00:56.6
Yung title niya, naayon ba sa batas ang pagtrato ni Sen. Rafi Tulfo sa mga resource persons sa Senado?
01:03.6
Kuinas yun din ni Kayo yan.
01:05.5
So, ngayon, ano ba yung pagtrato ni Rafi Tulfo sa mga resource persons sa Senado?
01:15.5
Tinatawag niyang inutil.
01:19.6
Naaayon ba yun sa batas?
01:22.9
Nakalagay ba sa batas na dapat?
01:26.6
O okay lang tawagan o tawagin na inutil ang isang tao?
01:33.2
Nakalagay ba sa batas na okay lang tawagin ang mga tao?
01:40.4
Na istupido, namurahin, na pinabili lang ng suka?
01:46.1
Naaayon ba yun sa batas?
01:48.0
Yung pambabastos ba naaayon sa batas?
01:54.3
Ngayon, syempre, they will question me.
02:01.3
Hindi naman bastos si Rafi Tulfo?
02:06.8
Sabihin nyo yan doon sa 400 plus na men and women in uniform
02:16.0
na nagsabi kay Rafi Tulfo na binastos niya si Katulog.
02:22.4
Sa pagtawag sa kanyang duwag.
02:26.6
Sabihin nyo yan sa mga tao, sa mga teachers
02:30.9
na nabastos at nag-rally pa
02:35.1
nung binatikos niya
02:39.8
ang isang pinapatanggal niya
02:43.4
ang isang teacher
02:44.6
na wala namang kasalanan.
02:50.3
Pag nasagot nyo yan at nasabi nyo
02:52.6
sa harap kayo sa salamin
02:55.5
tapos ulit kayo sa salamin.
02:56.6
Tapos ulitin nyo, hindi bastos yun.
02:58.4
Hindi bastos tumawag ng inutil
03:04.9
Hindi bastos yung bastusin yung mga men in uniform.
03:08.5
Hindi bastos na tawag yung duwag yung mga bayani na lumalaban para sa bansa.
03:13.9
Ulit-ulitin mo yan sa harap ng salamin.
03:21.9
pag nakumbinsi mo na yung sarili mo,
03:23.7
o message mo si Rikul,
03:26.6
ipi-feature kita dito.
03:30.8
Kumbinsihin mo rin kami.
03:34.9
Okay, mag-message ka dyan.
03:37.7
Kumbinsihin mo rin kami na hindi bastos
03:40.1
yung mga ganun na klaseng trato
03:53.4
Kasi mali ka ng pinupuntahan.
03:59.4
Never naman kasi naging issue yan.
04:05.4
Hindi ko alam kung ba't ka naandyaan.
04:10.4
Since hindi naman bawal yun,
04:12.4
punta ka sa ethics.
04:15.4
Sa moral side siya eh.
04:17.4
So, ethics ang puntahan mo.
04:25.4
Kasi mga kabatas natin,
04:27.4
sa mga hindi pa nakapanood,
04:28.4
para magkaroon lang tayo ng konteksto,
04:33.4
sinabi ni Fiskal EJ na may dalawang karapatan.
04:40.4
Only daw yung mga resource persons.
04:43.4
Yung right against self-incrimination,
04:46.4
mga kabatas natin.
04:48.4
Tapos, may isa pa.
04:51.4
Anyway, tuloy na lang natin dito.
04:54.4
Pero kasali yun doon.
04:56.4
Sa tingin ko, kailangan muna nating pag-usapan nito.
04:59.4
Babanggitin naman ni Kayo yun mamaya eh.
05:01.4
Tapos ipapakita ko ulit sa inyo, mga kabatas natin,
05:04.4
yung code of professional
05:08.4
responsibility and accountability, mga kabatas natin,
05:15.4
Congress power of legislative investigation
05:18.4
is subject to three limitations.
05:21.4
The inquiry must be in aid of legislation,
05:23.4
the inquiry must be conducted in accordance with its
05:27.4
duly published rules and procedure,
05:29.4
and the rights of persons appearing in or affected by such inquiries
05:32.4
shall be respected.
05:34.4
Research, research din.
05:36.4
Eh bakit hindi yung code yung puntahan mo?
05:47.4
Diba may code sa lawyer?
05:50.4
Kanina, meron din sinabi na kailangan totality.
05:53.4
Of evidence of weight.
05:54.4
Asa ba? Ano ba yan?
06:02.4
Versus formally, diba?
06:04.4
Sabi kasi nila, mga kabatas natin,
06:06.4
ang parang pinupunto kasi dito din na parang wala daw due process.
06:12.4
Hindi daw kailangan ng due process dyan.
06:14.4
Kasi hindi naman daw yan korte.
06:17.4
Mga kabatas natin,
06:20.4
gusto ko na ipakita sa inyo ito.
06:23.4
Bill of Rights, diba?
06:25.4
No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.
06:34.4
Sinabi ba dyan na section 1,
06:38.4
no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law in the court only?
06:54.4
President, Senate, contempt against them.
07:02.4
Order date, citing petitioners.
07:05.4
The court, however, ruled that the phrase testified falsely or evasively under the Senate Rules Procedure is not unconstitutional.
07:14.4
Considering the broad definition of false in evasive testimony,
07:18.4
the witness must,
07:19.4
at the very least,
07:20.4
at the very least,
07:21.4
given a chance to explain why his or her testimony is not false or evasive.
07:27.4
Okay. Legislative.
07:30.4
Okay. Explain ko na lang sa inyo yung ano, mga kabatas natin.
07:34.4
Explain ko na lang sa inyo
07:36.4
yung sinabi dun sa formally case na iyon.
07:38.4
I think, tayo, paliwanag ko na rin sa inyo yun.
07:40.4
Ang sinabi sa formally case na iyon,
07:42.4
nung sinayt nila for contempt,
07:46.4
yung mga formally executives,
07:50.4
Nung sinayt nila for contempt,
07:51.4
yung mga formally executives,
07:52.4
sinabi na dapat sumunod kayo sa due process.
07:56.4
Dapat pinagpaliwanag nyo muna sila.
08:00.4
What is the basic concept?
08:01.4
No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.
08:08.4
Ano yung pagpapakulong?
08:10.4
That is deprivation of liberty.
08:12.4
That's why you need due process.
08:15.4
Mga kabatas natin,
08:17.4
yung no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law,
08:23.4
mga kabatas natin,
08:24.4
that is applicable anywhere.
08:31.4
Kasi nga, kung hindi mo sinunod yan,
08:34.4
kahit private individual ka,
08:36.4
may paglabag ka sa batas.
08:40.4
O, private individual ako.
08:43.4
Ngayon, kinulong ko yung isang tao.
08:48.4
Illegal detention.
08:50.4
Pinatay ko yung isang tao.
08:52.4
Private individual ako.
08:56.4
Ninakawan ko yung isang tao.
08:57.4
Private individual ako.
08:59.4
May paglabag ako sa batas.
09:09.4
Kailangan ba sa korte lang yan?
09:15.4
Ngayon, pagpunta mo sa korte,
09:17.4
dahil hindi mo sinunod yung due process,
09:19.4
at ikaw ang humawak sa batas sa kamay mo,
09:24.4
Because you violated the law.
09:26.4
Ito pala yung sinasabi
09:28.4
ni Fabry na dalawa lang daw.
09:30.4
May paglabag ba sa right to counsel
09:32.4
at right against self-incrimination?
09:38.4
Hindi ba naaayon?
09:40.4
Tignan nyo, ipiplay nyo yata dito.
09:44.4
Asa na tayo sa ano?
09:48.4
Asa na tayo sa ano?
09:51.4
Asa na tayo sa point?
09:53.4
Sa mga videos na ipinakita natin kanina
09:56.4
at base na rin sa kabuuan
09:58.4
ng mga Senate hearings na dinaluhan ni Sen. Raffi,
10:01.4
nilabag ba ni Sen. Raffi ang right to counsel
10:05.4
at right against self-incrimination
10:07.4
ng mga resource persons?
10:11.4
Kaya nga sinasabi ko sa iyo eh.
10:12.4
Title mo palang sablay na eh.
10:15.4
Hindi ba naaayon dapat ang title mo?
10:17.4
Kasi huling-huling ka na dyan mo i-end eh.
10:19.4
May paglabag ba sa right to counsel
10:21.4
at right against self-incrimination?
11:11.4
muna sa inyo itong
11:12.3
kasi parang pinapakita niya dito
11:17.1
sa dulo ng video niya
11:19.4
hindi, hindi, punta na lang
11:21.2
tayo dun sa video niya mismo
11:22.4
punta tayo sa video
11:39.4
pag makikita nyo kasi ito
11:41.3
mga kabatas natin
11:42.6
na ayon ba sa batas ang pagtrato
11:45.6
ni Sen. Rafi Tulfo sa mga
11:47.4
yan, resource person
11:54.6
pinalabas niya si Miriam Defensor
11:56.5
madali lang naman sagutin itong
11:59.0
pagtatanong na ito, ito bang
12:00.6
pinapasagot natin o respondent natin
12:03.5
ay binibintangan mo sa ilalim
12:05.5
ng Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act
12:08.8
Opo, Madam Sen. Dahil na palagay
12:11.2
dito in violation of the
12:13.0
Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act
12:15.7
give me the presumption of literacy
12:19.2
overstep yourself
12:20.4
ngayon, pag tatanong ko sa iyo ganito
12:23.3
do not engage in a
12:26.2
yan, may ground naman yung mga
12:29.3
sinasabi niya, tapos yan
12:30.8
ikukumpara mo siya kay Rafi Tulfo
12:34.3
si Rafi Tulfo, alam niya lang lahat
12:44.4
how dare you compare
12:52.8
well, if you cannot give me peace in the Middle East
12:55.3
make the Philippine Senate stop
13:00.3
inquiries in aid of legislation
13:05.6
umpisa pa lang, tapos na
13:11.2
make the Philippine Senate stop
13:15.6
its so-called inquiries
13:17.6
in aid of legislation
13:18.8
because number one
13:23.4
no matter how scandalous
13:24.7
and no matter how lengthy its TV coverage
13:27.7
has ever resulted
13:28.9
in any substantial
13:41.2
, so it does not serve its constitutional purpose
13:45.6
ummm, dinibang ka Fiskal EJ
13:48.8
kasi mga kapatid natin dun sa video ni Fiskal EJ
13:54.0
panuorin niyo na lang yung video niya
13:56.0
tsaka yung video ni ano
13:57.2
sinasabi niya doon na
13:59.2
ay, nasa Constitution pala
14:02.4
yung inquiry in aid of legislation
14:06.0
alam na namin yan
14:07.8
matagal na namin alam yan
14:09.8
hindi naman yung constitutionality
14:13.8
ng inquiries in aid of legislation
14:18.5
ang problema namin
14:20.0
katulad ng hindi naman
14:22.3
kung itong si Rafi Tulfo
14:31.0
kasi that's not even the question in the first place
14:36.0
ang problema namin sa inquiry
14:39.2
in aid of legislation
14:41.2
ay katulad nitong sinasabi
14:44.2
nitong si Madam Miriam Santiago
14:48.2
make the Philippine Senate stop
14:50.2
its so called inquiries in aid of legislation
14:54.2
because number one
14:56.2
no such inquiry no matter how scandalous
14:59.2
and no matter how lengthy its TV coverage
15:02.2
has ever resulted
15:04.2
in any substantial legislation
15:07.2
so it does not serve
15:09.2
its constitutional purpose
15:11.2
walang question sa constitutionality niya
15:15.2
it does not serve its purpose
15:23.2
Miriam Defensor Santiago
15:25.2
hindi, madalas utak pala sa kanya yan
15:34.2
narinig mo na yung issue
15:38.2
that's the issue there
15:40.2
it's not the constitutionality
15:43.2
hindi naman kung si Rafi Tulfo
15:46.2
ay may parliamentary immunity
15:49.2
na siyempre meron silang privilege
15:53.2
tsaka sa speech nila
15:55.2
kapag nandyan sila sa Senado
15:57.2
ang problema dyan
15:59.2
how he treats people
16:02.2
ang problema dyan
16:04.2
how he treats people
16:09.2
when these Senators conduct their investigations
16:13.2
they are brazen about their ignorance of the rules
16:16.2
they are brazen about their ignorance
16:30.2
pinagyayabang ang kabubuhan
16:38.2
this was years ago
16:42.2
twenty years ago?
16:47.2
fifteen years ago?
16:51.2
ilang taon na ang lumipas?
16:59.2
Miriam Santiago become Senator?
17:08.2
twenty years ago?
17:12.2
wala pa ring substansyal
17:14.2
na nangyayari sa mga in-aid of legislation
17:16.2
tapos they are still
17:18.2
brazen about their ignorance of the laws
17:52.2
they are still brazen about their ignorance
17:57.2
what's is the difference between domicile
18:06.6
dinidebang ka ng tao
18:14.0
it still applies until now
18:29.6
about their ignorance of the rules of court
18:31.8
well the rules of
18:40.2
they are brazen about the ignorance
18:42.2
of their own rules
18:43.1
ako pa nga nagpapaliwalag sa kanila eh
18:47.4
that should be a crime in itself
18:59.3
siguro sa rules of court
19:00.5
mapapatawad ko sila
19:01.5
pag hindi sila abogado
19:02.5
pero their own rules
19:03.8
how you should cite people in contempt
19:06.8
the required votes
19:10.6
wherein you need to listen
19:12.1
before you condemn
19:13.1
how dare you not do that
19:15.4
kaya nga sa formal case sa ONG
19:17.1
anong desisyon ng korte doon
19:19.6
illegal yung ginawa nyo
19:21.9
na pagpapakulong sa kanila
19:24.4
kasi hindi nyo sinunod yung due process
19:31.5
автомобilt
19:42.3
mayroon niya lang
20:01.3
Mas mataas pala si Rafi Tulfo sa iyo
20:08.9
Ay, mas mataas ka kay Rafi Tulfo
20:12.9
Support the needs
20:45.0
It's still like that
20:47.6
Nothing's changed
20:48.9
Tapos paglalaban niya yung Senate
20:50.7
Investigation in aid of legislation
20:54.1
Paglalaban mo pa yung ginagawa ni Rafi Tulfo
20:57.5
Na pambabastos doon sa mga
21:01.9
It's zero capability
21:10.7
What justice should be administered
21:17.2
The scandalous hearings
21:18.8
Scandalous hearings?
21:22.6
Of legal ignorance
21:25.8
Of legal ignorance
21:28.4
Pero okay lang daw
21:30.7
Okay, mamaya pupunta na naman tayo sa CPRA
21:37.6
A fiesta of legal ignorance
21:40.0
We are conducting in effect
21:45.9
For the preliminary investigation
21:47.9
Of an ordinary fiscal
21:49.7
That's what we're doing
22:00.7
But you cannot stop these Senators
22:04.2
Because as I've said on another occasion
22:07.2
The process of legislation
22:13.2
You don't want to see us
22:15.2
Studying our papers
22:16.7
Delivering academic or theoretical
22:19.2
Or well-researched analysis
22:22.2
On the present conditions that reset our country
22:25.2
Dean Pakalangan mentioned that he was
22:28.2
Yan yung sinasabi ko sa inyo eh
22:30.7
Na gustong gusto nila yung mga Senate
22:32.7
Investigation in aid of legislation
22:34.7
Kasi hindi naman sila makagawa ng maayos na batas eh
22:38.7
Pero kaya nilang mga alipustad ng tao doon
22:41.7
Kaya nilang sumigaw, magyabang
22:43.7
Kaya nilang sabayin inutil
22:46.7
Kaya nilang murahin
22:48.7
Kaya nilang ipakita kung gaano
22:51.7
Katapang, kayabang
22:53.7
At makapangyarihan sila
22:56.7
Pero hindi yun ang trabaho nila
22:58.7
Pero hindi yun ang trabaho nila
23:00.7
Hindi na ako yung nagsasabi niyan ha
23:04.7
Hindi na ako yung nagsasabi niyan ha
23:15.7
Sumalangit na wa ang kanyang kaluluwa
23:18.7
Debunked Fiscal EJ
23:20.7
Debunked Fiscal EJ
23:24.7
Debunked Fiscal EJ
23:26.7
Debunked Fiscal EJ
23:28.7
Debunked Fiscal EJ
23:29.7
Debunked Fiscal EJ
23:30.7
when I delivered my sponsorship speech
23:33.3
on the International Criminal Court
23:35.0
particularly the Rome Statute
23:36.7
and when I tried to defend it
23:38.8
during the debates, that is to say
23:40.5
during the period of interpellation from my colleagues
23:42.9
He described my demeanor at that time
23:45.5
as firm and gracious
23:48.3
I was not firm, I was angry
23:54.8
But I was being subjected
23:58.4
to the mediation of interpellation
24:02.3
Do you feel like that too?
24:17.6
To the mediation of interpellation by idiots
24:24.6
people who doesn't even know the law
24:28.1
people who doesn't even know the law
24:28.4
hindi man lang nakatungtong sa law school
24:30.8
sila yung magsasabi sa akin
24:33.0
tsaka sa mga iba pang abogado
24:35.3
na hindi tama yung ginagawa nila
24:40.9
And I was not gracious
24:47.7
I wanted to kill them
24:50.7
with my bare hands
24:51.8
If only you can do it
24:58.4
So mga kabatas natin
24:59.5
The truth is like a lion
25:05.1
and it will defend itself
25:10.6
How dare you impugn
25:16.2
of the brightest minds
25:18.3
in the whole judicial system
25:20.1
of the entire planet
25:21.4
after reading only 10 minutes
25:33.5
Dekada na nag-aral
25:39.4
Of the brightest minds
25:43.4
Of hair you impugn
25:47.8
Of the brightest minds
25:49.9
In the whole judicial system
25:56.6
I think our judicial system is
26:02.7
Kasi it's a contribution of many
26:05.4
Great legal minds
26:07.1
Pinag-aaralan lahat yan sa law school
26:09.6
Tapos kapag katapos mo ng law school
26:12.1
Mag-aaral ka dun ng apat na taon
26:14.0
Magpa-bar exam ka
26:15.2
Magpa-practice ka ng ilang taon din
26:19.0
Ang mangyayari sa'yo
26:20.2
Ang magsasabi sa'yo na mali ka
26:31.6
Kasi yung mga senador yun eh
26:33.0
Nawala silang alam
26:35.0
Tapos babasahin mo lang ng 10 minutes yun
26:38.4
Tapos ikaw na yung magaling
26:41.2
10 minutes Google
26:54.0
I will never stop these
26:57.7
But I will tell you
27:00.3
That when the genie heard
27:01.6
I wanted the senate to stop
27:03.7
These legislative investigations
27:05.4
He said immediately
27:06.9
Stop the televised
27:12.2
Of the committees in the senate
27:13.6
And even in the house of representatives
27:15.3
I'd rather bring peace to the middle east
27:26.0
Mga kapatid natin yung gusto niya sabihin
27:29.0
Question ko sa'yo Fiscal EJ
27:30.9
This is coming from a person
27:32.9
Who became a senator
27:39.1
In hearings in aid of legislation
27:43.9
Sino ngayon ang mas maayos na posisyon
27:47.4
Para magsalita tungkol dito?
27:53.9
Well tama ka naman
27:57.4
It's not unconstitutional
27:59.4
It's provided by the constitution
28:01.7
But just like what she said
28:06.2
Is being defeated
28:17.3
Let's go to this one again
28:20.0
And let's end with this
28:21.9
A lawyer shall uphold the dignity of the legal profession in all social media interactions
28:37.1
In a manner that enhances the people's confidence in the legal system
28:43.2
As well as promote its responsible use
28:50.0
It enhances the people's confidence in the legal system
29:01.0
Uphold the dignity of the legal profession and shield it from disrepute
29:06.6
Shield it from disrepute
29:13.3
You should actively protect the dignity of the legal profession from disrepute
29:29.8
as well as maintain
29:34.0
respect for the law.
29:39.5
Ito yung lagi nilang
29:42.0
Bakit ganyan yung ginagawa mo, attorney?
29:45.4
hindi ka nilang pumunta sa korte
29:47.8
at nandiyan ka sa social media?
29:53.5
Legal Information, Legal Advice
29:55.7
Pursuant to a lawyer's
29:59.4
and the legal profession,
30:01.6
a lawyer may provide general
30:03.7
legal information.
30:06.0
Attorney, ba't ka nasa social media?
30:08.4
Ba't wala ka sa korte?
30:16.4
A lawyer may provide
30:18.0
general legal information
30:20.0
in answer to questions asked
30:27.1
through traditional
30:33.8
or electronic means
30:44.7
Ako nga, busy ako eh.
30:46.3
Wala akong panahon mag-vlog.
30:48.9
Wala akong panahon mag-vlog.
30:49.8
Wala akong panahon mag-vlog.
30:50.0
Pero I teach on the side.
30:54.9
Wala, occupied yung oras ko
30:57.1
sa trabaho ko sa korte.
31:08.8
according to the code
31:11.5
of professional responsibility
31:14.0
and accountability.
31:20.0
It is my duty to say thank you to all of you.
31:23.7
Madam Miriam Santiago,
31:27.8
Because you left us a legacy.
31:31.8
Even though during your time,
31:34.5
we are not like this.
31:37.4
Please allow me to thank you.
31:46.7
please allow me to thank you
31:55.2
that we want to fight
31:56.7
because of your legacy.
32:00.9
Dahil kahit wala ka na,
32:03.8
tinutulungan mo pa rin.
32:09.4
na iyong sinimulan.
32:12.7
Huwag ko kayong mag-alala.
32:17.2
yung mga binigay niyong oportunidad.
32:23.6
ang matagal ng laban.
32:27.3
Maraming salamat po
32:28.4
mga kabatas natin.
32:29.8
tulad ng lagi kong sinasabi,
32:31.5
matulog po tayo na may himbing.
32:33.6
na yung natutulog na may himbing,
32:35.3
siya yung lagi yung panalo.
