Close
 


Richard Heydarian VLOGS is live!
Hide Subtitles
Click any subtitle word to view Tagalog.com dictionary results.
Computer Shortcuts: Left / Right arrows to jump 2 seconds back or forward. +Enter or Space to toggle Play/Pause button. Full Screen Mode

Richard Heydarian VLOGS
  Mute  
Run time: 54:13
Has AI Subtitles



Video Transcript / Subtitles:( AI generated. About AI subtitles » )
00:00.0
From the octa-research.
00:00.8
Okay, yeah, yeah.
00:02.1
From the octa-research na lang.
00:03.7
May UP people naman eh.
00:06.0
Okay, yeah.
00:06.6
Yeah, yeah, of course.
00:07.7
Fantastic.
00:08.5
Okay, sige.
00:13.5
Paano ulit to?
00:14.4
One second.
00:15.8
Recording.
00:16.4
Okay, recording.
00:18.4
Alright, good evening.
00:19.8
Good morning, everyone.
00:20.9
Thank you so much for joining us
00:22.1
for the latest episode of our podcast.
00:24.6
Eto, may returning na tayo
00:26.1
dito sa podcast natin.
00:27.5
Of course, one of our favorite guests
00:29.1
and my former professor,
00:30.5
Professor Ranjit Rai,
00:31.6
who is also a fellow at octa-research.
00:34.3
Thank you very much, professor,
00:35.2
for joining us.
00:36.9
Thank you, Richard, for having me here.
00:38.8
Good morning, good afternoon,
00:40.3
good evening to anyone,
00:41.4
to everyone who's watching
00:42.3
this particular podcast.
00:44.5
Yeah.
00:44.9
Thank you so much.
00:45.7
Very popular podcast now.
00:50.1
Thank you so much.
00:52.6
Thanks to you guys.
00:53.9
I mean, I think definitely having
00:55.6
high caliber guests
00:58.0
who feel comfortable
00:59.0
like I said about, you know,
01:00.2
what we do in podcast,
01:01.0
it's not actually just interview.
01:02.3
It's a conversation, right?
01:04.0
It's usually, it's like one social scientist
01:06.3
to the other and all.
01:07.1
And I think that's what people appreciate.
01:09.4
Professor Rai,
01:10.6
so a lot of surveys have come out
01:12.7
in recent days and all.
01:16.0
Obviously, the two authoritative ones.
01:17.8
I'm not saying this because we're colleagues
01:19.1
and friends, but it's really Paul's Asia
01:21.0
and you guys who came out
01:22.1
with some very important surveys
01:23.5
that are relevant to our discussion today.
01:25.5
One is on the Senate race
01:26.7
and I can see a lot of overlap.
01:29.0
Perhaps, in a good way,
01:30.9
in the sense that there is
01:31.8
a kind of a corroboration there
01:33.2
between the two
01:34.8
in terms of sino yung mga
01:36.5
leading candidates.
01:38.9
At least the number one, two, three, four
01:40.6
at least.
01:41.7
And then sino yung potential
01:42.7
with the Magic 12.
01:43.9
But more importantly, obviously,
01:45.4
the Paul's Asia one was interesting.
01:47.5
Correct me if I'm wrong
01:48.3
if you guys also have your own version
01:50.1
kasi the charter change survey
01:52.0
was very important
01:52.8
which we had a separate episode on
01:54.7
and hopefully I'll also have
01:56.2
Ronnie Holmes of Paul's Asia Sigur
01:57.8
to also discuss their survey.
01:59.0
But I think it would be interesting
02:00.1
to also discuss in charter change.
02:02.5
But where I think your survey agency
02:05.4
has done something very interesting
02:06.9
which I saw on Twitter
02:09.2
a few days ago
02:11.0
I was tagged by some people
02:12.1
who were referring to the survey
02:14.4
whereby you're looking at political affiliation
02:16.6
for the lack of a better term
02:19.1
loyalist versus DDS
02:20.8
versus the loud pink whatever.
02:23.2
You know, this kind of pedestrian way of putting it.
02:25.6
Apparently, the survey was from you guys.
02:27.8
So when forward,
02:29.0
I heard the data from you.
02:30.3
I said, no, no, no.
02:31.3
We have to have a conversation
02:32.5
about this, Professor Wright.
02:34.1
So let's first get the ball rolling
02:35.6
because yes, the election proper
02:39.2
will be next year.
02:40.7
Yes, technically speaking,
02:42.6
Sigur mga October pa
02:43.9
magsastarting registration and all.
02:45.8
But we all know as early as right now,
02:47.3
everyone is talking about next year's elections.
02:49.1
It's just the nature of politics in our country.
02:51.8
So what is the OCTA research finding so far
02:55.0
as far as the Senate race is concerned?
02:58.0
Of course, the most high
02:58.9
profile race.
02:59.9
And then from there,
03:00.4
let's talk about the bigger implications of that.
03:02.6
You want to share, Professor,
03:03.9
your survey so that more people can see?
03:05.5
Okay, I'll just share a screen
03:06.8
for everyone watching.
03:07.9
Yes, please go ahead, sir.
03:10.0
Okay.
03:10.5
So just for everyone's information,
03:13.5
we do a regular survey quarterly
03:16.4
and this is our Tugulang Masa survey.
03:19.1
And this is our first survey
03:20.4
for the year 2024, quarter one.
03:23.3
So it's around political preference
03:27.2
and preferences of adult Filipinos.
03:28.9
And, you know,
03:31.2
it was conducted from March 11 to 14
03:34.5
and the gold standard face-to-face interviews,
03:38.2
1,200 respondents all around the country.
03:42.4
That's Balas Luzon,
03:44.7
the National Capital Region,
03:46.8
Visayas and Mindanao.
03:48.4
And of course,
03:50.3
the margin of error is plus minus 3%.
03:53.8
Okay.
03:55.5
Okay, what are the big findings?
03:57.2
Okay, so,
03:58.9
here are the list of possible, no,
04:01.5
winners.
04:02.7
If the election for the Senate
04:04.8
was held during the period of the survey,
04:08.0
which was March 11 to 14.
04:10.5
So a note to our viewers,
04:13.4
these things, these numbers will change.
04:15.3
These rankings will change.
04:17.3
Okay, and so when you look at it,
04:19.0
look at the list,
04:20.1
it's very similar to the Pulse Asia list,
04:23.2
no, in many respects.
04:25.0
So we have Erwin Tulfo at 58%.
04:28.9
We have Tito Soto, of course, at 50%, 51%.
04:33.7
Christopher Goh, or Bom Goh, Senator Goh, at 49%.
04:38.3
And the new person we added to the list,
04:43.1
the disruptor in this list,
04:45.0
is, of course, Mr. Ben Tulfo, the brother of...
04:47.4
Another Tulfo, yeah, yeah.
04:50.1
Yeah, another.
04:51.0
No, but this is important
04:52.2
because this is the first time
04:54.0
we're including him in the list.
04:55.1
Yeah.
04:55.8
And he caused a major disruption, no?
04:58.9
At 42%.
05:01.7
So if you do a straight counting,
05:05.1
he is in the top five, no?
05:07.3
Okay, and of course,
05:08.1
former president Rodrigo Duterte at 38%.
05:12.2
So I guess this is the top five.
05:14.4
And yeah, this looks similar to the surveys
05:19.2
of some of the more prestigious survey companies
05:22.8
that have come out.
05:24.4
And to round off,
05:26.2
we have Benjamin Abalos,
05:28.9
or Abalos.
05:30.4
These are the statistically, no?
05:33.2
The personalities with a statistical chance
05:35.3
of winning the election,
05:37.4
being the top 12, I should say,
05:40.0
if the elections were held during the survey period.
05:45.6
For some reason, I thought...
05:47.9
Ben Tulfo, yeah.
05:48.9
Ben Tulfo was the big disruptor.
05:50.6
Everybody went down because of him.
05:53.0
Just to give you a sense,
05:53.9
Erwin Tulfo was 76%.
05:57.4
He was hovering around 70%.
05:58.9
68% to 74%
06:02.2
for the last two quarters.
06:04.6
His brother comes into the list,
06:06.0
he's now down by 18 points.
06:08.3
Oh, wow.
06:09.5
He's regular,
06:11.2
because it happens with the Heresto brothers anyway also.
06:15.2
So you put two names,
06:16.6
it also happens with the Binays.
06:18.8
So when you put two names in the list,
06:21.3
the voters tend to...
06:24.6
Split a bit.
06:26.2
Split.
06:27.6
So now he's what?
06:28.9
58%.
06:29.8
He's 18 points down.
06:31.7
Okay.
06:32.5
I think the big story here is Aimee Marcos.
06:35.3
Senator Aimee Marcos.
06:36.8
She used to be 42%.
06:38.3
She's down 13 points.
06:40.0
In fact, she's the...
06:40.8
I think one of the biggest...
06:42.2
biggest changers.
06:45.4
Sliders.
06:46.4
Yeah.
06:47.9
Slight decline.
06:49.0
Not slight, but actually a significant decline
06:51.4
in her numbers.
06:53.6
She's still within the top 12.
06:57.0
Her range here is 6 to 12.
06:58.9
But her number was 42%.
07:02.0
She was around that area.
07:03.8
Or that range, I should say.
07:05.4
38 to 44%
07:07.2
for the last three quarters.
07:09.3
And for the first quarter of this year,
07:12.4
she went down 13 points.
07:15.2
So these, I think, are the big stories
07:17.2
for this particular survey.
07:22.0
You know, the survey findings for the quarter one.
07:25.2
I think another one,
07:26.4
if you go down the list, Richard,
07:27.7
if you go down,
07:28.9
this is 7.
07:31.5
You'd be surprised that
07:32.6
Pulong Duterte,
07:33.5
another new entrant.
07:35.1
I'm sorry.
07:35.6
I'm sorry.
07:36.7
He's here.
07:37.5
Bastet.
07:38.0
I mean, Bastet.
07:39.3
Yeah, yeah.
07:40.4
Can you see him from the...
07:42.0
Yeah, I'm sorry.
07:42.8
It's that one.
07:44.4
This is kind of surprising to us.
07:46.9
Bastet Duterte.
07:49.0
16.8%.
07:50.7
Number 13.
07:52.3
This is the first time
07:53.4
we're measuring his numbers.
07:56.8
And...
07:57.0
What do you mean surprised?
07:58.0
Surprised.
07:58.9
That he's within the range
07:59.9
or surprised that he's not higher?
08:02.5
No, no.
08:03.1
Surprised that he got high marks.
08:05.5
Remember that three Dutertes in this list.
08:07.7
Yeah.
08:08.9
Nominally higher than his brother, no?
08:10.9
So it also shows the power of that brand, no?
08:13.2
The Duterte brand, no?
08:14.2
It just goes to show
08:15.6
that they have a strong
08:16.5
race following, no?
08:19.0
As far as the Filipino voter is concerned.
08:21.7
Prof, just a second, sorry.
08:23.9
I don't know for some reason,
08:25.2
bakit frozen yung screen?
08:27.5
I was wondering...
08:28.6
Okay, okay, okay, I'm sorry.
08:29.5
Can you redo it again?
08:30.7
My apologies for that.
08:32.2
So...
08:32.6
Yeah, I don't know.
08:33.5
It's my...
08:34.2
Maybe it's just the internet or something.
08:35.8
Yun nga, medyo frozen siya.
08:37.3
If you can redo it again,
08:38.7
apologies for that.
08:39.4
Yeah, is that good now?
08:41.7
Yun nga, I just see the first page.
08:44.6
But I wonder bakit hindi ko nakikita
08:45.9
yung mga ibang pages.
08:47.5
Oh, yeah.
08:48.0
Okay, is that better?
08:49.2
I wonder what's going on.
08:51.2
Bakit yung first page lang
08:52.3
pinapakita dito sa site ko?
08:53.9
Okay.
08:55.6
Yeah.
08:56.7
That's first page lang.
08:57.7
But can you see, Bastet?
08:58.6
No, I think the thing it shows
09:01.1
is just the tugon ng mas
09:03.8
sa first page.
09:05.0
Ah, okay, okay.
09:05.8
I wonder why.
09:07.2
I think you're using a different...
09:09.2
Baka may iba pa yung window na bukas.
09:12.5
Ah, wala na naman.
09:13.9
Bakit kaya ganun?
09:15.3
Yeah, usually it doesn't happen.
09:16.6
So I was wondering what's going on.
09:17.8
I mean, your explanation is still valid.
09:19.5
Just for the purpose of those
09:22.1
who want to see the exact numbers and all.
09:24.9
Gusto ko lang makita nila.
09:25.9
So I was just wondering
09:26.7
what was going on.
09:27.6
Okay.
09:28.6
This is interesting.
09:29.2
So there are two people
09:30.4
we have to talk about.
09:31.2
One is Ben Tulfo
09:32.3
and the other one is Bastet.
09:34.3
And we have a situation
09:35.2
of three Dutertes
09:36.5
within the range.
09:37.9
One of them definitely there.
09:39.2
Yeah.
09:39.4
And then you also have a situation
09:42.0
of two Tulfos within top five.
09:45.2
Yeah.
09:45.4
So I'm wondering.
09:46.6
Can this be now?
09:48.1
Yeah.
09:48.6
I don't know what's going on
09:49.5
but it's just...
09:50.4
Ayan.
09:50.7
Now it's moving na.
09:51.8
Yeah, it's dynamic na.
09:52.7
Okay.
09:53.1
Okay na.
09:53.7
Yes, perfect.
09:54.9
There we go.
09:56.2
Right.
09:56.5
So Erwin Tulfo at 58.4%.
09:58.6
Which is more or less the same
09:60.0
as we see in Pulse Asia.
10:01.9
So at least the numbers
10:02.7
are similar.
10:03.3
It's a little higher maybe
10:04.5
with us
10:05.3
but still within the margin of error.
10:06.6
Exactly.
10:07.1
More or less the same.
10:07.9
So you can collaborate
10:08.9
as you say.
10:10.0
You can compare.
10:11.1
Then you can see that
10:12.0
we can validate their list.
10:16.7
They can validate ours.
10:18.6
And I think the only difference
10:20.3
is the placement of Duterte
10:22.2
in their list.
10:23.1
It's a little higher.
10:25.0
But this is how it came out.
10:27.1
It's almost the same.
10:28.6
Statistically the same.
10:30.7
The only big story is
10:32.0
Erwin Tulfo lost 18 points
10:34.2
but his brother
10:35.0
is in the top three.
10:36.8
So that split the vote.
10:40.6
Sergio Marcos
10:41.8
has a 13-point decline
10:43.5
but he's still within the top 12.
10:46.3
Right.
10:46.7
42 to 29%.
10:49.3
Yeah.
10:50.3
And then of course
10:51.5
we have
10:52.4
I think still significant
10:54.5
Bastet Duterte
10:55.4
getting 16%.
10:57.6
Okay.
10:57.9
And Pulong.
10:58.6
Okay.
10:59.6
So when we go down the list.
11:02.7
Yeah.
11:03.6
For the traditional opposition
11:05.5
the Liberals
11:08.3
I think the highest ranking
11:09.9
Pangilinan, no?
11:12.6
Yeah.
11:13.3
But it's really
11:14.2
Pangilinan, Trilon.
11:15.3
The regular names
11:16.4
are still there.
11:20.0
Lenny Lombred is 11.7%.
11:22.4
She went down
11:23.2
in this particular survey.
11:25.3
Yeah.
11:25.8
Siguro.
11:26.1
Yeah.
11:27.6
This is,
11:28.2
I think
11:28.7
in terms of the
11:32.8
percentage
11:34.2
Pico Pangilinan
11:35.4
still has a very good chance.
11:38.3
Former Senator Delor
11:39.5
has an excellent chance.
11:41.1
So,
11:41.3
you know,
11:41.8
these are just snapshots
11:43.5
of a particular period.
11:45.2
These numbers will change
11:46.3
obviously
11:46.7
as we come closer
11:48.3
to the
11:48.9
October,
11:50.5
no?
11:50.7
And when we start campaigning.
11:52.9
But these are the dominant names
11:54.3
in the list.
11:55.4
Secretary Ralph Rector
11:56.5
is not doing so bad
11:57.4
at
11:58.2
13.9%.
11:59.4
Abigail Binay
12:00.5
is at 14.1%.
12:03.5
Still,
12:04.2
these are good numbers,
12:05.2
no?
12:05.4
For
12:05.6
people thinking of
12:08.3
running for the Senate
12:09.1
in the double digits.
12:10.8
Like a base to work on,
12:12.2
no?
12:12.3
A foundation to work on.
12:13.7
Yeah.
12:14.0
Yeah.
12:14.5
But I think
12:15.5
the
12:15.7
big story is
12:18.1
I think
12:18.4
Bam Aquino
12:19.0
in our survey
12:19.6
7.3%.
12:21.1
Yeah.
12:21.5
Very low, no?
12:22.5
Yeah.
12:22.8
And
12:23.1
and
12:23.8
and Pulse, no?
12:26.5
So,
12:27.2
then as you go,
12:28.2
the highest rated
12:31.9
possible candidate
12:34.5
for the left
12:35.6
is Nery Colmenares
12:36.6
at 5.4%.
12:38.1
Which is not a surprise, no?
12:39.4
I think this is more
12:40.2
just a surprise.
12:41.3
And it's stable there
12:42.3
at that number.
12:43.0
It's still a good base
12:44.5
to start with.
12:46.0
There's
12:46.5
some traction
12:47.8
as far as
12:48.8
this candidate's name
12:51.1
is concerned.
12:53.1
Congressman Nery Colmenares
12:54.4
of
12:54.9
the progressives
12:56.5
on the left, no?
12:57.6
So,
12:58.2
Prof. Ray,
12:59.5
ba't wala kayong
13:00.5
awareness level?
13:04.2
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
13:04.7
We actually have
13:05.6
Yeah, I mean
13:07.1
in the
13:07.8
yeah, in the
13:08.4
in the
13:09.1
in the
13:09.1
published version.
13:10.4
It was a packed table.
13:12.3
Wala ng space.
13:14.1
Yeah.
13:14.6
But we
13:15.1
we gave the awareness
13:16.3
numbers for our clients
13:18.0
obviously.
13:19.2
Right, yeah.
13:20.5
The top 10
13:21.2
have a high awareness
13:22.4
already.
13:22.7
Almost 100%, yeah.
13:24.2
I'm sorry, yeah.
13:25.1
Almost 100%.
13:26.2
Yeah.
13:26.9
So,
13:27.3
except for
13:28.6
Benher Abalos.
13:30.8
Yeah.
13:31.1
So,
13:31.3
that,
13:32.6
something like
13:33.1
about 90%,
13:35.1
92%.
13:37.0
Yeah, but
13:37.4
the
13:38.2
relatively
13:39.5
high awareness
13:41.6
for most of these
13:42.7
top ranking
13:44.5
senatorial balls
13:46.1
in the top 12.
13:48.4
Yeah,
13:48.7
but
13:49.3
this looks like
13:50.5
a very packed
13:51.7
survey, no?
13:53.0
Kasi even if you go
13:54.1
to the
13:54.7
lower half,
13:55.8
there are people
13:56.8
who are senators
13:57.5
there for multiple times.
13:59.0
Forget about people
13:59.5
are known, no?
14:00.7
So,
14:01.4
I don't know.
14:02.8
I mean, of course,
14:03.5
longitudinally,
14:04.9
we can refer to
14:05.6
other surveys here,
14:06.5
but I mean,
14:07.2
from both of us,
14:08.1
I think our understanding
14:08.9
is that this is probably
14:09.8
the most competitive
14:10.6
Senate race, no?
14:11.8
If all of the people
14:12.9
we think we're gonna run
14:13.9
are gonna run, right?
14:14.8
I mean, this is crazy.
14:15.9
It's so tight.
14:17.9
Yeah, it's
14:18.9
very tight
14:19.7
and we feel
14:20.8
that at least
14:21.3
four slots
14:22.8
are the only ones
14:23.5
being relatively open.
14:25.7
And you'll notice
14:27.3
when you look at
14:28.5
as you go down
14:29.2
the list
14:29.7
that the gaps
14:30.8
between candidates
14:31.6
are much,
14:32.4
much, much smaller
14:33.5
from
14:34.0
10 to
14:36.3
15, no?
14:37.6
So,
14:39.8
from rank 10
14:40.5
to 15
14:41.2
or, yeah,
14:41.9
it's very competitive.
14:43.8
And
14:44.4
the magic number
14:45.7
for us
14:46.9
is something
14:47.4
above 30%, no?
14:49.7
Anybody above
14:50.5
30% has
14:51.5
a very good chance
14:52.4
of getting in the top 12.
14:54.5
Yeah,
14:54.6
that looks like
14:55.5
the threshold, no?
14:56.8
Yeah,
14:57.7
that looks like
14:58.9
20% puts you
15:00.3
within the competitive range
15:01.8
and 30% more or less
15:03.3
puts you almost
15:04.5
in a shoo-in range,
15:05.6
right?
15:06.3
Yeah,
15:06.9
a short spot.
15:08.6
You see,
15:09.2
the vulnerable
15:10.4
are those
15:11.2
around 8 and below.
15:13.6
So, yeah.
15:15.1
Which includes
15:16.0
Aimee Marcos,
15:17.0
which is
15:17.6
quite a shock, no?
15:20.7
It's a shocker
15:21.4
considering, you know.
15:22.7
Actually, it's a shocker
15:23.7
for us
15:24.1
because
15:24.4
you know,
15:25.5
she's had
15:26.6
she's not a client,
15:28.3
by the way.
15:30.6
We've been
15:31.4
measuring her numbers
15:32.5
really as a proxy
15:33.5
also for the administration,
15:34.7
no?
15:36.0
And it's
15:37.0
gone down.
15:38.0
And her numbers
15:38.8
have gone down.
15:40.6
And to some extent,
15:42.3
although we haven't
15:42.8
reported
15:43.4
the numbers
15:44.1
for the administration yet,
15:45.3
we're still going
15:46.0
over them
15:46.7
a second time.
15:48.4
There's a slight
15:49.2
decline
15:49.6
on major issues.
15:51.5
But Aimee's
15:51.7
opposition in a way,
15:52.9
right?
15:53.4
I know,
15:54.5
maybe that's quite
15:55.5
of the problem also.
15:56.5
Nobody knows.
15:57.5
She's more opposition.
15:59.0
I mean,
15:59.1
let's be honest about it.
16:01.6
She's
16:02.0
everywhere
16:02.8
with that erosion,
16:04.0
that noise
16:04.8
and
16:05.3
the confusion
16:07.1
on which side she is.
16:08.9
I find it also
16:10.3
interesting,
16:12.0
Professor Rai,
16:13.2
the fact that
16:13.9
Isko and Willie Ong
16:14.8
are almost the same.
16:16.2
No, I mean,
16:16.6
it's very close.
16:17.7
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
16:18.1
Consider how far
16:18.8
they were back in the day.
16:20.0
One was presidential
16:21.0
ball,
16:21.8
not competitive
16:22.5
at some point.
16:23.2
One was like
16:23.7
a vice presidential
16:24.6
that people were not
16:25.4
sure about.
16:26.6
And mukhang,
16:27.3
eto,
16:27.6
baka mag-third time
16:28.5
lucky na si Willie Ong,
16:29.6
no?
16:30.1
Just like Rizzo
16:30.8
and Tiberio sent
16:31.5
the awards pa.
16:32.7
Yeah, mukhang,
16:33.5
eto, may chance na siya
16:34.4
mag-third time lucky, no?
16:35.7
Kasi,
16:36.1
for the last three quarters,
16:37.6
he's been in the top 12.
16:39.2
Yeah, pasok siya eh.
16:40.4
And actually,
16:41.2
very few occasions
16:42.9
in the last few quarters
16:45.9
that his numbers
16:46.6
have really fluctuated.
16:48.8
It's statistically
16:49.7
sustainable.
16:51.2
Except that
16:51.8
in this particular quarter,
16:53.9
for the last
16:54.6
two quarters,
16:55.4
it's been statistically
16:56.9
stable.
16:58.0
But in this
16:59.0
third quarter,
16:59.8
he went down
17:01.0
slightly
17:01.7
because,
17:02.4
you know,
17:02.7
you put in
17:03.5
two big names eh.
17:05.6
A president
17:06.0
Duterte
17:06.4
and
17:07.3
a former president
17:09.0
Duterte
17:09.4
and of course
17:10.4
Ben Tulfoy.
17:11.5
They disrupted
17:12.0
the list.
17:13.0
So,
17:13.3
they ate into
17:14.3
a lot of the
17:15.0
support for the others.
17:17.4
So, that's one
17:18.1
big takeaway
17:19.0
that once you
17:20.0
introduce
17:21.0
B and B,
17:22.8
right?
17:23.1
Ben and
17:24.0
Baste,
17:24.7
diba?
17:25.4
Ben and Baste,
17:26.6
it kind of scrambled
17:28.3
the whole rankings
17:29.4
and all of that
17:30.2
which tells you
17:31.0
how volatile
17:31.7
the situation is
17:32.9
including the top guy
17:34.2
coming down to
17:35.0
58%
17:36.0
from 70 plus
17:37.6
from 70 plus percent.
17:40.5
I mean,
17:40.6
that's crazy.
17:41.1
Mid-70s
17:42.3
percent.
17:43.8
So, okay.
17:44.7
So,
17:44.9
one implication is
17:46.8
if you're Erwin Tulfo,
17:48.0
the biggest threat
17:48.9
to you topping
17:49.5
the Senate race
17:50.4
because we know
17:50.9
it matters to be
17:51.5
is your own brother,
17:52.7
right?
17:54.1
And,
17:54.6
ang marites sa akin
17:55.9
ang marites sa akin
17:57.5
is yung pinaka-kuya nila
17:58.8
ay napaisip bigla
18:00.4
na wait lang,
18:01.3
baka okay lang
18:02.2
ko rin tumakbo dyan
18:03.4
kasi
18:03.7
Mon Tulfo
18:04.7
wasn't doing too bad
18:06.0
in 2019
18:06.7
service
18:07.7
if I'm not mistaken
18:08.6
and he's the
18:09.3
he's the OG, right?
18:11.0
So,
18:11.4
a three Tulfo run
18:12.8
would be quite bad
18:13.8
for Erwin, right?
18:14.7
It could really split
18:15.5
the votes in ways
18:16.4
that happened today.
18:17.2
The explosive part
18:18.5
of this is TNT.
18:20.5
Tulfo and Tulfo,
18:21.5
you know?
18:21.9
Of course.
18:23.1
But they're on
18:23.7
the opposite side.
18:24.6
It's a political
18:25.0
you have to understand.
18:27.0
Oh yeah, definitely.
18:28.1
We're leaning
18:28.6
towards the
18:30.0
Duterte side
18:30.8
and
18:31.2
Erwin is
18:33.4
very much
18:34.5
with the administration.
18:35.6
Which is like
18:36.1
the Marcoses, right?
18:37.3
One is admin,
18:38.6
one is the
18:39.2
other side.
18:40.3
But,
18:41.3
okay,
18:41.7
of course,
18:42.3
I'm not sure if this was
18:43.1
in the survey
18:44.0
but
18:44.3
is there
18:45.4
when people
18:47.5
express their preference,
18:50.4
meron bang appreciation
18:51.3
ng mga ganyan nuances
18:52.4
or it's more really
18:53.4
the brand,
18:54.2
the name?
18:54.6
The name recall?
18:56.8
We don't have
18:57.8
the data yet
18:58.5
for that.
18:59.8
Hopefully,
19:00.4
we're going to build
19:00.9
the probe on that.
19:03.6
We link
19:04.6
preference with culture.
19:05.9
Of course,
19:06.4
it's a big debate
19:06.8
in politics.
19:08.1
But,
19:08.8
you know,
19:09.3
this is where
19:10.0
we're coming from
19:10.7
at ComOcta
19:11.5
and that these
19:12.6
preferences are built
19:13.5
on identities,
19:14.7
on cleavages,
19:15.9
on perceptions
19:16.6
about
19:17.1
our political culture.
19:19.5
And
19:20.1
you'll see that
19:21.3
in the next
19:21.8
set of
19:22.7
survey data
19:24.0
that we'll go to.
19:24.6
We're going to
19:25.2
show you.
19:26.3
But, yes,
19:27.4
brand is important
19:28.4
and you're seeing it.
19:29.6
The Tulfo brand
19:30.5
is alive
19:31.5
and kicking
19:31.9
and still very competitive.
19:34.3
You're also seeing it
19:35.0
with the Duterte brand.
19:36.5
All three
19:37.2
possible candidates,
19:40.7
I'm sure,
19:41.7
you know,
19:41.9
we're not sure
19:42.3
if any of them
19:43.0
are actually going to run,
19:44.4
are in
19:45.1
the top 15.
19:46.6
So, you know,
19:47.5
this is
19:48.2
brand,
19:49.4
brand name,
19:50.6
you know,
19:52.0
is important.
19:53.1
And
19:53.3
in this particular
19:54.5
midterm elections,
19:55.7
if this might
19:57.0
look like the cast,
19:58.3
it's going to be
19:59.2
highly competitive
20:00.2
because you're
20:01.4
pitting
20:01.8
very established
20:03.7
brands
20:04.1
against each other.
20:06.0
And then,
20:06.3
again,
20:06.7
machinery will come in,
20:09.5
your network,
20:10.3
political network
20:10.9
will come in.
20:12.2
Of course,
20:12.6
resources will come in.
20:14.0
And so,
20:14.9
you know,
20:15.5
to
20:17.1
go to the next
20:18.6
part of our survey,
20:19.5
you will notice
20:20.2
that it's also
20:21.5
important if you're
20:22.1
aligned with
20:22.6
the administration.
20:23.6
I think,
20:24.5
that's a perfect
20:25.1
segue.
20:25.6
But before we segue
20:26.3
to the next part
20:27.1
because that's where
20:27.7
we can break down
20:28.4
the alignments
20:29.3
and affiliations
20:30.2
and preferences
20:31.0
which is,
20:32.1
I think,
20:32.5
kudos to Okta
20:33.3
for doing that
20:34.0
because I think
20:34.4
that's the kind of
20:35.1
service we want
20:35.7
to also see
20:36.2
more data
20:37.5
because we
20:38.1
generally talk
20:38.9
about DDS
20:40.1
versus loyalist
20:41.3
in a blogger
20:42.3
sense of the word
20:43.0
but we really
20:43.6
need the data.
20:44.7
But,
20:44.8
for a moment,
20:46.4
can we,
20:47.0
I understand
20:47.6
that,
20:48.0
you know,
20:48.2
we want to talk
20:48.9
about things
20:50.1
based on
20:51.0
as much possible
20:52.4
as data we can get
20:53.2
but let's just say,
20:54.5
despite the
20:55.2
epistemological
20:56.1
limitations,
20:57.1
if I can put it,
20:58.2
what is your sense
20:59.0
with the rise
20:60.0
and rise of Tulfo's
21:01.0
because our understanding
21:02.0
is that,
21:02.9
well,
21:03.4
I mean,
21:04.3
Rafi Tulfo is also
21:05.3
now the frontrunner
21:06.4
to be the next
21:07.8
president of the Philippines
21:08.9
although,
21:09.5
of course,
21:09.7
in the Paul Seixas survey
21:10.6
at least from what we see,
21:11.7
it's statistically tied
21:12.8
but his trajectory
21:14.1
is just incredible
21:15.0
from teens
21:16.5
to 30 plus percent
21:18.2
right now
21:18.7
and who knows,
21:20.1
right?
21:20.3
If Lenny doesn't run
21:21.2
or someone else,
21:21.7
probably numbers
21:22.4
will go more to Tulfo
21:23.3
than Sarah
21:23.7
considering that,
21:24.5
the opposition
21:24.9
between Sarah
21:25.6
and Lenny Robredo,
21:28.9
right?
21:29.4
So,
21:30.0
this is really,
21:31.6
you're absolutely right.
21:33.3
We can talk about
21:34.1
the Dutertes shortly
21:35.2
but
21:35.5
the thing
21:38.5
with the Tulfos is,
21:39.9
ang basa ko dito is,
21:41.8
the surprise to me
21:42.8
is how Dutertes
21:43.9
made it to national politics
21:45.9
ahead of Tulfos
21:46.7
kasi if we recall it
21:48.2
five,
21:48.5
ten years ago,
21:49.6
the Tulfos were already
21:50.7
a national brand.
21:51.8
It was just a matter
21:52.5
of them making that leap,
21:53.6
diba?
21:53.9
They were already
21:54.8
household names
21:55.7
and they already had
21:56.9
that huge appeal
21:57.8
to the masses
21:58.4
as a kind of a
21:59.3
savior of the people.
22:00.8
Talagang top na top nila yan.
22:02.0
So, in a way,
22:02.9
you could say
22:03.3
this is a belated
22:04.4
right,
22:05.5
harvest
22:06.1
of that
22:07.6
long-term
22:08.6
building of their brand
22:10.2
and the appeal
22:11.2
that they enjoy
22:11.8
among the,
22:12.3
I mean,
22:12.5
andyan dat,
22:13.0
diba?
22:13.4
Macho,
22:14.2
savior,
22:15.2
I won't say
22:15.9
vigilante justice
22:16.9
but, you know,
22:17.7
let's just call it
22:18.3
Tulfo justice.
22:19.1
I interviewed Rafi Tulfo
22:20.0
so people can check
22:20.8
the interview that I had
22:21.6
with Rafi Tulfo
22:22.2
on these issues.
22:23.9
So, yun ang basa ko.
22:25.9
I want to understand
22:26.7
where you come from
22:27.5
as a political scientist.
22:28.4
Again, I understand
22:29.1
because you're now
22:30.4
in the survey agencies.
22:31.5
You want to be a little bit
22:32.3
circumspect
22:33.9
about any kind
22:35.1
of speculative analysis
22:36.2
but just overall.
22:39.1
Okay, I agree
22:40.2
with the common perceptions
22:42.1
about the Tulfo brand.
22:45.9
It's been evolving
22:47.2
over time.
22:48.4
The decision to run
22:49.5
was only recent
22:51.2
and the decision to run
22:53.0
was, by the way,
22:53.5
linked also
22:54.1
to the support
22:54.7
of the Duterte family.
22:56.3
To a great extent,
22:57.6
they were associated
22:58.4
very strongly
22:59.3
with the Duterte brand also
23:01.9
and they share
23:03.2
many commonalities
23:04.3
as far as
23:04.9
that brand of leadership
23:08.1
and governance
23:09.3
is concerned.
23:12.1
They come from
23:13.5
a populist mood.
23:14.9
Sure.
23:15.5
And this,
23:17.7
you know,
23:18.0
in an era where
23:19.4
or in a context
23:20.5
where we have
23:21.8
weak institutions,
23:23.5
okay,
23:24.0
a state that's characterized
23:25.5
as weak on many fronts,
23:27.5
you find space
23:28.9
for these kinds of candidates
23:30.2
and the kinds of advocacies
23:31.7
and the leadership style
23:33.6
that they promote.
23:35.6
These tend to rise,
23:37.1
especially during hard times.
23:39.7
Richard,
23:40.1
you see a lot of populists
23:41.4
rising up, no?
23:43.0
And this particular context
23:45.3
that we're in
23:46.2
as a country
23:47.2
is extremely hard
23:48.1
for most of our countrymen.
23:49.5
Mahirap na hirapan
23:50.4
uwi mga ating kababayan.
23:52.2
Naikita rin namin
23:52.8
sa surveys,
23:53.5
na meron niya
23:53.9
consistency
23:54.8
over the last year, no?
23:57.1
Ang talagang problema,
23:58.4
number one,
23:59.1
urgent national concern
24:00.4
that people want to resolve,
24:02.4
that what people want
24:03.2
government to resolve
24:04.0
has always been
24:05.0
the high prices
24:05.8
of goods and services.
24:07.5
Nahihirapan po siya.
24:08.5
Their second is,
24:10.7
of course,
24:11.5
accessible food
24:12.5
and, of course,
24:13.4
higher wages.
24:14.7
So, yan,
24:15.2
consistent yan.
24:16.2
In times of hardship,
24:18.0
you know,
24:19.7
populists
24:20.5
find space, no?
24:22.2
And I guess
24:22.7
this is the kind
24:23.3
of population
24:25.3
that's very...
24:25.9
I think the term
24:26.5
we use is...
24:27.3
Right.
24:29.4
The term we use is
24:30.1
weak states
24:32.7
strong tulfos, right?
24:36.6
Yeah.
24:37.7
Now...
24:38.1
That's a problem,
24:39.7
you know.
24:40.1
That's a struggle, yeah?
24:42.3
We...
24:42.7
You use the
24:43.6
weak states
24:44.3
strong society
24:45.1
perspective.
24:46.4
But that's one way
24:47.3
of looking at it.
24:47.8
But the populist
24:48.9
appeal is very strong
24:50.2
with Filipinos.
24:51.0
You have to also understand
24:51.8
the tulfos
24:52.3
are a particular
24:53.1
ethnic background.
24:54.9
They're Visaya.
24:55.8
They have a strong
24:56.4
support as far as
24:57.8
that's concerned.
24:58.4
Although their father
24:59.0
is Ilocano.
24:59.9
Last time I checked.
25:01.0
Ilocano yung daddy nila.
25:02.1
Yes.
25:02.8
From Batak pa nga yata eh.
25:04.2
And then,
25:04.7
Japanese yung mom nila.
25:06.3
Yeah.
25:07.3
Yeah.
25:07.7
And then,
25:08.0
they're also popular
25:09.6
in the...
25:10.4
They're a strong candidate
25:12.5
in this particular sense.
25:14.6
Right.
25:15.0
You get votes everywhere.
25:16.7
When you look
25:17.1
at the Duterte,
25:17.9
let's say,
25:18.2
assuming there's a
25:19.1
Sarah,
25:20.3
Rafi,
25:22.0
you know,
25:22.5
competition in 2020
25:24.2
which is so far away,
25:25.4
no?
25:26.6
Rafi will have...
25:28.4
will be very competitive
25:29.3
because he...
25:30.8
he gets votes everywhere.
25:33.0
North,
25:33.6
South,
25:34.1
Visaya.
25:34.9
We have a probe.
25:36.4
We just have to ask
25:37.3
our...
25:39.5
You know,
25:40.2
our...
25:40.8
the company
25:41.9
had commissioned it
25:42.7
if we can release
25:43.8
the probe on
25:45.3
tulfo versus Sarah.
25:47.5
But in our probe,
25:49.4
tulfo is not lost
25:50.4
to Sarah Duterte
25:52.2
one-on-one.
25:53.3
In fact,
25:53.8
the gap is increasing.
25:55.4
Thank you for...
25:56.7
Reality, eh.
25:57.6
Reality, eh.
25:59.8
We won't give the numbers yet.
26:01.3
Yeah, exactly.
26:02.1
No, no.
26:02.5
I appreciate it.
26:03.1
I appreciate that, Ranji.
26:05.0
Yeah.
26:05.7
The basic...
26:07.0
The basic perspective is
26:09.1
in Philippine elections,
26:11.3
it's not just
26:11.8
a two-way contest,
26:13.3
na-no, eh?
26:13.7
Of course.
26:14.0
You haven't seen
26:14.3
a two-way contest,
26:16.1
okay,
26:16.6
in post-Mars
26:17.8
or the Philippines.
26:18.8
Except...
26:19.1
No, no.
26:19.4
Except for the contest
26:20.7
within Korea,
26:22.0
Kenya,
26:22.2
you know,
26:22.4
and President Marcos Sr.
26:25.4
After that,
26:25.9
it's always been,
26:26.5
you know,
26:27.0
tandems, no?
26:28.3
Multiple tandems
26:29.2
competing against each other.
26:30.5
And that's where
26:31.1
Rafi Tulfo's weakness is.
26:33.6
Okay?
26:34.2
Yes, no baluarte.
26:35.8
Right.
26:36.3
Duterte's a consistent baluarte.
26:38.2
Even now,
26:38.9
despite all the
26:40.0
attacks against them,
26:41.4
they have a baluarte.
26:42.3
Yes, you can say
26:42.9
it's only located
26:43.7
in one region.
26:45.1
In the now, yeah, yeah.
26:45.7
Yeah, I mean,
26:46.3
the now.
26:46.6
But, you know,
26:47.1
you still have that.
26:48.7
So, in a three-way,
26:49.7
four-way contest,
26:50.9
Sarah Duterte
26:51.4
will always be
26:52.0
competitive.
26:53.6
You understand?
26:54.6
That's a very good point.
26:55.8
Kaya nga sabi ko.
26:57.0
Yeah, kaya nga sabi ko.
26:57.8
Of course,
26:58.4
I understand that,
26:59.3
you know,
27:00.2
thank you so much,
27:01.8
by the way,
27:02.2
for at least confirming
27:03.0
kasi, you know,
27:03.9
I've been saying for a while
27:04.8
that not only in Paus Asia,
27:06.4
but we've seen
27:06.8
different surveys,
27:08.0
this upward trajectory
27:09.6
of Rafi Tulfo.
27:11.5
Obviously,
27:11.9
that's where the second
27:12.7
preference comes in
27:13.7
because it's very possible
27:15.0
that a lot of those
27:15.7
candidates there,
27:16.8
particularly Leni,
27:17.6
I doubt if she'll run
27:18.6
in 2028,
27:19.4
but of course,
27:19.7
things could change
27:20.4
if she does well,
27:21.6
let's say,
27:22.1
as a local official
27:23.0
in 2025 onwards.
27:25.6
So,
27:25.9
that's where things
27:27.0
could get very interesting,
27:28.1
right?
27:28.7
But obviously,
27:29.8
you're right.
27:30.5
The other important factor
27:31.9
are Dutertes
27:32.4
and three Dutertes
27:33.5
could potentially make it.
27:35.1
I mean,
27:35.5
that's next level, right?
27:36.5
We have already
27:37.0
Magkapatid,
27:38.0
Mag-Ina,
27:38.9
right?
27:39.2
The Villars,
27:40.1
the Caetanos,
27:41.1
but three brothers
27:42.6
and three Dutertes
27:44.1
would be something,
27:44.8
right?
27:45.9
Yeah.
27:46.8
This is a
27:48.2
veto constituency
27:49.3
of that.
27:49.7
Yeah,
27:51.2
parang,
27:51.6
partido na sila,
27:52.7
no?
27:54.1
Yeah,
27:54.3
but we'll see
27:56.4
if it will actually happen,
27:57.7
you know?
27:58.7
Things could change
27:59.9
between now and October.
28:01.6
And so,
28:02.3
para sa ating mga kababayan,
28:03.3
nagbabago pa yung mga numero na to.
28:05.1
At meron pang espasyo
28:06.3
para sa mga progresibo.
28:07.9
Meron pang espasyo talaga
28:08.9
para sa ating mga
28:09.9
sa oposisyon.
28:12.8
And of course,
28:14.2
you know,
28:14.6
wala pa namang kampanya,
28:16.0
although nagkakampanya na
28:17.1
informally ang lahat.
28:19.8
Mukhang pamilya,
28:21.6
ang malaking
28:23.0
factor dito,
28:24.2
pangalan,
28:24.9
pamilya,
28:26.1
pera,
28:26.7
ang magiging malaking
28:27.3
factor dito sa
28:28.4
ating
28:29.2
2025 election.
28:30.8
It's gonna be expensive,
28:31.8
very competitive,
28:33.3
and parang may alas
28:34.4
yung ating
28:35.2
administration.
28:37.2
Okay?
28:37.5
Kasi marami silang resources,
28:38.8
sila nakapuesto
28:40.0
ngayon.
28:40.6
So those associated
28:41.6
with the administration,
28:43.1
when you look down
28:43.7
the list,
28:44.8
yeah, but the thing is,
28:45.6
that's the big question,
28:46.9
that's the other big question,
28:48.2
Richard.
28:48.6
Saan ba dyan yung
28:49.1
administration?
28:50.8
Hindi na,
28:51.1
saan ba dyan yung
28:51.6
kandidato ng
28:52.3
administration?
28:54.0
Yeah.
28:54.5
Yeah, exactly.
28:55.3
Si Abalos,
28:57.8
I mean,
28:58.5
I could only think about
28:59.4
Abalos as a solid
29:00.4
candidate of the
29:01.0
administration.
29:01.3
Yeah, Abalos,
29:02.1
yeah, that's
29:02.6
possible.
29:03.1
But you know,
29:03.5
he's at the,
29:04.2
you know,
29:05.6
he's at the end
29:06.2
of the list.
29:07.0
Yun nga,
29:07.6
medyo ala.
29:10.1
Unless Erwin
29:11.1
openly sides
29:12.3
with the admin,
29:13.4
unless Erwin
29:14.1
explicitly
29:15.0
come,
29:16.8
I mean,
29:17.0
you could have a
29:17.4
situation of Ben
29:18.3
being in the
29:18.8
campaign of
29:19.3
Duterte camp,
29:20.2
and then the
29:20.8
Erwin on the
29:22.3
other side,
29:22.8
that would be an
29:23.2
interesting opposition
29:24.1
also in that sense,
29:25.2
between two
29:25.7
brothers,
29:26.3
diba?
29:27.1
Wow.
29:27.2
But right now,
29:27.9
there's no
29:28.8
Estrada,
29:30.5
Ejército
29:31.0
sort of situation
29:32.5
like we had in
29:33.0
2019.
29:33.6
Both of them
29:34.0
lost.
29:34.4
I think tama na,
29:35.0
2019 yan.
29:35.9
Yes.
29:36.5
Then,
29:36.8
number 14
29:38.2
si JV ata nun,
29:39.5
if I'm not mistaken.
29:40.6
Yeah,
29:40.9
14 or 13.
29:42.1
Yeah, yeah.
29:42.9
So,
29:43.5
they're in the
29:44.9
top five,
29:45.6
which is kind of,
29:46.8
you know,
29:47.4
they're eating to
29:48.0
each other,
29:48.5
splitting the vote,
29:49.3
but they're
29:49.8
very competitive.
29:50.8
And with those
29:51.9
numbers,
29:52.5
you're almost
29:52.8
assured,
29:53.4
assured na,
29:54.4
winning.
29:56.2
It's just a matter
29:56.9
of whether you
29:57.4
top the race,
29:58.0
kasi that's the
29:58.5
other important.
29:59.2
If you top the
29:59.8
Senate race,
30:00.3
it puts you in a
30:00.9
position for the
30:02.0
bigger conversation.
30:03.2
And if there's
30:03.7
going to be so
30:04.2
many Tulfos,
30:05.3
it's going to be
30:05.9
a question of
30:06.3
who's the
30:06.6
top Tulfo.
30:08.0
If you're a
30:08.0
Tulfo right now,
30:09.0
you're already
30:09.5
part of the
30:10.0
conversation.
30:10.6
Yeah, exactly.
30:13.0
It doesn't matter
30:13.6
if you're going to
30:14.0
top it or not.
30:15.2
But it looks like
30:15.9
the way things are
30:16.8
at the top,
30:17.3
they're going to
30:17.9
top.
30:18.8
Momentum talaga yan.
30:19.7
But you have to
30:21.3
also look at
30:21.7
Tito Soto.
30:22.7
His numbers
30:23.3
have actually
30:23.9
improved.
30:25.1
Yes, exactly.
30:26.3
Interesting.
30:26.8
But Bongo is
30:27.5
stable.
30:28.8
Hardly changed.
30:30.1
Statistically stable.
30:32.2
So nag-crystallizing
30:33.9
base nila.
30:34.6
Oo, crystallizing
30:35.5
base nila.
30:36.3
Yeah, yeah.
30:37.7
Bongo has a
30:38.9
these are the
30:39.6
things we have to
30:40.1
also look at.
30:41.0
How Bongo has
30:41.8
evolved into
30:42.5
an independent
30:43.7
candidate.
30:44.5
Candidate on
30:45.5
base.
30:47.2
Not a proxy
30:47.8
only for Digong.
30:49.6
Yeah.
30:49.7
He has not a
30:50.2
proxy anymore.
30:51.2
And he's much
30:51.8
higher than his
30:52.5
own mentor.
30:54.5
Yeah.
30:54.9
His vote.
30:56.2
Yeah, you know,
30:56.8
these are
30:58.3
significant numbers.
30:60.0
One could also
31:00.5
argue that the
31:01.1
president's numbers
31:02.1
have declined
31:03.0
over time.
31:04.3
You know,
31:05.0
it's number.
31:06.2
But you can't
31:07.0
say that they
31:07.4
don't have support.
31:08.2
All three sons
31:08.9
are within the
31:09.7
top 15.
31:10.7
Higher than
31:11.4
even the established.
31:12.7
The real people
31:13.2
who are real
31:13.8
candidates who
31:14.4
want to run.
31:16.0
Don't really
31:16.7
think that
31:17.2
Bastet and
31:18.3
Pulong are going
31:19.5
to run.
31:19.7
for the Senate.
31:20.3
So when you
31:20.6
take out all
31:21.3
these,
31:22.3
sorry,
31:23.1
it's a dynamic
31:23.9
prime list.
31:24.6
We don't even
31:25.3
know if President
31:26.2
Duterte is going
31:27.0
to run for the
31:27.4
Senate.
31:27.8
But if you
31:28.1
take him out,
31:29.3
a lot of
31:30.0
people will
31:30.4
go up.
31:31.3
I mean,
31:32.4
probably if
31:32.9
Digong doesn't
31:33.5
run,
31:33.7
then you're
31:34.1
going to see
31:34.4
a bump in
31:34.9
the numbers
31:35.3
of the son.
31:35.9
Particularly
31:36.3
suspicious if
31:37.3
this is going
31:37.8
to be Bastet.
31:38.8
Obviously,
31:39.2
people are
31:39.7
watching that
31:40.3
because if
31:41.3
Bastet doesn't
31:41.9
become the
31:42.7
mayor next,
31:43.9
I know,
31:44.3
people are even
31:45.1
wondering if
31:45.6
Sara will
31:46.1
slide down,
31:47.1
which would
31:47.3
be unprecedented
31:47.9
and crazy.
31:49.3
But,
31:49.7
again,
31:50.1
this is
31:50.4
Philippine
31:50.7
politics.
31:51.3
Anything can
31:51.7
happen.
31:52.1
But I don't
31:52.3
want to push
31:52.7
you too much
31:53.2
because we're
31:53.8
trying to
31:54.1
keep this as
31:54.6
data-driven
31:55.3
as possible.
31:56.3
Can we
31:56.5
now transition
31:57.2
to the
31:58.1
second part
31:58.7
of this in
31:59.2
terms of
31:59.5
alignments and
32:00.2
affiliations?
32:00.9
Because I
32:01.2
think,
32:02.0
Jan Solid,
32:02.7
you're making
32:03.4
a very
32:03.8
important
32:04.2
contribution.
32:04.9
So,
32:05.1
Kudusto,
32:05.5
off the
32:05.7
bat.
32:07.5
Okay,
32:07.8
so,
32:08.1
can you
32:08.9
see this?
32:10.4
Again,
32:11.2
I'm seeing
32:11.4
the first
32:12.1
page.
32:12.6
It says
32:13.0
the survey
32:13.5
2014
32:14.4
results.
32:15.5
Okay,
32:16.0
okay.
32:17.5
I don't know
32:18.7
why.
32:19.0
Pero kanina,
32:19.8
okay na.
32:21.2
Baka ulitin
32:22.0
na lang,
32:22.5
Prof.
32:23.3
Okay,
32:23.9
now,
32:24.3
can you see
32:24.7
this?
32:25.5
Can you
32:25.9
slide it
32:26.3
down to
32:26.7
just see
32:27.0
if there's
32:27.2
a movement?
32:28.6
Yeah.
32:29.7
Is it
32:30.3
moving now?
32:31.1
Hindi pa rin.
32:31.8
I don't
32:32.0
know why.
32:32.7
But kanina,
32:33.2
naayos natin
32:34.0
na.
32:35.3
Sinasabot
32:35.7
na d'yata
32:36.1
tayo.
32:38.9
Baka may
32:39.5
din natutuwa
32:40.2
sa mga
32:40.5
surveys nyo.
32:42.6
It's
32:43.1
possible,
32:43.7
you know.
32:45.5
I'm gonna
32:46.0
share anyway
32:46.8
the links and
32:48.0
all just in
32:48.4
case people
32:48.7
are
32:48.9
interested.
32:49.0
Yeah,
32:49.3
okay.
32:49.6
What about
32:50.0
this?
32:50.7
Can you
32:51.6
move it
32:51.9
again?
32:54.0
Huh.
32:54.4
Yeah,
32:55.2
can that
32:55.7
be seen?
32:56.4
I mean,
32:57.3
we only see
32:57.9
a frozen
32:58.4
nung first
32:59.5
page.
33:00.0
I don't
33:00.3
know why.
33:01.2
But kanina,
33:02.0
naayos natin
33:02.7
eh.
33:03.5
Oh,
33:03.8
I know.
33:04.2
Let me
33:04.9
just check.
33:05.5
Let's see.
33:06.0
Oh,
33:06.3
what's
33:06.7
going on
33:07.4
kaya?
33:09.0
Never ko
33:09.5
nakita yung
33:09.9
ganun yung
33:10.2
nagfreeze.
33:10.7
Oh,
33:10.8
yan.
33:11.0
Ito,
33:11.2
yan.
33:11.6
Ito,
33:11.6
yan.
33:11.8
Is that
33:12.1
better?
33:13.3
Yeah.
33:14.1
Let me
33:14.6
see lang,
33:15.0
ano.
33:15.2
Let me
33:15.5
see.
33:18.9
Take your
33:19.3
time.
33:20.2
We want
33:20.5
to make
33:20.7
sure we
33:20.9
get the
33:21.2
data.
33:21.2
While we're
33:21.8
talking,
33:22.3
can participants
33:22.9
can now see
33:23.4
your application?
33:24.2
Is that
33:24.4
good?
33:25.0
Yun nga,
33:25.4
frozen pa rin
33:26.1
siya.
33:26.4
I don't
33:26.6
know why.
33:28.0
Yeah,
33:28.3
is that
33:28.5
going down?
33:31.9
Hindi pa rin eh.
33:32.9
But anyway,
33:33.6
siguro what we
33:34.1
can do is we
33:34.5
can just
33:34.8
discuss it
33:35.2
and you
33:35.4
just set
33:35.8
the numbers.
33:36.6
If ever,
33:37.0
I can just
33:37.4
share na lang
33:37.9
screenshots and
33:38.6
all later on.
33:40.2
Yeah,
33:40.5
sure.
33:41.0
While we're
33:43.4
talking about
33:44.0
it,
33:44.5
so our
33:46.4
basic question
33:47.2
was,
33:48.1
which of the
33:48.6
following
33:48.9
best describes
33:49.7
your political
33:50.3
preference?
33:52.0
And,
33:52.7
you know,
33:55.6
we
33:56.0
looked at
33:59.1
the survey
33:59.6
results,
34:00.4
and the
34:00.8
survey results
34:01.4
are this.
34:03.4
I'm trying
34:04.1
to see if
34:04.7
we can still
34:05.1
share,
34:06.0
Richard.
34:07.7
You want,
34:08.4
I'll re-appoint
34:10.0
you na lang
34:10.4
as a
34:11.0
co-host.
34:11.8
Yeah,
34:12.0
yeah,
34:12.1
yeah.
34:12.4
And while you're
34:13.4
doing that,
34:13.8
maybe you can
34:14.1
look at your
34:14.5
side.
34:16.0
I sent the
34:16.9
file to you
34:17.5
anyway.
34:18.0
Baka ako na
34:18.8
lang.
34:18.9
Oh,
34:19.0
magano.
34:19.9
Oh,
34:20.2
yeah.
34:20.5
Siguro.
34:22.0
So,
34:22.4
while we're
34:22.7
talking about
34:23.2
it,
34:23.4
so,
34:23.8
so,
34:24.3
okay,
34:24.8
so,
34:25.2
first,
34:25.7
measure,
34:26.1
siguro,
34:26.5
um,
34:26.7
prof,
34:26.9
can you give
34:27.2
us a
34:27.5
background?
34:27.9
Why are
34:28.2
we doing
34:28.5
these surveys?
34:29.2
Why is
34:29.5
this survey
34:30.0
important?
34:30.8
Ganun na lang,
34:31.5
siguro,
34:31.9
the basic
34:32.6
questions.
34:33.2
Why,
34:33.4
why this
34:33.8
survey?
34:34.2
Kasi I
34:34.5
didn't see
34:34.9
that with
34:35.2
other survey
34:35.8
agencies.
34:36.4
This is
34:36.7
quite unique.
34:37.4
Yeah,
34:37.6
actually,
34:37.9
this was
34:38.1
client-driven,
34:40.0
to be
34:40.5
brutally honest,
34:41.4
although it
34:41.9
was not
34:43.3
commissioned.
34:44.9
A client
34:45.8
was wondering
34:47.0
if,
34:48.0
when we had
34:48.4
the free
34:48.7
question,
34:49.2
we had
34:49.4
a free
34:49.7
space in
34:50.9
our survey,
34:51.9
so,
34:52.3
he wanted
34:53.3
to ask,
34:53.8
you know,
34:54.2
if,
34:54.9
is there
34:55.5
a way
34:55.9
to find
34:56.5
out
34:56.8
partisanship,
34:57.6
na,
34:58.1
as far
34:58.8
as the
34:59.3
political
34:59.6
context is
35:00.4
concerned?
35:01.6
And,
35:02.0
you know,
35:03.7
the implication
35:04.5
amongst
35:05.0
associates,
35:05.7
we divide
35:06.3
along parties,
35:07.5
ideology,
35:08.9
but we're
35:09.9
not,
35:10.2
no?
35:10.6
So,
35:11.3
we constructed
35:11.9
this as
35:12.7
a,
35:13.0
you know,
35:14.1
a preliminary
35:14.8
survey
35:15.8
question that
35:16.5
we want to
35:16.8
test,
35:17.5
approve,
35:17.9
no?
35:18.5
But the
35:18.8
client was
35:19.2
a big part
35:20.6
of constructing
35:21.8
the question.
35:23.0
Right.
35:23.2
And,
35:23.8
the object
35:25.1
is,
35:25.5
of course,
35:25.8
to look at
35:26.1
political
35:26.5
preference
35:27.3
in general
35:28.4
and to
35:28.8
look at
35:29.2
how we
35:29.9
are,
35:30.3
you know,
35:31.7
who
35:32.0
every
35:33.0
Filipino
35:33.6
support
35:34.3
at this
35:35.0
particular
35:35.4
time.
35:36.9
And so,
35:37.9
we were
35:38.9
happy to
35:39.6
get,
35:40.0
to generate
35:40.4
some information.
35:42.1
It was also
35:43.0
a time to
35:43.6
test the
35:43.9
validity of
35:44.4
the question.
35:45.0
We could
35:45.5
change the
35:45.9
question over
35:46.4
time.
35:48.5
And so,
35:48.7
this was
35:49.0
the object
35:49.6
of our
35:50.3
probe.
35:51.4
So,
35:52.1
I'm trying
35:53.1
to,
35:53.6
sorry.
35:54.4
Yeah,
35:54.7
that's it.
35:55.5
Yeah.
35:55.9
You can
35:56.2
just go
35:56.5
down.
35:57.7
Yes.
35:58.3
Okay.
35:58.9
Just go
35:59.3
down.
36:01.1
One second.
36:02.5
One more,
36:03.2
one more.
36:03.9
Alright,
36:04.2
you want to
36:04.4
go down?
36:04.8
Yeah,
36:05.0
that's it.
36:05.6
You may
36:06.5
sit now,
36:06.9
Richard.
36:07.2
Yeah,
36:07.4
okay,
36:07.8
that's it.
36:08.5
Okay.
36:08.8
Can you go up?
36:09.5
Yeah,
36:09.6
that's it.
36:10.0
That's it.
36:10.6
Alright,
36:11.1
let's go for
36:11.6
this.
36:11.9
Okay,
36:12.3
this is
36:12.6
interesting.
36:12.9
A little
36:13.1
more.
36:13.3
One page
36:13.9
one,
36:14.7
Richard.
36:16.4
Or page
36:16.9
two.
36:17.2
Second page,
36:18.2
I'm sorry.
36:18.5
Second page.
36:19.3
No problem.
36:20.2
Yeah.
36:21.1
Okay,
36:21.6
that's it.
36:22.0
Stop there.
36:22.9
Make it
36:23.2
bigger.
36:23.6
Yeah,
36:23.8
that should
36:24.2
be good.
36:26.2
Interesting
36:26.6
findings.
36:28.1
Yeah.
36:29.1
So,
36:29.3
the basic
36:29.7
question is,
36:31.0
are you
36:32.1
pro-Marcos?
36:32.9
So,
36:33.6
the statement
36:35.0
which best
36:35.9
describes you
36:36.7
is the way
36:37.7
we ask
36:38.8
the question.
36:39.6
And I support
36:40.2
President Marcos
36:41.0
and his
36:41.4
administration
36:42.1
31%
36:43.2
I support
36:44.7
the Duterte
36:45.4
family and
36:46.0
their political
36:46.4
alliance.
36:47.6
We classify
36:48.7
them as
36:49.0
pro-Duterte.
36:49.7
That's 20%.
36:50.8
I support
36:52.4
the opposition.
36:53.4
We didn't
36:53.9
give,
36:54.7
we didn't
36:55.1
define the
36:55.5
opposition
36:55.9
to our
36:56.6
interviewees
36:57.4
as just
36:58.3
the Liberal
36:58.6
Party.
36:59.0
We just
36:59.3
said that,
36:59.7
you know,
37:00.3
this may
37:00.6
include
37:01.1
the left
37:01.9
and the
37:03.1
Liberal
37:04.2
Party
37:04.7
or the
37:05.3
traditional
37:05.7
opposition.
37:07.5
But that
37:08.0
generated
37:08.4
a support
37:09.1
of 4%.
37:10.2
So,
37:11.3
but then
37:11.7
this is
37:12.0
quite surprising.
37:13.2
29%
37:14.7
we call
37:15.3
them
37:15.4
independents
37:16.1
in the
37:16.6
study.
37:17.6
I do
37:18.0
not support
37:18.6
the Marcos
37:19.2
administration,
37:20.7
the Duterte
37:21.1
family,
37:21.8
and the
37:22.0
opposition.
37:23.5
29%.
37:24.1
And those
37:25.4
ambipolite,
37:26.4
15%.
37:27.2
They refused.
37:28.9
So,
37:29.2
ang laki
37:29.4
ng anti-system
37:30.4
if I can
37:30.9
put it
37:31.2
that way.
37:32.2
Right?
37:33.0
Paalang
37:33.6
eh dyan.
37:34.9
But this
37:35.9
is a space
37:36.6
where the
37:37.0
opposition
37:37.5
can build
37:38.6
on.
37:39.2
This is
37:39.9
a space
37:40.4
also that
37:40.9
will be
37:41.2
up for
37:41.5
grabs
37:42.0
if you're
37:43.2
part of
37:43.6
the Duterte
37:44.3
alliance
37:45.9
building
37:46.3
the new
37:47.0
opposition
37:47.5
in their
37:48.1
view.
37:48.9
And of
37:49.1
course,
37:49.4
the Marcos
37:49.7
administration
37:50.4
was trying
37:50.9
to solidify
37:51.6
their base.
37:52.5
So,
37:53.1
29%.
37:53.8
So,
37:54.3
where do
37:55.8
we locate
37:56.3
the Marcos
37:57.1
support?
37:58.8
It's
37:59.0
largely
37:59.3
the National
37:59.9
Capital
38:00.3
Legion
38:00.7
and
38:03.0
Visayas.
38:04.6
Okay?
38:05.0
They're
38:05.5
not very
38:06.4
strong
38:06.8
at this
38:07.6
particular
38:07.9
time.
38:08.5
In
38:08.6
Mindanao,
38:09.0
17%
38:09.9
lang sa
38:10.2
kayala.
38:11.6
And
38:12.1
they're
38:13.2
their base
38:13.7
of support
38:14.3
is D&D.
38:15.4
Okay?
38:16.1
So,
38:16.4
when you
38:16.5
go to
38:16.8
the Duterte
38:17.3
family,
38:18.3
the support,
38:19.3
20%
38:20.4
of adult
38:21.7
Filipinos
38:22.4
support
38:24.3
the Duterte
38:24.8
family.
38:26.5
Their base
38:27.4
is in
38:27.7
Mindanao,
38:28.2
53%.
38:28.7
You can
38:28.9
see naman,
38:29.2
oh.
38:30.3
So,
38:31.1
talagang may
38:31.9
hold sila
38:33.1
sa lugar.
38:33.6
Right.
38:34.1
And probably
38:34.7
the low
38:35.8
numbers in
38:36.4
Mindanao
38:36.8
is because
38:37.2
of the
38:37.9
feud,
38:38.3
right?
38:38.6
I mean,
38:39.0
after the
38:39.6
president
38:39.9
coming out,
38:40.7
I mean,
38:40.9
we can
38:41.1
see that
38:41.5
in,
38:42.1
for instance,
38:42.4
the other
38:43.0
side survey
38:43.7
on the
38:44.1
presidential
38:44.6
balls,
38:45.3
ang baba
38:45.7
lahat dun sa
38:46.4
Mindanao.
38:47.2
And then
38:47.5
dun sa
38:47.7
preference also
38:48.4
for the
38:48.7
president,
38:49.3
laki ng
38:49.7
baksak ni
38:50.2
Marcos sa
38:50.9
Mindanao.
38:51.6
You're
38:51.8
correct.
38:52.5
You're
38:52.8
correct.
38:53.4
Kasi,
38:54.1
yung ibang
38:55.5
probes natin
38:56.3
on trust
38:57.2
and approval,
38:58.6
bumagsak talaga
38:59.6
yung support
39:00.5
sa Mindanao
39:01.2
kay President
39:02.2
Marcos.
39:03.5
So,
39:04.1
it's consistent,
39:05.1
na?
39:05.5
And when you
39:06.3
look at the
39:07.7
base of
39:08.4
support,
39:09.1
it's really
39:09.6
class E.
39:11.6
Okay?
39:12.5
So,
39:12.6
for
39:12.9
the 29%,
39:14.2
which is
39:14.6
They're
39:14.9
tie sila
39:15.2
sa class E,
39:15.9
no?
39:16.0
Both of
39:16.4
them are
39:16.6
30%.
39:17.4
They're
39:17.8
tie.
39:18.4
So,
39:18.7
yung mass
39:19.4
of
39:19.5
appeal nila
39:20.2
is almost
39:20.6
identical.
39:22.4
Pero mas
39:22.9
malaki si
39:23.8
Impro Marcos
39:24.7
group sa
39:25.1
class E,
39:25.7
which is
39:26.0
the biggest
39:26.9
one,
39:27.4
which is
39:27.6
55 to
39:28.2
60%.
39:28.9
So,
39:31.2
even of
39:31.8
the population
39:32.3
in general,
39:32.8
adult
39:33.1
Filipino
39:33.4
population.
39:34.2
So,
39:34.4
yeah.
39:35.8
So,
39:36.2
those who
39:36.5
do not
39:36.7
support
39:37.0
is still
39:37.4
huge,
39:38.2
siya.
39:38.8
And
39:39.3
those who
39:40.3
refuse to
39:41.3
you know,
39:44.3
who are
39:44.7
ambivalent,
39:45.4
basically.
39:46.4
So,
39:46.6
the 29%,
39:47.7
we classify
39:48.4
them as
39:48.7
independent.
39:50.1
Yeah?
39:50.7
And you'll
39:51.5
notice the
39:52.4
basis of
39:52.7
can you go
39:53.3
down to
39:53.6
the last
39:54.4
three slides
39:55.3
at the
39:57.2
bottom?
39:57.6
Yeah?
39:58.5
So,
39:58.7
yeah.
39:59.0
We can
39:59.5
put,
40:01.2
yeah.
40:02.3
Yeah.
40:03.3
Okay ka pala
40:03.8
sa Zoom.
40:04.2
Okay,
40:04.5
sure.
40:04.8
Pwede ka pala.
40:06.4
Partner pala tayo.
40:07.4
Pwede tayo partner
40:08.1
sa presentation.
40:09.5
Sige,
40:09.9
sir.
40:10.3
Ako yung
40:10.8
as
40:11.1
research assistant.
40:13.6
Gawin niyo na lang
40:14.3
ako sa
40:14.7
OKTA ng
40:15.6
ano.
40:15.9
Okay,
40:17.1
but this is
40:18.3
useful.
40:18.8
You look at the
40:19.2
mail.
40:19.4
Yes,
40:19.8
this is very
40:20.3
useful.
40:21.7
This is very
40:22.1
good.
40:23.4
So,
40:24.2
this is how
40:25.9
it's spread
40:26.4
at the
40:27.3
regional.
40:27.8
We know
40:27.9
that already.
40:28.5
But workman
40:29.0
rural,
40:29.3
it's almost
40:29.7
the same.
40:30.5
Yeah,
40:30.6
for the
40:30.9
Marcos vote.
40:31.8
Yeah?
40:32.3
The pro-Marcos
40:33.0
support,
40:33.8
not vote,
40:34.2
but support.
40:35.2
I'm sorry.
40:36.4
Male,
40:37.0
female,
40:37.3
almost the
40:37.7
same.
40:38.7
But look
40:39.3
at the
40:39.8
age group.
40:41.1
They're
40:43.4
pretty balanced.
40:44.9
Very strongly,
40:45.6
well supported
40:46.5
in the
40:47.1
critical
40:47.7
18 to
40:49.4
35 range.
40:51.7
Right.
40:52.1
So,
40:52.3
that's where
40:52.8
there's lots
40:54.0
of support.
40:55.1
And you'll
40:55.6
be surprised,
40:56.4
55 to
40:57.2
64,
40:57.9
ito yung
40:58.2
Marcos
40:58.6
babies.
41:01.0
Ito yung,
41:02.6
hindi pa naman
41:03.0
ako dito sa
41:03.4
age group.
41:04.0
Pero,
41:04.3
alam mo yun,
41:04.6
walang
41:06.7
laglakgan.
41:09.0
Walang
41:09.6
laglakgan.
41:10.7
So,
41:11.1
I think
41:12.1
interesting yung
41:12.7
sa education,
41:14.1
educational background
41:16.3
ng Marcos
41:19.3
supporter,
41:20.0
no?
41:20.6
So,
41:21.3
you'll see
41:21.9
that a big
41:22.7
chunk of
41:23.1
them are
41:23.5
from high
41:24.0
school,
41:24.4
vocational.
41:25.6
Yeah.
41:27.9
And,
41:28.3
interesting,
41:29.2
but not surprising,
41:30.3
Iglesia
41:30.6
na Cristo
41:30.9
is a big,
41:31.6
you know,
41:31.8
when you look
41:32.0
at the
41:32.2
religious
41:32.5
breakdown,
41:33.7
55%
41:34.9
of that.
41:36.5
And then,
41:37.8
of course,
41:38.5
you look
41:39.6
at the
41:40.3
ethnic,
41:41.1
you know,
41:42.1
it's basically
41:44.2
Ilocano,
41:45.1
Tagalog,
41:45.6
no?
41:46.0
Yes.
41:47.0
I can...
41:47.5
There's a very
41:48.1
strong
41:49.4
Cebuano support
41:50.4
pa rin.
41:51.2
22%.
41:52.2
Pero,
41:53.3
wait lang,
41:53.6
and Aglipayan,
41:54.6
wasn't it found
41:55.2
by an Ilocano?
41:57.7
Kanina,
41:58.3
I was just reading
41:58.8
about Isabelo
41:59.7
de los Reyes
42:00.4
and then Aglipayan,
42:01.3
but ang baba
42:01.9
ng...
42:02.3
Yeah.
42:02.8
Chunks ng
42:03.4
Roman Catholic,
42:04.8
Islam,
42:05.6
so many in the
42:06.8
terms of the
42:07.3
actual percentage
42:08.6
that they have
42:10.2
as far as the
42:10.7
population.
42:11.1
So...
42:12.9
Very interesting.
42:13.7
This is good.
42:14.4
This is good.
42:15.2
You look at
42:16.1
the next slide,
42:18.3
which is
42:19.2
the family.
42:21.1
Yeah.
42:21.4
Okay.
42:22.3
Yeah.
42:23.6
So,
42:25.0
yeah,
42:25.4
you'll notice
42:27.1
the support
42:28.9
is very different
42:29.7
as far as
42:30.4
the age groups
42:31.0
are concerned.
42:35.3
Yeah,
42:36.0
the big
42:37.5
supporters
42:38.0
are Islam,
42:38.9
no?
42:39.0
Can you see?
42:39.6
66%
42:40.3
of the
42:41.1
Muslim
42:42.1
brothers
42:43.1
are in
42:43.5
Mindanao.
42:43.5
So,
42:44.2
when you look at the
42:44.3
religious...
42:44.4
So, clearly the
42:44.6
Mindanao factor
42:45.5
there,
42:45.8
because most of
42:46.3
our Muslim
42:46.7
brothers are in
42:47.4
Mindanao.
42:48.2
Exactly.
42:49.3
So, Mindanao
42:50.1
is also their
42:50.7
base of support.
42:52.3
And,
42:52.6
Visaya,
42:54.9
the 41%,
42:55.9
you see?
42:57.1
1%
42:58.3
sa Ilocano.
43:00.0
1%.
43:00.6
Which I wonder,
43:02.3
sino tong 1%
43:03.3
na may Ilocano
43:04.1
na to?
43:05.4
I'm gonna
43:06.1
research them.
43:07.9
Lagot kayo sa akin.
43:09.4
Uwi ako ng
43:09.9
Baguio soon.
43:11.1
1%.
43:12.1
1%!
43:14.3
I mean,
43:14.8
wow.
43:16.1
Anyway,
43:17.5
this is a
43:19.1
snapshot.
43:20.2
This is good.
43:21.0
This is a very
43:21.6
helpful
43:22.6
professor,
43:24.3
right?
43:24.4
I appreciate this.
43:25.5
It reinforces
43:26.7
the demographics
43:27.4
we know about
43:28.1
these two
43:28.6
political families.
43:30.3
And why they
43:31.0
were also
43:31.8
very
43:32.3
unbeatable
43:33.4
together.
43:35.1
Okay?
43:37.1
Meaning,
43:37.5
you can understand
43:38.3
their base of support
43:39.2
if they're
43:40.3
united.
43:40.6
And,
43:41.1
they can really,
43:42.4
there will be
43:43.2
a lot of continuity
43:43.9
as far as government
43:44.9
and politics is concerned.
43:46.5
Interesting.
43:47.2
But then,
43:47.6
they're bifurcated
43:49.8
not just around
43:51.1
personalities
43:52.2
and personal interests
43:53.8
but also along
43:54.5
policy lines.
43:55.2
We also know that,
43:56.0
di ba?
43:56.4
Right.
43:58.3
It's become
43:58.9
the great divide
43:59.8
between the families.
44:01.7
One is
44:02.4
very supportive
44:03.6
of China.
44:04.4
The other one is
44:05.0
not so
44:06.4
supportive.
44:09.4
Sorry,
44:10.2
is that
44:10.9
yours or mine?
44:11.8
No,
44:12.1
I think that
44:13.4
that probably is yours,
44:14.7
bro.
44:15.3
Wala,
44:15.6
okay ako dito.
44:16.6
No, no,
44:16.9
this is very important
44:17.8
because honestly,
44:19.1
for me,
44:19.6
the big thing
44:20.1
before we talk about
44:20.8
the third part,
44:21.5
independence is,
44:22.5
and the reason why
44:23.2
I find this very interesting,
44:24.9
aside from the fact na
44:26.0
meron mga sub-demographics,
44:28.0
this reminds us
44:29.3
of the,
44:31.7
kasi kung titignan mo dito,
44:33.9
almost kalahatan
44:35.0
ng mga voters
44:35.6
are either
44:36.2
undecided,
44:37.1
independent,
44:37.6
or medyo
44:38.5
traditional opposition,
44:39.9
right?
44:40.7
Because,
44:40.9
pag sinama mo yung dalawa,
44:42.7
31 plus 20,
44:43.7
that's just 51%.
44:44.9
So,
44:45.7
roughly half of the voters
44:47.4
are up for grabs,
44:48.7
right?
44:48.9
In a sense,
44:49.6
for an alternative
44:50.5
to both Duterte and Marcos.
44:52.0
This is,
44:52.4
this is huge.
44:53.5
This is actually very important
44:54.7
if you look at it that way.
44:56.2
Assuming,
44:56.8
of course,
44:57.1
someone consolidates them
44:58.4
into a third force.
44:60.0
A third force.
45:00.8
If you're planning
45:01.3
a campaign
45:02.3
for the midterms,
45:03.8
this is important
45:04.8
to take note of.
45:06.6
But this is not surprising.
45:08.1
They're not very strong.
45:09.6
The administration
45:10.1
is not very strong.
45:10.9
In Mindanao.
45:14.3
So,
45:14.7
but the thing is
45:15.7
they can consolidate.
45:16.7
When you look at
45:17.3
the independents,
45:18.2
a lot of them
45:19.2
are still in balance
45:20.5
with Zon Visayas.
45:21.9
So,
45:22.1
you can,
45:23.2
that's up for grabs.
45:24.7
Lalo na Visayas.
45:26.3
So,
45:27.1
this is something
45:28.5
that the administration
45:29.4
and even
45:30.2
the opposition
45:31.1
eventually becomes,
45:34.3
or takes control of it.
45:36.5
However,
45:37.0
it evolves.
45:39.1
We'll have to work on.
45:40.2
Right.
45:40.7
There's a lot
45:41.1
for grabs.
45:42.5
If you put that
45:43.6
plus those who did not respond,
45:46.0
that's around
45:46.4
40%
45:47.3
for grabs.
45:49.9
I find this
45:51.3
very, very helpful.
45:52.3
Thank you so much.
45:54.2
I'll just call you
45:55.1
Ranjit na lang
45:55.8
kasi,
45:56.2
we want to have you
45:57.4
more regularly
45:58.0
sa first-name basis na lang.
46:00.1
Professor Ranjit.
46:01.2
This is very, very helpful.
46:04.3
Obviously,
46:05.2
I found nothing shocking
46:06.7
in terms of numbers
46:07.7
except the 1%.
46:08.9
Bakit may 1%
46:10.0
pang mga ilokal?
46:10.7
Mga hudas.
46:12.4
I'm just kidding.
46:13.2
I'm kidding.
46:14.4
No, kasi I was just in Baguio,
46:15.8
di ba?
46:16.1
Last week before I flew into US.
46:17.9
And, and,
46:18.5
ang dami mga bumper sticker.
46:20.3
Where are you now?
46:21.3
I mean,
46:22.4
Berkeley now.
46:23.9
Berkeley.
46:24.6
Okay, okay.
46:25.4
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
46:26.0
Kaya na yung time zone natin.
46:27.8
It's nighttime.
46:28.8
Yeah, it's 9pm right now.
46:30.6
Yeah, exactly.
46:31.7
So, thank you so much
46:33.0
for agreeing to morning
46:34.2
kasi ang hirap.
46:35.3
Because later this week,
46:36.1
we're gonna have
46:36.6
Senator Trillianis back again
46:38.3
also on our show.
46:39.5
Pero gabi sa kanya.
46:40.5
So, that's gonna be like
46:41.2
5am my time.
46:42.6
So, medyo you're gonna see
46:43.4
more sabog version of me.
46:46.3
5am is not my time talaga eh.
46:48.6
But,
46:48.9
thank you so much for this.
46:51.4
So, Professor,
46:51.9
can we look at the big picture now?
46:53.7
And also dito sa independence.
46:55.3
What is your read
46:56.0
dito sa independence?
46:56.8
Because I also find this
46:57.6
very interesting.
46:59.7
Well, there are
47:01.2
Pilipinos who
47:03.6
are still,
47:05.6
you know,
47:06.0
they may have actually
47:07.4
support.
47:09.5
I mean,
47:10.0
the,
47:10.1
the question is not
47:11.8
crafted,
47:12.8
you know,
47:13.7
it still needs
47:14.7
a lot of improvement.
47:16.5
Medyo generic pa siya eh.
47:18.7
O, medyo generic pa.
47:22.6
Improve this question
47:23.9
over time.
47:25.0
This is,
47:25.3
I remember,
47:26.0
this was not developed
47:27.2
by Octave.
47:28.4
So, the client based.
47:29.6
The client suggested
47:30.8
this question.
47:32.0
And,
47:32.4
we just ran it
47:34.1
for them.
47:35.9
Nag-operationalize lang kayo.
47:37.9
Nag-operationalize.
47:38.8
It's like,
47:39.3
it's like,
47:39.4
it's like,
47:39.5
it's like,
47:39.5
it's like,
47:39.5
it's like,
47:39.5
it's like,
47:39.5
it's like,
47:39.6
it's like,
47:39.6
it's like,
47:39.6
it's like,
47:39.7
it's like,
47:39.7
it's like,
47:40.1
it's like,
47:40.1
improvements to improve
47:41.6
the validity of the question.
47:43.1
Then again,
47:43.8
we can break this down
47:45.5
ideologically.
47:46.7
We try to find out.
47:47.8
A lot of people
47:48.5
are out there
47:49.5
who don't see
47:50.4
the administration
47:51.1
or the
47:51.6
groups that they
47:54.7
want to support.
47:55.7
Okay?
47:56.4
And,
47:56.6
that's also good,
47:57.4
right?
47:57.8
Diba?
47:58.7
Very good.
47:59.6
It's not bifurcated
48:00.9
by just two families.
48:01.9
Although,
48:02.2
a big chunk of it
48:02.9
is nearly 50%.
48:04.5
I don't know,
48:05.6
more than 50%.
48:06.7
Right.
48:07.5
Basically,
48:07.9
the pro-Marcos
48:08.9
or pro-detente.
48:10.1
But,
48:10.4
a big chunk
48:10.8
is still open
48:11.5
and
48:12.5
is still looking
48:14.4
for that group
48:15.7
they want to support
48:16.4
or they have
48:16.9
support,
48:17.8
no?
48:19.1
But,
48:19.6
we also included
48:20.2
the opposition
48:20.9
kasi,
48:21.3
that's 4% lang,
48:22.4
no?
48:23.1
And so,
48:23.9
they don't see
48:24.7
the Liberal Party
48:26.1
as the group
48:30.1
they want to support.
48:31.2
So,
48:31.3
that's also good
48:32.2
that we,
48:33.3
you know,
48:33.6
our own,
48:35.1
but one could also
48:36.1
argue there's a divide,
48:37.0
diba?
48:37.2
There's a divide
48:37.9
between those
48:38.4
who have already
48:39.0
affiliations,
48:40.1
and those
48:40.8
who do not.
48:43.4
What's relevant
48:44.2
for me here
48:44.9
is that it reaffirms
48:46.0
all these old images
48:47.0
of Philippine government
48:48.5
and politics,
48:49.2
diba?
48:49.4
It's familial,
48:50.7
it's very personal,
48:52.5
that our divides
48:54.0
are along
48:54.6
ethnic cleavages,
48:56.2
no?
48:56.8
And that,
48:57.8
you know,
48:58.9
the weakness
48:59.3
of the party system,
49:00.4
the lack of it,
49:01.2
no?
49:01.8
The non-existence of it
49:03.0
has not disciplined
49:04.2
our politics.
49:05.1
It has made our politics
49:06.1
ill-disciplined
49:07.2
around all this
49:08.6
parochialism
49:09.5
and personalism.
49:10.8
Yeah,
49:11.2
but if we had
49:12.2
stronger parties,
49:13.6
you know,
49:13.9
we could
49:14.5
see ourselves
49:17.1
be divided along
49:18.0
ideas,
49:18.9
ideology,
49:19.7
platforms,
49:20.3
and programs,
49:21.2
instead of just families.
49:23.2
But I think
49:23.9
a lot of the data
49:25.0
reaffirms
49:25.7
all our own,
49:26.6
you know,
49:28.0
consistent images
49:29.5
of how changeless
49:31.0
Philippine politics
49:31.8
seems to be.
49:32.8
But, you know,
49:33.4
there's hope
49:33.8
in the 29
49:34.6
and the 40 percent
49:35.9
who don't have
49:36.7
a decision yet.
49:37.7
That's a huge number.
49:39.3
Honestly,
49:39.7
I think I'm more optimistic
49:40.8
than you,
49:41.4
cautiously more optimistic
49:42.3
in a sense that
49:43.1
the two surveys
49:44.7
that we discussed today
49:45.8
are two sides
49:47.0
of the picture, right?
49:48.2
One side is the continuity part,
49:50.2
particularly continuity
49:51.4
in terms of appeal
49:52.3
of the Tulfos
49:53.1
and Dutertes
49:54.1
and the whole
49:54.7
macho populist
49:55.9
kind of appeal.
49:57.2
Although,
49:57.7
I think both of us argued
49:58.8
that forget about
49:59.7
differences between
50:00.4
Dutertes and Tulfos.
50:01.3
The Tulfo brothers themselves
50:02.3
are extremely different
50:03.2
from each other, right?
50:04.1
I have interviewed
50:04.6
Merwin and Rafi,
50:06.2
two very different individuals.
50:08.2
I think Rafi
50:09.0
is much more
50:09.6
independent so far.
50:11.3
Let's see with Erwin
50:12.3
if he's going to
50:13.2
hew more towards
50:14.0
the administration
50:14.6
and then Ben Tulfo
50:15.4
is totally
50:15.9
different conversation, right?
50:18.2
But at the same time,
50:19.1
I think the second survey
50:20.0
was very interesting
50:20.7
because almost half
50:22.2
of the voters
50:22.9
were either
50:24.6
independents
50:25.2
or kind of
50:25.8
anti-system or something
50:27.0
which tells you
50:28.1
in theory,
50:29.5
there could be
50:29.9
a third force.
50:30.6
Exactly.
50:31.3
Assuming certain things
50:32.5
are done.
50:33.0
Yeah, yeah.
50:34.0
So at one level,
50:35.0
one could construe
50:36.1
continuity of change
50:38.2
from the picture
50:39.0
that you showed.
50:39.6
Although the data
50:41.4
is not enough
50:42.1
to make solid arguments.
50:43.9
But, you know,
50:44.3
there's always that
50:45.0
us taking ourselves
50:46.4
out of the survey
50:47.2
and looking at
50:47.7
the general trajectory
50:49.0
of Philippine politics.
50:50.1
There is a trajectory
50:51.7
for reform.
50:53.3
There's a strong
50:54.5
sense of continuity
50:55.8
as far as government
50:56.6
and politics are concerned.
50:57.6
But there is always
50:58.4
that, you know,
50:59.9
that element of change
51:01.2
that's happening
51:01.8
and being driven
51:02.7
by young people,
51:03.9
by people who
51:04.8
are progressive,
51:06.0
who align themselves
51:07.1
around ideas.
51:09.6
And, you know,
51:11.9
I believe that,
51:13.0
you know,
51:13.2
democracy and development
51:14.6
can actually happen
51:15.7
if we all work together.
51:17.9
So, you know,
51:18.4
there's always
51:19.0
that movement there.
51:21.1
And, you know,
51:22.7
hopefully that movement
51:24.0
will have more voice
51:25.5
and become more,
51:26.5
you know,
51:28.1
vibrant.
51:29.2
And we hope to see
51:31.0
that, you know,
51:32.4
more survey numbers
51:33.9
in the future
51:34.9
pointing out
51:35.5
to this progressive movement
51:37.4
taking hold
51:38.0
of our politics.
51:39.6
On that note,
51:40.2
thank you very much,
51:41.2
Professor Rai.
51:42.4
As you can see,
51:42.9
I'm a little low-bat here.
51:44.0
I'm a little golfy.
51:45.3
So, perfect
51:46.8
and timely.
51:47.3
I'm a little sleepy.
51:48.9
Sleep is a preparation
51:50.6
for the Senate
51:51.9
for Yanis.
51:52.6
Yeah, I know.
51:54.0
There's so much going on.
51:55.1
I still have to write
51:55.9
a piece on the
51:56.7
Quad Patrols
51:57.7
in West Philippine CNL.
51:59.0
So, thank you so much,
51:60.0
Professor Rai.
52:00.7
This was very helpful data.
52:02.4
And definitely,
52:02.9
I'm going to refer this
52:03.8
to this
52:04.8
in future lectures,
52:06.3
discussions,
52:06.9
and writings.
52:07.7
We hope to have you again
52:08.9
in the future.
52:08.9
Thank you.
52:08.9
Thank you.
52:09.0
Thank you.
52:09.0
Thank you.
52:09.1
Thank you.
52:09.6
In the near future,
52:10.6
as more data,
52:11.6
as more interesting surveys,
52:12.9
as more tightened,
52:14.3
you know,
52:14.6
designed surveys come in
52:16.2
because
52:16.5
I can see you're hedging
52:18.8
a little bit
52:19.4
in a social scientist way.
52:21.9
We don't want to jump
52:23.0
into conclusions.
52:24.4
But, as I said,
52:25.3
at least we have something
52:26.4
to hold on to
52:27.1
before we can make
52:27.9
a conjectural
52:29.5
or more than hopefully
52:30.4
conjectural
52:31.0
political analysis.
52:32.2
Thank you very much,
52:32.9
Professor Ranjit Rai
52:33.7
from OCTA Research
52:34.8
and, of course,
52:35.6
University of the Philippines
52:36.3
Diliman Total Science Department
52:37.5
for joining us.
52:39.6
Thank you, Richard.
52:40.8
And thank you to all those
52:42.1
who watched today's podcast.
52:43.9
Thank you.
52:44.5
God bless and have a good day,
52:45.6
sir.
52:46.3
Thank you.
52:48.0
Okay.
52:51.2
All right, guys.
52:52.0
Thank you so much for that.
52:53.8
I know medyo
52:54.4
dahil sa times on differences,
52:56.2
things are a bit tricky
52:57.7
kasi yung usually
53:00.3
evening time natin
53:01.3
will be like 5 a.m. here.
53:03.0
But I'll try to do that
53:03.8
when we have
53:04.4
Senator Trillianas
53:05.4
later this week
53:06.7
in a day or two.
53:09.6
But stick around
53:10.3
because baka naman
53:11.5
mahatak ko pa yung kasama natin
53:13.0
dito si Lelo
53:13.8
if we're possible
53:14.7
short discussion
53:15.5
kung hindi siya masyadong pagod.
53:16.9
So thank you so much again
53:17.9
for following us.
53:19.8
As I said,
53:20.3
I can see in the comments
53:21.2
may mga tao na
53:21.9
focus pa rin sa Tulfos,
53:23.6
Tulfonatics,
53:24.5
DDS, etc.
53:25.5
But you are forgetting
53:26.8
a very important part
53:27.8
of our discussion
53:28.5
which is the second survey
53:30.0
where it shows that
53:30.8
almost half of
53:31.9
Filipinos
53:33.1
are either
53:33.7
anti-system,
53:34.7
independent,
53:35.9
and a very small part
53:37.1
of course
53:37.5
is hewing towards
53:38.5
the traditional
53:39.4
opposition
53:39.8
which only means that
53:41.0
in theory
53:41.4
there's a huge, huge room
53:42.7
for a third force
53:43.9
if we get our act together.
53:45.9
At ito yung parating
53:46.6
ko sinasabi.
53:47.5
Alright?
53:48.4
Look at the glass
53:49.6
half independent
53:51.2
and unsure
53:53.5
and open to other possibilities.
53:55.3
Hindi lang yung glass
53:56.1
half Duterte,
53:57.1
Marcos,
53:57.9
and all of that.
53:58.6
Pero then again,
54:00.6
I still have to research
54:01.6
sino mo yung mga
54:02.2
1% mga Ilocanos
54:03.9
na pro-Duterte?
54:05.5
Siguro ito yung mga
54:06.3
Ilocanos na nasa Mindanao
54:08.0
na matagal.
54:08.9
So on that note,
54:09.9
thank you very much.
54:10.5
God bless
54:10.9
and talk to you soon.