00:18.8
LV Tawas Trademarks
00:26.0
It Bulaga Trademark at Court of Appeals
00:28.9
It's Showtime It Bulaga Karma
00:31.8
Ngayon mga kabatas natin
00:34.5
wala pa namang official announcement
00:39.1
from the Court of Appeals
00:41.4
or from any of the lawyers
00:43.0
of It Bulaga or TAPE
00:48.6
the case of TVJ and It Bulaga
00:54.3
sa Court of Appeals
00:59.6
of appealing the case
01:07.5
Ito mga kabatas natin
01:10.5
kung sino yung tao ito?
01:15.0
kung sino yung tao nito?
01:19.8
mga kabatas natin ha
01:20.7
This message is especially
01:33.6
sa Court of Appeals
01:39.7
sa Court of Appeals
01:41.0
Ngayon mga kabatas natin
01:51.4
against all of it
01:54.8
there are certain leaks
01:56.1
I have a certain mole
01:58.3
may leaks daw siya
02:01.4
from different parts
02:10.5
may mole tayo dyan
02:12.7
Alam nyo mga kabatas natin
02:13.9
bawal yung mga mole-mole
02:16.0
especially yung mga
02:18.6
hindi po pwede yan
00:00.0
02:58.120 --> 02:59.120
03:02.1
si Rowena Guanzon
03:03.1
kasi mga kabatas natin
03:05.1
alam nyo naman kasi
03:08.1
sa Court of Appeals
03:18.1
nagkakaroon ng mga drafts yan
03:21.1
syempre yung mga drafts na yan
03:23.1
hindi lang naman na
03:24.1
ang nakakakita dyan
03:25.1
ay yung judge alone
03:27.1
syempre pinapakita nyo yan
03:28.0
pinapatype din yan
03:29.0
may mga researchers din sila
03:35.0
Ngayon mga kabatas natin
03:36.0
kapag yung mga desisyon na yun
03:39.0
may violation yun
03:42.0
Pero dito kasi mga kabatas natin
03:44.0
syempre hindi na ah
03:45.0
innocent until proven guilty naman
03:50.0
I think he also knows that
03:53.0
sabi niya galing sa mall daw
03:55.0
alam niya na natalo yung
03:57.0
doon sa trademark na kaso
04:07.0
Sabi ni George T.
04:08.0
I don't think na abogado
04:09.0
yung nagsasalita about salik
04:10.0
dahil ang attorney ay may moral obligations
04:13.0
at di nagsasabi ng kasinungalingan
04:18.0
yan na naman kayo
04:19.0
mapa plus one kayo
04:20.0
buti hindi mo tinuloy
04:22.0
O tuloy natin ito
04:24.0
This is a special report
04:40.0
is a land dispute case
04:43.0
That's what I heard
04:46.0
That is what I heard
04:51.0
Yung ginamit daw ng Divina Law na
04:57.0
land dispute case
04:60.0
Hindi ba pwedeng ganon?
05:02.0
Well if you are talking only about principles
05:07.0
principles or specific principles
05:10.0
So like for example
05:12.0
construction of the law
05:15.0
Okay eh due process
05:17.0
You can use a land case
05:19.0
Wala namang problema
05:20.0
Titignan naman kasi talaga
05:22.0
kung ano yung issue
05:25.0
Hindi naman kailangan
05:34.0
Kunwari copyright infringement
05:36.0
Dapat yung mga kaso
05:37.0
na gagamitin mo dun
05:38.0
copyright infringement din
05:41.0
the pronouncement of the
05:45.0
Pag hindi siya relevant
05:50.0
Gonzaga versus ah
05:56.0
to the intervenors there
05:59.0
Who is the enemy of ah
06:04.0
that was a land dispute case
06:05.0
Land dispute case po yun
06:09.0
Hindi siya intellectual property
06:11.0
You see an intellectual property
06:13.0
It has copyright and trademark
06:15.0
and that two do not mix
06:17.0
In some countries
06:22.0
in a lot of countries abroad
06:24.0
the ones handling trademark
06:25.0
and the ones handling copyright
06:26.0
is a separate agency
06:27.0
Like for instance
06:28.0
We have let's say
06:51.0
Kasi tulad nga lang sinabi ko sa inyo, mga kabatas natin, you can apply for trademark naman sa mga bagay na intellectual property mo or copyrightable material.
07:04.6
Pero yun, in some countries yun eh, hindi dito sa Pilipinas yun eh.
07:09.0
In ano ko na ho, yung ating live stream kanina, naibalik ko na, tapos yung kasi na-delete ko, buti na lang merong kopya dito sa EVMAX.
07:30.0
Ngayon, tinanggal ko lang yung mga ilang dead air.
07:34.3
Nilinis ko lang doon sa after ko yung nagpapalit-palit ako ng mga.
07:39.0
Ano, mga ipipresent, especially doon sa Supreme Court decision tungkol sa disbarment.
07:47.2
Tinanggal ko lang yung dead air doon.
07:49.2
Anyway, tuloy natin ito.
07:51.3
Makaw, ang dami-daming shows every evening, some of them would claim copyright.
07:56.0
Ipafile talaga nila or some TV shows would really file something like in Las Vegas.
08:01.5
So copyright would be like, dagsaan ang papers ng copyright.
08:05.6
Whereas trademark, hindi masyado.
08:07.6
Kasi trademark is a word.
08:09.0
So they are different.
08:10.2
So you cannot compare, you cannot compare.
08:15.0
Hindi, trademark, hindi naman necessarily word lang yun eh.
08:20.0
Kasi nga, mark, para yung itbolaga logo, naka-trademark yun.
08:24.6
Yung Nike logo, naka-trademark yun.
08:27.2
Yung Coca-Cola, naka-trademark yun.
08:30.3
Yung Coca-Cola, word.
08:31.4
Pero yung Nike logo, word ba yun?
08:34.7
Naka-trademark din yun.
08:39.0
So pwede, pwede, pwedeng ano.
08:42.0
Kasi yung Nike na logo, walang word doon.
08:49.9
Ngayon, hindi ba pwedeng, ano yun?
08:58.6
Pumasok sa copyright infringement when in fact it is also a creation?
09:09.0
O pati yung Adidas.
09:10.2
Yung Adidas, diba yung logo niya, yung gano'n, tapos may gano'n sa taas.
09:18.5
Ang sinasabi ng Divina Law na dapat mananalo sila is because a land dispute case is not intellectual property.
09:28.7
A land dispute case is something that has something to do with something tangible.
09:33.7
So the arguments are homogenous o isa't isa yung arguments.
09:45.5
Kasi nahahawakan mo yung lupa.
09:48.3
Pati rin naman logo pag ginawa mo, diba?
09:50.7
Nagiging tangible na siya.
09:56.9
Ayan, Apple Attorney logo lang.
10:00.9
Produkto din yun ng isang copyrightable material.
10:03.9
Sa intellectual property, yung ginawa ni John Stagra,
10:08.0
kinuha niya yung trademark at tinalo niya yung isang copyright case which has nothing to do with trademarks
10:16.8
and said that in order to complete his judgment, he will cite a civil code as you have said, diba?
10:25.2
I haven't seen the document.
10:27.4
That's why I will...
10:29.3
Yan yun ang problema dun eh. I haven't seen the document din eh.
10:34.7
Pag printed na, tangible na.
10:39.2
I will tell you that I am truthful, no? I am truthful and that they're...
10:43.1
Trust me, bro pala eh. Trust me, bro.
10:45.9
There is no leakage as far as MG Soriano Trading Inc. concerned, Eric Mediorente and Harold Bontano, no?
10:53.6
In case they file a case against those corporation, they will have to deal with me.
10:59.0
Kasi I haven't seen that but I know because through my moles.
11:04.7
Yung marami siyang moles eh.
11:07.9
Noonal. Marami siyang noonal.
11:10.2
There is a leakage. Just like them, diba? May leakage kayo. So, subjudice kayo.
11:15.9
Mark Gamboa, you are subjudice and Atty. Brennan...
11:19.2
Subjudice o subjudice eh? Ewan ko.
11:23.1
Kasi harba-tera law eh, sabi niya eh.
11:27.5
Because you'll be discussing things of this case which can only come from Atty. Buko.
11:35.1
Galing daw kay Atty. Buko yung mga dinidiscuss nila.
11:37.9
Nila na mga information.
11:41.8
Well, mga kabatas natin, ito yung gusto kong ipaliwanag sa inyo, no?
11:44.8
Hindi naman automatic.
11:48.1
Kasi may maraming tao, alam nyo naman, tinitwist nila yung batas.
11:51.2
Some lawyers also do that just to further the interest.
11:54.1
Na kapag diniscuss ng isang tao, ang abogado man o hindi,
12:00.2
ang isang kaso, it's already subjudice.
12:04.1
Okay? May requirements yun.
12:05.9
Ang requirements niya, yun nga.
12:07.9
May i-impluensyahan yung outcome ng kaso.
12:12.6
Nagkakaroon ng public trial.
12:15.1
If you just discuss the case, like for example, its existence.
12:22.2
Lagi nating nakikita sa newspaper.
12:28.8
Pag may nag-file, sasabihin kung ano ang dahilan kung bakit sila nag-file.
12:34.1
Kung hindi mo naman sasabihin na parang dapat ganito, dapat ganyan.
12:37.9
And you will not deal with the merits of the case.
12:40.9
Hindi naman sa subjudice.
12:45.5
So anyway, let us go back to our argument.
12:47.9
Our argument is that talo na talaga si TBJ.
12:50.9
Dahil ginamit nila ang AS Defense, ang isang land dispute case.
13:00.9
I don't think parang matatalo ka dahil sa pag-sight mo ng isang kaso.
13:07.8
Ibig kong sabihin, ano mga kabatas natin, for example, hindi nga tama, let's give him the benefit of the doubt.
13:17.3
For example nga, nag-sight ka ng isang kaso na hindi tama or in other words, irrelevant.
13:24.6
Nag-sight ka ng isang kaso na irrelevant.
13:28.1
Will that cost you the case?
13:29.8
Will that cost you the case?
13:31.6
It will not cost you the case.
13:32.9
Kasi nga, mga kabatas natin, syempre, yung judge din.
13:36.6
Hindi lang naman yung kaso na yun ang titignan niya.
13:39.5
Hindi naman sa isang kaso, kapag nag-sight ka ng isang...
13:43.3
Sa ano, sa pleadings mo, kapag nag-sight ka ng isang kaso, tapos may maling isang kaso, makukuryente ka doon at madidismiss na yung kaso mo doon.
13:50.8
Ang mangyayari dyan, mga kabatas natin, no,
13:54.5
o hindi lang bibigyan ng weight
13:57.0
yung sinight mo na kaso yun.
14:00.8
Yung sinight mo na kaso na yun, hindi lang bibigyan ng weight, gano'n lang yung mangyayari doon.
14:04.2
It does not mean that if you...
14:06.6
affected that case or a wrong case,
14:09.0
immediately, it will cause
14:12.4
the... ano, the...
14:18.6
It has no bearing in intellectual property.
14:20.8
Kasi, you know, when you lie, pag nagsisin...
14:22.9
Yun, kung meron kang... kung wala naman
14:24.6
bearing talaga, it will just be
14:28.0
I don't think hindi rin yun yung magiging dahilan.
14:32.2
It has no weight.
14:33.7
So, hindi maapektuhan yung
14:36.6
Tungkol doon sa sinight mo na kaso
14:38.4
if it is... it has no bearing.
14:42.8
Which has no bearing in intellectual property.
14:45.5
Kasi, you know, when you lie,
14:46.9
pag nagsisinungaling ka po,
14:48.2
nagiging mahirap... mahirap
14:50.5
mag-defend ng sarili mo.
14:52.5
Pag nagsisinungaling ka, kasi...
14:54.6
Well, doon, nag-react ko sa kanya.
14:56.2
Kapag nagsisinungaling ka, mahirap mo talaga i-defend yung sarili mo.
15:01.3
So, pag nagsisinungaling ka,
15:02.9
hindi mo patagpo-tagpo.
15:04.7
Ngayon, si Judge Tagra nagsabi na, sige,
15:06.4
because of a civil code,
15:08.1
or because of a law dispute,
15:09.7
ipapanaluhinin namin si TVJ.
15:11.7
It is not consistent to international law.
15:13.8
And the Philippines is a signature...
15:15.9
is a signatory to international law.
15:19.2
Atong international law yun?
15:24.2
Tapos na ang laban.
15:25.2
Bugto na ang liog ng manok.
15:28.2
Atty. Buko, Divina Law,
15:33.9
Mark Modos of Manila,
15:39.8
antayin nyo na lang yung bisisyon ng Judge Court of Appeals.
15:44.1
But you have no way already of going out of this.
15:47.1
Tapos na ang laban at talo na kayo.
15:52.8
Lumalabas lang kasi ito.
15:54.0
So, I need to talk about this.
15:58.5
April 15, ngayon din lang lumabas mga kabatas natin.
16:04.5
Na-share lang sa akin.
16:05.9
Ang lumabas sa feed ko.
16:07.9
I need to talk about this.
16:13.2
Because it concerns, syempre, the court din.
16:16.2
Syempre, hindi rin naman ganun yung court dyan.
16:21.3
kung may masamang tao talaga doon na naglalabas,
16:23.8
na moldaw, na naglalabas ng mga disisyon,
16:26.4
it's inappropriate.
16:27.9
And pwede kang makasuhan dyan.
16:31.4
wala siyang source.
16:35.9
na-trust me, bro.
16:37.0
Ay, mold pala yung source niya.
16:39.5
hindi natin pagkakatiwalaan masyado yun.
16:42.3
Maraming salamat mga kabatas natin.
16:43.7
Syempre, tulad na lang yung sinasabi.
16:45.3
Matulog po tayo ng mahimbing.
16:46.5
Dahil alam natin,
16:47.2
na yung natutulog ng mahimbing,
16:48.4
siya yung laging panalo.
