ALVAREZ VS. ANO, SEDITION, REBELLION, COUP DE ETAT
* AI ("Artificial Intelligence") subtitles on Tagalog.com are generated using "Whisper" by OpenAI (the same company that created ChatGPT and DallE2). Results and accuracy may vary.
* The subtitles do include errors occasionally and should only be used as a tool to help with your listening practice.
* You can request this website to create a transcript for a video if one doesn't already exist by clicking the "Request AI Subtitles" button below a video. Transcribing usually takes 30-40% of the length of a video to complete if there are no other videos in
the queue. For example, a 21 minute video will take 7-8 minutes to transcribe.
* Running a super fast cloud GPU server to do these transcriptions does cost money. If you have the desire and financial ability, consider
becoming a patron
to support these video transcriptions, and the other tools and apps built by Tagalog.com
00:00.0
Right, yan! Magandang araw mga kabatas natin at welcome sa isa namang live stream.
00:05.2
Mga kabatas natin, ito yung mga basic na think before you click.
00:11.7
Ito yung kay Anyo at si Alvarez mga kabatas natin dito sa inquire.net.
00:18.0
Sabi Anyo, says Alvarez, says Marcos, support withdrawal plea illegal, seditious, sabi niya.
00:23.6
Yung ano niya mga kabatas natin, yung kanyang description.
00:31.5
National Security Advisor Eduardo Año says Davao Del Norte Representative Pantalion Alvarez's call urging the armed forces to withdraw support from President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. is illegal and unconstitutional and seditious.
00:53.6
That's the problem with fanaticism.
00:57.5
That's the problem kung ikaw gusto mong lumaban ng todong-todo para sa isang tao.
01:05.1
Pero ang pinaglalaban mo na ay hindi na ayon sa batas natin.
01:17.8
Papanoorin natin ito sa INQ today.
01:23.6
Eduardo Año says Davao Del Norte Representative Pantalion Alvarez's call urging the armed forces to withdraw support from President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. is illegal, unconstitutional, and seditious.
01:37.3
Ito ang unang tanong dyan.
01:39.4
Itong sinabi ba ni Anyo, National Security Advisor Eduardo Año, sinabi niya na yung statement
01:50.1
nitong si Davao Del Norte Representative Pantalion Alvarez.
01:53.6
Davao Del Norte Representative Pantalion Alvarez ay seditious.
02:00.5
Sedition, mga kabatas natin, is a crime.
02:03.5
Ngayon, mga kabatas natin, if you impute a crime against a person, that's libel, right?
02:12.6
If you use information and communication technology, that's cyber libel.
02:20.2
Dapat ba siya makasuhan?
02:22.1
Alam niyo kasi, it's very basic.
02:23.6
Sa mga tao na, oh, nag-impute siya ng crime.
02:27.9
And it's very basic din sa mga tulfonatics, no?
02:30.7
And, of course, di ang palaya na, oh, ganito, crime, ah, kaso yan, kaso yan.
02:36.2
They don't even think about actual malice at all.
02:43.4
You should think about actual malice also.
02:47.2
Malisioso ba yung pagkakasabi mo nun?
02:53.6
If you are rendering an opinion as a person who teaches law
03:05.0
or as a national security advisor,
03:11.5
baka naman walang actual malice.
03:20.2
Ano ba yung actual malice?
03:21.5
Disregard of the truth.
03:28.4
Dinidisregard mo yung truth.
03:31.8
Ngayon, mga kabatas natin, pwede ba siyang mag-comment ng ganun?
03:39.4
Especially pag hiningi yung comment niya.
03:41.9
And everybody knows naman, it's already given that if lawyers give cases,
03:48.7
give, give, give, ah,
03:50.2
anong tawag dyan?
03:51.8
Their opinions in relation to, to facts or hypothetical scenarios,
03:58.5
mga kabatas natin,
03:59.5
it is always given that you are innocent until proven guilty.
04:05.6
Kasi ang tanong dyan, anong pwedeng maging kaso dyan eh?
04:13.8
Kaya ano bang tanong?
04:16.4
Anong pwedeng maging kaso dito, attorney?
04:18.5
Pwedeng bigamy, pwedeng concubinage.
04:30.5
Because it's academic discussion.
04:33.6
It's an academic discussion.
04:36.3
O dito, playbill.
04:40.5
O syempre, pag-aaralan mo kung ano yung mga pwedeng may kaso,
04:44.1
ginagawa rin naman sa Rafi Tulfo yung action yan, diba?
04:46.4
Si Rafi Tulfo nga, sasabihin niya pa,
04:48.2
mga sobrang guilty.
04:50.7
Dito nga, they're not talking about being guilty.
04:54.7
They're talking about possible crimes.
04:59.4
In his statement,
05:00.3
Ano criticizes the remarks and actions of Alvarez,
05:04.0
And it's a criticism in relation to the remarks.
05:10.7
Is that malicious if you respond
05:13.3
to a particular stimuli or stimulus?
05:18.2
Is that malicious if you respond to a particular stimuli or stimulus?
05:23.2
Malicious ba yun?
05:25.5
E paano kung yun talaga yung reaction mo?
05:27.7
E paano kung yun talaga yung reaction mo?
05:28.9
If it's a malicious reaction,
05:29.6
it can be reservist with a rank of colonel.
05:32.2
Agno says that any call for withdrawal of support
05:34.8
by a public official,
05:36.0
especially a high-ranking reservist officer,
05:38.8
is illegal and unconstitutional.
05:42.3
So ano ito? Paninirang puri yan.
05:45.6
Dahil nagbibigay ka ng opinion mo
05:47.3
ng naaayon sa batas.
05:52.6
Let us take note,
05:55.6
in relation or a reaction
06:06.7
such utterances and actions
06:08.4
can be interpreted as seditious or rebellious
06:10.8
and that such remarks
06:12.4
have no place in the society.
06:14.8
Tapos in the first place,
06:16.3
mga kabatas natin,
06:28.3
Sabihin na nating tama.
06:42.5
E normal na reaction
06:44.4
yan ng isang tao na nag-aaral
06:49.5
Further says that
06:50.6
Alvarez underestimated the professionalism
06:53.9
and integrity of the armed forces
06:55.7
of the Philippines by making such
06:57.8
an appeal. During a rally in Tagum City
07:00.1
on April 14, Alvarez urged
07:02.0
the AFP to peacefully withdraw
07:03.8
their support to Marcos to avert a possible
07:06.1
war in the West Philippine Sea.
07:09.8
Of course, why would you ask people
07:13.6
to withdraw support from the
07:22.8
Sabi ni Enzo Miggy,
07:24.2
bawal na mag-react.
07:25.5
Sabihin niya yan sa Rafi Tulfo in action
07:27.6
at kay Rafi Tulfo.
07:30.8
Kaya nga yung mga pinaglalaban nilang kaso-kaso
07:33.7
natalo na daw ako
07:36.2
kasi finile na nila.
07:46.0
gagamitin nila yung
07:47.2
parang mga litanya nila na ganyan
07:50.3
na kapag ako yung nakasuhan,
07:54.3
O di ba, kayo rin ang sumisira
07:57.3
sa mga sinasabi nyo.
08:00.9
Self-debank kayo.
08:04.1
China and the Philippines would result
08:06.0
in countless of dead bodies,
08:08.1
unimaginable destruction, famine
08:10.0
and hunger. However, the AFP
08:12.3
dismissed Alvarez's call
08:13.8
and vowed loyalty to the Constitution
08:15.9
and chain of command.
08:17.5
You have to do that.
08:19.9
Chain of command, of course.
08:23.1
He is the president
08:24.1
of the Philippines.
08:31.9
his speech at the rally could neither be considered
08:34.1
seditious nor a manifestation
08:35.7
of disorderly conduct because it was
08:37.9
protected by the Freedom of Speech Clause
08:40.1
of the 1987 Constitution.
08:42.9
Freedom of Speech!
08:45.9
That is what they want to deny us.
08:54.1
wants to deny me.
08:58.1
Sinabi nga nung mga vloggers niya,
09:00.0
di ba, para hindi na daw
09:03.2
i-criticize siya.
09:07.2
criticism ko daw paninira.
09:11.8
Dapat daw mawala ako sa YouTube.
09:17.6
Kung hindi yun pagkitil sa
09:19.7
Freedom of Speech
09:20.8
na sasabihin nila na
09:23.7
kailangan mawala na ako sa YouTube.
09:31.6
Yung content ko, araw-araw, apat.
09:34.3
Ibat-ibang topics.
09:36.0
May isang Tulfo, minsan dalawa.
09:39.9
na apat na Rafi Tulfo.
09:43.8
tatanggalin nila yung YouTube channel ko
09:45.9
daw yung gusto nilang mangyari,
09:48.5
so, pati yung mga
09:49.2
komentaries ko in relation to this,
09:59.1
Joke talaga ito, mga to.
10:01.4
Anyway, maraming salamat
10:02.5
mga kapatid natin. At syempre, tulad na
10:04.0
lagi yung sinasabi, matulog po tayo ng mahimbing.
10:06.7
Dahil alam natin na yung natutulog
10:08.2
ng mahimbing, siya yung laging panalo.
10:10.0
Opo, Lawyer C. Alvarez.
10:11.9
Paalam po, pansamantala.
