Close
 


TVJ TALO SA COURT OF APPEALS SA EAT BULAGA CASE?
Hide Subtitles
Click any subtitle word to view Tagalog.com dictionary results.
Computer Shortcuts: Left / Right arrows to jump 2 seconds back or forward. +Enter or Space to toggle Play/Pause button. Full Screen Mode
TVJ TALO SA COURT OF APPEALS SA EAT BULAGA CASE? Eto po bagong FB natin para sa videos: https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100089533736096 https://www.facebook.com/Atty-Ranny-Randolf-B-Libayan-154012243457531 Alternate YT channel po for livestreams: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCskZGSV52krMvXgb8OXXx1g WEBSITE: https://batasnatin.com/ LAW FIRM: https://firm.batasnatin.com/ FACEBOOK PAGE: https://www.facebook.com/BATASnatin/ INSTAGRAM: https://www.instagram.com/batasnatin/ YOUTUBE CHANNEL: https://youtube.com/BATASnatinLive TWITTER: https://twitter.com/BATASnatin LAWYERS: Atty. Kristina Louise Magalong Atty. Ranny Randolf B. Libayan FIRM ADDRESS: #31 Gen. Luna St., Tuktukan, Taguig City, NCR (Across Taguig City Hall) Email: BATASnatin@gmail.com Telephone nos: +63915-954-6080 (+632)359-4203 We are a full-service Law Firm We handle and are experienced in litigating many kinds of cases. Please do not hesitate to contact us. We will be happy to assist you with all your legal needs. #AttyLiba
BATASnatin
  Mute  
Run time: 16:51
Has AI Subtitles



Video Transcript / Subtitles:( AI generated. About AI subtitles » )
00:00.0
Hello mga kabatas natin at welcome
00:01.7
sa isa namang live stream
00:04.3
Mga kabatas natin
00:05.6
hindi ko alam kung totoo to
00:08.7
kasi nga
00:10.5
pag nakita nyo yung title nito
00:13.3
na ito ay galing sa
00:14.4
Harvatera Law
00:15.6
Archwell
00:18.8
LV Tawas Trademarks
00:20.7
Ang title nito
00:24.0
TVJ Loses
00:26.0
It Bulaga Trademark at Court of Appeals
00:28.9
It's Showtime It Bulaga Karma
00:31.8
Ngayon mga kabatas natin
00:34.5
wala pa namang official announcement
00:39.1
from the Court of Appeals
00:41.4
or from any of the lawyers
00:43.0
of It Bulaga or TAPE
00:45.8
in relation to
00:48.6
the case of TVJ and It Bulaga
00:54.3
sa Court of Appeals
00:55.5
but we all know
00:56.9
na they have
00:58.9
the intention
00:59.6
of appealing the case
01:01.0
and I think
01:03.2
of course
01:04.5
they appealed it
01:05.8
diba?
01:07.5
Ito mga kabatas natin
01:09.0
kilala nyo ba
01:10.5
kung sino yung tao ito?
01:14.1
Kilala nyo ba
01:15.0
kung sino yung tao nito?
01:16.0
Abogado ba siya?
01:18.9
Panuorin natin
01:19.8
mga kabatas natin ha
01:20.7
This message is especially
01:22.4
for Mark Gamboa
01:24.0
and
01:25.2
Atty. Bueno
01:26.9
Okay?
01:28.3
Now
01:28.9
talo na
01:30.0
ang idol nyo
01:31.0
na si
01:32.0
TVJ
01:33.6
sa Court of Appeals
01:35.1
kasi
01:35.6
talo na daw
01:37.5
yung TVJ
01:39.7
sa Court of Appeals
01:41.0
Ngayon mga kabatas natin
01:44.5
bakit daw?
01:49.2
Alam mo
01:49.8
ang defense nila
01:51.4
against all of it
01:53.0
as I have known
01:54.0
from my leaks
01:54.8
there are certain leaks
01:56.1
I have a certain mole
01:57.4
from
01:58.3
may leaks daw siya
02:00.1
may mole siya
02:01.0
from
02:01.4
from different parts
02:03.7
of this
02:04.4
city
02:05.8
and also
02:07.2
even in the
02:08.5
Court of Appeals
02:10.5
may mole tayo dyan
02:12.0
Now
02:12.7
Alam nyo mga kabatas natin
02:13.9
bawal yung mga mole-mole
02:15.2
na ganyan ha
02:16.0
especially yung mga
02:17.1
nagli-leak
02:17.6
ng mga decisions
02:18.6
hindi po pwede yan
02:20.6
no?
02:21.8
Illegal yan
02:22.5
illegal yan
02:23.2
Alam nyo
02:24.2
yung nangyari
02:25.6
kay
02:26.3
ah
02:26.8
ah
02:27.3
ah
02:28.1
00:00.0
02:58.120 --> 02:59.120
02:59.1
si ano
03:00.1
Rowena Guanzon
03:01.1
yun
03:02.1
si Rowena Guanzon
03:03.1
kasi mga kabatas natin
03:05.1
alam nyo naman kasi
03:06.1
dito sa ano
03:07.1
sa Korte
03:08.1
sa Court of Appeals
03:09.1
sa RTC
03:10.1
o kahit anumang
03:11.1
ah
03:12.1
tribunal
03:13.1
na
03:14.1
gumagawa
03:15.1
ng
03:16.1
mga desisyon
03:17.1
eh
03:18.1
nagkakaroon ng mga drafts yan
03:20.1
tapos
03:21.1
syempre yung mga drafts na yan
03:22.1
hindi man
03:23.1
hindi lang naman na
03:24.1
ang nakakakita dyan
03:25.1
ay yung judge alone
03:26.1
kasi nga
03:27.1
syempre pinapakita nyo yan
03:28.0
pinapatype din yan
03:29.0
may mga researchers din sila
03:31.0
na gumagawa
03:32.0
ng mga desisyon
03:34.0
diba?
03:35.0
Ngayon mga kabatas natin
03:36.0
kapag yung mga desisyon na yun
03:38.0
nilalabas
03:39.0
may violation yun
03:41.0
okay?
03:42.0
Pero dito kasi mga kabatas natin
03:44.0
syempre hindi na ah
03:45.0
innocent until proven guilty naman
03:48.0
kung
03:49.0
abogado siya
03:50.0
I think he also knows that
03:51.0
diba?
03:52.0
Pero ito nga
03:53.0
sabi niya galing sa mall daw
03:55.0
alam niya na natalo yung
03:56.0
itbulaga
03:57.0
doon sa trademark na kaso
04:02.0
Bakit?
04:03.0
Bakit?
04:07.0
Sabi ni George T.
04:08.0
I don't think na abogado
04:09.0
yung nagsasalita about salik
04:10.0
dahil ang attorney ay may moral obligations
04:13.0
at di nagsasabi ng kasinungalingan
04:15.0
except kay
04:17.0
Hay nako
04:18.0
yan na naman kayo
04:19.0
mapa plus one kayo
04:20.0
buti hindi mo tinuloy
04:22.0
O tuloy natin ito
04:24.0
This is a special report
04:25.0
to tell
04:26.0
ah
04:27.0
Mark Gamboa
04:28.0
and ah
04:31.0
Atty. Bueno
04:32.0
no?
04:33.0
Yung ginamit
04:34.0
ng Divina Law
04:35.0
na defense
04:36.0
against ah
04:37.0
against ah
04:38.0
Tape Inc. no?
04:40.0
is a land dispute case
04:42.0
ha?
04:43.0
That's what I heard
04:44.0
from spouse
04:45.0
Ito eh
04:46.0
That is what I heard
04:48.0
sabi niya
04:51.0
Yung ginamit daw ng Divina Law na
04:53.0
decision
04:54.0
eh
04:55.0
galing sa isang
04:57.0
land dispute case
04:60.0
Hindi ba pwedeng ganon?
05:02.0
Well if you are talking only about principles
05:04.0
like for example
05:05.0
ah
05:07.0
principles or specific principles
05:09.0
of the law
05:10.0
So like for example
05:12.0
construction of the law
05:13.0
Diba?
05:15.0
Okay eh due process
05:17.0
You can use a land case
05:19.0
Wala namang problema
05:20.0
Titignan naman kasi talaga
05:22.0
kung ano yung issue
05:23.0
Okay?
05:24.0
Diba?
05:25.0
Hindi naman kailangan
05:26.0
na kapag ah
05:27.0
merong kang ah
05:28.0
ano
05:29.0
ah
05:30.0
merong kang ah
05:32.0
kaso
05:34.0
Kunwari copyright infringement
05:36.0
Dapat yung mga kaso
05:37.0
na gagamitin mo dun
05:38.0
copyright infringement din
05:40.0
As long as
05:41.0
the pronouncement of the
05:42.0
Supreme Court
05:43.0
is relevant
05:44.0
pwede yun
05:45.0
Pag hindi siya relevant
05:46.0
yun ang problema
05:47.0
Okay?
05:48.0
Outlawin natin
05:49.0
Process ah
05:50.0
Gonzaga versus ah
05:52.0
Court of Appeals
05:53.0
eventually
05:54.0
the 90,000
05:55.0
was indeed given
05:56.0
to the intervenors there
05:58.0
No?
05:59.0
Who is the enemy of ah
06:01.0
Gonzaga couple
06:02.0
But you see
06:03.0
in that case
06:04.0
that was a land dispute case
06:05.0
Land dispute case po yun
06:07.0
Atordi po eh no
06:08.0
Hindi siya
06:09.0
Hindi siya intellectual property
06:11.0
You see an intellectual property
06:12.0
has two facets
06:13.0
It has copyright and trademark
06:15.0
and that two do not mix
06:17.0
In some countries
06:18.0
ah
06:19.0
Yun
06:20.0
Meron daw
06:21.0
ah
06:22.0
in a lot of countries abroad
06:24.0
the ones handling trademark
06:25.0
and the ones handling copyright
06:26.0
is a separate agency
06:27.0
Like for instance
06:28.0
We have let's say
06:29.0
Macao
06:30.0
Kasi tulad ng
06:31.0
ito yung
06:32.0
Ang ito yung
06:33.0
Pababas
06:34.0
ito yung
06:35.0
Pababas
06:36.0
Kinabu-kita
06:37.0
Ito yung
06:38.0
Ito yung
06:39.0
Pababas
06:40.0
Ito yung
06:41.0
Kanipa
06:42.0
Ito yung
06:43.0
Pababas
06:44.0
Ito yung
06:45.0
Kanipa
06:46.0
Ito yung
06:47.0
Ito yung
06:48.0
Pababas
06:49.0
At meron
06:50.0
kanipa
06:51.0
Kasi tulad nga lang sinabi ko sa inyo, mga kabatas natin, you can apply for trademark naman sa mga bagay na intellectual property mo or copyrightable material.
07:04.6
Pero yun, in some countries yun eh, hindi dito sa Pilipinas yun eh.
07:09.0
In ano ko na ho, yung ating live stream kanina, naibalik ko na, tapos yung kasi na-delete ko, buti na lang merong kopya dito sa EVMAX.
07:30.0
Ngayon, tinanggal ko lang yung mga ilang dead air.
07:34.3
Nilinis ko lang doon sa after ko yung nagpapalit-palit ako ng mga.
07:39.0
Ano, mga ipipresent, especially doon sa Supreme Court decision tungkol sa disbarment.
07:47.2
Tinanggal ko lang yung dead air doon.
07:49.2
Anyway, tuloy natin ito.
07:51.3
Makaw, ang dami-daming shows every evening, some of them would claim copyright.
07:56.0
Ipafile talaga nila or some TV shows would really file something like in Las Vegas.
08:01.5
So copyright would be like, dagsaan ang papers ng copyright.
08:05.6
Whereas trademark, hindi masyado.
08:07.6
Kasi trademark is a word.
08:09.0
So they are different.
08:10.2
So you cannot compare, you cannot compare.
08:15.0
Hindi, trademark, hindi naman necessarily word lang yun eh.
08:20.0
Kasi nga, mark, para yung itbolaga logo, naka-trademark yun.
08:24.6
Yung Nike logo, naka-trademark yun.
08:27.2
Yung Coca-Cola, naka-trademark yun.
08:30.3
Yung Coca-Cola, word.
08:31.4
Pero yung Nike logo, word ba yun?
08:34.7
Naka-trademark din yun.
08:37.0
Diba?
08:39.0
So pwede, pwede, pwedeng ano.
08:42.0
Kasi yung Nike na logo, walang word doon.
08:46.5
Diba?
08:47.1
Checkmark lang.
08:49.9
Ngayon, hindi ba pwedeng, ano yun?
08:58.6
Pumasok sa copyright infringement when in fact it is also a creation?
09:07.7
Diba?
09:09.0
O pati yung Adidas.
09:10.2
Yung Adidas, diba yung logo niya, yung gano'n, tapos may gano'n sa taas.
09:18.5
Ang sinasabi ng Divina Law na dapat mananalo sila is because a land dispute case is not intellectual property.
09:28.7
A land dispute case is something that has something to do with something tangible.
09:33.7
So the arguments are homogenous o isa't isa yung arguments.
09:39.0
Tangible.
09:45.5
Kasi nahahawakan mo yung lupa.
09:48.3
Pati rin naman logo pag ginawa mo, diba?
09:50.7
Nagiging tangible na siya.
09:56.9
Ayan, Apple Attorney logo lang.
09:59.2
Oo nga.
10:00.9
Produkto din yun ng isang copyrightable material.
10:03.9
Sa intellectual property, yung ginawa ni John Stagra,
10:08.0
kinuha niya yung trademark at tinalo niya yung isang copyright case which has nothing to do with trademarks
10:16.8
and said that in order to complete his judgment, he will cite a civil code as you have said, diba?
10:25.2
I haven't seen the document.
10:27.4
That's why I will...
10:29.3
Yan yun ang problema dun eh. I haven't seen the document din eh.
10:34.7
Pag printed na, tangible na.
10:38.0
Oo.
10:39.2
I will tell you that I am truthful, no? I am truthful and that they're...
10:43.1
Trust me, bro pala eh. Trust me, bro.
10:45.9
There is no leakage as far as MG Soriano Trading Inc. concerned, Eric Mediorente and Harold Bontano, no?
10:53.6
In case they file a case against those corporation, they will have to deal with me.
10:59.0
Kasi I haven't seen that but I know because through my moles.
11:04.1
So...
11:04.7
Yung marami siyang moles eh.
11:07.7
Noon.
11:07.9
Noonal. Marami siyang noonal.
11:10.2
There is a leakage. Just like them, diba? May leakage kayo. So, subjudice kayo.
11:15.9
Mark Gamboa, you are subjudice and Atty. Brennan...
11:19.2
Subjudice o subjudice eh? Ewan ko.
11:23.1
Kasi harba-tera law eh, sabi niya eh.
11:27.5
Because you'll be discussing things of this case which can only come from Atty. Buko.
11:32.8
Yung sa akin...
11:33.5
Ayun.
11:35.1
Galing daw kay Atty. Buko yung mga dinidiscuss nila.
11:37.9
Nila na mga information.
11:41.8
Well, mga kabatas natin, ito yung gusto kong ipaliwanag sa inyo, no?
11:44.8
Hindi naman automatic.
11:48.1
Kasi may maraming tao, alam nyo naman, tinitwist nila yung batas.
11:51.2
Some lawyers also do that just to further the interest.
11:54.1
Na kapag diniscuss ng isang tao, ang abogado man o hindi,
12:00.2
ang isang kaso, it's already subjudice.
12:03.1
No.
12:04.1
Okay? May requirements yun.
12:05.9
Ang requirements niya, yun nga.
12:07.9
May i-impluensyahan yung outcome ng kaso.
12:11.4
Di ba?
12:12.6
Nagkakaroon ng public trial.
12:15.1
If you just discuss the case, like for example, its existence.
12:19.4
Di ba?
12:19.7
O kaya yung...
12:22.2
Lagi nating nakikita sa newspaper.
12:28.8
Pag may nag-file, sasabihin kung ano ang dahilan kung bakit sila nag-file.
12:34.1
Kung hindi mo naman sasabihin na parang dapat ganito, dapat ganyan.
12:37.9
And you will not deal with the merits of the case.
12:40.9
Hindi naman sa subjudice.
12:42.4
Okay?
12:43.5
Tunoy natin.
12:44.4
Ibang case.
12:45.5
So anyway, let us go back to our argument.
12:47.9
Our argument is that talo na talaga si TBJ.
12:50.9
Dahil ginamit nila ang AS Defense, ang isang land dispute case.
12:55.5
Which...
12:56.4
I don't...
13:00.9
I don't think parang matatalo ka dahil sa pag-sight mo ng isang kaso.
13:06.6
So...
13:07.0
Eh...
13:07.8
Ibig kong sabihin, ano mga kabatas natin, for example, hindi nga tama, let's give him the benefit of the doubt.
13:17.3
For example nga, nag-sight ka ng isang kaso na hindi tama or in other words, irrelevant.
13:24.2
Di ba?
13:24.6
Nag-sight ka ng isang kaso na irrelevant.
13:28.1
Will that cost you the case?
13:29.8
Will that cost you the case?
13:30.9
It will not.
13:31.6
It will not cost you the case.
13:32.9
Kasi nga, mga kabatas natin, syempre, yung judge din.
13:36.6
Hindi lang naman yung kaso na yun ang titignan niya.
13:39.5
Hindi naman sa isang kaso, kapag nag-sight ka ng isang...
13:42.9
Ay, sa...
13:43.3
Sa ano, sa pleadings mo, kapag nag-sight ka ng isang kaso, tapos may maling isang kaso, makukuryente ka doon at madidismiss na yung kaso mo doon.
13:50.0
Hindi.
13:50.8
Ang mangyayari dyan, mga kabatas natin, no,
13:53.2
i-disregard lang
13:54.5
o hindi lang bibigyan ng weight
13:57.0
yung sinight mo na kaso yun.
14:00.8
Yung sinight mo na kaso na yun, hindi lang bibigyan ng weight, gano'n lang yung mangyayari doon.
14:04.2
It does not mean that if you...
14:06.6
affected that case or a wrong case,
14:09.0
immediately, it will cause
14:10.5
the...
14:12.4
the... ano, the...
14:14.4
defeat or loss
14:16.6
in a case, okay?
14:18.6
It has no bearing in intellectual property.
14:20.8
Kasi, you know, when you lie, pag nagsisin...
14:22.9
Yun, kung meron kang... kung wala naman
14:24.6
bearing talaga, it will just be
14:26.1
disregarded.
14:28.0
I don't think hindi rin yun yung magiging dahilan.
14:32.2
It has no weight.
14:33.7
So, hindi maapektuhan yung
14:35.3
disisyon.
14:36.6
Tungkol doon sa sinight mo na kaso
14:38.4
if it is... it has no bearing.
14:41.2
Diba?
14:42.8
Which has no bearing in intellectual property.
14:45.5
Kasi, you know, when you lie,
14:46.9
pag nagsisinungaling ka po,
14:48.2
nagiging mahirap... mahirap
14:50.5
mag-defend ng sarili mo.
14:52.5
Pag nagsisinungaling ka, kasi...
14:54.6
Well, doon, nag-react ko sa kanya.
14:56.2
Kapag nagsisinungaling ka, mahirap mo talaga i-defend yung sarili mo.
14:59.9
No?
15:00.8
No.
15:01.3
So, pag nagsisinungaling ka,
15:02.9
hindi mo patagpo-tagpo.
15:04.7
Ngayon, si Judge Tagra nagsabi na, sige,
15:06.4
because of a civil code,
15:08.1
or because of a law dispute,
15:09.7
ipapanaluhinin namin si TVJ.
15:11.7
It is not consistent to international law.
15:13.8
And the Philippines is a signature...
15:15.9
is a signatory to international law.
15:18.7
That's why...
15:19.2
Atong international law yun?
15:23.0
Wala na.
15:24.2
Tapos na ang laban.
15:25.2
Bugto na ang liog ng manok.
15:27.0
Joel Croma,
15:28.2
Atty. Buko, Divina Law,
15:33.9
Mark Modos of Manila,
15:36.4
and Atty. Bueno,
15:39.8
antayin nyo na lang yung bisisyon ng Judge Court of Appeals.
15:44.1
But you have no way already of going out of this.
15:47.1
Tapos na ang laban at talo na kayo.
15:50.5
Ngayon.
15:52.8
Lumalabas lang kasi ito.
15:54.0
So, I need to talk about this.
15:58.5
April 15, ngayon din lang lumabas mga kabatas natin.
16:02.1
And, yun.
16:04.5
Na-share lang sa akin.
16:05.9
Ang lumabas sa feed ko.
16:07.9
I need to talk about this.
16:13.2
Because it concerns, syempre, the court din.
16:16.2
Syempre, hindi rin naman ganun yung court dyan.
16:18.3
Na parang...
16:19.4
O kaya, siguro,
16:21.3
kung may masamang tao talaga doon na naglalabas,
16:23.8
na moldaw, na naglalabas ng mga disisyon,
16:26.4
it's inappropriate.
16:27.9
And pwede kang makasuhan dyan.
16:29.8
Ngayon, ito rin,
16:31.4
wala siyang source.
16:32.3
Diba?
16:32.5
Diba?
16:35.2
Sabi niya lang,
16:35.9
na-trust me, bro.
16:37.0
Ay, mold pala yung source niya.
16:38.4
So, doon palang,
16:39.5
hindi natin pagkakatiwalaan masyado yun.
16:41.9
Alright?
16:42.3
Maraming salamat mga kabatas natin.
16:43.7
Syempre, tulad na lang yung sinasabi.
16:45.3
Matulog po tayo ng mahimbing.
16:46.5
Dahil alam natin,
16:47.2
na yung natutulog ng mahimbing,
16:48.4
siya yung laging panalo.
16:49.7
Paalam po.