
69:06.7
can we,
69:07.1
can we go back
69:07.7
to this issue of Taiwan?
69:08.5
Because your take
69:09.4
on the Taiwan issue
69:10.2
is quite,
69:10.8
quite unique.
69:12.5
In fact,
69:12.6
I would say that
69:13.2
perhaps we're
69:13.8
nidaman opposite.
69:15.6
But,
69:16.8
I argued
69:17.6
in certain
69:18.6
articles
69:19.6
that,
69:21.0
and in certain
69:21.5
interviews that
69:22.4
we could leverage
69:24.7
the Taiwan linkage
69:25.9
by, you know,
69:27.0
essentially making
69:27.6
clear to the Chinese
69:28.4
that the more
69:29.2
they bully us
69:29.8
in West Philippine Sea,
69:30.7
the more we give
69:31.3
access to the Americans.
69:32.3
But it could also
69:33.2
work the other way.
69:34.3
We can curb
69:35.1
the American access
69:35.9
in the North
69:36.6
if in exchange
69:37.7
in the West,
69:38.5
the Chinese
69:39.0
don't make
69:39.7
extra trouble.
69:41.5
I mean,
69:42.2
how do you stand
69:43.4
on that,
69:43.9
that linkage
69:45.0
kind of game
69:46.7
or calculus?
69:47.8
Or,
69:48.1
do you think
69:48.6
we should just
69:49.0
push back
69:49.5
on both fronts
69:50.3
and there should be
69:51.2
no compromise?
69:52.5
Or,
69:53.3
I think if I remember,
69:54.8
maybe the Taiwan issue
69:56.2
is even more important
69:57.1
at some point
69:57.7
because we're talking
69:58.2
about a giant island
69:59.2
next to it,
69:59.8
not just small islands here.
70:01.2
I think that's where
70:02.1
you have some interesting
70:03.3
take that I want
70:04.4
to go back to.
70:06.4
Okay.
70:07.1
Ang best case scenario
70:08.1
ko sa Taiwan
70:09.2
is status quo.
70:10.5
Meaning,
70:11.9
here is what it's now.
70:14.7
Minus, of course,
70:15.6
yung tension
70:16.0
in the Taiwan Strait.
70:19.5
So, that's my best case scenario.
70:21.5
My worst case scenario
70:22.5
is
70:23.1
Chinese presence
70:25.8
in Taiwan.
70:26.5
Kasi now,
70:27.9
Taiwan is essentially
70:28.8
buffer state natin
70:29.7
sa China.
70:30.5
So, if we lose Taiwan,
70:32.7
then kapit-bahay na natin
70:34.0
sa China.
70:35.3
And,
70:35.9
our northern part,
70:36.9
the northern part
70:38.0
of the Philippines
70:38.6
will be under threat.
70:40.0
It will be under threat
70:40.9
kasi base channel
70:42.1
is a strategic
70:42.8
waterway.
70:43.9
And,
70:44.3
yung discernment
70:46.2
natin dito
70:46.9
when
70:47.8
China,
70:49.1
during the previous administration,
70:50.6
was trying to
70:51.4
invest
70:54.6
in those certain areas
70:56.1
in the northern Philippines
70:57.3
na kami naman sa Navy
70:59.0
nakita namin,
70:59.8
oops,
71:00.3
strategic yung ano yan,
71:01.5
yung placement niya.
71:03.1
Red flag yan.
71:04.1
Hindi pwedeng,
71:05.2
hindi tayo magsasalita.
71:06.8
Kasi,
71:07.2
they gain access nila
71:08.2
to whether that is
71:09.6
pseudo
71:10.1
foreign direct investment
71:12.6
or whatever.
71:13.7
Purism naman daw.
71:15.1
Papagandahin nila
71:16.0
gawa ng casino.
71:18.3
That will give them
71:19.1
a footprint
71:19.7
doon sa ating
71:20.9
ano.
71:22.2
So,
71:22.4
medyo,
71:22.9
nung nakita natin,
71:24.0
ito na,
71:24.3
biro ko dyan eh,
71:25.9
for yung ano,
71:26.7
yung
71:26.9
those arguing against
71:29.2
EDCA.
71:30.1
Sabi ko,
71:30.5
may EDCA rin yung China.
71:32.4
Ang tawag nila ron,
71:33.5
BRI.
71:34.5
So,
71:35.4
the point is,
71:36.2
we cannot afford
71:37.9
a Taiwan
71:38.4
that is
71:39.2
may Chinese presence.
71:41.6
Okay?
71:42.2
So,
71:42.7
anything that disrupts
71:44.2
yung strategy nila
71:45.3
on Taiwan
71:46.0
that involves
71:47.7
base channel
71:48.4
or those,
71:49.1
I'm all for it.
71:51.4
So,
71:51.7
if you do not want
71:52.5
the Americans there,
71:53.8
kasi that might be
71:54.7
a driver for the country,
71:57.2
the minimum we can do
71:58.2
is deploy our own forces
71:59.9
there and strengthen
72:00.8
our position.
72:02.7
Okay?
72:03.5
And we can always claim
72:04.6
naman na
72:05.1
we have our
72:06.0
own agency.
72:07.7
Yung China,
72:09.0
even if you claim
72:10.0
na we are a US puppet,
72:12.5
that is our territory.
72:14.5
Responsible kami dyan.
72:16.2
And we will protect
72:17.3
that against you
72:18.4
and even
72:18.9
from the US.
72:20.2
Just to make sure
72:20.9
that it's peaceful.
72:22.5
Okay?
72:22.7
So, that's the minimum
72:23.4
that we can do.
72:25.3
And last one,
72:26.2
thank you very much for that.
72:27.6
Last one,
72:28.3
do you have
72:29.2
some sort of
72:30.2
just dun sa mga ating
72:31.7
mga kababayan na
72:32.7
siguro hindi nila na-appreciate.
72:34.4
I got a lot of bashing
72:36.0
online
72:36.4
dun sa some of the articles
72:37.6
I wrote about
72:38.4
itong
72:39.1
36 billion pesos.
72:41.0
Siyempre, hindi nila binasa.
72:42.2
Obviously,
72:42.7
this is over 10 years
72:44.3
as a share of GDP.
72:45.9
It's actually not that much.
72:47.7
I mean,
72:48.1
when you compare
72:48.7
to the Philippines
72:49.2
to a lot of our neighbors,
72:50.5
we're way behind the curve,
72:51.9
right?
72:52.3
So,
72:53.0
for a GDP
72:54.1
of almost
72:55.4
500 billion dollars,
72:56.6
half a trillion,
72:57.7
spending 36 billion
72:59.4
over 10 years
73:00.2
considering the threat
73:01.1
we're facing,
73:01.8
considering how far
73:02.8
we have to catch up
73:04.2
with things,
73:04.7
not only with China,
73:05.5
but even also
73:06.0
with some of our peers
73:06.9
in the region.
73:08.1
I mean,
73:08.3
I think I'm already
73:08.8
answering the question,
73:09.9
but I want it
73:11.1
from you,
73:12.0
Admiral,
73:12.6
someone who's
73:13.4
serving the Navy,
73:14.5
whose family
73:15.1
has served in the Navy
73:15.8
for a long time,
73:16.5
more than what,
73:17.0
half a century,
73:17.9
yung buong pamilyon
73:18.5
na yung family,
73:18.7
yung involved dito
73:19.3
sa Navy issue.
73:20.2
Can I just remind
73:20.9
yung mga kababayan natin
73:21.8
bakit mahalaga
73:22.5
itong modernization act?
73:24.3
And I know the context
73:25.1
of our conversation
73:25.8
is because,
73:26.4
you know,
73:26.6
I'm sure you've heard
73:27.6
even some people,
73:28.7
including my guests,
73:29.7
you know,
73:30.3
some of them were skeptical.
73:31.6
Some of them were like,
73:32.3
hmm,
73:32.5
I'm not sure you want
73:33.3
to spend that much,
73:34.2
right?
73:34.9
Baka naman,
73:35.6
emeldific lang ito
73:36.8
or maging white elephant
73:38.1
projects ito
73:38.9
or baka mamaharlik
73:39.9
ka-fund ito,
73:40.7
di ba?
73:41.6
What do you have to tell
73:42.7
the skeptics?
73:44.2
Okay,
73:44.4
number one,
73:45.0
in an ideal world,
73:46.7
I would prefer that
73:47.7
whatever,
73:48.5
whatever money
73:48.8
government has
73:49.7
pupunta sa education,
73:51.3
sa health,
73:52.1
anything that would be
73:53.2
good for the people.
73:54.1
But we are not
73:54.8
living in a perfect
73:55.9
ideal world.
73:56.7
We are living in a
73:57.9
very competitive
73:58.9
region sa East Asia.
74:01.3
And we have seen
74:02.6
the result
74:04.1
of yung
74:04.8
vacillation
74:06.1
or yung
74:07.6
pagdadalawang isip natin
74:08.9
in investing
74:09.6
for our own defense.
74:11.2
Ano yun?
74:12.3
Scarborough,
74:13.2
Pratibroop,
74:13.7
or Pailan.
74:14.4
Kung hindi
74:15.2
perfect yung
74:16.8
neighborhood mo,
74:17.7
then you have
74:18.5
it is your
74:19.1
responsibility
74:19.6
to protect yourself.
74:22.1
Now,
74:22.3
yung cost niyan
74:23.2
is something that is
74:24.8
ano eh,
74:26.3
ano mo yan eh,
74:28.0
ano yung cost nun
74:29.0
pag if we do not do that?
74:30.5
Then we are surrendering
74:31.5
yung country natin
74:33.1
to yung
74:33.6
whims and caprices
74:34.4
of a third country
74:35.7
who has ambitions
74:37.5
in the region.
74:39.1
Eh,
74:39.3
hindi naman tayo
74:40.0
Filipino tayo
74:41.5
paibang
74:41.8
and the
74:42.9
history,
74:43.5
our history
74:44.7
is replete
74:46.1
with
74:47.0
lessons of
74:48.0
Filipinos
74:48.6
fighting for
74:49.4
our own freedom
74:50.3
and fighting for
74:51.8
our own
74:52.2
rights as citizens.
74:54.9
So,
74:55.3
I think,
74:55.9
yung counting
74:56.4
investment,
74:56.8
kaunti lang yun eh,
74:58.2
compared to
74:59.4
yung counting
75:01.1
investment na yun
75:02.0
is quite
75:02.8
expensive.
75:03.7
Right.
75:04.1
I mean,
75:04.3
we're not even
75:04.8
spending 1.5%
75:06.3
of our GDP,
75:07.1
right?
75:07.3
I mean,
75:08.0
countries like US
75:09.0
are spending,
75:09.6
what,
75:09.7
3 to 4%,
75:10.8
Russia is spending
75:11.6
more than 4%,
75:12.6
China is spending
75:13.4
definitely more than
75:14.4
2%.
75:15.2
I mean,
75:16.0
we're like spending
75:16.5
at EU level,
75:18.0
but,
75:18.4
you know,
75:19.0
it's like,
75:19.8
but we don't have
75:20.6
1 point something.
75:22.7
Yeah,
75:22.9
I mean,
75:23.3
and considering
75:25.0
we're starting
75:25.9
from a very low base
75:26.9
and we're up
75:27.9
against China,
75:28.7
I mean,
75:28.9
this is serious stuff.
75:30.2
And hindi naman pwede
75:30.9
na palati tayo
75:31.7
umakasan na lang
75:32.4
sa America
75:33.8
as we discussed.
75:35.3
Hindi naman pwede
75:35.9
na magtatay
75:36.8
bigong style
75:37.4
naman tayo
75:38.0
na wala tayo
75:38.6
makakawa
75:39.1
at magdi-jet ski
75:39.9
na lang tayo.
75:40.6
So,
75:40.8
you know,
75:41.2
we have to find
75:41.8
a reasonable way
75:42.6
of dealing with this.
75:43.3
And,
75:43.9
hindi tayo siseryo
75:44.8
sa ina yung mga bansa
75:45.5
kung wala kang mati
75:46.3
nung,
75:46.7
you know,
75:47.0
modern,
75:47.6
diba,
75:48.1
military or armed forces.
75:51.3
And as we discussed,
75:52.5
we'd see Mike Loico
75:53.4
among others
75:53.8
from AFP,
75:54.8
Colonel Loico.
75:55.8
You know,
75:56.0
we want to have
75:56.5
a kind of a 21st century
75:57.8
modern armed forces.
75:59.0
Not the best in the world
76:00.6
but at least
76:01.2
a modern capable one.
76:04.1
What about
76:04.8
sa mga Philippine-American
76:05.9
communities?
76:06.8
Is there an advice
76:07.7
that maybe they should be
76:08.7
more involved
76:09.3
in pushing for
76:10.1
more American support
76:12.1
for the Philippines
76:12.7
modernization?
76:13.8
Siguro yung mga F-16 fighters
76:15.0
gawin nila mas mura
76:16.2
mas affordable.
76:17.0
Napakamahal yung
76:17.6
binibenta nila sa atin.
76:18.7
Ituloy na punta tayo
76:19.5
sa Sweden.
76:20.7
Anong masasabi natin dyan?
76:23.6
Siguro,
76:24.3
keep the fire burning
76:26.0
in terms of yung
76:26.9
visibility ng Pilipinas
76:28.9
gansa.
76:31.3
Kasi ang larangan kasi dyan
76:34.5
domestic politics
76:35.4
yung mga ating
76:36.2
So,
76:40.8
be a voice of
76:41.7
be a constant voice
76:45.2
of reminding
76:45.9
your congressmen
76:46.9
or senators
76:47.5
to look after
76:50.0
the Southeast Asia
76:51.7
and the Philippines.
76:52.5
On that note,
76:53.4
thank you very much
76:54.6
Admiral Ong,
76:56.3
Professor Ong
76:57.0
from
76:57.7
Ateneo Manila University.
76:59.4
Asok, di ba?
77:00.0
School of Government po.
77:01.5
Professor Ong,
77:02.2
Professor of Practice
77:03.1
at the Ateneo School of Government.
77:04.5
Thank you so much
77:05.2
for that discussion.
77:06.2
I think we went
77:06.9
a little bit
77:07.4
into logistics.
77:08.8
That's I think
77:09.1
what real experts do.
77:10.8
Amateurs do more like
77:12.0
grand strategy.
77:13.5
So, I think
77:14.0
people would appreciate
77:15.7
that, Admiral Ong.
77:17.8
Admiral,
77:18.4
are there
77:18.8
certain articles,
77:21.0
I mean, of course,
77:21.5
I know, but, you know,
77:22.2
for the purpose of audience
77:23.0
that you want people to check
77:24.3
especially your thoughts
77:26.1
on asymmetric warfare,
77:27.6
et cetera,
77:28.0
things that
77:28.4
siguro mas maganda
77:29.3
kung binasa niyo
77:30.1
yung mga sinulat niyo
77:30.9
na available to the public
77:32.2
for free, of course.
77:34.0
Are there certain things
77:35.0
that you want to flag there
77:36.3
for people to check?
77:38.3
So, I'm still writing one.
77:39.3
I will be writing one
77:40.2
on,
77:40.9
firstly,
77:41.4
it's archipelagic strategy.
77:43.3
So, hintayin niyo na lang.
77:44.6
Of course,
77:45.2
some of your
77:45.6
pieces on
77:46.3
thought leaders
77:47.1
on Rappler, right,
77:48.1
among others,
77:48.7
has touched on these issues.
77:50.2
So, I really suggest
77:50.9
guys to check that.
77:52.2
Not to mention, also,
77:53.0
if you go to YouTube
77:54.1
and, you know,
77:54.8
just put Hey Darian
77:55.6
and Admiral Ong,
77:57.4
some of our
77:58.1
previous conversations
77:58.9
comes in First Island Chain,
78:00.5
Second Island Chain,
78:01.1
some of the more
78:01.5
other issues that
78:02.4
hindi na namin inulit dito.
78:04.4
So, you can check them out.
78:05.8
But I look forward,
78:06.6
Admiral,
78:07.0
to catching up with you
78:08.0
perhaps at a better time
78:09.1
as far as my time is concerned.
78:11.8
Maraming salamat,
78:12.8
Admiral,
78:13.1
for putting aside
78:14.3
you know,
78:15.3
a precious time
78:15.8
from your weekend
78:16.4
and morning with us.
78:18.0
I can see a lot of people
78:19.0
showing a lot of appreciation
78:20.2
dito sa ganitong discussion.
78:22.3
So, hindi ito
78:22.8
kasing kalog
78:23.9
ng mga iba
78:24.6
like yung
78:25.5
usapan namin
78:26.2
ni Ronald Llamas.
78:27.8
Hindi ito
78:28.3
mga usapan gluta tayon
78:30.0
or usapan kalokoan.
78:32.3
This is serious stuff.
78:33.7
This is matters of war
78:34.7
and peace, right?
78:35.7
It gets
78:36.5
it gets grim.
78:38.3
But thank you so much,
78:39.4
Admiral,
78:39.8
for making it
78:40.6
as accessible
78:41.3
and as authoritative
78:42.9
as it should be.
78:44.5
Kasi ayoko yung mga
78:45.1
pa-amateur discussions lang.
78:46.7
So, thank you so much,
78:47.5
Admiral,
78:47.9
and hope to have you again
78:49.6
with us
78:50.0
for more discussions.
78:51.5
Baka gusto mo rin mag-ano,
78:52.6
usapan gluta tayon,
78:54.0
ano?
78:56.3
Pwede naman.
78:58.3
Exactly.
78:58.8
Pag-repress mo na.
79:01.0
Yan nga eh,
79:01.8
baka magpa-drip mo daw muna.
79:04.0
Magpa-drip muna daw
79:05.1
si Admiral
79:06.1
and then
79:06.7
pag-usapan natin
79:07.8
ng skin care.
79:08.9
On that note,
79:09.6
God bless
79:10.1
and talk to you soon.
79:11.6
Mabuhay po, Admiral.
79:13.5
Good night.